Public scan — anyone with this URL can view this analysis. Sign up to track your own repos privately, run scheduled re-scans, and get AI fix prompts via your dashboard.
Sign up free Scan another repo
88 of your 180 findings came from Repobility's proprietary detections. ✓ Repobility tags below mark them.
Upstream (GitHub) caused delay on this scan — not Repobility.
  • GitHub API rate-limited (HTTP 403) — preflight skipped, fell back to direct git clone.
  • Clone from GitHub took 189.43s for a 243.8 MB repo slow.
  • Repobility's analysis ran in 23.97s after the clone landed.

laurent22/joplin

https://github.com/laurent22/joplin · scanned 2026-06-05 10:28 UTC (5 days, 15 hours ago) · 10 languages

904 raw signals (150 security + 754 graph) 11/13 scanners ran 73rd percentile · Typescript · large (100-500K LoC) System graph score 60 (higher by 22)

File as issue Image
UNIFIED Repobility · multi-layer engine · AI coders

Complete repo analysis

Last scanned 5 days, 15 hours ago · v2 · 652 actionable findings from 2 signal sources. 252 repeated signals grouped for readability. Security checks, system graph analysis, and verified AI-agent feedback are merged into one review queue.

JSON
Combined
70.1
/100
Security checks
80
69 findings
System graph
60
100.0% cov · 583 findings
Critical
58
click to filter
Agents
6
0 votes
Crowd
0
reported
Score breakdown â 2026-05-18-v5
Component Sub-score Weight Contribution
structure_score 60.0 0.15 9.00
security_score 100.0 0.25 25.00
testing_score 95.0 0.20 19.00
documentation_score 62.0 0.15 9.30
practices_score 73.0 0.15 10.95
code_quality 80.0 0.10 8.00
Overall 1.00 81.2
security_score may be inflated — optional security scanners were skipped on this fast scan
Severity distribution — click a segment to filter
Active filters: excluding tests × Reset all
Severity: Critical 58 High 48 Medium 60 Low 122 9-Layer: Software Security Quality Integrity Frontend Hardware Data Network Cicd Source: Security checks 69 System graph 583 Crowd 0 Layer: Quality 357 Cicd 8 Security 99 Software 60 Frontend 115 Api 13

Bug-class explainers. Each card groups findings of the same shape — these are the patterns most likely to ship to prod and reappear in future scans unless you systematically fix the cause, not just the instance.

Legacy markers 4 findings
What it is: TODO, FIXME, XXX, HACK comments. Often indicate a known-broken path the author meant to fix.
Why it matters: Each marker is an unfinished thought. Production code shouldn't ship with debt that's documented but not tracked.
How AI causes it: AI mirrors the style of the codebase, so existing TODOs propagate into new code.
Fix approach: Convert each into a ticket. Delete the comment when the ticket lands. Use a pre-commit hook to block new TODOs without an issue link.
4 matching findings on this repo
  • low Old/deprecated-named symbol `pluginsLegacy` in packages/app-desktop/gui/WindowC…
  • low Old/deprecated-named symbol `pluginsLegacy` in packages/lib/reducer.ts:179
  • low Old/deprecated-named symbol `createTextPatchLegacy` in packages/lib/models/Revi…
  • low Old/deprecated-named symbol `createTextPatchLegacy` in packages/lib/models/Revi…
View all legacy markers findings →
Commented-out code 248 findings
What it is: Lines of source that were intentionally disabled but never deleted.
Why it matters: Git already remembers history — commented code rots, becomes wrong, and adds noise to diffs.
How AI causes it: AI sometimes comments out broken code instead of fixing it. Reviewers approve out of inertia.
Fix approach: Delete. Trust `git log`. If you really need to remember, save it in a notes file under `docs/`.
12 matching findings on this repo
  • info Commented-code block (5 lines) in gulpfile.js:38
  • info Commented-code block (5 lines) in lint-staged.config.js:15
  • info Commented-code block (5 lines) in eslint.config.js:227
  • info Commented-code block (9 lines) in packages/fork-sax/lib/sax.js:7
  • info Commented-code block (6 lines) in packages/pdf-viewer/pdfSource.test.ts:35
  • info Commented-code block (5 lines) in packages/turndown-plugin-gfm/src/tables.js:148
  • info Commented-code block (5 lines) in packages/renderer/htmlUtils.ts:380
  • info Commented-code block (6 lines) in packages/renderer/types.ts:11
  • info Commented-code block (5 lines) in packages/renderer/MdToHtml.ts:334
  • info Commented-code block (10 lines) in packages/renderer/MdToHtml/rules/frontmatter…
  • info Commented-code block (28 lines) in packages/renderer/MdToHtml/rules/katex.ts:59
  • info Commented-code block (7 lines) in packages/renderer/MdToHtml/rules/fence.ts:3
View all commented-out code findings →
Config drift 47 findings
What it is: Settings duplicated across env files, Docker compose, K8s, and code defaults, all with slightly different values.
Why it matters: Production behaviour depends on whichever copy your loader reads first. Subtle bugs in staging that don't reproduce in dev.
How AI causes it: AI writes new config from memory rather than reading the existing source.
Fix approach: Pick one source of truth (env vars + a settings module). Have every other place import from there. Lint for duplicates in CI.
12 matching findings on this repo
  • high [SEC027] XML External Entity (XXE) — Node.js xml parsers: Node.js XML parsers c…
  • low File has no detected symbols: jest.config.base.js
  • low File has no detected symbols: lint-staged.config.js
  • info TODO/FIXME marker in shipping code — eslint.config.js:30
  • medium `dangerouslySetInnerHTML` used in a React component — packages/app-desktop/gui/…
  • info TODO/FIXME marker in shipping code — packages/app-mobile/components/screens/Con…
  • info TODO/FIXME marker in shipping code — packages/app-mobile/components/screens/Con…
  • critical Possible secret in packages/app-desktop/gui/EncryptionConfigScreen/EncryptionCo… packages/app-desktop/gui/EncryptionConfigScreen/E…:368
  • medium Insecure pattern 'dangerous_innerhtml' in packages/app-desktop/gui/EncryptionCo… packages/app-desktop/gui/EncryptionConfigScreen/E…:557
  • critical Possible secret in packages/app-mobile/components/screens/encryption-config.tsx packages/app-mobile/components/screens/encryption…:145
  • info Commented-code block (5 lines) in lint-staged.config.js:15
  • info Commented-code block (5 lines) in eslint.config.js:227
View all config drift findings →
For AI agents: Voting guide (TP/FP) MCP manifest Stdio wrapper SARIF Integrate Findings queue Vote TP/FP on findings to calibrate the engine.
For AI agents + API integrations
Email me when this repo regresses
Free. We re-scan periodically; new criticals → your inbox. No signup required for the scan itself.
API access

This page is publicly accessible at: https://repobility.com/scan/1350e53b-3faa-4b9e-a365-be3c192a7c1a/

To check status programmatically (no auth required): 

curl -s https://repobility.com/api/v1/public/scan/1350e53b-3faa-4b9e-a365-be3c192a7c1a/

Important — please don't re-submit the same URL repeatedly. The submission endpoint is idempotent: re-submitting the same git URL returns this same scan_token, not a new one. To re-scan this repo, sign up free and use the dashboard.