{"version": "2.1.0", "$schema": "https://json.schemastore.org/sarif-2.1.0.json", "runs": [{"tool": {"driver": {"name": "Repobility", "informationUri": "https://repobility.com", "rules": [{"id": "foundry_blueprint_gap", "name": "Foundry mined blueprint gap alignment: sploithunter/RBX-Template", "shortDescription": {"text": "Foundry mined blueprint gap alignment: sploithunter/RBX-Template"}, "fullDescription": {"text": "Graph query export: Human feedback aligned with blueprint or architecture gaps\nQuery id: blueprint_gap_alignment\nQuery type: motif_query\nIntent: Curriculum-gap examples connecting issue threads to helicopter-view gaps.\nMotif: blueprint_gap_alignment\nTraining usage: curriculum_gap\nGraph gold label: weak_supervision_needs_review\nRepo: sploithunter/RBX-Template\nThread: sploithunter/RBX-Template#8\nEvidence:\nGraph motif: Human feedback aligns with blueprint or architecture gaps\nMotif id: blueprint_gap_alignment\nPolarity: mixed\nTraining usage: curriculum_gap\nSeverity: medium\nRepo: sploithunter/RBX-Template\nThread: sploithunter/RBX-Template#8\nGraph gold label: weak_supervision_needs_review\nThread graph evidence:\nGitHub issue/PR evidence subgraph\nThread: sploithunter/RBX-Template#8\nRepo: sploithunter/RBX-Template\nIssue/PR number: 8\nGraph consistency label: weak_supervision_needs_review\nNodes: 23\nEdges: 28\nNode types: {'link_quality': 6, 'commit': 5, 'alignment': 3, 'blueprint_finding': 3, 'thr"}, "properties": {"scanner": "foundry_dataset", "category": "tech_debt", "severity": "medium", "confidence": 0.7, "cwe": "", "owasp": ""}}, {"id": "foundry_assumption_check", "name": "Foundry mined assumption checks: sploithunter/RBX-Template", "shortDescription": {"text": "Foundry mined assumption checks: sploithunter/RBX-Template"}, "fullDescription": {"text": "Comment chain pattern product: assumption_checks\nRepo: sploithunter/RBX-Template\nThread: sploithunter/RBX-Template#9\nOutcome: claimed_resolved_unverified\nThread label: thread_has_human_issue_and_fix_context\nSource graph label: source_backed_multi_signal_graph\nReasons: source_graph_has_real_artifacts, source_graph_has_verification_artifacts, repo_has_isolated_helicopter_views, link_quality_weak_supervision, high_risk_human_feedback_label\nChain evidence:\nIssue/PR evidence chain: sploithunter/RBX-Template#9\nRepo: sploithunter/RBX-Template\nThread label: thread_has_human_issue_and_fix_context\nOutcome: claimed_resolved_unverified\nComment count: 1\nLinked commit count: 4\nLinked CI commit count: 0\nLinked CI labels: {}\nChanged file count: 0\nLabels: {'security_auth_secret': 1}\nPolarities: {'bad': 1}\nChanged file labels: {}\nExamples:\n[\n  {\n    \"id\": \"github-feedback-comment-3e836d774043080a\",\n    \"kind\": \"issue_body\",\n    \"label\": \"security_auth_secret\",\n    \"polarity\": \"bad\",\n    \"url\": \"https://"}, "properties": {"scanner": "foundry_dataset", "category": "practices", "severity": "medium", "confidence": 0.62, "cwe": "", "owasp": ""}}, {"id": "foundry_test_ci_gap", "name": "Foundry mined test ci gap after feedback: sploithunter/RBX-Template", "shortDescription": {"text": "Foundry mined test ci gap after feedback: sploithunter/RBX-Template"}, "fullDescription": {"text": "Graph query export: Feedback exposes missing tests or CI\nQuery id: test_ci_gap_after_feedback\nQuery type: motif_query\nIntent: Hard negatives for feedback/fix chains without adequate guardrails.\nMotif: test_ci_gap_after_feedback\nTraining usage: hard_negative\nGraph gold label: weak_supervision_needs_review\nRepo: sploithunter/RBX-Template\nThread: sploithunter/RBX-Template#2\nEvidence:\nGraph motif: Feedback or fix context exposes missing test/CI guardrails\nMotif id: test_ci_gap_after_feedback\nPolarity: bad\nTraining usage: hard_negative\nSeverity: high\nRepo: sploithunter/RBX-Template\nThread: sploithunter/RBX-Template#2\nGraph gold label: weak_supervision_needs_review\nThread graph evidence:\nGitHub issue/PR evidence subgraph\nThread: sploithunter/RBX-Template#2\nRepo: sploithunter/RBX-Template\nIssue/PR number: 2\nGraph consistency label: weak_supervision_needs_review\nNodes: 20\nEdges: 25\nNode types: {'link_quality': 6, 'alignment': 3, 'blueprint_finding': 3, 'commit': 2, 'thread': 1, 'repo': 1, 'com"}, "properties": {"scanner": "foundry_dataset", "category": "testing", "severity": "high", "confidence": 0.78, "cwe": "", "owasp": ""}}, {"id": "foundry_auth_guardrail_gap", "name": "Foundry mined security auth guardrail gaps: sploithunter/RBX-Template", "shortDescription": {"text": "Foundry mined security auth guardrail gaps: sploithunter/RBX-Template"}, "fullDescription": {"text": "Graph query export: Security/auth changes without enough guardrails\nQuery id: security_auth_guardrail_gaps\nQuery type: motif_query\nIntent: Assumption-check security/auth examples requiring stronger tests or CI.\nMotif: security_auth_without_guardrails\nTraining usage: assumption_check\nGraph gold label: weak_supervision_needs_review\nRepo: sploithunter/RBX-Template\nThread: sploithunter/RBX-Template#9\nEvidence:\nGraph motif: Security/auth change without enough guardrails\nMotif id: security_auth_without_guardrails\nPolarity: bad\nTraining usage: assumption_check\nSeverity: critical\nRepo: sploithunter/RBX-Template\nThread: sploithunter/RBX-Template#9\nGraph gold label: weak_supervision_needs_review\nThread graph evidence:\nGitHub issue/PR evidence subgraph\nThread: sploithunter/RBX-Template#9\nRepo: sploithunter/RBX-Template\nIssue/PR number: 9\nGraph consistency label: weak_supervision_needs_review\nNodes: 13\nEdges: 15\nNode types: {'commit': 4, 'link_quality': 3, 'thread': 1, 'repo': 1, 'comment': 1, 'co"}, "properties": {"scanner": "foundry_dataset", "category": "auth", "severity": "critical", "confidence": 0.78, "cwe": "", "owasp": ""}}, {"id": "scanner-506be2b95088f5d3", "name": "git log failed \u2014 history analysis incomplete", "shortDescription": {"text": "git log failed \u2014 history analysis incomplete"}, "fullDescription": {"text": "fatal: not a git repository (or any parent up to mount point /data)\nStopping at filesystem boundary (GIT_DISCOVERY_ACROSS_FILESYSTEM not set)."}, "properties": {"scanner": "scanner-primary", "layer": "quality", "severity": "info", "confidence": 1.0}}, {"id": "scanner-9710c8d059e53154", "name": "No frontend routes/components detected", "shortDescription": {"text": "No frontend routes/components detected"}, "fullDescription": {"text": "No React/Vue/Next routes were found. This is fine for backend-only repos."}, "properties": {"scanner": "scanner-primary", "layer": "frontend", "severity": "info", "confidence": 1.0}}, {"id": "scanner-6372cebde0220094", "name": "No auth library detected", "shortDescription": {"text": "No auth library detected"}, "fullDescription": {"text": "The scanner did not find any standard auth library (JWT, OAuth, NextAuth, Auth0, etc.). The repo has auth/admin/session surface indicators, so auth may live in custom code, in a separate service, or be missing."}, "properties": {"scanner": "scanner-primary", "layer": "security", "severity": "medium", "confidence": 1.0}}, {"id": "scanner-4601e3ad3bb28677", "name": "No CI/CD pipelines detected", "shortDescription": {"text": "No CI/CD pipelines detected"}, "fullDescription": {"text": "No GitHub Actions, GitLab CI, or CircleCI configs found. Without CI you can't gate deploys on tests/lints."}, "properties": {"scanner": "scanner-primary", "layer": "cicd", "severity": "medium", "confidence": 1.0}}, {"id": "scanner-cc55229a7a3c078d", "name": "Agent authority lacks a verifier contract: .mcp.json", "shortDescription": {"text": "Agent authority lacks a verifier contract: .mcp.json"}, "fullDescription": {"text": "This agent instruction grants code or shell authority but does not state the verification gate that decides promotion. The recurring safe pattern is: LLM proposes; deterministic tests/build/security checks verify; only verified code promotes."}, "properties": {"scanner": "scanner-primary", "layer": "quality", "severity": "medium", "confidence": 1.0}}]}}, "automationDetails": {"id": "repobility/20150"}, "properties": {"repository": "sploithunter/RBX-Template", "repoUrl": "https://github.com/sploithunter/RBX-Template", "branch": "main"}, "results": [{"ruleId": "foundry_blueprint_gap", "level": "warning", "message": {"text": "Foundry mined blueprint gap alignment: sploithunter/RBX-Template"}, "properties": {"repobilityId": 356263, "scanner": "foundry_dataset", "fingerprint": "6338d6f03a7268fc03c989a8b2b3579ca38d01a8ed0519b51f5be7147219daa6", "category": "tech_debt", "severity": "medium", "confidence": 0.7, "triageState": "open", "verdict": "needs_review", "isResolved": false, "reason": "Imported from mined Foundry/Fable5 evidence with real GitHub/source provenance. Review source_id before acting.", "evidence": {"meta": {"kind": "graph_query_record", "title": "Human feedback aligned with blueprint or architecture gaps", "intent": "Curriculum-gap examples connecting issue threads to helicopter-view gaps.", "labels": {"api_integration_gap": 1, "partial blueprint fit": 3, "verification_or_tests": 5, "issue_or_pull_request_thread": 1, "ambiguous_needs_more_evidence": 3, "blueprint_human_gap_alignment": 3, "comment_has_related_commit_context": 1, "thread_has_human_issue_and_fix_context": 2}, "source": "graph_query_export", "motif_id": "blueprint_gap_alignment", "outcomes": {"ambiguous_needs_more_evidence": 6}, "polarity": "mixed", "query_id": "blueprint_gap_alignment", "severity": "medium", "ci_labels": {}, "synthetic": false, "edge_count": 28, "edge_types": {"repo_has_thread": 1, "comment_has_chain": 1, "thread_has_comment": 1, "alignment_uses_comment": 3, "alignment_uses_finding": 3, "chain_has_link_quality": 6, "comment_aligns_finding": 3, "thread_has_fix_outcome": 1, "thread_has_issue_chain": 1, "thread_has_comment_chain": 1, "comment_chain_links_commit": 5, "issue_chain_has_fix_outcome": 1, "issue_chain_has_comment_chain": 1}, "node_count": 23, "node_types": {"repo": 1, "commit": 5, "thread": 1, "comment": 1, "alignment": 3, "fix_outcome": 1, "issue_chain": 1, "link_quality": 6, "comment_chain": 1, "blueprint_finding": 3}, "query_type": "motif_query", "thread_key": "sploithunter/RBX-Template#8", "issue_number": "8", "quality_tiers": {"assumption_check": 3, "weak_supervision": 3}, "repo_full_name": "sploithunter/RBX-Template", "training_usage": "curriculum_gap", "source_motif_id": "graph-pattern-motif-thread-a18b50b94b38aae7", "graph_gold_label": "weak_supervision_needs_review", "changed_file_labels": {}}, "text": "Graph query export: Human feedback aligned with blueprint or architecture gaps\nQuery id: blueprint_gap_alignment\nQuery type: motif_query\nIntent: Curriculum-gap examples connecting issue threads to helicopter-view gaps.\nMotif: blueprint_gap_alignment\nTraining usage: curriculum_gap\nGraph gold label: weak_supervision_needs_review\nRepo: sploithunter/RBX-Template\nThread: sploithunter/RBX-Template#8\nEvidence:\nGraph motif: Human feedback aligns with blueprint or architecture gaps\nMotif id: blueprint_gap_alignment\nPolarity: mixed\nTraining usage: curriculum_gap\nSeverity: medium\nRepo: sploithunter/RBX-Template\nThread: sploithunter/RBX-Template#8\nGraph gold label: weak_supervision_needs_review\nThread graph evidence:\nGitHub issue/PR evidence subgraph\nThread: sploithunter/RBX-Template#8\nRepo: sploithunter/RBX-Template\nIssue/PR number: 8\nGraph consistency label: weak_supervision_needs_review\nNodes: 23\nEdges: 28\nNode types: {'link_quality': 6, 'commit': 5, 'alignment': 3, 'blueprint_finding': 3, 'thread': 1, 'repo': 1, 'comment': 1, 'comment_chain': 1, 'issue_chain': 1, 'fix_outcome': 1}\nEdge types: {'chain_has_link_quality': 6, 'comment_chain_links_commit': 5, 'alignment_uses_comment': 3, 'alignment_uses_finding': 3, 'comment_aligns_finding': 3, 'repo_has_thread': 1, 'thread_has_comment': 1, 'thread_has_comment_chain': 1, 'comment_has_chain': 1, 'thread_has_issue_chain': 1, 'issue_chain_has_comment_chain': 1, 'thread_has_fix_outcome': 1, 'issue_chain_has_fix_outcome': 1}\nLabels: {'verification_or_tests': 5, 'ambiguous_needs_more_evidence': 3, 'blueprint_human_gap_alignment': 3, 'partial blueprint fit': 3, 'thread_has_human_issue_and_fix_context': 2, 'issue_or_pull_request_thread': 1, 'api_integration_gap': 1, 'comment_has_related_commit_context': 1}\nOutcomes: {'ambiguous_needs_more_evidence': 6}\nQuality tiers: {'weak_supervision': 3, 'assumption_check': 3}\nCI labels: {}\nCurriculum targets:\n- Use helicopter-view architecture/schema/design evidence beside issue threads.\n- Teach models to compare requested product class against implementation layers.\nAssumption checks:\n- Which blueprint layer is absent: frontend, API, data, auth, tests, or deployment?\n- Does human feedback confirm the same architectural gap?", "source": "foundry_mined_dataset", "repo_url": "https://github.com/sploithunter/RBX-Template", "source_id": "graph-query-motif_query-80ff3dbe0d8c7252", "synthetic": false, "gold_label": "", "graph_label": "", "source_path": "/data/distillate/foundry_data/graph_queries/blueprint_gap_alignment/shard-0.jsonl", "bundle_label": "", "priority_band": "", "priority_score": 0, "repo_full_name": "sploithunter/RBX-Template", "source_dataset": "graph_queries/blueprint_gap_alignment", "training_usage": "curriculum_gap"}}}, {"ruleId": "foundry_blueprint_gap", "level": "warning", "message": {"text": "Foundry mined blueprint gap alignment: sploithunter/RBX-Template"}, "properties": {"repobilityId": 356262, "scanner": "foundry_dataset", "fingerprint": "d7089776c31a87c9836b9ee17feeb47bc5a681d681e7ffc008bdc217a14f96f5", "category": "tech_debt", "severity": "medium", "confidence": 0.7, "triageState": "open", "verdict": "needs_review", "isResolved": false, "reason": "Imported from mined Foundry/Fable5 evidence with real GitHub/source provenance. Review source_id before acting.", "evidence": {"meta": {"kind": "graph_query_record", "title": "Human feedback aligned with blueprint or architecture gaps", "intent": "Curriculum-gap examples connecting issue threads to helicopter-view gaps.", "labels": {"bug_fix": 1, "ui_workflow_gap": 1, "partial blueprint fit": 3, "verification_or_tests": 4, "issue_or_pull_request_thread": 1, "blueprint_human_gap_alignment": 3, "thread_has_human_issue_and_fix_context": 2, "claimed_resolved_with_verification_signal": 3, "human_reported_issue_then_verified_fix_attempt": 1}, "source": "graph_query_export", "motif_id": "blueprint_gap_alignment", "outcomes": {"claimed_resolved_with_verification_signal": 6}, "polarity": "mixed", "query_id": "blueprint_gap_alignment", "severity": "medium", "ci_labels": {}, "synthetic": false, "edge_count": 28, "edge_types": {"repo_has_thread": 1, "comment_has_chain": 1, "thread_has_comment": 1, "alignment_uses_comment": 3, "alignment_uses_finding": 3, "chain_has_link_quality": 6, "comment_aligns_finding": 3, "thread_has_fix_outcome": 1, "thread_has_issue_chain": 1, "thread_has_comment_chain": 1, "comment_chain_links_commit": 5, "issue_chain_has_fix_outcome": 1, "issue_chain_has_comment_chain": 1}, "node_count": 23, "node_types": {"repo": 1, "commit": 5, "thread": 1, "comment": 1, "alignment": 3, "fix_outcome": 1, "issue_chain": 1, "link_quality": 6, "comment_chain": 1, "blueprint_finding": 3}, "query_type": "motif_query", "thread_key": "sploithunter/RBX-Template#5", "issue_number": "5", "quality_tiers": {"assumption_check": 3, "weak_supervision": 3}, "repo_full_name": "sploithunter/RBX-Template", "training_usage": "curriculum_gap", "source_motif_id": "graph-pattern-motif-thread-788c0222a503958d", "graph_gold_label": "supported_by_verification_signal", "changed_file_labels": {}}, "text": "Graph query export: Human feedback aligned with blueprint or architecture gaps\nQuery id: blueprint_gap_alignment\nQuery type: motif_query\nIntent: Curriculum-gap examples connecting issue threads to helicopter-view gaps.