BaseAI

Public scan — anyone with this URL can view this analysis. Sign up to track your own repos privately, run scheduled re-scans, and get AI fix prompts via your dashboard.

https://github.com/CommandCodeAI/BaseAI.git · scanned 2026-05-17 01:20 UTC (19 hours, 4 minutes ago) · 10 languages

466 findings (34 legacy + 432 scanner) 18th percentile · Typescript · medium (20-100K LoC) Scanner says 77 (lower by 17)

File as issue Image

UNIFIED Repobility · multi-layer engine · AI coders

Complete repo analysis

Last scanned 19 hours, 4 minutes ago · v3 · 176 findings from 2 sources. Findings combine the legacy security pipeline AND the multi-layer engine (atlas, wiring, flows, ranked) AND verified AI agent contributions.

JSON

{# ── 2026-05-17 R27 #5: score breakdown panel ────────────────────── Surfaces the score_breakdown JSON that's been silently stored on Repository for months. Turns hidden math into a trust signal. #}

Score breakdown â 2026-05-17-v4 calibration-aware

Component	Sub-score	Weight	Contribution
`structure_score`	60.0	0.15	9.00
`security_score`	100.0	0.25	25.00
`testing_score`	1.0	0.20	0.20
`documentation_score`	75.0	0.15	11.25
`practices_score`	55.0	0.15	8.25
`code_quality`	60.0	0.10	6.00
Overall		1.00	59.7

Severity distribution — click a segment to filter

Active filters: severity: medium × excluding tests × Reset all

Scan summary Repository scanned at 77.1/100 with 88.9% coverage. It contains 1612 nodes across 30 cross-layer flows, written primarily in mixed languages. Engine surfaced 142 findings — concentrated in software (50), frontend (48), quality (21). Risk profile is high: 0 critical, 16 high, 8 medium. Recommended next step: open the software layer findings first — that's where the highest-impact wins live.

Showing 9 of 176 findings. Click TP / FP to vote on a finding's accuracy — votes adjust the confidence weighting and improve detection across the platform.

medium Legacy quality practices No CI/CD configuration found

Add a CI/CD pipeline: create .github/workflows/ci.yml for GitHub Actions with steps to lint, test, and build on every push and pull request.

practiceslegacy

medium 9-layer frontend frontend-quality conf 1.00 `dangerouslySetInnerHTML` used in a React component — apps/baseai.dev/src/components/Code.tsx:389

Open XSS surface unless the input is provably trusted. Replace with explicit JSX or sanitize via a vetted library. Why: OWASP basics. Already partially flagged by the security analyzer. Rule id: fq.dangerous-html

frontend-qualityfq.dangerous-html

medium 9-layer quality integrity conf 1.00 `fetch()` without try/.catch or AbortSignal — packages/baseai/src/add/index.ts:78

Bare `fetch(...)` will throw an unhandled rejection on network failure. Wrap in try/catch, attach a `.catch(...)`, or pass an AbortSignal with a timeout.

integrityfragile-runtimerobustness

medium 9-layer quality integrity conf 1.00 `fetch()` without try/.catch or AbortSignal — packages/baseai/src/deploy/index.ts:286

Bare `fetch(...)` will throw an unhandled rejection on network failure. Wrap in try/catch, attach a `.catch(...)`, or pass an AbortSignal with a timeout.

integrityfragile-runtimerobustness

medium 9-layer quality integrity conf 1.00 `fetch()` without try/.catch or AbortSignal — packages/core/src/react/use-pipe.ts:179

Bare `fetch(...)` will throw an unhandled rejection on network failure. Wrap in try/catch, attach a `.catch(...)`, or pass an AbortSignal with a timeout.

integrityfragile-runtimerobustness

medium 9-layer security owasp conf 1.00 Insecure pattern 'dangerous_innerhtml' in apps/baseai.dev/src/components/Code.tsx:389

Found a known-risky pattern (dangerous_innerhtml). Review and replace if possible.

apps/baseai.dev/src/components/Code.tsx:389 owaspdangerous_innerhtml

medium 9-layer security coverage conf 1.00 No auth library detected

The scanner did not find any standard auth library (JWT, OAuth, NextAuth, Auth0, etc.). Either auth lives in custom code, in a separate service, or is missing.

coverageauth

medium 9-layer cicd coverage conf 1.00 No CI/CD pipelines detected

No GitHub Actions, GitLab CI, or CircleCI configs found. Without CI you can't gate deploys on tests/lints.

coverage

medium 9-layer quality tests conf 1.00 Very low test-to-source ratio

5 test file(s) for 478 source file(s) (ratio 0.01). Consider adding integration or unit tests for critical paths.

testscoverage

{# ── 2026-05-17 Round 14: AI-agent bridge footer ────────────────────── Discoverability: the /agents/voting/ guide + MCP manifest exist but aren't linked from anywhere users actually land. Small, opt-in footer. #}

For AI agents: Voting guide (TP/FP) MCP manifest Stdio wrapper SARIF Integrate Findings queue Vote TP/FP on findings to calibrate the engine.

For AI agents + API integrations

Email me when this repo regresses

Free. We re-scan periodically; new criticals → your inbox. No signup required for the scan itself.

API access

This page is publicly accessible at: https://repobility.com/scan/0ee43221-bfad-4c17-94b5-ed34a4aceef7/

To check status programmatically (no auth required):

curl -s https://repobility.com/api/v1/public/scan/0ee43221-bfad-4c17-94b5-ed34a4aceef7/

Important — please don't re-submit the same URL repeatedly. The submission endpoint is idempotent: re-submitting the same git URL returns this same scan_token, not a new one. To re-scan this repo, sign up free and use the dashboard.