Public scan — anyone with this URL can view this analysis. Sign up to track your own repos privately, run scheduled re-scans, and get AI fix prompts via your dashboard.

danieloda/world-cup-2026

https://github.com/danieloda/world-cup-2026 · scanned 2026-06-17 01:53 UTC (1 month, 1 week ago)

183 raw signals (0 security + 183 graph)

File as issue Image

UNIFIED Repobility · multi-layer engine · AI coders

Complete repo analysis

Last scanned 1 month, 1 week ago · v2 · last Δ -13.8 (diff) · 166 actionable findings from 1 signal source. 17 repeated signals grouped for readability. Security checks, system graph analysis, and verified AI-agent feedback are merged into one review queue.

JSON

88.9% cov · 166 findings

Severity distribution — click a segment to filter

Active filters: excluding tests × Reset all

Severity: Critical 14 High 0 Medium 33 Low 65 9-Layer: Software Security Quality Integrity Frontend Hardware Data Network Cicd Source: Security checks 0 System graph 166 Crowd 0 Layer: Frontend 61 Security 37 Cicd 3 Quality 65

Exclude dismissed / FP Exclude test files

Bug-class explainers. Each card groups findings of the same shape — these are the patterns most likely to ship to prod and reappear in future scans unless you systematically fix the cause, not just the instance.

Commented-out code 51 findings

What it is: Lines of source that were intentionally disabled but never deleted.

Why it matters: Git already remembers history — commented code rots, becomes wrong, and adds noise to diffs.

How AI causes it: AI sometimes comments out broken code instead of fixing it. Reviewers approve out of inertia.

Fix approach: Delete. Trust `git log`. If you really need to remember, save it in a notes file under `docs/`.

12 matching findings on this repo

info Commented-code block (6 lines) in vitest.config.js:12
info Commented-code block (5 lines) in tests/unit/leaderboard-parity.test.js:1
info Commented-code block (7 lines) in tests/unit/integrity-guards.test.js:4
info Commented-code block (9 lines) in tests/unit/integrity-report.test.js:4
info Commented-code block (8 lines) in tests/unit/bracket.test.js:165
info Commented-code block (5 lines) in tests/unit/qualifier.test.js:4
info Commented-code block (8 lines) in tests/unit/card-results.test.js:1
info Commented-code block (5 lines) in tests/unit/integrity-telegram-picks.test.js:5
info Commented-code block (6 lines) in tests/unit/progression.test.js:1
info Commented-code block (5 lines) in tests/unit/chart-utils.test.js:1
info Commented-code block (6 lines) in tests/unit/standings-tiebreak.test.js:1
info Commented-code block (5 lines) in tests/fixtures/tz-probe.mjs:1

View all commented-out code findings →

Config drift 3 findings

What it is: Settings duplicated across env files, Docker compose, K8s, and code defaults, all with slightly different values.

Why it matters: Production behaviour depends on whichever copy your loader reads first. Subtle bugs in staging that don't reproduce in dev.

How AI causes it: AI writes new config from memory rather than reading the existing source.

Fix approach: Pick one source of truth (env vars + a settings module). Have every other place import from there. Lint for duplicates in CI.

3 matching findings on this repo

low Stray `console.log` in TS/JS — scripts/build-config.js:64
medium Runtime service client appears to use placeholder configuration
info Commented-code block (6 lines) in vitest.config.js:12

View all config drift findings →

For AI agents: Voting guide (TP/FP) MCP manifest Stdio wrapper SARIF Integrate Findings queue Vote TP/FP on findings to calibrate the engine.

For AI agents + API integrations

Email me when this repo regresses

Free. We re-scan periodically; new criticals → your inbox. No signup required for the scan itself.

API access

This page is publicly accessible at: https://repobility.com/scan/154ec5f9-9d53-4d07-a806-ecb0643e2689/

To check status programmatically (no auth required):

curl -s https://repobility.com/api/v1/public/scan/154ec5f9-9d53-4d07-a806-ecb0643e2689/

Important — please don't re-submit the same URL repeatedly. The submission endpoint is idempotent: re-submitting the same git URL returns this same scan_token, not a new one. To re-scan this repo, sign up free and use the dashboard.