Public scan — anyone with this URL can view this analysis. Sign up to track your own repos privately, run scheduled re-scans, and get AI fix prompts via your dashboard.

SCpradhan/MobileApps_Ascendion

https://github.com/SCpradhan/MobileApps_Ascendion · scanned 2026-06-16 00:07 UTC (2 months, 2 weeks ago)

318 raw signals (1 security + 317 graph)

File as issue Image

UNIFIED Repobility · multi-layer engine · AI coders

Complete repo analysis

Last scanned 2 months, 2 weeks ago · v1 · 293 actionable findings from 2 signal sources. 25 repeated signals grouped for readability. Security checks, system graph analysis, and verified AI-agent feedback are merged into one review queue.

JSON

88.9% cov · 292 findings

Severity distribution — click a segment to filter

Active filters: excluding tests × Reset all

Severity: Critical 8 High 16 Medium 26 Low 128 9-Layer: Software Security Quality Integrity Frontend Hardware Data Network Cicd Source: Security checks 1 System graph 292 Crowd 0 Layer: Quality 241 Software 24 Frontend 1 Security 26 Cicd 1

Exclude dismissed / FP Exclude test files

Bug-class explainers. Each card groups findings of the same shape — these are the patterns most likely to ship to prod and reappear in future scans unless you systematically fix the cause, not just the instance.

Duplicates & near-duplicates 4 findings

What it is: Same function copy-pasted into multiple modules with minor variations.

Why it matters: Each copy drifts independently — bug fixes apply to one, miss the others.

How AI causes it: AI completes the same pattern in each file rather than refactoring to a shared helper.

Fix approach: Extract the duplicated logic into the most general module both call sites already import. Add tests at the helper level.

4 matching findings on this repo

low Near-duplicate function bodies in 2 places repo-level
low Near-duplicate function bodies in 8 places repo-level
low Near-duplicate function bodies in 6 places
low Near-duplicate function bodies in 3 places

View all duplicates & near-duplicates findings →

Legacy markers 1 finding

What it is: TODO, FIXME, XXX, HACK comments. Often indicate a known-broken path the author meant to fix.

Why it matters: Each marker is an unfinished thought. Production code shouldn't ship with debt that's documented but not tracked.

How AI causes it: AI mirrors the style of the codebase, so existing TODOs propagate into new code.

Fix approach: Convert each into a ticket. Delete the comment when the ticket lands. Use a pre-commit hook to block new TODOs without an issue link.

1 matching finding on this repo

low Old/deprecated-named symbol `protocol_legacy` in libs/flows/android/hpps/hpps_f…

View all legacy markers findings →

Commented-out code 113 findings

What it is: Lines of source that were intentionally disabled but never deleted.

Why it matters: Git already remembers history — commented code rots, becomes wrong, and adds noise to diffs.

How AI causes it: AI sometimes comments out broken code instead of fixing it. Reviewers approve out of inertia.

Fix approach: Delete. Trust `git log`. If you really need to remember, save it in a notes file under `docs/`.

12 matching findings on this repo

info Commented-code block (5 lines) in tests/conftest.py:184
info Commented-code block (12 lines) in tests/android/hpbridge/smoke/test_01_mp_home…
info Commented-code block (10 lines) in tests/windows/smart/smb/test_suite_02_smb_ca…
info Commented-code block (5 lines) in tests/windows/smart/cec/test_suite_03_cec_no_…
info Commented-code block (28 lines) in tests/windows/hpx_rebranding/windows/perform…
info Commented-code block (17 lines) in tests/windows/hpx_rebranding/windows/display…
info Commented-code block (8 lines) in tests/windows/hpx_rebranding/windows/energy_c…
info Commented-code block (7 lines) in tests/windows/hpx_rebranding/windows/MAT/test…
info Commented-code block (10 lines) in tests/windows/hpx_rebranding/windows/system_…
info Commented-code block (37 lines) in tests/windows/hpx_rebranding/windows/support…
info Commented-code block (37 lines) in tests/windows/hpx_rebranding/windows/support…
info Commented-code block (11 lines) in tests/windows/hpx_rebranding/windows/support…

View all commented-out code findings →

For AI agents: Voting guide (TP/FP) MCP manifest Stdio wrapper SARIF Integrate Findings queue Vote TP/FP on findings to calibrate the engine.

For AI agents + API integrations

Email me when this repo regresses

Free. We re-scan periodically; new criticals → your inbox. No signup required for the scan itself.

API access

This page is publicly accessible at: https://repobility.com/scan/1998c34e-6848-463d-994a-cb8199c08be3/

To check status programmatically (no auth required):

curl -s https://repobility.com/api/v1/public/scan/1998c34e-6848-463d-994a-cb8199c08be3/

Important — please don't re-submit the same URL repeatedly. The submission endpoint is idempotent: re-submitting the same git URL returns this same scan_token, not a new one. To re-scan this repo, sign up free and use the dashboard.