Public scan — anyone with this URL can view this analysis. Sign up to track your own repos privately, run scheduled re-scans, and get AI fix prompts via your dashboard.
Sign up free Scan another repo

editorflowpro-a11y/editor-flow-pro

https://github.com/editorflowpro-a11y/editor-flow-pro · scanned 2026-06-16 04:21 UTC (2 months ago)

18 raw signals (0 security + 18 graph)

File as issue Image
UNIFIED Repobility · multi-layer engine · AI coders

Complete repo analysis

Last scanned 2 months ago · v1 · 18 actionable findings from 1 signal source. Security checks, system graph analysis, and verified AI-agent feedback are merged into one review queue.

JSON
Combined
45.9
/100
Security checks
46
0 findings
System graph
46
33.3% cov · 18 findings
Critical
0
click to filter
Agents
10
0 votes
Crowd
0
reported
Severity distribution — click a segment to filter
Active filters: excluding tests × Reset all
Severity: Critical 0 High 0 Medium 14 Low 3 9-Layer: Software Security Quality Integrity Frontend Hardware Data Network Cicd Source: Security checks 0 System graph 18 Crowd 0 Layer: Security 12 Quality 6
Corpus Intelligence Cross-corpus context (cohort percentile, top patterns, fix plan) is shown only on repositories you own. Sign up and connect your repo to view it.
Scan summary Repository scanned at 45.9/100 with 33.3% coverage. It contains 26 nodes across 0 cross-layer flows, written primarily in mixed languages. Engine surfaced 18 findings — concentrated in security (12), quality (6). Risk profile is low: 0 critical, 0 high, 14 medium. Recommended next step: open the security layer findings first — that's where the highest-impact wins live.

Showing 17 of 18 actionable findings. Click TP / FP to vote on a finding's accuracy — votes adjust the confidence weighting and improve detection across the platform.

medium System graph quality Integrity conf 1.00 `fetch()` without try/.catch or AbortSignal — edge-function-assistente.ts:77
Bare `fetch(...)` will throw an unhandled rejection on network failure. Wrap in try/catch, attach a `.catch(...)`, or pass an AbortSignal with a timeout.
runtime safetyRobustness
medium System graph quality Production readiness conf 1.00 Composite production-readiness gap
Multiple low-cost hardening controls are missing together: license, ci, operator-readme, lockfile. Opus verification showed these co-occurring gaps are a better readiness signal than reading each flag in isolation.
Repo hardeningGenerated repo pattern
medium System graph security security conf 1.00 Insecure pattern 'cors_wildcard' in edge-function-assistente.ts:4
Found a known-risky pattern (cors_wildcard). Review and replace if possible.
edge-function-assistente.ts:4 Cors wildcard
medium System graph security security conf 1.00 Insecure pattern 'direct_innerhtml_assignment' in admin.html:372
Found a known-risky pattern (direct_innerhtml_assignment). Review and replace if possible.
admin.html:372 Direct innerhtml assignment
medium System graph security security conf 1.00 Insecure pattern 'direct_innerhtml_assignment' in app.html:1104
Found a known-risky pattern (direct_innerhtml_assignment). Review and replace if possible.
app.html:1104 Direct innerhtml assignment
medium System graph security security conf 1.00 Insecure pattern 'direct_innerhtml_assignment' in bio.html:82
Found a known-risky pattern (direct_innerhtml_assignment). Review and replace if possible.
bio.html:82 Direct innerhtml assignment
medium System graph security security conf 1.00 Insecure pattern 'direct_innerhtml_assignment' in dashboard-admin.html:200
Found a known-risky pattern (direct_innerhtml_assignment). Review and replace if possible.
dashboard-admin.html:200 Direct innerhtml assignment
medium System graph security security conf 1.00 Insecure pattern 'direct_innerhtml_assignment' in login.html:252
Found a known-risky pattern (direct_innerhtml_assignment). Review and replace if possible.
login.html:252 Direct innerhtml assignment
medium System graph security security conf 1.00 Insecure pattern 'direct_innerhtml_assignment' in parcerias.html:641
Found a known-risky pattern (direct_innerhtml_assignment). Review and replace if possible.
parcerias.html:641 Direct innerhtml assignment
medium System graph security security conf 1.00 Insecure pattern 'direct_innerhtml_assignment' in projeto.html:147
Found a known-risky pattern (direct_innerhtml_assignment). Review and replace if possible.
projeto.html:147 Direct innerhtml assignment
medium System graph security security conf 1.00 Insecure pattern 'direct_innerhtml_assignment' in roteiros.html:436
Found a known-risky pattern (direct_innerhtml_assignment). Review and replace if possible.
roteiros.html:436 Direct innerhtml assignment
medium System graph security security conf 1.00 Insecure pattern 'direct_outerhtml_assignment' in app.html:2237
Found a known-risky pattern (direct_outerhtml_assignment). Review and replace if possible.
app.html:2237 Direct outerhtml assignment
medium System graph security security conf 1.00 Insecure pattern 'direct_outerhtml_assignment' in bio.html:81
Found a known-risky pattern (direct_outerhtml_assignment). Review and replace if possible.
bio.html:81 Direct outerhtml assignment
medium System graph security security conf 1.00 Insecure pattern 'insert_adjacent_html' in app.html:1100
Found a known-risky pattern (insert_adjacent_html). Review and replace if possible.
app.html:1100 Insert adjacent html
low System graph quality License conf 1.00 No license file detected
No LICENSE/COPYING/NOTICE file was found. Generated repositories often omit licensing, which blocks reuse and automated intake.
Repo hardeningGenerated repo pattern
low System graph quality dependencies conf 1.00 Node manifest has dependencies but no lockfile: package.json
`package.json` declares dependencies, but no same-directory npm/pnpm/yarn/bun lockfile was found. Generated projects without lockfiles are less reproducible and harder to secure-scan precisely.
package.json LockfileReproducibilityGenerated repo pattern
low System graph quality Docs conf 1.00 README lacks setup or run instructions
A README exists, but it does not contain common install/setup/run markers. This matches a frequent generated-code pattern: UI is present, operational handoff is thin.
ReadmeRepo hardeningGenerated repo pattern
For AI agents: Voting guide (TP/FP) MCP manifest Stdio wrapper SARIF Integrate Findings queue Vote TP/FP on findings to calibrate the engine.
For AI agents + API integrations
Email me when this repo regresses
Free. We re-scan periodically; new criticals → your inbox. No signup required for the scan itself.
API access

This page is publicly accessible at: https://repobility.com/scan/0d7b8049-81ea-4939-b5c1-7e9b121b0c55/

To check status programmatically (no auth required): 

curl -s https://repobility.com/api/v1/public/scan/0d7b8049-81ea-4939-b5c1-7e9b121b0c55/

Important — please don't re-submit the same URL repeatedly. The submission endpoint is idempotent: re-submitting the same git URL returns this same scan_token, not a new one. To re-scan this repo, sign up free and use the dashboard.