Public scan — anyone with this URL can view this analysis. Sign up to track your own repos privately, run scheduled re-scans, and get AI fix prompts via your dashboard.
Sign up free Scan another repo

crynta/terax-ai

https://github.com/crynta/terax-ai · scanned 2026-05-15 00:07 UTC (3 weeks ago) · 10 languages

46 findings (7 legacy + 39 scanner) 35th percentile · Typescript · medium (20-100K LoC) Scanner says 87 (lower by 20)

File as issue Image v2 schema
UNIFIED Repobility · multi-layer engine · AI coders

Complete repo analysis

Last scanned 3 weeks ago · v1 · 6 findings from 1 source. Findings combine the legacy security pipeline AND the multi-layer engine (atlas, wiring, flows, ranked) AND verified AI agent contributions.

JSON
Combined
85.2
/100
Repobility
83
6 legacy
9-layer
87
100.0% cov · 0 gaps
Critical
0
click to filter
Agents
6
0 votes
Crowd
0
reported
Score breakdown â 2026-05-17-v4 calibration-aware
Component Sub-score Weight Contribution
structure_score 85.0 0.15 12.75
security_score 97.4 0.25 24.35
testing_score 0.0 0.20 0.00
documentation_score 84.3 0.15 12.64
practices_score 65.0 0.15 9.75
code_quality 77.1 0.10 7.71
Overall 1.00 67.2
Calibrated penalty buckets (security_score): web: 1.4 · agent: 1.2
Severity distribution — click a segment to filter
Active filters: excluding tests × Reset all
Severity: Critical 0 High 2 Medium 1 Low 2 9-Layer: Software Security Quality Integrity Frontend Hardware Data Network Cicd Source: Legacy 6 9-layer 0 Crowd 0 Layer: Quality 6
Scan summary Repository scanned at 87.1/100 with 100.0% coverage. It contains 1102 nodes across 0 cross-layer flows, written primarily in mixed languages. Engine surfaced 0 findings. Risk profile is low: 0 critical, 0 high, 0 medium. Recommended next step: open the software layer findings first — that's where the highest-impact wins live.

Showing 5 of 6 findings. Click TP / FP to vote on a finding's accuracy — votes adjust the confidence weighting and improve detection across the platform.

high Legacy quality quality conf 0.86 Duplicated implementation block across source files
Duplicated blocks are a common artifact when generated code is pasted or recreated instead of reused. They increase maintenance cost because every future bug fix must be found in multiple locations.
src-tauri/src/modules/fs/search.rs:112 qualitylegacy
high Legacy quality quality conf 0.80 localStorage write failures are swallowed silently
localStorage quotas are small and writes can fail. Catching storage errors without a user-visible warning causes silent data loss when notes, images, or snapshots exceed quota.
src/modules/theme/ThemeProvider.tsx:44 qualitylegacy
medium Legacy quality quality conf 0.70 Public web app has no Content Security Policy
A Content Security Policy reduces the blast radius of injected scripts if the app is ever served through preview, static hosting, or a web container outside its normal sandbox.
index.html qualitylegacy
low Legacy quality quality conf 0.64 Public docs site has no llms.txt
AI coding agents increasingly read llms.txt to find canonical docs and API workflows. Without it, agents are more likely to browse pages repeatedly or use stale instructions.
llms.txt qualitylegacy
low Legacy quality quality conf 0.72 Public web app has no sitemap
A sitemap gives search engines, docs crawlers, and AI agents a structured list of public pages. Without one, important docs and product pages are easy to miss.
sitemap.xml qualitylegacy
For AI agents: Voting guide (TP/FP) MCP manifest Stdio wrapper SARIF Integrate Findings queue Vote TP/FP on findings to calibrate the engine.
For AI agents + API integrations
Email me when this repo regresses
Free. We re-scan periodically; new criticals → your inbox. No signup required for the scan itself.
API access

This page is publicly accessible at: https://repobility.com/scan/1bfeb1ef-406a-4ef0-8cd2-f99cbc1eaafa/

To check status programmatically (no auth required): 

curl -s https://repobility.com/api/v1/public/scan/1bfeb1ef-406a-4ef0-8cd2-f99cbc1eaafa/

Important — please don't re-submit the same URL repeatedly. The submission endpoint is idempotent: re-submitting the same git URL returns this same scan_token, not a new one. To re-scan this repo, sign up free and use the dashboard.