Public scan — anyone with this URL can view this analysis. Sign up to track your own repos privately, run scheduled re-scans, and get AI fix prompts via your dashboard.

twobirds-kramerica/two-birds-portfolio

https://github.com/twobirds-kramerica/two-birds-portfolio · scanned 2026-06-16 00:44 UTC (2 months, 1 week ago)

54 raw signals (0 security + 54 graph)

File as issue Image

UNIFIED Repobility · multi-layer engine · AI coders

Complete repo analysis

Last scanned 2 months, 1 week ago · v1 · 42 actionable findings from 1 signal source. 12 repeated signals grouped for readability. Security checks, system graph analysis, and verified AI-agent feedback are merged into one review queue.

JSON

88.9% cov · 42 findings

Severity distribution — click a segment to filter

Active filters: excluding tests × Reset all

Severity: Critical 0 High 0 Medium 20 Low 19 9-Layer: Software Security Quality Integrity Frontend Hardware Data Network Cicd Source: Security checks 0 System graph 42 Crowd 0 Layer: Software 7 Frontend 6 Network 2 Security 3 Cicd 4 Quality 20

Exclude dismissed / FP Exclude test files

Corpus Intelligence Cross-corpus context (cohort percentile, top patterns, fix plan) is shown only on repositories you own. Sign up and connect your repo to view it.

Scan summary Repository scanned at 55.4/100 with 88.9% coverage. It contains 1319 nodes across 0 cross-layer flows, written primarily in mixed languages. Engine surfaced 54 findings — concentrated in quality (23), cicd (13), software (7). Risk profile is low: 0 critical, 0 high, 20 medium. Recommended next step: open the quality layer findings first — that's where the highest-impact wins live.

Showing 39 of 42 actionable findings. 54 raw detector signals were grouped into reader-sized issues. Click TP / FP to vote on a finding's accuracy — votes adjust the confidence weighting and improve detection across the platform.

medium System graph quality Integrity conf 1.00 `fetch()` without try/.catch or AbortSignal — family-ops/worker/src/index.js:22

Bare `fetch(...)` will throw an unhandled rejection on network failure. Wrap in try/catch, attach a `.catch(...)`, or pass an AbortSignal with a timeout.

runtime safetyRobustness

medium System graph quality Agent instructions conf 1.00 Agent authority lacks a verifier contract: .claude/commands/checkpoint.md

This agent instruction grants code or shell authority but does not state the verification gate that decides promotion. The recurring safe pattern is: LLM proposes; deterministic tests/build/security checks verify; only verified code promotes.

.claude/commands/checkpoint.md VerificationClaude instruction

medium System graph quality Agent instructions conf 1.00 Agent authority lacks a verifier contract: .claude/commands/commit-push-pr.md

.claude/commands/commit-push-pr.md VerificationClaude instruction

medium System graph quality Agent instructions conf 1.00 Agent authority lacks a verifier contract: .claude/commands/health.md

.claude/commands/health.md VerificationClaude instruction

medium System graph quality Agent instructions conf 1.00 Agent authority lacks a verifier contract: .claude/commands/next.md

.claude/commands/next.md VerificationClaude instruction

medium System graph quality Agent instructions conf 1.00 Agent authority lacks a verifier contract: .claude/commands/shutdown-export.md

.claude/commands/shutdown-export.md VerificationClaude instruction

medium System graph quality Agent instructions conf 1.00 Agent authority lacks a verifier contract: .claude/loop.md

.claude/loop.md VerificationClaude instruction

medium System graph quality Agent instructions conf 1.00 Agent instructions exist but release-hardening basics are missing

AI-coder instruction files were found, but the repo is missing tests. Treat this as a contract gap: the agent is guided, but the generated output is not yet guarded by the controls that make it repeatable.

Repo hardeningGenerated repo pattern

medium System graph quality Tests conf 1.00 CI is configured but no tests are detected

A CI pipeline exists, but the scan found no test files to gate. Opus labeled this generated-code pattern as config theater: release machinery exists, but it has little behavioral signal.

CI/CDConfig theaterRepo hardening

medium System graph quality Placeholder conf 1.00 Critical user flow still appears backed by mock or placeholder data

A payment/auth/admin/order/billing-style flow contains mock, fake, TODO, dummy, or placeholder markers in runtime source. In the Fable corpus this is a high-leverage completeness smell: the app can look finished while the money, identity, or tenant flow is still scaffolded.

Mock dataCritical flowGenerated repo pattern

medium System graph cicd CI/CD security conf 1.00 GitHub Action is tag-pinned rather than SHA-pinned

gitleaks/gitleaks-action@v2 can move without a code change in this repo. Pin third-party actions to a reviewed 40-character commit SHA.

.github/workflows/ci.yml:254 CI/CD securitySupply chainGithub actions

medium System graph cicd CI/CD security conf 1.00 GitHub Actions workflow grants broad write permissions

CI tokens with write permissions increase blast radius when an action, dependency, or PR workflow is compromised. Prefer job-level least-privilege permissions.

.github/workflows/changelog.yml CI/CD securitySupply chainGithub actions

medium System graph cicd CI/CD security conf 1.00 GitHub Actions workflow grants broad write permissions

CI tokens with write permissions increase blast radius when an action, dependency, or PR workflow is compromised. Prefer job-level least-privilege permissions.

