Public scan — anyone with this URL can view this analysis. Sign up to track your own repos privately, run scheduled re-scans, and get AI fix prompts via your dashboard.
Sign up free Scan another repo

uknow-web/export-doc-manager

https://github.com/uknow-web/export-doc-manager · scanned 2026-06-16 00:45 UTC (2 months, 1 week ago)

41 raw signals (0 security + 41 graph)

File as issue Image
UNIFIED Repobility · multi-layer engine · AI coders

Complete repo analysis

Last scanned 2 months, 1 week ago · v1 · 41 actionable findings from 1 signal source. Security checks, system graph analysis, and verified AI-agent feedback are merged into one review queue.

JSON
Combined
77.4
/100
Security checks
77
0 findings
System graph
77
66.7% cov · 41 findings
Critical
0
click to filter
Agents
10
0 votes
Crowd
0
reported
Severity distribution — click a segment to filter
Active filters: excluding tests × Reset all
Severity: Critical 0 High 0 Medium 15 Low 7 9-Layer: Software Security Quality Integrity Frontend Hardware Data Network Cicd Source: Security checks 0 System graph 41 Crowd 0 Layer: Frontend 1 Security 9 Cicd 1 Quality 30
Corpus Intelligence Cross-corpus context (cohort percentile, top patterns, fix plan) is shown only on repositories you own. Sign up and connect your repo to view it.
Scan summary Repository scanned at 77.4/100 with 66.7% coverage. It contains 534 nodes across 0 cross-layer flows, written primarily in mixed languages. Engine surfaced 41 findings — concentrated in quality (30), security (9), frontend (1). Risk profile is low: 0 critical, 0 high, 15 medium. Recommended next step: open the quality layer findings first — that's where the highest-impact wins live.

Showing 22 of 41 actionable findings. Click TP / FP to vote on a finding's accuracy — votes adjust the confidence weighting and improve detection across the platform.

