Public scan — anyone with this URL can view this analysis. Sign up to track your own repos privately, run scheduled re-scans, and get AI fix prompts via your dashboard.

YeseniaAyala-Bamalto/Clevercheck

https://github.com/YeseniaAyala-Bamalto/Clevercheck · scanned 2026-06-16 01:05 UTC (2 months, 1 week ago)

30 raw signals (0 security + 30 graph)

File as issue Image

UNIFIED Repobility · multi-layer engine · AI coders

Complete repo analysis

Last scanned 2 months, 1 week ago · v1 · 29 actionable findings from 1 signal source. 1 repeated signal grouped for readability. Security checks, system graph analysis, and verified AI-agent feedback are merged into one review queue.

JSON

77.8% cov · 29 findings

Severity distribution — click a segment to filter

Active filters: excluding tests × Reset all

Severity: Critical 0 High 1 Medium 12 Low 10 9-Layer: Software Security Quality Integrity Frontend Hardware Data Network Cicd Source: Security checks 0 System graph 29 Crowd 0 Layer: Software 2 Frontend 4 Hardware 5 Security 2 Cicd 3 Quality 13

Exclude dismissed / FP Exclude test files

Corpus Intelligence Cross-corpus context (cohort percentile, top patterns, fix plan) is shown only on repositories you own. Sign up and connect your repo to view it.

Scan summary Repository scanned at 44.8/100 with 77.8% coverage. It contains 445 nodes across 30 cross-layer flows, written primarily in mixed languages. Engine surfaced 30 findings — concentrated in quality (13), hardware (5), frontend (4). Risk profile is high: 0 critical, 1 high, 13 medium. Recommended next step: open the quality layer findings first — that's where the highest-impact wins live.

Showing 23 of 29 actionable findings. 30 raw detector signals were grouped into reader-sized issues. Click TP / FP to vote on a finding's accuracy — votes adjust the confidence weighting and improve detection across the platform.

high System graph security Secrets conf 1.00 Runtime dotenv file present in repo: src/clevercheck-web/.env.development

`src/clevercheck-web/.env.development` looks like a runtime dotenv file. No high-confidence secret value was matched, but runtime dotenv files often drift into live credentials. Move real values to a secret manager and keep only `.env.example` style templates in source control.

src/clevercheck-web/.env.development ConfigEnv fileRuntime env

medium System graph quality Integrity conf 1.00 `fetch()` without try/.catch or AbortSignal — src/clevercheck-web/src/api/client.ts:169

Bare `fetch(...)` will throw an unhandled rejection on network failure. Wrap in try/catch, attach a `.catch(...)`, or pass an AbortSignal with a timeout.

runtime safetyRobustness

medium System graph quality Agent instructions conf 1.00 Agent authority lacks a verifier contract: .claude/launch.json

This agent instruction grants code or shell authority but does not state the verification gate that decides promotion. The recurring safe pattern is: LLM proposes; deterministic tests/build/security checks verify; only verified code promotes.

.claude/launch.json VerificationClaude instruction

medium System graph quality Agent instructions conf 1.00 Agent instructions exist but release-hardening basics are missing

AI-coder instruction files were found, but the repo is missing license. Treat this as a contract gap: the agent is guided, but the generated output is not yet guarded by the controls that make it repeatable.

Repo hardeningGenerated repo pattern

medium System graph hardware Security conf 1.00 Dockerfile runs as root: src/Dockerfile

No non-root USER set. Containers running as root expand the blast radius of any vulnerability inside the image.

Container

medium System graph quality Integrity conf 1.00 Frontend route `/photos` has no Link/navigate to it — src/clevercheck-web/src/App.tsx

The route is registered but no `<Link to=…>` or `navigate(…)` in the codebase navigates here. Either it's reachable only via direct URL (intentional), it's dead, or the link broke during a refactor.

Orphan pageWiring

medium System graph cicd CI/CD security conf 1.00 2 occurrences GitHub Action is tag-pinned rather than SHA-pinned

azure/login@v2 can move without a code change in this repo. Pin third-party actions to a reviewed 40-character commit SHA.

2 files, 2 locations

.github/workflows/deploy-prod.yml:35

.github/workflows/deploy-qa.yml:40

CI/CD securitySupply chainGithub actions

medium System graph cicd CI/CD security conf 1.00 GitHub Actions workflow grants broad write permissions

CI tokens with write permissions increase blast radius when an action, dependency, or PR workflow is compromised. Prefer job-level least-privilege permissions.

.github/workflows/deploy-prod.yml CI/CD securitySupply chainGithub actions

medium System graph cicd CI/CD security conf 1.00 GitHub Actions workflow grants broad write permissions

CI tokens with write permissions increase blast radius when an action, dependency, or PR workflow is compromised. Prefer job-level least-privilege permissions.