\nMotif: blueprint_gap_alignment\nTraining usage: curriculum_gap\nGraph gold label: supported_by_verification_signal\nRepo: sploithunter/RBX-Template\nThread: sploithunter/RBX-Template#5\nEvidence:\nGraph motif: Human feedback aligns with blueprint or architecture gaps\nMotif id: blueprint_gap_alignment\nPolarity: mixed\nTraining usage: curriculum_gap\nSeverity: medium\nRepo: sploithunter/RBX-Template\nThread: sploithunter/RBX-Template#5\nGraph gold label: supported_by_verification_signal\nThread graph evidence:\nGitHub issue/PR evidence subgraph\nThread: sploithunter/RBX-Template#5\nRepo: sploithunter/RBX-Template\nIssue/PR number: 5\nGraph consistency label: supported_by_verification_signal\nNodes: 23\nEdges: 28\nNode types: {'link_quality': 6, 'commit': 5, 'alignment': 3, 'blueprint_finding': 3, 'thread': 1, 'repo': 1, 'comment': 1, 'comment_chain': 1, 'issue_chain': 1, 'fix_outcome': 1}\nEdge types: {'chain_has_link_quality': 6, 'comment_chain_links_commit': 5, 'alignment_uses_comment': 3, 'alignment_uses_finding': 3, 'comment_aligns_finding': 3, 'repo_has_thread': 1, 'thread_has_comment': 1, 'thread_has_comment_chain': 1, 'comment_has_chain': 1, 'thread_has_issue_chain': 1, 'issue_chain_has_comment_chain': 1, 'thread_has_fix_outcome': 1, 'issue_chain_has_fix_outcome': 1}\nLabels: {'verification_or_tests': 4, 'claimed_resolved_with_verification_signal': 3, 'blueprint_human_gap_alignment': 3, 'partial blueprint fit': 3, 'thread_has_human_issue_and_fix_context': 2, 'issue_or_pull_request_thread': 1, 'ui_workflow_gap': 1, 'human_reported_issue_then_verified_fix_attempt': 1, 'bug_fix': 1}\nOutcomes: {'claimed_resolved_with_verification_signal': 6}\nQuality tiers: {'weak_supervision': 3, 'assumption_check': 3}\nCI labels: {}\nCurriculum targets:\n- Use helicopter-view architecture/schema/design evidence beside issue threads.\n- Teach models to compare requested product class against implementation layers.\nAssumption checks:\n- Which blueprint layer is absent: frontend, API, data, auth, tests, or deployment?\n- Does human feedback confirm the same architectural gap?", "source": "foundry_mined_dataset", "repo_url": "https://github.com/sploithunter/RBX-Template", "source_id": "graph-query-motif_query-d2c97436f013acd7", "synthetic": false, "gold_label": "", "graph_label": "", "source_path": "/data/distillate/foundry_data/graph_queries/blueprint_gap_alignment/shard-0.jsonl", "bundle_label": "", "priority_band": "", "priority_score": 0, "repo_full_name": "sploithunter/RBX-Template", "source_dataset": "graph_queries/blueprint_gap_alignment", "training_usage": "curriculum_gap"}}}, {"ruleId": "foundry_blueprint_gap", "level": "warning", "message": {"text": "Foundry mined blueprint gap alignment: sploithunter/RBX-Template"}, "properties": {"repobilityId": 356261, "scanner": "foundry_dataset", "fingerprint": "72ab635f808b79b26cedaf3d89d55c42bf4af07ef240fda71423c6e3453d0051", "category": "tech_debt", "severity": "medium", "confidence": 0.7, "triageState": "open", "verdict": "needs_review", "isResolved": false, "reason": "Imported from mined Foundry/Fable5 evidence with real GitHub/source provenance. Review source_id before acting.", "evidence": {"meta": {"kind": "graph_query_record", "title": "Human feedback aligned with blueprint or architecture gaps", "intent": "Curriculum-gap examples connecting issue threads to helicopter-view gaps.", "labels": {"test_ci_gap": 1, "partial blueprint fit": 3, "verification_or_tests": 2, "issue_or_pull_request_thread": 1, "ambiguous_needs_more_evidence": 3, "blueprint_human_gap_alignment": 3, "comment_has_related_commit_context": 1, "thread_has_human_issue_and_fix_context": 2}, "source": "graph_query_export", "motif_id": "blueprint_gap_alignment", "outcomes": {"ambiguous_needs_more_evidence": 6}, "polarity": "mixed", "query_id": "blueprint_gap_alignment", "severity": "medium", "ci_labels": {}, "synthetic": false, "edge_count": 25, "edge_types": {"repo_has_thread": 1, "comment_has_chain": 1, "thread_has_comment": 1, "alignment_uses_comment": 3, "alignment_uses_finding": 3, "chain_has_link_quality": 6, "comment_aligns_finding": 3, "thread_has_fix_outcome": 1, "thread_has_issue_chain": 1, "thread_has_comment_chain": 1, "comment_chain_links_commit": 2, "issue_chain_has_fix_outcome": 1, "issue_chain_has_comment_chain": 1}, "node_count": 20, "node_types": {"repo": 1, "commit": 2, "thread": 1, "comment": 1, "alignment": 3, "fix_outcome": 1, "issue_chain": 1, "link_quality": 6, "comment_chain": 1, "blueprint_finding": 3}, "query_type": "motif_query", "thread_key": "sploithunter/RBX-Template#2", "issue_number": "2", "quality_tiers": {"assumption_check": 3, "weak_supervision": 3}, "repo_full_name": "sploithunter/RBX-Template", "training_usage": "curriculum_gap", "source_motif_id": "graph-pattern-motif-thread-febac0e73e192d9b", "graph_gold_label": "weak_supervision_needs_review", "changed_file_labels": {}}, "text": "Graph query export: Human feedback aligned with blueprint or architecture gaps\nQuery id: blueprint_gap_alignment\nQuery type: motif_query\nIntent: Curriculum-gap examples connecting issue threads to helicopter-view gaps.\nMotif: blueprint_gap_alignment\nTraining usage: curriculum_gap\nGraph gold label: weak_supervision_needs_review\nRepo: sploithunter/RBX-Template\nThread: sploithunter/RBX-Template#2\nEvidence:\nGraph motif: Human feedback aligns with blueprint or architecture gaps\nMotif id: blueprint_gap_alignment\nPolarity: mixed\nTraining usage: curriculum_gap\nSeverity: medium\nRepo: sploithunter/RBX-Template\nThread: sploithunter/RBX-Template#2\nGraph gold label: weak_supervision_needs_review\nThread graph evidence:\nGitHub issue/PR evidence subgraph\nThread: sploithunter/RBX-Template#2\nRepo: sploithunter/RBX-Template\nIssue/PR number: 2\nGraph consistency label: weak_supervision_needs_review\nNodes: 20\nEdges: 25\nNode types: {'link_quality': 6, 'alignment': 3, 'blueprint_finding': 3, 'commit': 2, 'thread': 1, 'repo': 1, 'comment': 1, 'comment_chain': 1, 'issue_chain': 1, 'fix_outcome': 1}\nEdge types: {'chain_has_link_quality': 6, 'alignment_uses_comment': 3, 'alignment_uses_finding': 3, 'comment_aligns_finding': 3, 'comment_chain_links_commit': 2, 'repo_has_thread': 1, 'thread_has_comment': 1, 'thread_has_comment_chain': 1, 'comment_has_chain': 1, 'thread_has_issue_chain': 1, 'issue_chain_has_comment_chain': 1, 'thread_has_fix_outcome': 1, 'issue_chain_has_fix_outcome': 1}\nLabels: {'ambiguous_needs_more_evidence': 3, 'blueprint_human_gap_alignment': 3, 'partial blueprint fit': 3, 'verification_or_tests': 2, 'thread_has_human_issue_and_fix_context': 2, 'issue_or_pull_request_thread': 1, 'test_ci_gap': 1, 'comment_has_related_commit_context': 1}\nOutcomes: {'ambiguous_needs_more_evidence': 6}\nQuality tiers: {'weak_supervision': 3, 'assumption_check': 3}\nCI labels: {}\nCurriculum targets:\n- Use helicopter-view architecture/schema/design evidence beside issue threads.\n- Teach models to compare requested product class against implementation layers.\nAssumption checks:\n- Which blueprint layer is absent: frontend, API, data, auth, tests, or deployment?\n- Does human feedback confirm the same architectural gap?", "source": "foundry_mined_dataset", "repo_url": "https://github.com/sploithunter/RBX-Template", "source_id": "graph-query-motif_query-4d32f169d93970ef", "synthetic": false, "gold_label": "", "graph_label": "", "source_path": "/data/distillate/foundry_data/graph_queries/blueprint_gap_alignment/shard-0.jsonl", "bundle_label": "", "priority_band": "", "priority_score": 0, "repo_full_name": "sploithunter/RBX-Template", "source_dataset": "graph_queries/blueprint_gap_alignment", "training_usage": "curriculum_gap"}}}, {"ruleId": "foundry_blueprint_gap", "level": "warning", "message": {"text": "Foundry mined blueprint gap alignment: sploithunter/RBX-Template"}, "properties": {"repobilityId": 356260, "scanner": "foundry_dataset", "fingerprint": "434d045ab7d47234d477f350606128df3c34c4b4dd8852181f0c1bfdebc95d3c", "category": "tech_debt", "severity": "medium", "confidence": 0.7, "triageState": "open", "verdict": "needs_review", "isResolved": false, "reason": "Imported from mined Foundry/Fable5 evidence with real GitHub/source provenance. Review source_id before acting.", "evidence": {"meta": {"kind": "graph_query_record", "title": "Human feedback aligned with blueprint or architecture gaps", "intent": "Curriculum-gap examples connecting issue threads to helicopter-view gaps.", "labels": {"bug_fix": 1, "ui_workflow_gap": 1, "partial blueprint fit": 3, "verification_or_tests": 4, "issue_or_pull_request_thread": 1, "blueprint_human_gap_alignment": 3, "thread_has_human_issue_and_fix_context": 2, "claimed_resolved_with_verification_signal": 3, "human_reported_issue_then_verified_fix_attempt": 1}, "source": "graph_query_export", "motif_id": "blueprint_gap_alignment", "outcomes": {"claimed_resolved_with_verification_signal": 6}, "polarity": "mixed", "query_id": "blueprint_gap_alignment", "severity": "medium", "ci_labels": {}, "synthetic": false, "edge_count": 28, "edge_types": {"repo_has_thread": 1, "comment_has_chain": 1, "thread_has_comment": 1, "alignment_uses_comment": 3, "alignment_uses_finding": 3, "chain_has_link_quality": 6, "comment_aligns_finding": 3, "thread_has_fix_outcome": 1, "thread_has_issue_chain": 1, "thread_has_comment_chain": 1, "comment_chain_links_commit": 5, "issue_chain_has_fix_outcome": 1, "issue_chain_has_comment_chain": 1}, "node_count": 23, "node_types": {"repo": 1, "commit": 5, "thread": 1, "comment": 1, "alignment": 3, "fix_outcome": 1, "issue_chain": 1, "link_quality": 6, "comment_chain": 1, "blueprint_finding": 3}, "query_type": "motif_query", "thread_key": "sploithunter/RBX-Template#10", "issue_number": "10", "quality_tiers": {"assumption_check": 3, "weak_supervision": 3}, "repo_full_name": "sploithunter/RBX-Template", "training_usage": "curriculum_gap", "source_motif_id": "graph-pattern-motif-thread-30a1749bdbcdf528", "graph_gold_label": "supported_by_verification_signal", "changed_file_labels": {}}, "text": "Graph query export: Human feedback aligned with blueprint or architecture gaps\nQuery id: blueprint_gap_alignment\nQuery type: motif_query\nIntent: Curriculum-gap examples connecting issue threads to helicopter-view gaps.\nMotif: blueprint_gap_alignment\nTraining usage: curriculum_gap\nGraph gold label: supported_by_verification_signal\nRepo: sploithunter/RBX-Template\nThread: sploithunter/RBX-Template#10\nEvidence:\nGraph motif: Human feedback aligns with blueprint or architecture gaps\nMotif id: blueprint_gap_alignment\nPolarity: mixed\nTraining usage: curriculum_gap\nSeverity: medium\nRepo: sploithunter/RBX-Template\nThread: sploithunter/RBX-Template#10\nGraph gold label: supported_by_verification_signal\nThread graph evidence:\nGitHub issue/PR evidence subgraph\nThread: sploithunter/RBX-Template#10\nRepo: sploithunter/RBX-Template\nIssue/PR number: 10\nGraph consistency label: supported_by_verification_signal\nNodes: 23\nEdges: 28\nNode types: {'link_quality': 6, 'commit': 5, 'alignment': 3, 'blueprint_finding': 3, 'thread': 1, 'repo': 1, 'comment': 1, 'comment_chain': 1, 'issue_chain': 1, 'fix_outcome': 1}\nEdge types: {'chain_has_link_quality': 6, 'comment_chain_links_commit': 5, 'alignment_uses_comment': 3, 'alignment_uses_finding': 3, 'comment_aligns_finding': 3, 'repo_has_thread': 1, 'thread_has_comment': 1, 'thread_has_comment_chain': 1, 'comment_has_chain': 1, 'thread_has_issue_chain': 1, 'issue_chain_has_comment_chain': 1, 'thread_has_fix_outcome': 1, 'issue_chain_has_fix_outcome': 1}\nLabels: {'verification_or_tests': 4, 'claimed_resolved_with_verification_signal': 3, 'blueprint_human_gap_alignment': 3, 'partial blueprint fit': 3, 'thread_has_human_issue_and_fix_context': 2, 'issue_or_pull_request_thread': 1, 'ui_workflow_gap': 1, 'human_reported_issue_then_verified_fix_attempt': 1, 'bug_fix': 1}\nOutcomes: {'claimed_resolved_with_verification_signal': 6}\nQuality tiers: {'weak_supervision': 3, 'assumption_check': 3}\nCI labels: {}\nCurriculum targets:\n- Use helicopter-view architecture/schema/design evidence beside issue threads.\n- Teach models to compare requested product class against implementation layers.\nAssumption checks:\n- Which blueprint layer is absent: frontend, API, data, auth, tests, or deployment?