medium System graph quality Integrity conf 1.00 `fetch()` without try/.catch or AbortSignal — api/proxy/ai.js:88
Bare `fetch(...)` will throw an unhandled rejection on network failure. Wrap in try/catch, attach a `.catch(...)`, or pass an AbortSignal with a timeout.
runtime safetyRobustness
medium System graph quality Integrity conf 1.00 `fetch()` without try/.catch or AbortSignal — api/proxy/mail.js:60
Bare `fetch(...)` will throw an unhandled rejection on network failure. Wrap in try/catch, attach a `.catch(...)`, or pass an AbortSignal with a timeout.
runtime safetyRobustness
medium System graph quality Integrity conf 1.00 `fetch()` without try/.catch or AbortSignal — js/app.js:867
Bare `fetch(...)` will throw an unhandled rejection on network failure. Wrap in try/catch, attach a `.catch(...)`, or pass an AbortSignal with a timeout.
runtime safetyRobustness
medium System graph quality Production readiness conf 1.00 Composite production-readiness gap
Multiple low-cost hardening controls are missing together: license, ci, tests. Opus verification showed these co-occurring gaps are a better readiness signal than reading each flag in isolation.
Repo hardeningGenerated repo pattern
medium System graph quality Placeholder conf 1.00 Critical user flow still appears backed by mock or placeholder data
A payment/auth/admin/order/billing-style flow contains mock, fake, TODO, dummy, or placeholder markers in runtime source. In the Fable corpus this is a high-leverage completeness smell: the app can look finished while the money, identity, or tenant flow is still scaffolded.
Mock dataCritical flowGenerated repo pattern
medium System graph security security conf 1.00 Insecure pattern 'direct_innerhtml_assignment' in js/app.js:534
Found a known-risky pattern (direct_innerhtml_assignment). Review and replace if possible.
js/app.js:534 Direct innerhtml assignment
medium System graph security security conf 1.00 Insecure pattern 'direct_innerhtml_assignment' in js/docs/export-certificate.js:20
Found a known-risky pattern (direct_innerhtml_assignment). Review and replace if possible.
js/docs/export-certificate.js:20 Direct innerhtml assignment
medium System graph security security conf 1.00 Insecure pattern 'direct_innerhtml_assignment' in js/docs/invoice.js:23
Found a known-risky pattern (direct_innerhtml_assignment). Review and replace if possible.
js/docs/invoice.js:23 Direct innerhtml assignment
medium System graph security security conf 1.00 Insecure pattern 'direct_innerhtml_assignment' in js/docs/preserved-record.js:31
Found a known-risky pattern (direct_innerhtml_assignment). Review and replace if possible.
js/docs/preserved-record.js:31 Direct innerhtml assignment
medium System graph security security conf 1.00 Insecure pattern 'direct_innerhtml_assignment' in js/docs/sales-confirmation.js:25
Found a known-risky pattern (direct_innerhtml_assignment). Review and replace if possible.
js/docs/sales-confirmation.js:25 Direct innerhtml assignment
medium System graph security security conf 1.00 Insecure pattern 'direct_innerhtml_assignment' in js/docs/shipping-instruction.js:112
Found a known-risky pattern (direct_innerhtml_assignment). Review and replace if possible.
js/docs/shipping-instruction.js:112 Direct innerhtml assignment
medium System graph security security conf 1.00 Insecure pattern 'insert_adjacent_html' in js/app.js:616
Found a known-risky pattern (insert_adjacent_html). Review and replace if possible.
js/app.js:616 Insert adjacent html
medium System graph security security conf 1.00 Insecure pattern 'weak_hash' in js/totp.js:97
Found a known-risky pattern (weak_hash). Review and replace if possible.
js/totp.js:97 Weak hash
medium System graph cicd CI/CD security conf 1.00 No CI/CD pipelines detected
No GitHub Actions, GitLab CI, or CircleCI configs found. Without CI you can't gate deploys on tests/lints.
CI/CD securityCoverage
medium System graph quality Tests conf 1.00 Very low test-to-source ratio
0 test file(s) for 25 source file(s) (ratio 0.00). Consider adding integration or unit tests for critical paths.
Coverage
low System graph security security conf 1.00 Insecure pattern 'document_write' in js/app.js:4499
Found a known-risky pattern (document_write). Review and replace if possible.
js/app.js:4499 Document write
low System graph quality License conf 1.00 No license file detected
No LICENSE/COPYING/NOTICE file was found. Generated repositories often omit licensing, which blocks reuse and automated intake.
Repo hardeningGenerated repo pattern
low System graph quality Integrity conf 1.00 Old/deprecated-named symbol `edm_session_v1` in js/auth.js:28
Names with suffixes like `_old`, `_v1`, `_deprecated` usually indicate replaced-but-not-removed code (typical AI-coder leftover). Confirm and delete, or rename if it's the active version.
old markerDead code
low System graph quality Provenance conf 1.00 Shallow git history limits provenance confidence
The repository is a shallow clone. Origin/evolution analysis cannot distinguish fresh generation, imported legacy code, or long-lived human code with high confidence.
Git historyGenerated repo pattern
low System graph quality Complexity conf 1.00 Very large file: js/app.js (6300 lines)
Files with >800 lines often hide complexity hotspots and discourage tests.
low System graph quality Complexity conf 1.00 Very large file: js/db.js (1440 lines)
Files with >800 lines often hide complexity hotspots and discourage tests.
low System graph quality Complexity conf 1.00 Very large file: js/help-content.js (2023 lines)
Files with >800 lines often hide complexity hotspots and discourage tests.
For AI agents: Voting guide (TP/FP) MCP manifest Stdio wrapper SARIF Integrate Findings queue Vote TP/FP on findings to calibrate the engine.
For AI agents + API integrations
Email me when this repo regresses
Free. We re-scan periodically; new criticals → your inbox. No signup required for the scan itself.
API access

This page is publicly accessible at: https://repobility.com/scan/05935dc7-f0a8-45d5-88eb-4d62d85b0ccf/

To check status programmatically (no auth required): 

curl -s https://repobility.com/api/v1/public/scan/05935dc7-f0a8-45d5-88eb-4d62d85b0ccf/

Important — please don't re-submit the same URL repeatedly. The submission endpoint is idempotent: re-submitting the same git URL returns this same scan_token, not a new one. To re-scan this repo, sign up free and use the dashboard.