Public scan — anyone with this URL can view this analysis. Sign up to track your own repos privately, run scheduled re-scans, and get AI fix prompts via your dashboard.

rodrigoalvesmelo1-a11y/central-banks-monitor

https://github.com/rodrigoalvesmelo1-a11y/central-banks-monitor · scanned 2026-06-15 23:54 UTC (2 months, 3 weeks ago)

41 raw signals (0 security + 41 graph)

UNIFIED Repobility · multi-layer engine · AI coders

Complete repo analysis

Last scanned 2 months, 3 weeks ago · v1 · 37 actionable findings from 1 signal source. 4 repeated signals grouped for readability. Security checks, system graph analysis, and verified AI-agent feedback are merged into one review queue.

JSON
Severity distribution — click a segment to filter
Active filters: excluding tests × Reset all
Corpus Intelligence Cross-corpus context (cohort percentile, top patterns, fix plan) is shown only on repositories you own. Sign up and connect your repo to view it.
Scan summary Repository scanned at 69.3/100 with 66.7% coverage. It contains 449 nodes across 0 cross-layer flows, written primarily in mixed languages. Engine surfaced 41 findings — concentrated in quality (16), software (13), network (9). Risk profile is low: 0 critical, 0 high, 14 medium. Recommended next step: open the quality layer findings first — that's where the highest-impact wins live.

Showing 34 of 37 actionable findings. 41 raw detector signals were grouped into reader-sized issues. Click TP / FP to vote on a finding's accuracy — votes adjust the confidence weighting and improve detection across the platform.