\n- Does human feedback confirm the same architectural gap?", "source": "foundry_mined_dataset", "repo_url": "https://github.com/sploithunter/RBX-Template", "source_id": "graph-query-motif_query-381bdb22b5e3f29b", "synthetic": false, "gold_label": "", "graph_label": "", "source_path": "/data/distillate/foundry_data/graph_queries/blueprint_gap_alignment/shard-0.jsonl", "bundle_label": "", "priority_band": "", "priority_score": 0, "repo_full_name": "sploithunter/RBX-Template", "source_dataset": "graph_queries/blueprint_gap_alignment", "training_usage": "curriculum_gap"}}}, {"ruleId": "foundry_assumption_check", "level": "warning", "message": {"text": "Foundry mined assumption checks: sploithunter/RBX-Template"}, "properties": {"repobilityId": 312549, "scanner": "foundry_dataset", "fingerprint": "f1c0965121ef163fe2bd1c64a2887d75f4aa9f86edb76a12e6eee4e0a92333a5", "category": "practices", "severity": "medium", "confidence": 0.62, "triageState": "open", "verdict": "needs_review", "isResolved": false, "reason": "Imported from mined Foundry/Fable5 evidence with real GitHub/source provenance. Review source_id before acting.", "evidence": {"meta": {"kind": "comment_chain_pattern_product", "source": "comment_chain_pattern_miner", "product": "assumption_checks", "synthetic": false, "thread_key": "sploithunter/RBX-Template#9", "human_labels": ["security_auth_secret"], "issue_number": "9", "thread_label": "thread_has_human_issue_and_fix_context", "outcome_label": "claimed_resolved_unverified", "source_backed": true, "max_confidence": 0.642, "repo_full_name": "sploithunter/RBX-Template", "training_usage": "weak_supervision", "confidence_tier": "weak_supervision", "source_chain_id": "evidence-chain-issue_chain-6872dd13047d9f28", "helicopter_views": {"graphs": 2}, "artifact_families": {"docs": 6, "tests": 1, "generated_claims": 1}, "source_chain_kind": "issue_chain", "changed_file_count": 0, "source_graph_label": "source_backed_multi_signal_graph", "changed_file_labels": {}, "linked_commit_count": 4, "helicopter_view_count": 2, "source_artifact_count": 8, "classification_reasons": ["source_graph_has_real_artifacts", "source_graph_has_verification_artifacts", "repo_has_isolated_helicopter_views", "link_quality_weak_supervision", "high_risk_human_feedback_label"], "linked_ci_commit_count": 0, "verification_artifact_count": 1, "design_schema_api_artifact_count": 0}, "text": "Comment chain pattern product: assumption_checks\nRepo: sploithunter/RBX-Template\nThread: sploithunter/RBX-Template#9\nOutcome: claimed_resolved_unverified\nThread label: thread_has_human_issue_and_fix_context\nSource graph label: source_backed_multi_signal_graph\nReasons: source_graph_has_real_artifacts, source_graph_has_verification_artifacts, repo_has_isolated_helicopter_views, link_quality_weak_supervision, high_risk_human_feedback_label\nChain evidence:\nIssue/PR evidence chain: sploithunter/RBX-Template#9\nRepo: sploithunter/RBX-Template\nThread label: thread_has_human_issue_and_fix_context\nOutcome: claimed_resolved_unverified\nComment count: 1\nLinked commit count: 4\nLinked CI commit count: 0\nLinked CI labels: {}\nChanged file count: 0\nLabels: {'security_auth_secret': 1}\nPolarities: {'bad': 1}\nChanged file labels: {}\nExamples:\n[\n  {\n    \"id\": \"github-feedback-comment-3e836d774043080a\",\n    \"kind\": \"issue_body\",\n    \"label\": \"security_auth_secret\",\n    \"polarity\": \"bad\",\n    \"url\": \"https://github.com/sploithunter/RBX-Template/issues/9\",\n    \"text\": \"GitHub feedback: security_auth_secret\\nPolarity: bad\\nKind: issue_body\\nRepo: sploithunter/RBX-Template\\nAuthor: sploithunter (User)\\nURL: https://github.com/sploithunter/RBX-Template/issues/9\\nTitle: Feature: Add earning-rate enemy pressure for high-income farming\\nBody:\\n## Summary\\nAdd a server-authoritative earning-rate enemy pressure system that reacts to unusually high mining income by spawning or escalating enemies, using the existing stat-counter and combat substrate instead of hard income caps.\\n\\n## Rationale\\n`docs/wiki/CURRENT_STATUS.md` lists earning-rate enemy pressure as the next Pet Realm anti-cheat/progression-pressure tool: high income should attract enemies, and the baseline should seed from DataStore-loaded lifetime totals so normal login restoration does not look like a suspicious join spike. Recent commits also added the `StatEventCounters` bridge and trade-earned counter cleanup, which gives the repo a cleaner event/counter substrate for measuring earned income without conflating transfers or restored state.\\n\\nThis fits the current architecture because mining already produces biome currencies through server-owned reward paths, combat/enemy systems already exist, and the p\"\n  }\n]\nChanged files:\n[]\nLinked chain ids:\n[\"evidence-chain-comment_to_commit-6772021b038b8f5e\"]\nSource graph evidence:\nSource evidence repo graph summary\nRepo: sploithunter/RBX-Template\nGraph label: source_backed_multi_signal_graph\nNodes: 14\nEdges: 22\nNode types: {\"cooccurrence_profile\": 1, \"github_repo_summary\": 1, \"helicopter_repo_view\": 2, \"repo\": 1, \"source_artifact\": 8, \"source_bundle\": 1}\nEdge types: {\"artifact_needs_claim_verification\": 7, \"artifact_supports_verification\": 1, \"repo_has_cooccurrence_profile\": 1, \"repo_has_github_evidence_summary\": 1, \"repo_has_graphs_helicopter_view\": 2, \"repo_has_source_artifact\": 8, \"repo_has_source_bundle\": 1, \"source_bundle_uses_cooccurren\n[truncated by importer]", "source": "foundry_mined_dataset", "repo_url": "https://github.com/sploithunter/RBX-Template", "source_id": "comment-chain-pattern-assumption_checks-e4dc6ce87e571181", "synthetic": false, "gold_label": "", "graph_label": "source_backed_multi_signal_graph", "source_path": "/data/distillate/foundry_data/comment_chain_patterns/assumption_checks/shard-0.jsonl", "bundle_label": "", "priority_band": "", "priority_score": 0, "repo_full_name": "sploithunter/RBX-Template", "source_dataset": "comment_chain_patterns/assumption_checks", "training_usage": "weak_supervision"}}}, {"ruleId": "foundry_assumption_check", "level": "warning", "message": {"text": "Foundry mined assumption checks: sploithunter/RBX-Template"}, "properties": {"repobilityId": 312548, "scanner": "foundry_dataset", "fingerprint": "31e061a4295ada29220e5ecc95b4a066b543a919c2b6228bb66f9f4420abe0be", "category": "practices", "severity": "medium", "confidence": 0.62, "triageState": "open", "verdict": "needs_review", "isResolved": false, "reason": "Imported from mined Foundry/Fable5 evidence with real GitHub/source provenance. Review source_id before acting.", "evidence": {"meta": {"kind": "comment_chain_pattern_product", "source": "comment_chain_pattern_miner", "product": "assumption_checks", "synthetic": false, "thread_key": "sploithunter/RBX-Template#8", "human_labels": ["api_integration_gap"], "issue_number": "8", "thread_label": "thread_has_human_issue_and_fix_context", "outcome_label": "ambiguous_needs_more_evidence", "source_backed": true, "max_confidence": 0.65, "repo_full_name": "sploithunter/RBX-Template", "training_usage": "weak_supervision", "confidence_tier": "weak_supervision", "source_chain_id": "evidence-chain-issue_chain-5c1b6334badc0178", "helicopter_views": {"graphs": 2}, "artifact_families": {"docs": 6, "tests": 1, "generated_claims": 1}, "source_chain_kind": "issue_chain", "changed_file_count": 0, "source_graph_label": "source_backed_multi_signal_graph", "changed_file_labels": {}, "linked_commit_count": 5, "helicopter_view_count": 2, "source_artifact_count": 8, "classification_reasons": ["source_graph_has_real_artifacts", "source_graph_has_verification_artifacts", "repo_has_isolated_helicopter_views", "link_quality_weak_supervision", "high_risk_human_feedback_label"], "linked_ci_commit_count": 0, "verification_artifact_count": 1, "design_schema_api_artifact_count": 0}, "text": "Comment chain pattern product: assumption_checks\nRepo: sploithunter/RBX-Template\nThread: sploithunter/RBX-Template#8\nOutcome: ambiguous_needs_more_evidence\nThread label: thread_has_human_issue_and_fix_context\nSource graph label: source_backed_multi_signal_graph\nReasons: source_graph_has_real_artifacts, source_graph_has_verification_artifacts, repo_has_isolated_helicopter_views, link_quality_weak_supervision, high_risk_human_feedback_label\nChain evidence:\nIssue/PR evidence chain: sploithunter/RBX-Template#8\nRepo: sploithunter/RBX-Template\nThread label: thread_has_human_issue_and_fix_context\nOutcome: ambiguous_needs_more_evidence\nComment count: 1\nLinked commit count: 5\nLinked CI commit count: 0\nLinked CI labels: {}\nChanged file count: 0\nLabels: {'api_integration_gap': 1}\nPolarities: {'bad': 1}\nChanged file labels: {}\nExamples:\n[\n  {\n    \"id\": \"github-feedback-comment-fd353224b6646a5d\",\n    \"kind\": \"issue_body\",\n    \"label\": \"api_integration_gap\",\n    \"polarity\": \"bad\",\n    \"url\": \"https://github.com/sploithunter/RBX-Template/issues/8\",\n    \"text\": \"GitHub feedback: api_integration_gap\\nPolarity: bad\\nKind: issue_body\\nRepo: sploithunter/RBX-Template\\nAuthor: sploithunter (User)\\nURL: https://github.com/sploithunter/RBX-Template/issues/8\\nTitle: Feature: Add active targeted support-pet buffs and debuffs\\nBody:\\n## Summary\\nAdd an active support-pet targeting mode where support pets can select friendly pets or enemies using combat-style targeting, then apply configured buffs or debuffs instead of direct HP damage.\\n\\n## Rationale\\nThe current Pet Realm roadmap calls out support pets as the next experiment after passive support auras: support pets should target like combat pets, but their hit applies a buff or debuff. This fits the existing architecture because the repo already has pet roles, combat targeting, status-effect badges, player/pet buff channels, `PetDamageBuff`, `PetTeamDamageBuff`, `Vulnerable`, `TeamDefenseBuff`, and config-driven pet power/effect rules.\\n\\nA focused feature request helps keep the work bounded: make friendly pets a valid target class, reuse the existing status-effect and modifier infrastructure, and define stacking/duration rules without disturbing enemy aggro or combat-pet targeting.\\n\\n## Proposed behavior\\n- Add\"\n  }\n]\nChanged files:\n[]\nLinked chain ids:\n[\"evidence-chain-comment_to_commit-628eb5312eada97a\"]\nSource graph evidence:\nSource evidence repo graph summary\nRepo: sploithunter/RBX-Template\nGraph label: source_backed_multi_signal_graph\nNodes: 14\nEdges: 22\nNode types: {\"cooccurrence_profile\": 1, \"github_repo_summary\": 1, \"helicopter_repo_view\": 2, \"repo\": 1, \"source_artifact\": 8, \"source_bundle\": 1}\nEdge types: {\"artifact_needs_claim_verification\": 7, \"artifact_supports_verification\": 1, \"repo_has_cooccurrence_profile\": 1, \"repo_has_github_evidence_summary\": 1, \"repo_has_graphs_helicopter_view\": 2, \"repo_has_source_artifact\": 8, \"repo_has_source_bundle\": 1, \"source_bundle_uses_coocc\n[truncated by importer]", "source": "foundry_mined_dataset", "repo_url": "https://github.com/sploithunter/RBX-Template", "source_id": "comment-chain-pattern-assumption_checks-71022d63f67db0d0", "synthetic": false, "gold_label": "", "graph_label": "source_backed_multi_signal_graph", "source_path": "/data/distillate/foundry_data/comment_chain_patterns/assumption_checks/shard-0.jsonl", "bundle_label": "", "priority_band": "", "priority_score": 0, "repo_full_name": "sploithunter/RBX-Template", "source_dataset": "comment_chain_patterns/assumption_checks", "training_usage": "weak_supervision"}}}, {"ruleId": "foundry_assumption_check", "level": "warning", "message": {"text": "Foundry mined assumption checks: sploithunter/RBX-Template"}, "properties": {"repobilityId": 312547, "scanner": "foundry_dataset", "fingerprint": "85f68355eb7d1dcc91f0f5e9fe13d64d68dcea5a93d3965714c6450b5525eaf1", "category": "practices", "severity": "medium", "confidence": 0.62, "triageState": "open", "verdict": "needs_review", "isResolved": false, "reason": "Imported from mined Foundry/Fable5 evidence with real GitHub/source provenance. Review source_id before acting.", "evidence": {"meta": {"kind": "comment_chain_pattern_product", "source": "comment_chain_pattern_miner", "product": "assumption_checks", "synthetic": false, "thread_key": "sploithunter/RBX-Template#7", "human_labels": ["security_auth_secret"], "issue_number": "7", "thread_label": "thread_has_human_issue_and_fix_context", "outcome_label": "claimed_resolved_unverified", "source_backed": true, "max_confidence": 0.805, "repo_full_name": "sploithunter/RBX-Template", "training_usage": "gold_candidate", "confidence_tier": "high_confidence", "source_chain_id": "evidence-chain-issue_chain-55d704268c344ba8", "helicopter_views": {"graphs": 2}, "artifact_families": {"docs": 6, "tests": 1, "generated_claims": 1}, "source_chain_kind": "issue_chain", "changed_file_count": 0, "source_graph_label": "source_backed_multi_signal_graph", "changed_file_labels": {}, "linked_commit_count": 5, "helicopter_view_count": 2, "source_artifact_count": 8, "classification_reasons": ["source_graph_has_real_artifacts", "source_graph_has_verification_artifacts", "repo_has_isolated_helicopter_views", "link_quality_high_confidence", "high_risk_human_feedback_label"], "linked_ci_commit_count": 0, "verification_artifact_count": 1, "design_schema_api_artifact_count": 0}, "text": "Comment chain pattern product: assumption_checks\nRepo: sploithunter/RBX-Template\nThread: sploithunter/RBX-Template#7\nOutcome: claimed_resolved_unverified\nThread label: thread_has_human_issue_and_fix_context\nSource graph label: source_backed_multi_signal_graph\nReasons: source_graph_has_real_artifacts, source_graph_has_verification_artifacts, repo_has_isolated_helicopter_views, link_quality_high_confidence, high_risk_human_feedback_label\nChain evidence:\nIssue/PR evidence chain: sploithunter/RBX-Template#7\nRepo: sploithunter/RBX-Template\nThread label: thread_has_human_issue_and_fix_context\nOutcome: claimed_resolved_unverified\nComment count: 1\nLinked commit count: 5\nLinked CI commit count: 0\nLinked CI labels: {}\nChanged file count: 0\nLabels: {'security_auth_secret': 1}\nPolarities: {'bad': 1}\nChanged file labels: {}\nExamples:\n[\n  {\n    \"id\": \"github-feedback-comment-bf7a6f596583a674\",\n    \"kind\": \"issue_body\",\n    \"label\": \"security_auth_secret\",\n    \"polarity\": \"bad\",\n    \"url\": \"https://github.com/sploithunter/RBX-Template/issues/7\",\n    \"text\": \"GitHub feedback: security_auth_secret\\nPolarity: bad\\nKind: issue_body\\nRepo: sploithunter/RBX-Template\\nAuthor: sploithunter (User)\\nURL: https://github.com/sploithunter/RBX-Template/issues/7\\nTitle: Feature: Add World S3 realm-axis token progression\\nBody:\\n## Summary\\nAdd the World S3 heaven/hell realm-axis progression loop: a non-terminal endgame layer where players earn realm tokens, spend traversal charge to push deeper, and chase depth-based Eternal pet desirability without turning the ring zones into a dead end.\\n\\n## Rationale\\n`docs/wiki/CURRENT_STATUS.md` lists World S3 as the top active Pet Realm task: expand the heaven/hell sides, add a token earning loop, add the traversal-sink knob (`charge_on`), and make depth desirable through Eternal pets. The repo already has the right substrate for this: config-driven areas/layers, per-biome economies, level gates, PetPower/Eternal scaling, reward bundles, command-bus automation, and the new HUD/power work from recent commits. A focused realm-axis feature would connect the completed grass/ice/lava/desert chapter loop into the planned heaven/hell endgame instead of leaving the terminal zone as a progression stop.