← Back to scan
File as GitHub Issue repo: redis/redis

Push this scan report to redis/redis

Click the green button below to open GitHub’s new-issue form, pre-filled with the report title, summary table, top findings, and an embedded score-card image. No authentication needed — you review on GitHub before submitting. Repobility is credited as the scanner.

Embedded score card image

This image will render at the top of the issue body. Hosted on Repobility, refreshes automatically after re-scans.

Repobility score card

Issue title

Path Traversal — User Input in File Path

Curate findings to include

Pick exactly which findings appear in the issue body. By default the top 5 are included. Uncheck noise, check what matters.

Top 5 (default)
Severity Rule Title File:line
CRIT SEC022 [SEC022] Database URL With Embedded Credential: A database connection URL contains an emb… src/redis-benchmark.c:1589
CRIT SEC022 [SEC022] Database URL With Embedded Credential: A database connection URL contains an emb… src/redis-cli.c:3165
HIGH SEC029 [SEC029] Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) — outbound HTTP from user input: Outbound HTT… modules/vector-sets/examples/cli-tool/c…:84
HIGH SEC033 [SEC033] Prototype Pollution — unfiltered merge of user object: Merging user-controlled o… utils/req-res-log-validator.py:229
HIGH SEC013 [SEC013] Path Traversal — User Input in File Path: User-controlled input used in file pat… src/tls.c:322
MED ERR001 [ERR001] Silent Exception Swallowing: Silently swallowing all exceptions hides bugs. Even… deps/jemalloc/scripts/gen_run_tests.py:34
LOW AIC003 Duplicated implementation block across source files src/mt19937-64.h:1
LOW AIC003 Duplicated implementation block across source files src/crcspeed.c:1
LOW AIC003 Duplicated implementation block across source files deps/jemalloc/include/jemalloc/internal…:77
LOW AIC003 Duplicated implementation block across source files deps/jemalloc/include/jemalloc/internal…:9
LOW AIC002 Source file name looks like an AI patch artifact utils/redis-copy.rb:1
Reset to top 5 11 findings available (after auto-suppression of test files + won't-fix)

Issue body (markdown)

## Code-quality scan: `redis/redis`

**Score: 78/100 (B)**  ·  11 findings  ·  scanned 2026-05-16 12:50 UTC  ·  371,544 LOC

| Severity | Count |
|---|---|
| CRITICAL | 2 |
| HIGH | 3 |
| MEDIUM | 1 |
| LOW | 5 |

📊 [Full filterable report](https://repobility.com/scan/5c014606-776f-4166-9443-d737e6ae7dc2/)  ·  ![scorecard](https://repobility.com/scan/5c014606-776f-4166-9443-d737e6ae7dc2/report.png?v=1778935815-s2)

### Top findings

1. **CRITICAL** `SEC022` — Database URL With Embedded Credential
   `src/redis-benchmark.c:1589` · A07:2021 Identification & Authentication Failures
2. **CRITICAL** `SEC022` — Database URL With Embedded Credential
   `src/redis-cli.c:3165` · A07:2021 Identification & Authentication Failures
3. **HIGH** `SEC029` — Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) — outbound HTTP from user input
   `modules/vector-sets/examples/cli-tool/cli.py:84` · A10:2021 SSRF
4. **HIGH** `SEC033` — Prototype Pollution — unfiltered merge of user object
   `utils/req-res-log-validator.py:229` · CWE-1321
5. **HIGH** `SEC013` — Path Traversal — User Input in File Path
   `src/tls.c:322` · A01:2021 Broken Access Control (path traversal)

---

**Security note**: this issue is public. If any flagged finding is a real, exploitable vulnerability, please redirect to your `SECURITY.md` policy or open a [private security advisory](https://docs.github.com/en/code-security/security-advisories/guidance-on-reporting-and-writing-information-about-vulnerabilities/privately-reporting-a-security-vulnerability) instead. We're happy to close this and re-submit privately.

---

_Filed automatically. Close this issue if not useful — we won't refile. Full report: https://repobility.com/scan/5c014606-776f-4166-9443-d737e6ae7dc2/_
Premium account
This scan was submitted by a Enterprise-tier account. Premium accounts have full outreach control â Repobility doesn't pre-fill the 'file as GitHub issue' button for paid users. You can still file the issue manually using the markdown body above (Copy markdown), or contact us if you'd like batch-filing enabled for your account.
Already filed
This repo publishes a SECURITY.md policy and the scan contains 5 Critical/High security finding(s). Public issue filing would violate coordinated disclosure. Submit privately via the project's security reporting channel.
Megaproject â high spam risk
Could not determine 'redis/redis' star count (GitHub API rate-limited or unreachable). When in doubt about repo size, prefer opening a focused PR or a discussion rather than an issue.
I read the warnings â override Cancel

The button opens GitHubâs new-issue page in a new tab. You will see the title + body pre-filled â review, edit if you want, then click GitHubâs "Submit new issue" button. Repobility never posts anything on your behalf.

For real security findings on big repos: use the project's SECURITY.md or private advisory flow instead of a public issue.