Public scan — anyone with this URL can view this analysis. Sign up to track your own repos privately, run scheduled re-scans, and get AI fix prompts via your dashboard.

TayfunTurgut/phantom-table

https://github.com/TayfunTurgut/phantom-table · scanned 2026-06-16 00:30 UTC (2 months, 2 weeks ago)

10 raw signals (4 security + 6 graph)

File as issue Image

UNIFIED Repobility · multi-layer engine · AI coders

Complete repo analysis

Last scanned 2 months, 2 weeks ago · v1 · 10 actionable findings from 2 signal sources. 6 repeated signals grouped for readability. Security checks, system graph analysis, and verified AI-agent feedback are merged into one review queue.

JSON

55.6% cov · 6 findings

Severity distribution — click a segment to filter

Active filters: excluding tests × Reset all

Severity: Critical 0 High 2 Medium 3 Low 3 9-Layer: Software Security Quality Integrity Frontend Hardware Data Network Cicd Source: Security checks 4 System graph 6 Crowd 0 Layer: Quality 8 Frontend 1 Cicd 1

Exclude dismissed / FP Exclude test files

Corpus Intelligence Cross-corpus context (cohort percentile, top patterns, fix plan) is shown only on repositories you own. Sign up and connect your repo to view it.

Scan summary Repository scanned at 99.6/100 with 55.6% coverage. It contains 388 nodes across 0 cross-layer flows, written primarily in mixed languages. Engine surfaced 6 findings — concentrated in quality (4), frontend (1), cicd (1). Risk profile is low: 0 critical, 0 high, 1 medium. Recommended next step: open the quality layer findings first — that's where the highest-impact wins live.

Showing 8 of 10 actionable findings. 16 raw detector signals were grouped into reader-sized issues. Click TP / FP to vote on a finding's accuracy — votes adjust the confidence weighting and improve detection across the platform.

high Security checks quality Practices conf 0.84 4 occurrences Foundry mined bad chains: TayfunTurgut/phantom-table

Comment chain pattern product: bad_chains Repo: TayfunTurgut/phantom-table Thread: TayfunTurgut/phantom-table#4 Outcome: not_resolved_or_not_observed Thread label: thread_has_human_issue_without_fix_context Source graph label: source_artifact_without_verification_graph Reasons: source_graph_has_rea…

4 occurrences

repo-level (4 hits)

high Security checks quality Testing conf 0.78 Foundry mined test ci gap after feedback: TayfunTurgut/phantom-table

Graph query export: Feedback exposes missing tests or CI Query id: test_ci_gap_after_feedback Query type: motif_query Intent: Hard negatives for feedback/fix chains without adequate guardrails. Motif: test_ci_gap_after_feedback Training usage: hard_negative Graph gold label: assumption_check Repo: …

medium Security checks quality maintenance conf 0.70 Foundry mined blueprint gap alignment: TayfunTurgut/phantom-table

Graph query export: Human feedback aligned with blueprint or architecture gaps Query id: blueprint_gap_alignment Query type: motif_query Intent: Curriculum-gap examples connecting issue threads to helicopter-view gaps. Motif: blueprint_gap_alignment Training usage: curriculum_gap Graph gold label: …

medium Security checks quality Practices conf 0.70 4 occurrences Foundry mined unresolved feedback: TayfunTurgut/phantom-table

Graph query export: Human feedback without linked fix evidence Query id: unresolved_feedback Query type: motif_query Intent: Negative/unresolved examples that should not be hallucinated into fixes. Motif: unlinked_feedback_needs_evidence Training usage: negative_or_unresolved Graph gold label: need…

4 occurrences

repo-level (4 hits)

medium System graph cicd CI/CD security conf 1.00 No CI/CD pipelines detected

No GitHub Actions, GitLab CI, or CircleCI configs found. Without CI you can't gate deploys on tests/lints.

CI/CD securityCoverage

low System graph quality Integrity conf 1.00 Near-duplicate function bodies in 2 places

Functions with the same first-5-line body hash: src/playtest/engine/loader.py:load_engine_from_path, src/playtest/engine/loader.py:load_engine This is *the* AI-coder failure mode (4× more duplication in vibe-coded repos — see https://jw.hn/ai-code-hygiene). Consolidate or document why they're sepa…

duplicatesduplication

low System graph quality Integrity conf 1.00 Near-duplicate function bodies in 3 places

Functions with the same first-5-line body hash: src/playtest/llm/__init__.py:complete, src/playtest/llm/claude_cli.py:complete, src/playtest/llm/openai_api.py:complete This is *the* AI-coder failure mode (4× more duplication in vibe-coded repos — see https://jw.hn/ai-code-hygiene). Consolidate or …

duplicatesduplication

low System graph quality Provenance conf 1.00 Shallow git history limits provenance confidence

The repository is a shallow clone. Origin/evolution analysis cannot distinguish fresh generation, imported legacy code, or long-lived human code with high confidence.

Git historyGenerated repo pattern

For AI agents: Voting guide (TP/FP) MCP manifest Stdio wrapper SARIF Integrate Findings queue Vote TP/FP on findings to calibrate the engine.

For AI agents + API integrations

Email me when this repo regresses

Free. We re-scan periodically; new criticals → your inbox. No signup required for the scan itself.

API access

This page is publicly accessible at: https://repobility.com/scan/103a87e1-89b1-4d22-96df-9d07c00a7da9/

To check status programmatically (no auth required):

curl -s https://repobility.com/api/v1/public/scan/103a87e1-89b1-4d22-96df-9d07c00a7da9/

Important — please don't re-submit the same URL repeatedly. The submission endpoint is idempotent: re-submitting the same git URL returns this same scan_token, not a new one. To re-scan this repo, sign up free and use the dashboard.