\\n\\n## Proposed behavior\\n- Exte\"\n  }\n]\nChanged files:\n[]\nLinked chain ids:\n[\"evidence-chain-comment_to_commit-00f480c056429123\"]\nSource graph evidence:\nSource evidence repo graph summary\nRepo: sploithunter/RBX-Template\nGraph label: source_backed_multi_signal_graph\nNodes: 14\nEdges: 22\nNode types: {\"cooccurrence_profile\": 1, \"github_repo_summary\": 1, \"helicopter_repo_view\": 2, \"repo\": 1, \"source_artifact\": 8, \"source_bundle\": 1}\nEdge types: {\"artifact_needs_claim_verification\": 7, \"artifact_supports_verification\": 1, \"repo_has_cooccurrence_profile\": 1, \"repo_has_github_evidence_summary\": 1, \"repo_has_graphs_helicopter_view\": 2, \"repo_has_source_artifact\": 8, \"repo_has_source_bundle\": 1, \"source_bundle_uses_cooccurren\n[truncated by importer]", "source": "foundry_mined_dataset", "repo_url": "https://github.com/sploithunter/RBX-Template", "source_id": "comment-chain-pattern-assumption_checks-bccf1ede573c096b", "synthetic": false, "gold_label": "", "graph_label": "source_backed_multi_signal_graph", "source_path": "/data/distillate/foundry_data/comment_chain_patterns/assumption_checks/shard-0.jsonl", "bundle_label": "", "priority_band": "", "priority_score": 0, "repo_full_name": "sploithunter/RBX-Template", "source_dataset": "comment_chain_patterns/assumption_checks", "training_usage": "gold_candidate"}}}, {"ruleId": "foundry_assumption_check", "level": "warning", "message": {"text": "Foundry mined assumption checks: sploithunter/RBX-Template"}, "properties": {"repobilityId": 312546, "scanner": "foundry_dataset", "fingerprint": "1bed8580cd06903ca0f2f1200b51b3cd1ad1adb6befb3b51ee4d1688160b16d9", "category": "practices", "severity": "medium", "confidence": 0.62, "triageState": "open", "verdict": "needs_review", "isResolved": false, "reason": "Imported from mined Foundry/Fable5 evidence with real GitHub/source provenance. Review source_id before acting.", "evidence": {"meta": {"kind": "comment_chain_pattern_product", "source": "comment_chain_pattern_miner", "product": "assumption_checks", "synthetic": false, "thread_key": "sploithunter/RBX-Template#4", "human_labels": ["agent_instruction_gap", "human_feedback_general"], "issue_number": "4", "thread_label": "thread_has_human_issue_and_fix_context", "outcome_label": "claimed_resolved_unverified", "source_backed": true, "max_confidence": 0.65, "repo_full_name": "sploithunter/RBX-Template", "training_usage": "weak_supervision", "confidence_tier": "weak_supervision", "source_chain_id": "evidence-chain-issue_chain-5e8a0a8644412fcb", "helicopter_views": {"graphs": 2}, "artifact_families": {"docs": 6, "tests": 1, "generated_claims": 1}, "source_chain_kind": "issue_chain", "changed_file_count": 0, "source_graph_label": "source_backed_multi_signal_graph", "changed_file_labels": {}, "linked_commit_count": 15, "helicopter_view_count": 2, "source_artifact_count": 8, "classification_reasons": ["source_graph_has_real_artifacts", "source_graph_has_verification_artifacts", "repo_has_isolated_helicopter_views", "link_quality_weak_supervision"], "linked_ci_commit_count": 0, "verification_artifact_count": 1, "design_schema_api_artifact_count": 0}, "text": "Comment chain pattern product: assumption_checks\nRepo: sploithunter/RBX-Template\nThread: sploithunter/RBX-Template#4\nOutcome: claimed_resolved_unverified\nThread label: thread_has_human_issue_and_fix_context\nSource graph label: source_backed_multi_signal_graph\nReasons: source_graph_has_real_artifacts, source_graph_has_verification_artifacts, repo_has_isolated_helicopter_views, link_quality_weak_supervision\nChain evidence:\nIssue/PR evidence chain: sploithunter/RBX-Template#4\nRepo: sploithunter/RBX-Template\nThread label: thread_has_human_issue_and_fix_context\nOutcome: claimed_resolved_unverified\nComment count: 3\nLinked commit count: 15\nLinked CI commit count: 0\nLinked CI labels: {}\nChanged file count: 0\nLabels: {'human_feedback_general': 1, 'agent_instruction_gap': 2}\nPolarities: {'neutral': 1, 'bad': 2}\nChanged file labels: {}\nExamples:\n[\n  {\n    \"id\": \"github-feedback-comment-0cf1c646485fe8a0\",\n    \"kind\": \"issue_body\",\n    \"label\": \"human_feedback_general\",\n    \"polarity\": \"neutral\",\n    \"url\": \"https://github.com/sploithunter/RBX-Template/issues/4\",\n    \"text\": \"GitHub feedback: human_feedback_general\\nPolarity: neutral\\nKind: issue_body\\nRepo: sploithunter/RBX-Template\\nAuthor: sploithunter (User)\\nURL: https://github.com/sploithunter/RBX-Template/issues/4\\nTitle: [template] Replace legacy pet follow/mining/damage scripts with a service-owned PetWork/Combat loop\\nBody:\\n## What\\nPet movement / follow / mining-damage currently runs through **legacy scripts cloned onto pet models**, pulled in from old code. They are not service-owned, not config-as-code, and don't fit the Halo & Horns design. Replace them with a **service-owned PetWork/Combat loop**.\\n\\nLegacy code involved:\\n- `src/Server/Services/PetScripts/Follow.server.lua`, `PetScripts/FollowBox.server.lua` (the cloned follow/movement scripts)\\n- `PetHandler.server.lua`, `PetCharacterAttachments.server.lua`, `ImportedPetHandler.server.lua`, `PetCompatibilityService.server.lua` (the surrounding bridge)\\n\\n## Why it matters\\n- **Testability**: the cloned-script approach has no headless/bus coverage; behavior lives in instances, not a service. Our pipeline (headless specs + `AutomationSuite`) can't exercise it.\\n- **Config-as-code**: movement/follow/damage tuning is effectively hardcoded in the cloned scr\"\n  },\n  {\n    \"id\": \"github-feedback-comment-e59e38aac8f9d8c7\",\n    \"kind\": \"issue_comment\",\n    \"label\": \"agent_instruction_gap\",\n    \"polarity\": \"bad\",\n    \"url\": \"https://github.com/sploithunter/RBX-Template/issues/4#issuecomment-4583383471\",\n    \"text\": \"GitHub feedback: agent_instruction_gap\\nPolarity: bad\\nKind: issue_comment\\nRepo: sploithunter/RBX-Template\\nAuthor: sploithunter (User)\\nURL: https://github.com/sploithunter/RBX-Template/issues/4#issuecomment-4583383471\\nTitle: \\nBody:\\nResolved. The movement half of this issue is complete (the damage half landed earlier in Phase 4 via `PetCombat` + `CombatService:ResolvePetDamage` through the modifier pipe\n[truncated by importer]", "source": "foundry_mined_dataset", "repo_url": "https://github.com/sploithunter/RBX-Template", "source_id": "comment-chain-pattern-assumption_checks-8faa9aef3fb673aa", "synthetic": false, "gold_label": "", "graph_label": "source_backed_multi_signal_graph", "source_path": "/data/distillate/foundry_data/comment_chain_patterns/assumption_checks/shard-0.jsonl", "bundle_label": "", "priority_band": "", "priority_score": 0, "repo_full_name": "sploithunter/RBX-Template", "source_dataset": "comment_chain_patterns/assumption_checks", "training_usage": "weak_supervision"}}}, {"ruleId": "foundry_assumption_check", "level": "warning", "message": {"text": "Foundry mined assumption checks: sploithunter/RBX-Template"}, "properties": {"repobilityId": 312545, "scanner": "foundry_dataset", "fingerprint": "5c3fd313025227f84d2cf176451238d3d9d92172c8d106f92fe43d1bec037e24", "category": "practices", "severity": "medium", "confidence": 0.62, "triageState": "open", "verdict": "needs_review", "isResolved": false, "reason": "Imported from mined Foundry/Fable5 evidence with real GitHub/source provenance. Review source_id before acting.", "evidence": {"meta": {"kind": "comment_chain_pattern_product", "source": "comment_chain_pattern_miner", "product": "assumption_checks", "synthetic": false, "thread_key": "sploithunter/RBX-Template#3", "human_labels": ["human_feedback_general"], "issue_number": "3", "thread_label": "thread_needs_classification", "outcome_label": "ambiguous_needs_more_evidence", "source_backed": true, "max_confidence": 0.642, "repo_full_name": "sploithunter/RBX-Template", "training_usage": "weak_supervision", "confidence_tier": "weak_supervision", "source_chain_id": "evidence-chain-issue_chain-6cfe429a45814953", "helicopter_views": {"graphs": 2}, "artifact_families": {"docs": 6, "tests": 1, "generated_claims": 1}, "source_chain_kind": "issue_chain", "changed_file_count": 0, "source_graph_label": "source_backed_multi_signal_graph", "changed_file_labels": {}, "linked_commit_count": 5, "helicopter_view_count": 2, "source_artifact_count": 8, "classification_reasons": ["source_graph_has_real_artifacts", "source_graph_has_verification_artifacts", "repo_has_isolated_helicopter_views", "link_quality_weak_supervision"], "linked_ci_commit_count": 0, "verification_artifact_count": 1, "design_schema_api_artifact_count": 0}, "text": "Comment chain pattern product: assumption_checks\nRepo: sploithunter/RBX-Template\nThread: sploithunter/RBX-Template#3\nOutcome: ambiguous_needs_more_evidence\nThread label: thread_needs_classification\nSource graph label: source_backed_multi_signal_graph\nReasons: source_graph_has_real_artifacts, source_graph_has_verification_artifacts, repo_has_isolated_helicopter_views, link_quality_weak_supervision\nChain evidence:\nIssue/PR evidence chain: sploithunter/RBX-Template#3\nRepo: sploithunter/RBX-Template\nThread label: thread_needs_classification\nOutcome: ambiguous_needs_more_evidence\nComment count: 1\nLinked commit count: 5\nLinked CI commit count: 0\nLinked CI labels: {}\nChanged file count: 0\nLabels: {'human_feedback_general': 1}\nPolarities: {'neutral': 1}\nChanged file labels: {}\nExamples:\n[\n  {\n    \"id\": \"github-feedback-comment-f913779d423007b9\",\n    \"kind\": \"issue_body\",\n    \"label\": \"human_feedback_general\",\n    \"polarity\": \"neutral\",\n    \"url\": \"https://github.com/sploithunter/RBX-Template/issues/3\",\n    \"text\": \"GitHub feedback: human_feedback_general\\nPolarity: neutral\\nKind: issue_body\\nRepo: sploithunter/RBX-Template\\nAuthor: sploithunter (User)\\nURL: https://github.com/sploithunter/RBX-Template/issues/3\\nTitle: Feature: Config-driven daily gifts and streak rewards\\nBody:\\n## Summary\\nAdd a config-driven daily gifts and streak reward service that grants once-per-UTC-day rewards through the existing server-authoritative reward/stat/profile pipeline.\\n\\n## Rationale\\nDaily gifts and reward tracks are listed in the planned roadmap, and the repo already has the pieces this should reuse: deterministic UTC day helpers, ProfileStore-backed player data, stat counters, reward validation/grant paths, achievements/pet-index reward patterns, and the newer command-bus/automation test surface. A small daily-gift foundation would create a reusable cadence system for later reward tracks, codes, limited stock, and event rotations without hardcoding one-off UI or economy logic.\\n\\n## Proposed behavior\\n- Add a `configs/daily_rewards.lua` file that defines enabled state, reset time basis (`UTC`), optional streak policy, reward slots, and preview copy.\\n- Add a server-owned `DailyRewardService` that reads/writes per-playe\"\n  }\n]\nChanged files:\n[]\nLinked chain ids:\n[\"evidence-chain-comment_to_commit-957b5d0a9b6654b1\"]\nSource graph evidence:\nSource evidence repo graph summary\nRepo: sploithunter/RBX-Template\nGraph label: source_backed_multi_signal_graph\nNodes: 14\nEdges: 22\nNode types: {\"cooccurrence_profile\": 1, \"github_repo_summary\": 1, \"helicopter_repo_view\": 2, \"repo\": 1, \"source_artifact\": 8, \"source_bundle\": 1}\nEdge types: {\"artifact_needs_claim_verification\": 7, \"artifact_supports_verification\": 1, \"repo_has_cooccurrence_profile\": 1, \"repo_has_github_evidence_summary\": 1, \"repo_has_graphs_helicopter_view\": 2, \"repo_has_source_artifact\": 8, \"repo_has_source_bundle\": 1, \"source_bundle_uses_cooccurrence_profile\": 1}\nArtifact families: {\n[truncated by importer]", "source": "foundry_mined_dataset", "repo_url": "https://github.com/sploithunter/RBX-Template", "source_id": "comment-chain-pattern-assumption_checks-28a6f69f804bbcb8", "synthetic": false, "gold_label": "", "graph_label": "source_backed_multi_signal_graph", "source_path": "/data/distillate/foundry_data/comment_chain_patterns/assumption_checks/shard-0.jsonl", "bundle_label": "", "priority_band": "", "priority_score": 0, "repo_full_name": "sploithunter/RBX-Template", "source_dataset": "comment_chain_patterns/assumption_checks", "training_usage": "weak_supervision"}}}, {"ruleId": "foundry_assumption_check", "level": "warning", "message": {"text": "Foundry mined assumption checks: sploithunter/RBX-Template"}, "properties": {"repobilityId": 312544, "scanner": "foundry_dataset", "fingerprint": "6b4b700e5a15e559c7c48548e342d3350f4380a3f09c59c5cb1e7ea28f2aec36", "category": "practices", "severity": "medium", "confidence": 0.62, "triageState": "open", "verdict": "needs_review", "isResolved": false, "reason": "Imported from mined Foundry/Fable5 evidence with real GitHub/source provenance. Review source_id before acting.", "evidence": {"meta": {"kind": "comment_chain_pattern_product", "source": "comment_chain_pattern_miner", "product": "assumption_checks", "synthetic": false, "thread_key": "sploithunter/RBX-Template#2", "human_labels": ["test_ci_gap"], "issue_number": "2", "thread_label": "thread_has_human_issue_and_fix_context", "outcome_label": "ambiguous_needs_more_evidence", "source_backed": true, "max_confidence": 0.7, "repo_full_name": "sploithunter/RBX-Template", "training_usage": "weak_supervision", "confidence_tier": "weak_supervision", "source_chain_id": "evidence-chain-issue_chain-dbed86bc15bb323d", "helicopter_views": {"graphs": 2}, "artifact_families": {"docs": 6, "tests": 1, "generated_claims": 1}, "source_chain_kind": "issue_chain", "changed_file_count": 0, "source_graph_label": "source_backed_multi_signal_graph", "changed_file_labels": {}, "linked_commit_count": 2, "helicopter_view_count": 2, "source_artifact_count": 8, "classification_reasons": ["source_graph_has_real_artifacts", "source_graph_has_verification_artifacts", "repo_has_isolated_helicopter_views", "link_quality_weak_supervision", "high_risk_human_feedback_label"], "linked_ci_commit_count": 0, "verification_artifact_count": 1, "design_schema_api_artifact_count": 0}, "text": "Comment chain pattern product: assumption_checks\nRepo: sploithunter/RBX-Template\nThread: sploithunter/RBX-Template#2\nOutcome: ambiguous_needs_more_evidence\nThread label: thread_has_human_issue_and_fix_context\nSource graph label: source_backed_multi_signal_graph\nReasons: source_graph_has_real_artifacts, source_graph_has_verification_artifacts, repo_has_isolated_helicopter_views, link_quality_weak_supervision, high_risk_human_feedback_label\nChain evidence:\nIssue/PR evidence chain: sploithunter/RBX-Template#2\nRepo: sploithunter/RBX-Template\nThread label: thread_has_human_issue_and_fix_context\nOutcome: ambiguous_needs_more_evidence\nComment count: 1\nLinked commit count: 2\nLinked CI commit count: 0\nLinked CI labels: {}\nChanged file count: 0\nLabels: {'test_ci_gap': 1}\nPolarities: {'bad': 1}\nChanged file labels: {}\nExamples:\n[\n  {\n    \"id\": \"github-feedback-comment-54f0aa5d97425400\",\n    \"kind\": \"issue_body\",\n    \"label\": \"test_ci_gap\",\n    \"polarity\": \"bad\",\n    \"url\": \"https://github.com/sploithunter/RBX-Template/issues/2\",\n    \"text\": \"GitHub feedback: test_ci_gap\\nPolarity: bad\\nKind: issue_body\\nRepo: sploithunter/RBX-Template\\nAuthor: sploithunter (User)\\nURL: https://github.com/sploithunter/RBX-Template/issues/2\\nTitle: \ud83d\udea6 Active Work \u2014 agent coordination board\\nBody:\\nLive coordination board for agents working this repo (game, template, and delegated/Cursor agents). **GitHub is our single coordination substrate** (see `AGENTS.md` \u2192 Multi-Agent Collaboration). Because all agents currently push as the same GitHub user, \\\"who's doing what\\\" is tracked here by **convention**, not by GitHub assignment.