medium System graph quality Agent instructions conf 1.00 Agent instructions exist but release-hardening basics are missing
AI-coder instruction files were found, but the repo is missing license, ci, tests. Treat this as a contract gap: the agent is guided, but the generated output is not yet guarded by the controls that make it repeatable.
Repo hardeningGenerated repo pattern
medium System graph quality Production readiness conf 1.00 Composite production-readiness gap
Multiple low-cost hardening controls are missing together: license, ci, tests. Opus verification showed these co-occurring gaps are a better readiness signal than reading each flag in isolation.
Repo hardeningGenerated repo pattern
medium System graph security Coverage conf 1.00 No auth library detected
The scanner did not find any standard auth library (JWT, OAuth, NextAuth, Auth0, etc.). The repo has auth/admin/session surface indicators, so auth may live in custom code, in a separate service, or be missing.
auth
medium System graph cicd CI/CD security conf 1.00 No CI/CD pipelines detected
No GitHub Actions, GitLab CI, or CircleCI configs found. Without CI you can't gate deploys on tests/lints.
CI/CD securityCoverage
medium System graph network Security conf 1.00 Privileged port 10 in use
Port 10 is privileged (<1024). Make sure the service runs with the right caps or front it with a non-privileged port via a load balancer.
config/decision_calendar.yaml Ports
medium System graph network Security conf 1.00 Privileged port 11 in use
Port 11 is privileged (<1024). Make sure the service runs with the right caps or front it with a non-privileged port via a load balancer.
config/decision_calendar.yaml Ports
medium System graph network Security conf 1.00 Privileged port 12 in use
Port 12 is privileged (<1024). Make sure the service runs with the right caps or front it with a non-privileged port via a load balancer.
config/decision_calendar.yaml Ports
medium System graph network Security conf 1.00 Privileged port 13 in use
Port 13 is privileged (<1024). Make sure the service runs with the right caps or front it with a non-privileged port via a load balancer.
config/decision_calendar.yaml Ports
medium System graph network Security conf 1.00 Privileged port 14 in use
Port 14 is privileged (<1024). Make sure the service runs with the right caps or front it with a non-privileged port via a load balancer.
config/decision_calendar.yaml Ports
medium System graph network Security conf 1.00 Privileged port 15 in use
Port 15 is privileged (<1024). Make sure the service runs with the right caps or front it with a non-privileged port via a load balancer.
config/decision_calendar.yaml Ports
medium System graph network Security conf 1.00 Privileged port 18 in use
Port 18 is privileged (<1024). Make sure the service runs with the right caps or front it with a non-privileged port via a load balancer.
config/decision_calendar.yaml Ports
medium System graph network Security conf 1.00 Privileged port 30 in use
Port 30 is privileged (<1024). Make sure the service runs with the right caps or front it with a non-privileged port via a load balancer.
config/decision_calendar.yaml Ports
medium System graph network Security conf 1.00 Privileged port 45 in use
Port 45 is privileged (<1024). Make sure the service runs with the right caps or front it with a non-privileged port via a load balancer.
config/decision_calendar.yaml Ports
medium System graph quality Tests conf 1.00 Very low test-to-source ratio
3 test file(s) for 61 source file(s) (ratio 0.05). Consider adding integration or unit tests for critical paths.
Coverage
low System graph quality Integrity conf 1.00 5 env vars used in code but missing from .env.example
Drift between code and config docs. The first few: `GEMINI_MODEL`, `GOOGLE_API_KEY`, `GROQ_API_KEY`, `GROQ_MODEL`, `REPORTS_DIR`. Add them (with a placeholder/comment) to .env.example so onboarding doesn't break.
config drift
low System graph quality Debug conf 1.00 Debug logging residue appears in source files
Found 135 console/debugger/print-style debug statements in non-test source. This is a common fast-generation residue before production cleanup.
CleanupRepo hardeningGenerated repo pattern
low System graph quality Integrity conf 1.00 Near-duplicate function bodies in 12 places
Functions with the same first-5-line body hash: scrapers/banrep.py:check_new_videos, scrapers/boe.py:check_new_videos, scrapers/sarb.py:check_new_videos, scrapers/norges.py:check_new_videos This is *the* AI-coder failure mode (4× more duplication in vibe-coded repos — see https://jw.hn/ai-code-hyg…
duplicatesduplication
low System graph quality Integrity conf 1.00 4 occurrences Near-duplicate function bodies in 2 places
Functions with the same first-5-line body hash: _probe_rosters2.py:get, _probe_rosters.py:get This is *the* AI-coder failure mode (4× more duplication in vibe-coded repos — see https://jw.hn/ai-code-hygiene). Consolidate or document why they're separate.
4 occurrences
repo-level (4 hits)
duplicatesduplication
low System graph quality Integrity conf 1.00 2 occurrences Near-duplicate function bodies in 3 places
Functions with the same first-5-line body hash: scrapers/banrep.py:fetch_text, scrapers/rba.py:fetch_text, scrapers/rbnz.py:fetch_text This is *the* AI-coder failure mode (4× more duplication in vibe-coded repos — see https://jw.hn/ai-code-hygiene). Consolidate or document why they're separate.
2 occurrences
repo-level (2 hits)
duplicatesduplication
low System graph quality License conf 1.00 No license file detected
No LICENSE/COPYING/NOTICE file was found. Generated repositories often omit licensing, which blocks reuse and automated intake.
Repo hardeningGenerated repo pattern
low System graph software Dead code conf 1.00 Possibly dead Python function: filter_new
No callers detected by AST scan in this repo. Could be exported for external callers or a framework handler.
state/state_manager.py:73
low System graph software Dead code conf 1.00 Possibly dead Python function: format_rate_action
No callers detected by AST scan in this repo. Could be exported for external callers or a framework handler.
analyzers/summary_generator.py:14
low System graph software Dead code conf 1.00 Possibly dead Python function: job_daily_decisions
No callers detected by AST scan in this repo. Could be exported for external callers or a framework handler.
scheduler.py:24
low System graph software Dead code conf 1.00 Possibly dead Python function: job_daily_minutes
No callers detected by AST scan in this repo. Could be exported for external callers or a framework handler.
scheduler.py:30
low System graph software Dead code conf 1.00 Possibly dead Python function: job_daily_quarterly
No callers detected by AST scan in this repo. Could be exported for external callers or a framework handler.
scheduler.py:36
low System graph software Dead code conf 1.00 Possibly dead Python function: job_daily_speeches
No callers detected by AST scan in this repo. Could be exported for external callers or a framework handler.
scheduler.py:18
low System graph software Dead code conf 1.00 Possibly dead Python function: job_daily_videos
No callers detected by AST scan in this repo. Could be exported for external callers or a framework handler.
scheduler.py:12
low System graph software Dead code conf 1.00 Possibly dead Python function: job_hawkdove_meter
No callers detected by AST scan in this repo. Could be exported for external callers or a framework handler.
scheduler.py:63
low System graph software Dead code conf 1.00 Possibly dead Python function: job_premeeting_briefing
No callers detected by AST scan in this repo. Could be exported for external callers or a framework handler.
scheduler.py:56
low System graph software Dead code conf 1.00 Possibly dead Python function: job_speech_digest
No callers detected by AST scan in this repo. Could be exported for external callers or a framework handler.
scheduler.py:49
low System graph software Dead code conf 1.00 Possibly dead Python function: job_weekly_calendar
No callers detected by AST scan in this repo. Could be exported for external callers or a framework handler.
scheduler.py:42
low System graph software Dead code conf 1.00 Possibly dead Python function: tone_emoji
No callers detected by AST scan in this repo. Could be exported for external callers or a framework handler.
analyzers/tone_analyzer.py:325
low System graph software Dead code conf 1.00 Possibly dead Python function: update_checked_time
No callers detected by AST scan in this repo. Could be exported for external callers or a framework handler.
state/state_manager.py:70
low System graph quality Provenance conf 1.00 Shallow git history limits provenance confidence
The repository is a shallow clone. Origin/evolution analysis cannot distinguish fresh generation, imported legacy code, or long-lived human code with high confidence.
Git historyGenerated repo pattern
For AI agents: Voting guide (TP/FP) MCP manifest Stdio wrapper SARIF Integrate Findings queue Vote TP/FP on findings to calibrate the engine.
For AI agents + API integrations
Email me when this repo regresses
Free. We re-scan periodically; new criticals → your inbox. No signup required for the scan itself.
API access

This page is publicly accessible at: https://repobility.com/scan/0954a98a-0ae5-456c-bc1f-ee6272eb104b/

To check status programmatically (no auth required):

curl -s https://repobility.com/api/v1/public/scan/0954a98a-0ae5-456c-bc1f-ee6272eb104b/

Important — please don't re-submit the same URL repeatedly. The submission endpoint is idempotent: re-submitting the same git URL returns this same scan_token, not a new one. To re-scan this repo, sign up free and use the dashboard.