.github/workflows/deploy-qa.yml CI/CD securitySupply chainGithub actions

medium System graph security security conf 1.00 Insecure pattern 'cors_wildcard' in src/clevercheck-web/tools/mock-api.mjs:84

Found a known-risky pattern (cors_wildcard). Review and replace if possible.

src/clevercheck-web/tools/mock-api.mjs:84 Cors wildcard

medium System graph quality Integrity conf 1.00 Network/subprocess call without timeout or try/except — _extract_secrets.py:76

`subprocess.run(...)` here lacks both a `timeout=` arg and an enclosing try/except. This is exactly the class of bug that took down our git-clone earlier (HTTP/2 stream cancel surfaced as a fatal). Add a `timeout=` and wrap in try/except, or use a wrapper that retries.

runtime safetyRobustness

medium System graph quality Placeholder conf 1.00 Placeholder or mock-heavy implementation detected

Found 15 placeholder/mock markers across 6 source files. This often means the repo looks complete while core flows still use generated scaffolding or fake data.

Mock dataIncompleteGenerated repo pattern

medium System graph quality Tests conf 1.00 Very low test-to-source ratio

1 test file(s) for 30 source file(s) (ratio 0.03). Consider adding integration or unit tests for critical paths.

Coverage

low System graph hardware Coverage conf 1.00 Containers defined but no K8s/orchestration manifest found

Repo has Dockerfiles/compose but no Kubernetes/Nomad manifests. If the target deployment is K8s, the manifests may live in a separate ops repo.

Deployment

low System graph quality Debug conf 1.00 Debug logging residue appears in source files

Found 8 console/debugger/print-style debug statements in non-test source. This is a common fast-generation residue before production cleanup.

CleanupRepo hardeningGenerated repo pattern

low System graph hardware Supply chain conf 1.00 Docker base image is tag-pinned but not digest-pinned: mcr.microsoft.com/dotnet/aspnet:10.0

Container tags can be retagged upstream. Pin production base images to a reviewed digest (`image@sha256:...`) when reproducibility and supply-chain integrity matter.

src/Dockerfile:30 containersPinned dependencies

low System graph hardware Supply chain conf 1.00 Docker base image is tag-pinned but not digest-pinned: mcr.microsoft.com/dotnet/sdk:10.0

Container tags can be retagged upstream. Pin production base images to a reviewed digest (`image@sha256:...`) when reproducibility and supply-chain integrity matter.

src/Dockerfile:18 containersPinned dependencies

low System graph hardware Supply chain conf 1.00 Docker base image is tag-pinned but not digest-pinned: node:24-alpine

Container tags can be retagged upstream. Pin production base images to a reviewed digest (`image@sha256:...`) when reproducibility and supply-chain integrity matter.

src/Dockerfile:8 containersPinned dependencies

low System graph quality Integrity conf 1.00 Near-duplicate function bodies in 2 places

Functions with the same first-5-line body hash: _build_avance_pdf.py:inline, _build_pdf.py:inline This is *the* AI-coder failure mode (4× more duplication in vibe-coded repos — see https://jw.hn/ai-code-hygiene). Consolidate or document why they're separate.

duplicatesduplication

low System graph quality License conf 1.00 No license file detected

No LICENSE/COPYING/NOTICE file was found. Generated repositories often omit licensing, which blocks reuse and automated intake.

Repo hardeningGenerated repo pattern

low System graph software Dead code conf 1.00 Possibly dead Python function: header_footer

No callers detected by AST scan in this repo. Could be exported for external callers or a framework handler.

_build_avance_pdf.py:84

low System graph software Dead code conf 1.00 Possibly dead Python function: header_footer

No callers detected by AST scan in this repo. Could be exported for external callers or a framework handler.

_build_pdf.py:117

low System graph quality Provenance conf 1.00 Shallow git history limits provenance confidence

The repository is a shallow clone. Origin/evolution analysis cannot distinguish fresh generation, imported legacy code, or long-lived human code with high confidence.

Git historyGenerated repo pattern

For AI agents: Voting guide (TP/FP) MCP manifest Stdio wrapper SARIF Integrate Findings queue Vote TP/FP on findings to calibrate the engine.

For AI agents + API integrations

Email me when this repo regresses

Free. We re-scan periodically; new criticals → your inbox. No signup required for the scan itself.

API access

This page is publicly accessible at: https://repobility.com/scan/17c4cba6-cca8-4482-8ff9-a691b323aca9/

To check status programmatically (no auth required):

curl -s https://repobility.com/api/v1/public/scan/17c4cba6-cca8-4482-8ff9-a691b323aca9/

Important — please don't re-submit the same URL repeatedly. The submission endpoint is idempotent: re-submitting the same git URL returns this same scan_token, not a new one. To re-scan this repo, sign up free and use the dashboard.