\\n\\n## How to use\\n**Before starting work:**\\n1. Add a row to the **Active** table (agent \u00b7 domain \u00b7 branch \u00b7 scope \u00b7 started).\\n2. Open a **draft PR** early (or comment here) so your branch is visible to others.\\n\\n**When done** (merged or abandoned): remove your row.\\n\\nKeep it short \u2014 this is a *now* board, not history. The durable record lives in PRs + `docs/wiki/LOG.md`.\\n\\n## Active\\n| Agent | Domain | Branch | Scope | Started |\\n|-------|--------|--------|-------|---------|\\n| _(none yet)_ | | | | |\\n\\n## Conventions\\n- Branches: `template/*` (template), `game/*` / `pet-realm/*` (game), `agent/<who>/*` (delegated).\\n- Everything lands on\"\n  }\n]\nChanged files:\n[]\nLinked chain ids:\n[\"evidence-chain-comment_to_commit-43c8db57788413e2\"]\nSource graph evidence:\nSource evidence repo graph summary\nRepo: sploithunter/RBX-Template\nGraph label: source_backed_multi_signal_graph\nNodes: 14\nEdges: 22\nNode types: {\"cooccurrence_profile\": 1, \"github_repo_summary\": 1, \"helicopter_repo_view\": 2, \"repo\": 1, \"source_artifact\": 8, \"source_bundle\": 1}\nEdge types: {\"artifact_needs_claim_verification\": 7, \"artifact_supports_verification\": 1, \"repo_has_cooccurrence_profile\": 1, \"repo_has_github_evidence_summary\": 1, \"repo_has_graphs_helicopter_view\": 2, \"repo_has_source_artifact\": 8, \"repo_has_source_bundle\": 1, \"source_bundle_uses_cooccurren\n[truncated by importer]", "source": "foundry_mined_dataset", "repo_url": "https://github.com/sploithunter/RBX-Template", "source_id": "comment-chain-pattern-assumption_checks-a33ea0a14f5a9018", "synthetic": false, "gold_label": "", "graph_label": "source_backed_multi_signal_graph", "source_path": "/data/distillate/foundry_data/comment_chain_patterns/assumption_checks/shard-0.jsonl", "bundle_label": "", "priority_band": "", "priority_score": 0, "repo_full_name": "sploithunter/RBX-Template", "source_dataset": "comment_chain_patterns/assumption_checks", "training_usage": "weak_supervision"}}}, {"ruleId": "foundry_assumption_check", "level": "warning", "message": {"text": "Foundry mined assumption checks: sploithunter/RBX-Template"}, "properties": {"repobilityId": 312543, "scanner": "foundry_dataset", "fingerprint": "948a15080564c7ff8853a00dee2cded21c4f369486d397eb73c3aa05f104b41a", "category": "practices", "severity": "medium", "confidence": 0.62, "triageState": "open", "verdict": "needs_review", "isResolved": false, "reason": "Imported from mined Foundry/Fable5 evidence with real GitHub/source provenance. Review source_id before acting.", "evidence": {"meta": {"kind": "comment_chain_pattern_product", "source": "comment_chain_pattern_miner", "product": "assumption_checks", "synthetic": false, "thread_key": "sploithunter/RBX-Template#14", "human_labels": ["security_auth_secret"], "issue_number": "14", "thread_label": "thread_has_human_issue_and_fix_context", "outcome_label": "claimed_resolved_unverified", "source_backed": true, "max_confidence": 0.65, "repo_full_name": "sploithunter/RBX-Template", "training_usage": "weak_supervision", "confidence_tier": "weak_supervision", "source_chain_id": "evidence-chain-issue_chain-a45a63438a4027d1", "helicopter_views": {"graphs": 2}, "artifact_families": {"docs": 6, "tests": 1, "generated_claims": 1}, "source_chain_kind": "issue_chain", "changed_file_count": 0, "source_graph_label": "source_backed_multi_signal_graph", "changed_file_labels": {}, "linked_commit_count": 4, "helicopter_view_count": 2, "source_artifact_count": 8, "classification_reasons": ["source_graph_has_real_artifacts", "source_graph_has_verification_artifacts", "repo_has_isolated_helicopter_views", "link_quality_weak_supervision", "high_risk_human_feedback_label"], "linked_ci_commit_count": 0, "verification_artifact_count": 1, "design_schema_api_artifact_count": 0}, "text": "Comment chain pattern product: assumption_checks\nRepo: sploithunter/RBX-Template\nThread: sploithunter/RBX-Template#14\nOutcome: claimed_resolved_unverified\nThread label: thread_has_human_issue_and_fix_context\nSource graph label: source_backed_multi_signal_graph\nReasons: source_graph_has_real_artifacts, source_graph_has_verification_artifacts, repo_has_isolated_helicopter_views, link_quality_weak_supervision, high_risk_human_feedback_label\nChain evidence:\nIssue/PR evidence chain: sploithunter/RBX-Template#14\nRepo: sploithunter/RBX-Template\nThread label: thread_has_human_issue_and_fix_context\nOutcome: claimed_resolved_unverified\nComment count: 1\nLinked commit count: 4\nLinked CI commit count: 0\nLinked CI labels: {}\nChanged file count: 0\nLabels: {'security_auth_secret': 1}\nPolarities: {'bad': 1}\nChanged file labels: {}\nExamples:\n[\n  {\n    \"id\": \"github-feedback-comment-467b6c55b043c56d\",\n    \"kind\": \"issue_body\",\n    \"label\": \"security_auth_secret\",\n    \"polarity\": \"bad\",\n    \"url\": \"https://github.com/sploithunter/RBX-Template/issues/14\",\n    \"text\": \"GitHub feedback: security_auth_secret\\nPolarity: bad\\nKind: issue_body\\nRepo: sploithunter/RBX-Template\\nAuthor: sploithunter (User)\\nURL: https://github.com/sploithunter/RBX-Template/issues/14\\nTitle: Feature: Add realm gate preview UI for Heaven/Hell progression\\nBody:\\n## Summary\\nAdd a player-facing realm gate preview and next-step UI for Heaven/Hell progression, driven by the same config/server gate metadata used by zone travel and layer access.\\n\\n## Rationale\\nRecent commits moved the game further into the World S3 lane: `Heaven_1` is now a lava-coin unlock-gated zone, solar/realm egg stands resolve through the unified area/world egg-stand path, and pet combat targeting is reliable enough for authored realm content. The open World S3 issue (#7) covers the server-side realm-axis loop itself: tokens, traversal charge, deeper layers, and reward desirability. What is still missing is the player-facing contract that explains why a realm portal is locked, what the next reachable step is, and which requirement the player can work on now.\\n\\nThis fits the current architecture because area/layer requirements already live in config, travel is server-authoritative, HUD/menu surfaces already read liv\"\n  }\n]\nChanged files:\n[]\nLinked chain ids:\n[\"evidence-chain-comment_to_commit-a2eb51581821a8ec\"]\nSource graph evidence:\nSource evidence repo graph summary\nRepo: sploithunter/RBX-Template\nGraph label: source_backed_multi_signal_graph\nNodes: 14\nEdges: 22\nNode types: {\"cooccurrence_profile\": 1, \"github_repo_summary\": 1, \"helicopter_repo_view\": 2, \"repo\": 1, \"source_artifact\": 8, \"source_bundle\": 1}\nEdge types: {\"artifact_needs_claim_verification\": 7, \"artifact_supports_verification\": 1, \"repo_has_cooccurrence_profile\": 1, \"repo_has_github_evidence_summary\": 1, \"repo_has_graphs_helicopter_view\": 2, \"repo_has_source_artifact\": 8, \"repo_has_source_bundle\": 1, \"source_bundle_uses_cooccur\n[truncated by importer]", "source": "foundry_mined_dataset", "repo_url": "https://github.com/sploithunter/RBX-Template", "source_id": "comment-chain-pattern-assumption_checks-3065386f87c9bbaf", "synthetic": false, "gold_label": "", "graph_label": "source_backed_multi_signal_graph", "source_path": "/data/distillate/foundry_data/comment_chain_patterns/assumption_checks/shard-0.jsonl", "bundle_label": "", "priority_band": "", "priority_score": 0, "repo_full_name": "sploithunter/RBX-Template", "source_dataset": "comment_chain_patterns/assumption_checks", "training_usage": "weak_supervision"}}}, {"ruleId": "foundry_assumption_check", "level": "warning", "message": {"text": "Foundry mined assumption checks: sploithunter/RBX-Template"}, "properties": {"repobilityId": 312542, "scanner": "foundry_dataset", "fingerprint": "377f23fab5845d230f016beae86728a42128e45a5ebd44e86b3d8ec15a76f2f0", "category": "practices", "severity": "medium", "confidence": 0.62, "triageState": "open", "verdict": "needs_review", "isResolved": false, "reason": "Imported from mined Foundry/Fable5 evidence with real GitHub/source provenance. Review source_id before acting.", "evidence": {"meta": {"kind": "comment_chain_pattern_product", "source": "comment_chain_pattern_miner", "product": "assumption_checks", "synthetic": false, "thread_key": "sploithunter/RBX-Template#13", "human_labels": ["security_auth_secret"], "issue_number": "13", "thread_label": "thread_has_human_issue_and_fix_context", "outcome_label": "claimed_resolved_unverified", "source_backed": true, "max_confidence": 0.65, "repo_full_name": "sploithunter/RBX-Template", "training_usage": "weak_supervision", "confidence_tier": "weak_supervision", "source_chain_id": "evidence-chain-issue_chain-fd56116021a0785a", "helicopter_views": {"graphs": 2}, "artifact_families": {"docs": 6, "tests": 1, "generated_claims": 1}, "source_chain_kind": "issue_chain", "changed_file_count": 0, "source_graph_label": "source_backed_multi_signal_graph", "changed_file_labels": {}, "linked_commit_count": 5, "helicopter_view_count": 2, "source_artifact_count": 8, "classification_reasons": ["source_graph_has_real_artifacts", "source_graph_has_verification_artifacts", "repo_has_isolated_helicopter_views", "link_quality_weak_supervision", "high_risk_human_feedback_label"], "linked_ci_commit_count": 0, "verification_artifact_count": 1, "design_schema_api_artifact_count": 0}, "text": "Comment chain pattern product: assumption_checks\nRepo: sploithunter/RBX-Template\nThread: sploithunter/RBX-Template#13\nOutcome: claimed_resolved_unverified\nThread label: thread_has_human_issue_and_fix_context\nSource graph label: source_backed_multi_signal_graph\nReasons: source_graph_has_real_artifacts, source_graph_has_verification_artifacts, repo_has_isolated_helicopter_views, link_quality_weak_supervision, high_risk_human_feedback_label\nChain evidence:\nIssue/PR evidence chain: sploithunter/RBX-Template#13\nRepo: sploithunter/RBX-Template\nThread label: thread_has_human_issue_and_fix_context\nOutcome: claimed_resolved_unverified\nComment count: 1\nLinked commit count: 5\nLinked CI commit count: 0\nLinked CI labels: {}\nChanged file count: 0\nLabels: {'security_auth_secret': 1}\nPolarities: {'bad': 1}\nChanged file labels: {}\nExamples:\n[\n  {\n    \"id\": \"github-feedback-comment-09142426c6020cd6\",\n    \"kind\": \"issue_body\",\n    \"label\": \"security_auth_secret\",\n    \"polarity\": \"bad\",\n    \"url\": \"https://github.com/sploithunter/RBX-Template/issues/13\",\n    \"text\": \"GitHub feedback: security_auth_secret\\nPolarity: bad\\nKind: issue_body\\nRepo: sploithunter/RBX-Template\\nAuthor: sploithunter (User)\\nURL: https://github.com/sploithunter/RBX-Template/issues/13\\nTitle: Feature: Add Rebirth class loop with all-11 self-hatched dragon gate\\nBody:\\n## Summary\\nAdd the Pet Realm Rebirth class loop: reaching level 50 allows a player to rebirth into the next player class, receive the configured huge dragon reward, reset the climb, and require a full set of all 11 self-hatched realm dragons at the current class before the next rebirth.\\n\\n## Rationale\\nRecent project docs and commits define the Rebirth direction but do not have an open implementation issue for it. `docs/PET_REALM_DESIGN_DOCUMENT.md` now pins the dragon/class design: dragons are Secret-tier unique records, each unique pet records `hatched_by` and `player_class`, there are exactly 11 signature dragons across Base + Heaven 1-5 + Hell 1-5, and the next rebirth requires hatching all 11 dragon species yourself at the current class.\\n\\nThis fits the current architecture because unique pet records already carry durable identity/provenance, the heaven/hell realm axis is now being built out with per-realm rosters\"\n  }\n]\nChanged files:\n[]\nLinked chain ids:\n[\"evidence-chain-comment_to_commit-a7ecf4810638e259\"]\nSource graph evidence:\nSource evidence repo graph summary\nRepo: sploithunter/RBX-Template\nGraph label: source_backed_multi_signal_graph\nNodes: 14\nEdges: 22\nNode types: {\"cooccurrence_profile\": 1, \"github_repo_summary\": 1, \"helicopter_repo_view\": 2, \"repo\": 1, \"source_artifact\": 8, \"source_bundle\": 1}\nEdge types: {\"artifact_needs_claim_verification\": 7, \"artifact_supports_verification\": 1, \"repo_has_cooccurrence_profile\": 1, \"repo_has_github_evidence_summary\": 1, \"repo_has_graphs_helicopter_view\": 2, \"repo_has_source_artifact\": 8, \"repo_has_source_bundle\": 1, \"source_bundle_uses_cooccur\n[truncated by importer]", "source": "foundry_mined_dataset", "repo_url": "https://github.com/sploithunter/RBX-Template", "source_id": "comment-chain-pattern-assumption_checks-26029277b44083a3", "synthetic": false, "gold_label": "", "graph_label": "source_backed_multi_signal_graph", "source_path": "/data/distillate/foundry_data/comment_chain_patterns/assumption_checks/shard-0.jsonl", "bundle_label": "", "priority_band": "", "priority_score": 0, "repo_full_name": "sploithunter/RBX-Template", "source_dataset": "comment_chain_patterns/assumption_checks", "training_usage": "weak_supervision"}}}, {"ruleId": "foundry_assumption_check", "level": "warning", "message": {"text": "Foundry mined assumption checks: sploithunter/RBX-Template"}, "properties": {"repobilityId": 312541, "scanner": "foundry_dataset", "fingerprint": "112b6cec0387f4c38a8f7aac482c0a8f21485df5281eec1734f19bb4d7da1aa3", "category": "practices", "severity": "medium", "confidence": 0.62, "triageState": "open", "verdict": "needs_review", "isResolved": false, "reason": "Imported from mined Foundry/Fable5 evidence with real GitHub/source provenance. Review source_id before acting.", "evidence": {"meta": {"kind": "comment_chain_pattern_product", "source": "comment_chain_pattern_miner", "product": "assumption_checks", "synthetic": false, "thread_key": "sploithunter/RBX-Template#12", "human_labels": ["security_auth_secret"], "issue_number": "12", "thread_label": "thread_has_human_issue_and_fix_context", "outcome_label": "claimed_resolved_unverified", "source_backed": true, "max_confidence": 0.642, "repo_full_name": "sploithunter/RBX-Template", "training_usage": "weak_supervision", "confidence_tier": "weak_supervision", "source_chain_id": "evidence-chain-issue_chain-4d0e7ec9c9d1c895", "helicopter_views": {"graphs": 2}, "artifact_families": {"docs": 6, "tests": 1, "generated_claims": 1}, "source_chain_kind": "issue_chain", "changed_file_count": 0, "source_graph_label": "source_backed_multi_signal_graph", "changed_file_labels": {}, "linked_commit_count": 5, "helicopter_view_count": 2, "source_artifact_count": 8, "classification_reasons": ["source_graph_has_real_artifacts", "source_graph_has_verification_artifacts", "repo_has_isolated_helicopter_views", "link_quality_weak_supervision", "high_risk_human_feedback_label"], "linked_ci_commit_count": 0, "verification_artifact_count": 1, "design_schema_api_artifact_count": 0}, "text": "Comment chain pattern product: assumption_checks\nRepo: sploithunter/RBX-Template\nThread: sploithunter/RBX-Template#12\nOutcome: claimed_resolved_unverified\nThread label: thread_has_human_issue_and_fix_context\nSource graph label: source_backed_multi_signal_graph\nReasons: source_graph_has_real_artifacts, source_graph_has_verification_artifacts, repo_has_isolated_helicopter_views, link_quality_weak_supervision, high_risk_human_feedback_label\nChain evidence:\nIssue/PR evidence chain: sploithunter/RBX-Template#12\nRepo: sploithunter/RBX-Template\nThread label: thread_has_human_issue_and_fix_context\nOutcome: claimed_resolved_unverified\nComment count: 1\nLinked commit count: 5\nLinked CI commit count: 0\nLinked CI labels: {}\nChanged file count: 0\nLabels: {'security_auth_secret': 1}\nPolarities: {'bad': 1}\nChanged file labels: {}\nExamples:\n[\n  {\n    \"id\": \"github-feedback-comment-2618c93206735cd9\",\n    \"kind\": \"issue_body\",\n    \"label\": \"security_auth_secret\",\n    \"polarity\": \"bad\",\n    \"url\": \"https://github.com/sploithunter/RBX-Template/issues/12\",\n    \"text\": \"GitHub feedback: security_auth_secret\\nPolarity: bad\\nKind: issue_body\\nRepo: sploithunter/RBX-Template\\nAuthor: sploithunter (User)\\nURL: https://github.com/sploithunter/RBX-Template/issues/12\\nTitle: Feature: Add Creator S5 apex class and shiny pet axis\\nBody:\\n## Summary\\nAdd the Pet Realm Creator S5 lane: a dev-only, untradeable Creator apex class paired with a Meet-the-Creator encounter and a config-owned shiny pet axis that sits under the existing Creator ceiling.