Public scan — anyone with this URL can view this analysis. Sign up to track your own repos privately, run scheduled re-scans, and get AI fix prompts via your dashboard.

activepieces/activepieces

https://github.com/activepieces/activepieces · scanned 2026-06-26 22:34 UTC (1 month ago)

1541 raw signals (0 security + 1541 graph)

File as issue Image

UNIFIED Repobility · multi-layer engine · AI coders

Complete repo analysis

Last scanned 1 month ago · v3 · 1460 actionable findings from 1 signal source. 81 repeated signals grouped for readability. Security checks, system graph analysis, and verified AI-agent feedback are merged into one review queue.

JSON

100.0% cov · 1460 findings

Severity distribution — click a segment to filter

Active filters: excluding tests × Reset all

Severity: Critical 18 High 104 Medium 224 Low 976 9-Layer: Software Security Quality Integrity Frontend Hardware Data Network Cicd Source: Security checks 0 System graph 1460 Crowd 0 Layer: Frontend 213 Security 255 Quality 906 Network 2 Hardware 6 Cicd 4 Api 74

Exclude dismissed / FP Exclude test files

Bug-class explainers. Each card groups findings of the same shape — these are the patterns most likely to ship to prod and reappear in future scans unless you systematically fix the cause, not just the instance.

Commented-out code 56 findings

What it is: Lines of source that were intentionally disabled but never deleted.

Why it matters: Git already remembers history — commented code rots, becomes wrong, and adds noise to diffs.

How AI causes it: AI sometimes comments out broken code instead of fixing it. Reviewers approve out of inertia.

Fix approach: Delete. Trust `git log`. If you really need to remember, save it in a notes file under `docs/`.

12 matching findings on this repo

info Commented-code block (5 lines) in packages/pieces/community/youtube/src/lib/tri…
info Commented-code block (7 lines) in packages/pieces/community/canny/src/index.ts:…
info Commented-code block (5 lines) in packages/pieces/community/coda/src/lib/common…
info Commented-code block (22 lines) in packages/pieces/community/pollybot-ai/src/li…
info Commented-code block (7 lines) in packages/pieces/community/hubspot/src/lib/com…
info Commented-code block (7 lines) in packages/pieces/community/azure-ad/src/lib/au…
info Commented-code block (5 lines) in packages/pieces/community/slite/src/lib/commo…
info Commented-code block (6 lines) in packages/pieces/community/coupa/src/lib/trigg…
info Commented-code block (5 lines) in packages/pieces/community/add-event/src/lib/c…
info Commented-code block (12 lines) in packages/pieces/community/microsoft-copilot/…
info Commented-code block (14 lines) in packages/pieces/community/convertkit/src/lib…
info Commented-code block (5 lines) in packages/pieces/community/simplyprint/src/lib…

View all commented-out code findings →

Config drift 1 finding

What it is: Settings duplicated across env files, Docker compose, K8s, and code defaults, all with slightly different values.

Why it matters: Production behaviour depends on whichever copy your loader reads first. Subtle bugs in staging that don't reproduce in dev.

How AI causes it: AI writes new config from memory rather than reading the existing source.

Fix approach: Pick one source of truth (env vars + a settings module). Have every other place import from there. Lint for duplicates in CI.

1 matching finding on this repo

low Unused endpoint: GET /ServiceProviderConfig

View all config drift findings →

For AI agents: Voting guide (TP/FP) MCP manifest Stdio wrapper SARIF Integrate Findings queue Vote TP/FP on findings to calibrate the engine.

For AI agents + API integrations

Email me when this repo regresses

Free. We re-scan periodically; new criticals → your inbox. No signup required for the scan itself.

API access

This page is publicly accessible at: https://repobility.com/scan/195f8714-1e7f-4e04-bc90-e66ac1b3c39d/

To check status programmatically (no auth required):

curl -s https://repobility.com/api/v1/public/scan/195f8714-1e7f-4e04-bc90-e66ac1b3c39d/

Important — please don't re-submit the same URL repeatedly. The submission endpoint is idempotent: re-submitting the same git URL returns this same scan_token, not a new one. To re-scan this repo, sign up free and use the dashboard.