\\n\\n## Rationale\\n`README.md` and `docs/wiki/CURRENT_STATUS.md` both list Creator S5 as a planned Pet Realm follow-up after World S3 and Teaming S4: Creator class (dev-only, untradeable apex), Meet-the-Creator, and shiny pets. Open issues already cover World S3, Teaming S4, earning-rate pressure, support-pet targeting, and PetPower S3, but there is no issue for Creator S5.\\n\\nThis fits the current architecture because durable pet power is already config-owned, Eternal pets scale from the player's non-eternal baseline, the Creator ceiling is enforced through `max_pet_power`, Huge/Secret/Exclusive uniqueness already has provenance and trade rules, and recent combat work has made enemies, targeting, area ownership, and HUD feedback m\"\n  }\n]\nChanged files:\n[]\nLinked chain ids:\n[\"evidence-chain-comment_to_commit-2cd7a4bcd1258097\"]\nSource graph evidence:\nSource evidence repo graph summary\nRepo: sploithunter/RBX-Template\nGraph label: source_backed_multi_signal_graph\nNodes: 14\nEdges: 22\nNode types: {\"cooccurrence_profile\": 1, \"github_repo_summary\": 1, \"helicopter_repo_view\": 2, \"repo\": 1, \"source_artifact\": 8, \"source_bundle\": 1}\nEdge types: {\"artifact_needs_claim_verification\": 7, \"artifact_supports_verification\": 1, \"repo_has_cooccurrence_profile\": 1, \"repo_has_github_evidence_summary\": 1, \"repo_has_graphs_helicopter_view\": 2, \"repo_has_source_artifact\": 8, \"repo_has_source_bundle\": 1, \"source_bundle_uses_cooccur\n[truncated by importer]", "source": "foundry_mined_dataset", "repo_url": "https://github.com/sploithunter/RBX-Template", "source_id": "comment-chain-pattern-assumption_checks-5e972a8da3045383", "synthetic": false, "gold_label": "", "graph_label": "source_backed_multi_signal_graph", "source_path": "/data/distillate/foundry_data/comment_chain_patterns/assumption_checks/shard-0.jsonl", "bundle_label": "", "priority_band": "", "priority_score": 0, "repo_full_name": "sploithunter/RBX-Template", "source_dataset": "comment_chain_patterns/assumption_checks", "training_usage": "weak_supervision"}}}, {"ruleId": "foundry_assumption_check", "level": "warning", "message": {"text": "Foundry mined assumption checks: sploithunter/RBX-Template"}, "properties": {"repobilityId": 312540, "scanner": "foundry_dataset", "fingerprint": "038a0bf6ef4013d0a77968ec787c32338cfbad9f8b98dbe20b6b986b03d99578", "category": "practices", "severity": "medium", "confidence": 0.62, "triageState": "open", "verdict": "needs_review", "isResolved": false, "reason": "Imported from mined Foundry/Fable5 evidence with real GitHub/source provenance. Review source_id before acting.", "evidence": {"meta": {"kind": "comment_chain_pattern_product", "source": "comment_chain_pattern_miner", "product": "assumption_checks", "synthetic": false, "thread_key": "sploithunter/RBX-Template#11", "human_labels": ["human_feedback_general"], "issue_number": "11", "thread_label": "thread_needs_classification", "outcome_label": "ambiguous_needs_more_evidence", "source_backed": true, "max_confidence": 0.65, "repo_full_name": "sploithunter/RBX-Template", "training_usage": "weak_supervision", "confidence_tier": "weak_supervision", "source_chain_id": "evidence-chain-issue_chain-33185a96116ecedf", "helicopter_views": {"graphs": 2}, "artifact_families": {"docs": 6, "tests": 1, "generated_claims": 1}, "source_chain_kind": "issue_chain", "changed_file_count": 0, "source_graph_label": "source_backed_multi_signal_graph", "changed_file_labels": {}, "linked_commit_count": 5, "helicopter_view_count": 2, "source_artifact_count": 8, "classification_reasons": ["source_graph_has_real_artifacts", "source_graph_has_verification_artifacts", "repo_has_isolated_helicopter_views", "link_quality_weak_supervision"], "linked_ci_commit_count": 0, "verification_artifact_count": 1, "design_schema_api_artifact_count": 0}, "text": "Comment chain pattern product: assumption_checks\nRepo: sploithunter/RBX-Template\nThread: sploithunter/RBX-Template#11\nOutcome: ambiguous_needs_more_evidence\nThread label: thread_needs_classification\nSource graph label: source_backed_multi_signal_graph\nReasons: source_graph_has_real_artifacts, source_graph_has_verification_artifacts, repo_has_isolated_helicopter_views, link_quality_weak_supervision\nChain evidence:\nIssue/PR evidence chain: sploithunter/RBX-Template#11\nRepo: sploithunter/RBX-Template\nThread label: thread_needs_classification\nOutcome: ambiguous_needs_more_evidence\nComment count: 1\nLinked commit count: 5\nLinked CI commit count: 0\nLinked CI labels: {}\nChanged file count: 0\nLabels: {'human_feedback_general': 1}\nPolarities: {'neutral': 1}\nChanged file labels: {}\nExamples:\n[\n  {\n    \"id\": \"github-feedback-comment-421cc59fc9d96861\",\n    \"kind\": \"issue_body\",\n    \"label\": \"human_feedback_general\",\n    \"polarity\": \"neutral\",\n    \"url\": \"https://github.com/sploithunter/RBX-Template/issues/11\",\n    \"text\": \"GitHub feedback: human_feedback_general\\nPolarity: neutral\\nKind: issue_body\\nRepo: sploithunter/RBX-Template\\nAuthor: sploithunter (User)\\nURL: https://github.com/sploithunter/RBX-Template/issues/11\\nTitle: Feature: Show recent dealt output for PetPower S3\\nBody:\\n## Summary\\nAdd PetPower S3 \\\"display = dealt\\\" telemetry so pet cards, squad HUD, and enemy combat UI show the power that actually landed in recent mining/combat, not only configured or theoretical pet power.\\n\\n## Rationale\\n`docs/wiki/CURRENT_STATUS.md` lists PetPower S3 (`display=dealt`) as an active Pet Realm follow-up. The project already has the right substrate: PetPower separates mining and combat, the accuracy curve can reduce combat output, active-mining boosts alter node damage, enemies now expose combat state to the client, and the new left-side Enemy HUD mirrors the squad cards. Recent commits also tightened combat readability through enemy aggro ownership, indirect target highlighting, hit-react flinches, and Windfall/drop-rate clarity.\\n\\nThe remaining gap is that players can see pet power numbers and enemy health, but not whether a pet's displayed power is actually being converted into dealt damage under current conditio\"\n  }\n]\nChanged files:\n[]\nLinked chain ids:\n[\"evidence-chain-comment_to_commit-695d0192c4d40f9e\"]\nSource graph evidence:\nSource evidence repo graph summary\nRepo: sploithunter/RBX-Template\nGraph label: source_backed_multi_signal_graph\nNodes: 14\nEdges: 22\nNode types: {\"cooccurrence_profile\": 1, \"github_repo_summary\": 1, \"helicopter_repo_view\": 2, \"repo\": 1, \"source_artifact\": 8, \"source_bundle\": 1}\nEdge types: {\"artifact_needs_claim_verification\": 7, \"artifact_supports_verification\": 1, \"repo_has_cooccurrence_profile\": 1, \"repo_has_github_evidence_summary\": 1, \"repo_has_graphs_helicopter_view\": 2, \"repo_has_source_artifact\": 8, \"repo_has_source_bundle\": 1, \"source_bundle_uses_cooccurrence_profile\": 1}\nArtifact families\n[truncated by importer]", "source": "foundry_mined_dataset", "repo_url": "https://github.com/sploithunter/RBX-Template", "source_id": "comment-chain-pattern-assumption_checks-2a6bf96dc377532d", "synthetic": false, "gold_label": "", "graph_label": "source_backed_multi_signal_graph", "source_path": "/data/distillate/foundry_data/comment_chain_patterns/assumption_checks/shard-0.jsonl", "bundle_label": "", "priority_band": "", "priority_score": 0, "repo_full_name": "sploithunter/RBX-Template", "source_dataset": "comment_chain_patterns/assumption_checks", "training_usage": "weak_supervision"}}}, {"ruleId": "foundry_test_ci_gap", "level": "error", "message": {"text": "Foundry mined test ci gap after feedback: sploithunter/RBX-Template"}, "properties": {"repobilityId": 341063, "scanner": "foundry_dataset", "fingerprint": "d64cff1873138c62041bcc0b70af9b6fd463946b1c176e5ad7e16dfb5b13e666", "category": "testing", "severity": "high", "confidence": 0.78, "triageState": "open", "verdict": "confirmed", "isResolved": false, "reason": "Imported from mined Foundry/Fable5 evidence with real GitHub/source provenance. Review source_id before acting.", "evidence": {"meta": {"kind": "graph_query_record", "title": "Feedback exposes missing tests or CI", "intent": "Hard negatives for feedback/fix chains without adequate guardrails.", "labels": {"test_ci_gap": 1, "partial blueprint fit": 3, "verification_or_tests": 2, "issue_or_pull_request_thread": 1, "ambiguous_needs_more_evidence": 3, "blueprint_human_gap_alignment": 3, "comment_has_related_commit_context": 1, "thread_has_human_issue_and_fix_context": 2}, "source": "graph_query_export", "motif_id": "test_ci_gap_after_feedback", "outcomes": {"ambiguous_needs_more_evidence": 6}, "polarity": "bad", "query_id": "test_ci_gap_after_feedback", "severity": "high", "ci_labels": {}, "synthetic": false, "edge_count": 25, "edge_types": {"repo_has_thread": 1, "comment_has_chain": 1, "thread_has_comment": 1, "alignment_uses_comment": 3, "alignment_uses_finding": 3, "chain_has_link_quality": 6, "comment_aligns_finding": 3, "thread_has_fix_outcome": 1, "thread_has_issue_chain": 1, "thread_has_comment_chain": 1, "comment_chain_links_commit": 2, "issue_chain_has_fix_outcome": 1, "issue_chain_has_comment_chain": 1}, "node_count": 20, "node_types": {"repo": 1, "commit": 2, "thread": 1, "comment": 1, "alignment": 3, "fix_outcome": 1, "issue_chain": 1, "link_quality": 6, "comment_chain": 1, "blueprint_finding": 3}, "query_type": "motif_query", "thread_key": "sploithunter/RBX-Template#2", "issue_number": "2", "quality_tiers": {"assumption_check": 3, "weak_supervision": 3}, "repo_full_name": "sploithunter/RBX-Template", "training_usage": "hard_negative", "source_motif_id": "graph-pattern-motif-thread-92f65b6191dfe39a", "graph_gold_label": "weak_supervision_needs_review", "changed_file_labels": {}}, "text": "Graph query export: Feedback exposes missing tests or CI\nQuery id: test_ci_gap_after_feedback\nQuery type: motif_query\nIntent: Hard negatives for feedback/fix chains without adequate guardrails.\nMotif: test_ci_gap_after_feedback\nTraining usage: hard_negative\nGraph gold label: weak_supervision_needs_review\nRepo: sploithunter/RBX-Template\nThread: sploithunter/RBX-Template#2\nEvidence:\nGraph motif: Feedback or fix context exposes missing test/CI guardrails\nMotif id: test_ci_gap_after_feedback\nPolarity: bad\nTraining usage: hard_negative\nSeverity: high\nRepo: sploithunter/RBX-Template\nThread: sploithunter/RBX-Template#2\nGraph gold label: weak_supervision_needs_review\nThread graph evidence:\nGitHub issue/PR evidence subgraph\nThread: sploithunter/RBX-Template#2\nRepo: sploithunter/RBX-Template\nIssue/PR number: 2\nGraph consistency label: weak_supervision_needs_review\nNodes: 20\nEdges: 25\nNode types: {'link_quality': 6, 'alignment': 3, 'blueprint_finding': 3, 'commit': 2, 'thread': 1, 'repo': 1, 'comment': 1, 'comment_chain': 1, 'issue_chain': 1, 'fix_outcome': 1}\nEdge types: {'chain_has_link_quality': 6, 'alignment_uses_comment': 3, 'alignment_uses_finding': 3, 'comment_aligns_finding': 3, 'comment_chain_links_commit': 2, 'repo_has_thread': 1, 'thread_has_comment': 1, 'thread_has_comment_chain': 1, 'comment_has_chain': 1, 'thread_has_issue_chain': 1, 'issue_chain_has_comment_chain': 1, 'thread_has_fix_outcome': 1, 'issue_chain_has_fix_outcome': 1}\nLabels: {'ambiguous_needs_more_evidence': 3, 'blueprint_human_gap_alignment': 3, 'partial blueprint fit': 3, 'verification_or_tests': 2, 'thread_has_human_issue_and_fix_context': 2, 'issue_or_pull_request_thread': 1, 'test_ci_gap': 1, 'comment_has_related_commit_context': 1}\nOutcomes: {'ambiguous_needs_more_evidence': 6}\nQuality tiers: {'weak_supervision': 3, 'assumption_check': 3}\nCI labels: {}\nCurriculum targets:\n- Turn human feedback into regression tests and CI gates.\n- Penalize fixes that do not add or exercise verification for affected workflows.\nAssumption checks:\n- Did the fix add tests for the exact complaint?\n- Does CI run those tests, or is verification only implied?", "source": "foundry_mined_dataset", "repo_url": "https://github.com/sploithunter/RBX-Template", "source_id": "graph-query-motif_query-77ccbcfd0ff3047b", "synthetic": false, "gold_label": "", "graph_label": "", "source_path": "/data/distillate/foundry_data/graph_queries/test_ci_gap_after_feedback/shard-0.jsonl", "bundle_label": "", "priority_band": "", "priority_score": 0, "repo_full_name": "sploithunter/RBX-Template", "source_dataset": "graph_queries/test_ci_gap_after_feedback", "training_usage": "hard_negative"}}}, {"ruleId": "foundry_auth_guardrail_gap", "level": "error", "message": {"text": "Foundry mined security auth guardrail gaps: sploithunter/RBX-Template"}, "properties": {"repobilityId": 334956, "scanner": "foundry_dataset", "fingerprint": "4410f6c64a4538c3bcfcd3a9f84d9ca23c57b24e12df9cf30e38bc906f7caf3d", "category": "auth", "severity": "critical", "confidence": 0.78, "triageState": "open", "verdict": "needs_review", "isResolved": false, "reason": "Imported from mined Foundry/Fable5 evidence with real GitHub/source provenance. Review source_id before acting.", "evidence": {"meta": {"kind": "graph_query_record", "title": "Security/auth changes without enough guardrails", "intent": "Assumption-check security/auth examples requiring stronger tests or CI.", "labels": {"bug_fix": 4, "security_auth_secret": 1, "claimed_resolved_unverified": 3, "issue_or_pull_request_thread": 1, "human_reported_issue_then_fix_attempt": 1, "thread_has_human_issue_and_fix_context": 2}, "source": "graph_query_export", "motif_id": "security_auth_without_guardrails", "outcomes": {"claimed_resolved_unverified": 6}, "polarity": "bad", "query_id": "security_auth_guardrail_gaps", "severity": "critical", "ci_labels": {}, "synthetic": false, "edge_count": 15, "edge_types": {"repo_has_thread": 1, "comment_has_chain": 1, "thread_has_comment": 1, "chain_has_link_quality": 3, "thread_has_fix_outcome": 1, "thread_has_issue_chain": 1, "thread_has_comment_chain": 1, "comment_chain_links_commit": 4, "issue_chain_has_fix_outcome": 1, "issue_chain_has_comment_chain": 1}, "node_count": 13, "node_types": {"repo": 1, "commit": 4, "thread": 1, "comment": 1, "fix_outcome": 1, "issue_chain": 1, "link_quality": 3, "comment_chain": 1}, "query_type": "motif_query", "thread_key": "sploithunter/RBX-Template#9", "issue_number": "9", "quality_tiers": {"weak_supervision": 3}, "repo_full_name": "sploithunter/RBX-Template", "training_usage": "assumption_check", "source_motif_id": "graph-pattern-motif-thread-642a34ec968ba50e", "graph_gold_label": "weak_supervision_needs_review", "changed_file_labels": {}}, "text": "Graph query export: Security/auth changes without enough guardrails\nQuery id: security_auth_guardrail_gaps\nQuery type: motif_query\nIntent: Assumption-check security/auth examples requiring stronger tests or CI.\nMotif: security_auth_without_guardrails\nTraining usage: assumption_check\nGraph gold label: weak_supervision_needs_review\nRepo: sploithunter/RBX-Template\nThread: sploithunter/RBX-Template#9\nEvidence:\nGraph motif: Security/auth change without enough guardrails\nMotif id: security_auth_without_guardrails\nPolarity: bad\nTraining usage: assumption_check\nSeverity: critical\nRepo: sploithunter/RBX-Template\nThread: sploithunter/RBX-Template#9\nGraph gold label: weak_supervision_needs_review\nThread graph evidence:\nGitHub issue/PR evidence subgraph\nThread: sploithunter/RBX-Template#9\nRepo: sploithunter/RBX-Template\nIssue/PR number: 9\nGraph consistency label: weak_supervision_needs_review\nNodes: 13\nEdges: 15\nNode types: {'commit': 4, 'link_quality': 3, 'thread': 1, 'repo': 1, 'comment': 1, 'comment_chain': 1, 'issue_chain': 1, 'fix_outcome': 1}\nEdge types: {'comment_chain_links_commit': 4, 'chain_has_link_quality': 3, 'repo_has_thread': 1, 'thread_has_comment': 1, 'thread_has_comment_chain': 1, 'comment_has_chain': 1, 'thread_has_issue_chain': 1, 'issue_chain_has_comment_chain': 1, 'thread_has_fix_outcome': 1, 'issue_chain_has_fix_outcome': 1}\nLabels: {'bug_fix': 4, 'claimed_resolved_unverified': 3, 'thread_has_human_issue_and_fix_context': 2, 'issue_or_pull_request_thread': 1, 'security_auth_secret': 1, 'human_reported_issue_then_fix_attempt': 1}\nOutcomes: {'claimed_resolved_unverified': 6}\nQuality tiers: {'weak_supervision': 3}\nCI labels: {}\nCurriculum targets:\n- Train auth boundary repair with tests, permission matrices, and secret-handling checks.\n- Keep risky auth changes separate from ordinary bug-fix examples.\nAssumption checks:\n- Are auth/permission paths covered by tests?\n- Are secrets, CORS, or access rules verified rather than summarized?", "source": "foundry_mined_dataset", "repo_url": "https://github.com/sploithunter/RBX-Template", "source_id": "graph-query-motif_query-b76498946278de7b", "synthetic": false, "gold_label": "", "graph_label": "", "source_path": "/data/distillate/foundry_data/graph_queries/security_auth_guardrail_gaps/shard-0.jsonl", "bundle_label": "", "priority_band": "", "priority_score": 0, "repo_full_name": "sploithunter/RBX-Template", "source_dataset": "graph_queries/security_auth_guardrail_gaps", "training_usage": "assumption_check"}}}, {"ruleId": "foundry_auth_guardrail_gap", "level": "error", "message": {"text": "Foundry mined security auth guardrail gaps: sploithunter/RBX-Template"}, "properties": {"repobilityId": 334955, "scanner": "foundry_dataset", "fingerprint": "7d9f5b2f61b99f01a3230cdd2567a305cb038e6fda97b8c8174a7d0330bca677", "category": "auth", "severity": "critical", "confidence": 0.78, "triageState": "open", "verdict": "needs_review", "isResolved": false, "reason": "Imported from mined Foundry/Fable5 evidence with real GitHub/source provenance. Review source_id before acting.", "evidence": {"meta": {"kind": "graph_query_record", "title": "Security/auth changes without enough guardrails", "intent": "Assumption-check security/auth examples requiring stronger tests or CI.", "labels": {"bug_fix": 2, "dependency_or_build": 1, "security_or_secrets": 2, "security_auth_secret": 1, "claimed_resolved_unverified": 3, "issue_or_pull_request_thread": 1, "human_reported_issue_then_fix_attempt": 1, "thread_has_human_issue_and_fix_context": 2}, "source": "graph_query_export", "motif_id": "security_auth_without_guardrails", "outcomes": {"claimed_resolved_unverified": 6}, "polarity": "bad", "query_id": "security_auth_guardrail_gaps", "severity": "critical", "ci_labels": {}, "synthetic": false, "edge_count": 16, "edge_types": {"repo_has_thread": 1, "comment_has_chain": 1, "thread_has_comment": 1, "chain_has_link_quality": 3, "thread_has_fix_outcome": 1, "thread_has_issue_chain": 1, "thread_has_comment_chain": 1, "comment_chain_links_commit": 5, "issue_chain_has_fix_outcome": 1, "issue_chain_has_comment_chain": 1}, "node_count": 14, "node_types": {"repo": 1, "commit": 5, "thread": 1, "comment": 1, "fix_outcome": 1, "issue_chain": 1, "link_quality": 3, "comment_chain": 1}, "query_type": "motif_query", "thread_key": "sploithunter/RBX-Template#7", "issue_number": "7", "quality_tiers": {"high_confidence": 3}, "repo_full_name": "sploithunter/RBX-Template", "training_usage": "assumption_check", "source_motif_id": "graph-pattern-motif-thread-9f309712db19d047", "graph_gold_label": "supported_by_high_confidence_link", "changed_file_labels": {}}, "text": "Graph query export: Security/auth changes without enough guardrails\nQuery id: security_auth_guardrail_gaps\nQuery type: motif_query\nIntent: Assumption-check security/auth examples requiring stronger tests or CI.\nMotif: security_auth_without_guardrails\nTraining usage: assumption_check\nGraph gold label: supported_by_high_confidence_link\nRepo: sploithunter/RBX-Template\nThread: sploithunter/RBX-Template#7\nEvidence:\nGraph motif: Security/auth change without enough guardrails\nMotif id: security_auth_without_guardrails\nPolarity: bad\nTraining usage: assumption_check\nSeverity: critical\nRepo: sploithunter/RBX-Template\nThread: sploithunter/RBX-Template#7\nGraph gold label: supported_by_high_confidence_link\nThread graph evidence:\nGitHub issue/PR evidence subgraph\nThread: sploithunter/RBX-Template#7\nRepo: sploithunter/RBX-Template\nIssue/PR number: 7\nGraph consistency label: supported_by_high_confidence_link\nNodes: 14\nEdges: 16\nNode types: {'commit': 5, 'link_quality': 3, 'thread': 1, 'repo': 1, 'comment': 1, 'comment_chain': 1, 'issue_chain': 1, 'fix_outcome': 1}\nEdge types: {'comment_chain_links_commit': 5, 'chain_has_link_quality': 3, 'repo_has_thread': 1, 'thread_has_comment': 1, 'thread_has_comment_chain': 1, 'comment_has_chain': 1, 'thread_has_issue_chain': 1, 'issue_chain_has_comment_chain': 1, 'thread_has_fix_outcome': 1, 'issue_chain_has_fix_outcome': 1}\nLabels: {'claimed_resolved_unverified': 3, 'security_or_secrets': 2, 'bug_fix': 2, 'thread_has_human_issue_and_fix_context': 2, 'issue_or_pull_request_thread': 1, 'security_auth_secret': 1, 'human_reported_issue_then_fix_attempt': 1, 'dependency_or_build': 1}\nOutcomes: {'claimed_resolved_unverified': 6}\nQuality tiers: {'high_confidence': 3}\nCI labels: {}\nCurriculum targets:\n- Train auth boundary repair with tests, permission matrices, and secret-handling checks.\n- Keep risky auth changes separate from ordinary bug-fix examples.\nAssumption checks:\n- Are auth/permission paths covered by tests?\n- Are secrets, CORS, or access rules verified rather than summarized?", "source": "foundry_mined_dataset", "repo_url": "https://github.com/sploithunter/RBX-Template", "source_id": "graph-query-motif_query-717cf8dc037c9f68", "synthetic": false, "gold_label": "", "graph_label": "", "source_path": "/data/distillate/foundry_data/graph_queries/security_auth_guardrail_gaps/shard-0.jsonl", "bundle_label": "", "priority_band": "", "priority_score": 0, "repo_full_name": "sploithunter/RBX-Template", "source_dataset": "graph_queries/security_auth_guardrail_gaps", "training_usage": "assumption_check"}}}, {"ruleId": "foundry_auth_guardrail_gap", "level": "error", "message": {"text": "Foundry mined security auth guardrail gaps: sploithunter/RBX-Template"}, "properties": {"repobilityId": 334954, "scanner": "foundry_dataset", "fingerprint": "dea27e9b94004002cd0a095e553b544a23b69bc2e90fb7c11b2d39fdb05a31d7", "category": "auth", "severity": "critical", "confidence": 0.78, "triageState": "open", "verdict": "needs_review", "isResolved": false, "reason": "Imported from mined Foundry/Fable5 evidence with real GitHub/source provenance. Review source_id before acting.", "evidence": {"meta": {"kind": "graph_query_record", "title": "Security/auth changes without enough guardrails", "intent": "Assumption-check security/auth examples requiring stronger tests or CI.", "labels": {"bug_fix": 4, "security_auth_secret": 1, "claimed_resolved_unverified": 3, "issue_or_pull_request_thread": 1, "human_reported_issue_then_fix_attempt": 1, "thread_has_human_issue_and_fix_context": 2}, "source": "graph_query_export", "motif_id": "security_auth_without_guardrails", "outcomes": {"claimed_resolved_unverified": 6}, "polarity": "bad", "query_id": "security_auth_guardrail_gaps", "severity": "critical", "ci_labels": {}, "synthetic": false, "edge_count": 15, "edge_types": {"repo_has_thread": 1, "comment_has_chain": 1, "thread_has_comment": 1, "chain_has_link_quality": 3, "thread_has_fix_outcome": 1, "thread_has_issue_chain": 1, "thread_has_comment_chain": 1, "comment_chain_links_commit": 4, "issue_chain_has_fix_outcome": 1, "issue_chain_has_comment_chain": 1}, "node_count": 13, "node_types": {"repo": 1, "commit": 4, "thread": 1, "comment": 1, "fix_outcome": 1, "issue_chain": 1, "link_quality": 3, "comment_chain": 1}, "query_type": "motif_query", "thread_key": "sploithunter/RBX-Template#14", "issue_number": "14", "quality_tiers": {"weak_supervision": 3}, "repo_full_name": "sploithunter/RBX-Template", "training_usage": "assumption_check", "source_motif_id": "graph-pattern-motif-thread-484c3ced17a18781", "graph_gold_label": "weak_supervision_needs_review", "changed_file_labels": {}}, "text": "Graph query export: Security/auth changes without enough guardrails\nQuery id: security_auth_guardrail_gaps\nQuery type: motif_query\nIntent: Assumption-check security/auth examples requiring stronger tests or CI.\nMotif: security_auth_without_guardrails\nTraining usage: assumption_check\nGraph gold label: weak_supervision_needs_review\nRepo: sploithunter/RBX-Template\nThread: sploithunter/RBX-Template#14\nEvidence:\nGraph motif: Security/auth change without enough guardrails\nMotif id: security_auth_without_guardrails\nPolarity: bad\nTraining usage: assumption_check\nSeverity: critical\nRepo: sploithunter/RBX-Template\nThread: sploithunter/RBX-Template#14\nGraph gold label: weak_supervision_needs_review\nThread graph evidence:\nGitHub issue/PR evidence subgraph\nThread: sploithunter/RBX-Template#14\nRepo: sploithunter/RBX-Template\nIssue/PR number: 14\nGraph consistency label: weak_supervision_needs_review\nNodes: 13\nEdges: 15\nNode types: {'commit': 4, 'link_quality': 3, 'thread': 1, 'repo': 1, 'comment': 1, 'comment_chain': 1, 'issue_chain': 1, 'fix_outcome': 1}\nEdge types: {'comment_chain_links_commit': 4, 'chain_has_link_quality': 3, 'repo_has_thread': 1, 'thread_has_comment': 1, 'thread_has_comment_chain': 1, 'comment_has_chain': 1, 'thread_has_issue_chain': 1, 'issue_chain_has_comment_chain': 1, 'thread_has_fix_outcome': 1, 'issue_chain_has_fix_outcome': 1}\nLabels: {'bug_fix': 4, 'claimed_resolved_unverified': 3, 'thread_has_human_issue_and_fix_context': 2, 'issue_or_pull_request_thread': 1, 'security_auth_secret': 1, 'human_reported_issue_then_fix_attempt': 1}\nOutcomes: {'claimed_resolved_unverified': 6}\nQuality tiers: {'weak_supervision': 3}\nCI labels: {}\nCurriculum targets:\n- Train auth boundary repair with tests, permission matrices, and secret-handling checks.\n- Keep risky auth changes separate from ordinary bug-fix examples.\nAssumption checks:\n- Are auth/permission paths covered by tests?\n- Are secrets, CORS, or access rules verified rather than summarized?", "source": "foundry_mined_dataset", "repo_url": "https://github.com/sploithunter/RBX-Template", "source_id": "graph-query-motif_query-e5c2450fb31c1bd1", "synthetic": false, "gold_label": "", "graph_label": "", "source_path": "/data/distillate/foundry_data/graph_queries/security_auth_guardrail_gaps/shard-0.jsonl", "bundle_label": "", "priority_band": "", "priority_score": 0, "repo_full_name": "sploithunter/RBX-Template", "source_dataset": "graph_queries/security_auth_guardrail_gaps", "training_usage": "assumption_check"}}}, {"ruleId": "foundry_auth_guardrail_gap", "level": "error", "message": {"text": "Foundry mined security auth guardrail gaps: sploithunter/RBX-Template"}, "properties": {"repobilityId": 334953, "scanner": "foundry_dataset", "fingerprint": "de7c8b43734340bf54e601b320e8029048e25bacf608bbb090bfbc32725af574", "category": "auth", "severity": "critical", "confidence": 0.78, "triageState": "open", "verdict": "needs_review", "isResolved": false, "reason": "Imported from mined Foundry/Fable5 evidence with real GitHub/source provenance. Review source_id before acting.", "evidence": {"meta": {"kind": "graph_query_record", "title": "Security/auth changes without enough guardrails", "intent": "Assumption-check security/auth examples requiring stronger tests or CI.", "labels": {"bug_fix": 2, "dependency_or_build": 1, "security_or_secrets": 2, "security_auth_secret": 1, "claimed_resolved_unverified": 3, "issue_or_pull_request_thread": 1, "human_reported_issue_then_fix_attempt": 1, "thread_has_human_issue_and_fix_context": 2}, "source": "graph_query_export", "motif_id": "security_auth_without_guardrails", "outcomes": {"claimed_resolved_unverified": 6}, "polarity": "bad", "query_id": "security_auth_guardrail_gaps", "severity": "critical", "ci_labels": {}, "synthetic": false, "edge_count": 16, "edge_types": {"repo_has_thread": 1, "comment_has_chain": 1, "thread_has_comment": 1, "chain_has_link_quality": 3, "thread_has_fix_outcome": 1, "thread_has_issue_chain": 1, "thread_has_comment_chain": 1, "comment_chain_links_commit": 5, "issue_chain_has_fix_outcome": 1, "issue_chain_has_comment_chain": 1}, "node_count": 14, "node_types": {"repo": 1, "commit": 5, "thread": 1, "comment": 1, "fix_outcome": 1, "issue_chain": 1, "link_quality": 3, "comment_chain": 1}, "query_type": "motif_query", "thread_key": "sploithunter/RBX-Template#13", "issue_number": "13", "quality_tiers": {"weak_supervision": 3}, "repo_full_name": "sploithunter/RBX-Template", "training_usage": "assumption_check", "source_motif_id": "graph-pattern-motif-thread-da441676404c0a2f", "graph_gold_label": "weak_supervision_needs_review", "changed_file_labels": {}}, "text": "Graph query export: Security/auth changes without enough guardrails\nQuery id: security_auth_guardrail_gaps\nQuery type: motif_query\nIntent: Assumption-check security/auth examples requiring stronger tests or CI.\nMotif: security_auth_without_guardrails\nTraining usage: assumption_check\nGraph gold label: weak_supervision_needs_review\nRepo: sploithunter/RBX-Template\nThread: sploithunter/RBX-Template#13\nEvidence:\nGraph motif: Security/auth change without enough guardrails\nMotif id: security_auth_without_guardrails\nPolarity: bad\nTraining usage: assumption_check\nSeverity: critical\nRepo: sploithunter/RBX-Template\nThread: sploithunter/RBX-Template#13\nGraph gold label: weak_supervision_needs_review\nThread graph evidence:\nGitHub issue/PR evidence subgraph\nThread: sploithunter/RBX-Template#13\nRepo: sploithunter/RBX-Template\nIssue/PR number: 13\nGraph consistency label: weak_supervision_needs_review\nNodes: 14\nEdges: 16\nNode types: {'commit': 5, 'link_quality': 3, 'thread': 1, 'repo': 1, 'comment': 1, 'comment_chain': 1, 'issue_chain': 1, 'fix_outcome': 1}\nEdge types: {'comment_chain_links_commit': 5, 'chain_has_link_quality': 3, 'repo_has_thread': 1, 'thread_has_comment': 1, 'thread_has_comment_chain': 1, 'comment_has_chain': 1, 'thread_has_issue_chain': 1, 'issue_chain_has_comment_chain': 1, 'thread_has_fix_outcome': 1, 'issue_chain_has_fix_outcome': 1}\nLabels: {'claimed_resolved_unverified': 3, 'security_or_secrets': 2, 'bug_fix': 2, 'thread_has_human_issue_and_fix_context': 2, 'issue_or_pull_request_thread': 1, 'security_auth_secret': 1, 'human_reported_issue_then_fix_attempt': 1, 'dependency_or_build': 1}\nOutcomes: {'claimed_resolved_unverified': 6}\nQuality tiers: {'weak_supervision': 3}\nCI labels: {}\nCurriculum targets:\n- Train auth boundary repair with tests, permission matrices, and secret-handling checks.\n- Keep risky auth changes separate from ordinary bug-fix examples.\nAssumption checks:\n- Are auth/permission paths covered by tests?\n- Are secrets, CORS, or access rules verified rather than summarized?", "source": "foundry_mined_dataset", "repo_url": "https://github.com/sploithunter/RBX-Template", "source_id": "graph-query-motif_query-0cf84c1122cacc15", "synthetic": false, "gold_label": "", "graph_label": "", "source_path": "/data/distillate/foundry_data/graph_queries/security_auth_guardrail_gaps/shard-0.jsonl", "bundle_label": "", "priority_band": "", "priority_score": 0, "repo_full_name": "sploithunter/RBX-Template", "source_dataset": "graph_queries/security_auth_guardrail_gaps", "training_usage": "assumption_check"}}}, {"ruleId": "foundry_auth_guardrail_gap", "level": "error", "message": {"text": "Foundry mined security auth guardrail gaps: sploithunter/RBX-Template"}, "properties": {"repobilityId": 334952, "scanner": "foundry_dataset", "fingerprint": "f4c66cc9e58a2ce6154faf3398628f7e6724a94a4866b1341110dbd5a49f77c9", "category": "auth", "severity": "critical", "confidence": 0.78, "triageState": "open", "verdict": "needs_review", "isResolved": false, "reason": "Imported from mined Foundry/Fable5 evidence with real GitHub/source provenance. Review source_id before acting.", "evidence": {"meta": {"kind": "graph_query_record", "title": "Security/auth changes without enough guardrails", "intent": "Assumption-check security/auth examples requiring stronger tests or CI.", "labels": {"bug_fix": 4, "dependency_or_build": 1, "security_auth_secret": 1, "claimed_resolved_unverified": 3, "issue_or_pull_request_thread": 1, "human_reported_issue_then_fix_attempt": 1, "thread_has_human_issue_and_fix_context": 2}, "source": "graph_query_export", "motif_id": "security_auth_without_guardrails", "outcomes": {"claimed_resolved_unverified": 6}, "polarity": "bad", "query_id": "security_auth_guardrail_gaps", "severity": "critical", "ci_labels": {}, "synthetic": false, "edge_count": 16, "edge_types": {"repo_has_thread": 1, "comment_has_chain": 1, "thread_has_comment": 1, "chain_has_link_quality": 3, "thread_has_fix_outcome": 1, "thread_has_issue_chain": 1, "thread_has_comment_chain": 1, "comment_chain_links_commit": 5, "issue_chain_has_fix_outcome": 1, "issue_chain_has_comment_chain": 1}, "node_count": 14, "node_types": {"repo": 1, "commit": 5, "thread": 1, "comment": 1, "fix_outcome": 1, "issue_chain": 1, "link_quality": 3, "comment_chain": 1}, "query_type": "motif_query", "thread_key": "sploithunter/RBX-Template#12", "issue_number": "12", "quality_tiers": {"weak_supervision": 3}, "repo_full_name": "sploithunter/RBX-Template", "training_usage": "assumption_check", "source_motif_id": "graph-pattern-motif-thread-63341fb66fcd0607", "graph_gold_label": "weak_supervision_needs_review", "changed_file_labels": {}}, "text": "Graph query export: Security/auth changes without enough guardrails\nQuery id: security_auth_guardrail_gaps\nQuery type: motif_query\nIntent: Assumption-check security/auth examples requiring stronger tests or CI.\nMotif: security_auth_without_guardrails\nTraining usage: assumption_check\nGraph gold label: weak_supervision_needs_review\nRepo: sploithunter/RBX-Template\nThread: sploithunter/RBX-Template#12\nEvidence:\nGraph motif: Security/auth change without enough guardrails\nMotif id: security_auth_without_guardrails\nPolarity: bad\nTraining usage: assumption_check\nSeverity: critical\nRepo: sploithunter/RBX-Template\nThread: sploithunter/RBX-Template#12\nGraph gold label: weak_supervision_needs_review\nThread graph evidence:\nGitHub issue/PR evidence subgraph\nThread: sploithunter/RBX-Template#12\nRepo: sploithunter/RBX-Template\nIssue/PR number: 12\nGraph consistency label: weak_supervision_needs_review\nNodes: 14\nEdges: 16\nNode types: {'commit': 5, 'link_quality': 3, 'thread': 1, 'repo': 1, 'comment': 1, 'comment_chain': 1, 'issue_chain': 1, 'fix_outcome': 1}\nEdge types: {'comment_chain_links_commit': 5, 'chain_has_link_quality': 3, 'repo_has_thread': 1, 'thread_has_comment': 1, 'thread_has_comment_chain': 1, 'comment_has_chain': 1, 'thread_has_issue_chain': 1, 'issue_chain_has_comment_chain': 1, 'thread_has_fix_outcome': 1, 'issue_chain_has_fix_outcome': 1}\nLabels: {'bug_fix': 4, 'claimed_resolved_unverified': 3, 'thread_has_human_issue_and_fix_context': 2, 'issue_or_pull_request_thread': 1, 'security_auth_secret': 1, 'human_reported_issue_then_fix_attempt': 1, 'dependency_or_build': 1}\nOutcomes: {'claimed_resolved_unverified': 6}\nQuality tiers: {'weak_supervision': 3}\nCI labels: {}\nCurriculum targets:\n- Train auth boundary repair with tests, permission matrices, and secret-handling checks.\n- Keep risky auth changes separate from ordinary bug-fix examples.\nAssumption checks:\n- Are auth/permission paths covered by tests?\n- Are secrets, CORS, or access rules verified rather than summarized?", "source": "foundry_mined_dataset", "repo_url": "https://github.com/sploithunter/RBX-Template", "source_id": "graph-query-motif_query-7cc66782ac953095", "synthetic": false, "gold_label": "", "graph_label": "", "source_path": "/data/distillate/foundry_data/graph_queries/security_auth_guardrail_gaps/shard-0.jsonl", "bundle_label": "", "priority_band": "", "priority_score": 0, "repo_full_name": "sploithunter/RBX-Template", "source_dataset": "graph_queries/security_auth_guardrail_gaps", "training_usage": "assumption_check"}}}, {"ruleId": "foundry_auth_guardrail_gap", "level": "error", "message": {"text": "Foundry mined security auth guardrail gaps: sploithunter/RBX-Template"}, "properties": {"repobilityId": 334951, "scanner": "foundry_dataset", "fingerprint": "23e58d59bc707ad15693d85b77a550a6055603e9810ccdfc1dd7828d8b69d410", "category": "auth", "severity": "critical", "confidence": 0.78, "triageState": "open", "verdict": "needs_review", "isResolved": false, "reason": "Imported from mined Foundry/Fable5 evidence with real GitHub/source provenance. Review source_id before acting.", "evidence": {"meta": {"kind": "graph_query_record", "title": "Security/auth changes without enough guardrails", "intent": "Assumption-check security/auth examples requiring stronger tests or CI.", "labels": {"bug_fix": 2, "dependency_or_build": 1, "security_or_secrets": 1, "security_auth_secret": 1, "verification_or_tests": 1, "issue_or_pull_request_thread": 1, "thread_has_human_issue_and_fix_context": 2, "claimed_resolved_with_verification_signal": 3, "human_reported_issue_then_verified_fix_attempt": 1}, "source": "graph_query_export", "motif_id": "security_auth_without_guardrails", "outcomes": {"claimed_resolved_with_verification_signal": 6}, "polarity": "bad", "query_id": "security_auth_guardrail_gaps", "severity": "critical", "ci_labels": {}, "synthetic": false, "edge_count": 16, "edge_types": {"repo_has_thread": 1, "comment_has_chain": 1, "thread_has_comment": 1, "chain_has_link_quality": 3, "thread_has_fix_outcome": 1, "thread_has_issue_chain": 1, "thread_has_comment_chain": 1, "comment_chain_links_commit": 5, "issue_chain_has_fix_outcome": 1, "issue_chain_has_comment_chain": 1}, "node_count": 14, "node_types": {"repo": 1, "commit": 5, "thread": 1, "comment": 1, "fix_outcome": 1, "issue_chain": 1, "link_quality": 3, "comment_chain": 1}, "query_type": "motif_query", "thread_key": "sploithunter/RBX-Template#1", "issue_number": "1", "quality_tiers": {"weak_supervision": 3}, "repo_full_name": "sploithunter/RBX-Template", "training_usage": "assumption_check", "source_motif_id": "graph-pattern-motif-thread-b60c65c17dcc3507", "graph_gold_label": "supported_by_verification_signal", "changed_file_labels": {}}, "text": "Graph query export: Security/auth changes without enough guardrails\nQuery id: security_auth_guardrail_gaps\nQuery type: motif_query\nIntent: Assumption-check security/auth examples requiring stronger tests or CI.\nMotif: security_auth_without_guardrails\nTraining usage: assumption_check\nGraph gold label: supported_by_verification_signal\nRepo: sploithunter/RBX-Template\nThread: sploithunter/RBX-Template#1\nEvidence:\nGraph motif: Security/auth change without enough guardrails\nMotif id: security_auth_without_guardrails\nPolarity: bad\nTraining usage: assumption_check\nSeverity: critical\nRepo: sploithunter/RBX-Template\nThread: sploithunter/RBX-Template#1\nGraph gold label: supported_by_verification_signal\nThread graph evidence:\nGitHub issue/PR evidence subgraph\nThread: sploithunter/RBX-Template#1\nRepo: sploithunter/RBX-Template\nIssue/PR number: 1\nGraph consistency label: supported_by_verification_signal\nNodes: 14\nEdges: 16\nNode types: {'commit': 5, 'link_quality': 3, 'thread': 1, 'repo': 1, 'comment': 1, 'comment_chain': 1, 'issue_chain': 1, 'fix_outcome': 1}\nEdge types: {'comment_chain_links_commit': 5, 'chain_has_link_quality': 3, 'repo_has_thread': 1, 'thread_has_comment': 1, 'thread_has_comment_chain': 1, 'comment_has_chain': 1, 'thread_has_issue_chain': 1, 'issue_chain_has_comment_chain': 1, 'thread_has_fix_outcome': 1, 'issue_chain_has_fix_outcome': 1}\nLabels: {'claimed_resolved_with_verification_signal': 3, 'bug_fix': 2, 'thread_has_human_issue_and_fix_context': 2, 'issue_or_pull_request_thread': 1, 'security_auth_secret': 1, 'human_reported_issue_then_verified_fix_attempt': 1, 'verification_or_tests': 1, 'security_or_secrets': 1, 'dependency_or_build': 1}\nOutcomes: {'claimed_resolved_with_verification_signal': 6}\nQuality tiers: {'weak_supervision': 3}\nCI labels: {}\nCurriculum targets:\n- Train auth boundary repair with tests, permission matrices, and secret-handling checks.\n- Keep risky auth changes separate from ordinary bug-fix examples.\nAssumption checks:\n- Are auth/permission paths covered by tests?\n- Are secrets, CORS, or access rules verified rather than summarized?", "source": "foundry_mined_dataset", "repo_url": "https://github.com/sploithunter/RBX-Template", "source_id": "graph-query-motif_query-b16c2d147d4c90bf", "synthetic": false, "gold_label": "", "graph_label": "", "source_path": "/data/distillate/foundry_data/graph_queries/security_auth_guardrail_gaps/shard-0.jsonl", "bundle_label": "", "priority_band": "", "priority_score": 0, "repo_full_name": "sploithunter/RBX-Template", "source_dataset": "graph_queries/security_auth_guardrail_gaps", "training_usage": "assumption_check"}}}, {"ruleId": "scanner-506be2b95088f5d3", "level": "none", "message": {"text": "git log failed \u2014 history analysis incomplete"}, "properties": {"repobilityId": "b424308a11bb9b22", "scanner": "scanner-primary", "fingerprint": "506be2b95088f5d3", "layer": "quality", "severity": "info", "confidence": 1.0, "tags": ["git", "tooling"]}}, {"ruleId": "scanner-9710c8d059e53154", "level": "none", "message": {"text": "No frontend routes/components detected"}, "properties": {"repobilityId": "44ca61485762e494", "scanner": "scanner-primary", "fingerprint": "9710c8d059e53154", "layer": "frontend", "severity": "info", "confidence": 1.0, "tags": ["coverage"]}}, {"ruleId": "scanner-6372cebde0220094", "level": "warning", "message": {"text": "No auth library detected"}, "properties": {"repobilityId": "a5b6035a5bbf8054", "scanner": "scanner-primary", "fingerprint": "6372cebde0220094", "layer": "security", "severity": "medium", "confidence": 1.0, "tags": ["coverage", "auth"]}}, {"ruleId": "scanner-4601e3ad3bb28677", "level": "warning", "message": {"text": "No CI/CD pipelines detected"}, "properties": {"repobilityId": "c3ee439bce2bc51e", "scanner": "scanner-primary", "fingerprint": "4601e3ad3bb28677", "layer": "cicd", "severity": "medium", "confidence": 1.0, "tags": ["coverage"]}}, {"ruleId": "scanner-cc55229a7a3c078d", "level": "warning", "message": {"text": "Agent authority lacks a verifier contract: .mcp.json"}, "properties": {"repobilityId": "51942fb3d5b8b5b4", "scanner": "scanner-primary", "fingerprint": "cc55229a7a3c078d", "layer": "quality", "severity": "medium", "confidence": 1.0, "tags": ["agent-instructions", "verification", "mcp_config"]}, "locations": [{"physicalLocation": {"artifactLocation": {"uri": ".mcp.json"}, "region": {"startLine": 1}}}]}]}]}