.github/workflows/overnight-health.yml CI/CD securitySupply chainGithub actions

medium System graph security security conf 1.00 Insecure pattern 'cors_wildcard' in family-ops/worker/src/index.js:14

Found a known-risky pattern (cors_wildcard). Review and replace if possible.

family-ops/worker/src/index.js:14 Cors wildcard

medium System graph security security conf 1.00 Insecure pattern 'direct_innerhtml_assignment' in family-ops/index.html:434

Found a known-risky pattern (direct_innerhtml_assignment). Review and replace if possible.

family-ops/index.html:434 Direct innerhtml assignment

medium System graph security security conf 1.00 Insecure pattern 'direct_innerhtml_assignment' in tools/job-fit-assessment.html:198

Found a known-risky pattern (direct_innerhtml_assignment). Review and replace if possible.

tools/job-fit-assessment.html:198 Direct innerhtml assignment

medium System graph quality Placeholder conf 1.00 Placeholder or mock-heavy implementation detected

Found 26 placeholder/mock markers across 9 source files. This often means the repo looks complete while core flows still use generated scaffolding or fake data.

Mock dataIncompleteGenerated repo pattern

medium System graph network Security conf 1.00 Privileged port 11 in use

Port 11 is privileged (<1024). Make sure the service runs with the right caps or front it with a non-privileged port via a load balancer.

.github/workflows/ci.yml Ports

medium System graph network Security conf 1.00 Privileged port 6 in use

Port 6 is privileged (<1024). Make sure the service runs with the right caps or front it with a non-privileged port via a load balancer.

.github/workflows/ci.yml Ports

medium System graph quality Tests conf 1.00 Very low test-to-source ratio

1 test file(s) for 106 source file(s) (ratio 0.01). Consider adding integration or unit tests for critical paths.

Coverage

low System graph quality Integrity conf 1.00 7 env vars used in code but missing from .env.example

Drift between code and config docs. The first few: `GH_TOKEN`, `GITHUB_TOKEN`, `GMAIL_APP_PASSWORD`, `GMAIL_FROM`, `LOG_PATH`, `MCP_RELIABILITY_FALLBACK`, `MCP_RELIABILITY_LOG`. Add them (with a placeholder/comment) to .env.example so onboarding doesn't break.

config drift

low System graph quality Debug conf 1.00 Debug logging residue appears in source files

Found 613 console/debugger/print-style debug statements in non-test source. This is a common fast-generation residue before production cleanup.

CleanupRepo hardeningGenerated repo pattern

low System graph software Dead code candidate conf 1.00 File has no detected symbols: hal-stack/notion-sync/_tmp_inprogress.py

Source file with no class/function declarations — possible config, dead code, or scratch file.

low System graph software Dead code candidate conf 1.00 File has no detected symbols: hal-stack/notion-sync/_tmp_intaudit.py

Source file with no class/function declarations — possible config, dead code, or scratch file.

low System graph software Dead code candidate conf 1.00 File has no detected symbols: hal-stack/notion-sync/_tmp_read_logo.py

Source file with no class/function declarations — possible config, dead code, or scratch file.

low System graph cicd CI/CD security conf 1.00 10 occurrences GitHub Action is tag-pinned rather than SHA-pinned

actions/checkout@v4 can move without a code change in this repo. Pin third-party actions to a reviewed 40-character commit SHA.

3 files, 10 locations

.github/workflows/ci.yml:50, 53, 147, 170, 249 (5 hits)

.github/workflows/verify-gate.yml:25, 30, 55 (3 hits)

.github/workflows/overnight-health.yml:26, 31 (2 hits)

CI/CD securitySupply chainGithub actions

low System graph quality Integrity conf 1.00 3 occurrences Near-duplicate function bodies in 2 places

Functions with the same first-5-line body hash: hal-stack/notion-sync/_s_r01_phase_1d.py:main, hal-stack/notion-sync/_s_r01_phase_1c.py:main This is *the* AI-coder failure mode (4× more duplication in vibe-coded repos — see https://jw.hn/ai-code-hygiene). Consolidate or document why they're separa…

3 occurrences

repo-level (3 hits)

duplicatesduplication

low System graph quality Integrity conf 1.00 Near-duplicate function bodies in 20 places

Functions with the same first-5-line body hash: hal-stack/notion-sync/_s_r01_phase_1f.py:main, hal-stack/notion-sync/_s_r01_phase_1j.py:main, hal-stack/notion-sync/_s_r01_stretch_1n.py:main, hal-stack/notion-sync/_s_r01_stretch_1z.py:main This is *the* AI-coder failure mode (4× more duplication in…

duplicatesduplication

low System graph quality Integrity conf 1.00 2 occurrences Near-duplicate function bodies in 3 places

Functions with the same first-5-line body hash: hal-stack/notion-sync/_retrofile_2026_04_22_max_mode.py:main, hal-stack/notion-sync/_retrofile_2026_04_22_max_mode_part2.py:main, hal-stack/notion-sync/_retrofile_2026_04_22_max_mode_part3.py:main This is *the* AI-coder failure mode (4× more duplicat…

2 occurrences

repo-level (2 hits)

duplicatesduplication

low System graph software Dead code conf 1.00 Possibly dead Python function: build_page_body

No callers detected by AST scan in this repo. Could be exported for external callers or a framework handler.

hal-stack/notion-sync/notion-client.py:200

low System graph software Dead code conf 1.00 Possibly dead Python function: key

No callers detected by AST scan in this repo. Could be exported for external callers or a framework handler.

hal-stack/notion-sync/sync-queue.py:37

low System graph software Dead code conf 1.00 Possibly dead Python function: rank

No callers detected by AST scan in this repo. Could be exported for external callers or a framework handler.

hal-stack/sprint-system/trigger-writer.py:141

low System graph software Dead code conf 1.00 Possibly dead Python function: tick

No callers detected by AST scan in this repo. Could be exported for external callers or a framework handler.

hal-stack/mcp-reliability/heartbeat-check.py:97

low System graph quality Provenance conf 1.00 Shallow git history limits provenance confidence

The repository is a shallow clone. Origin/evolution analysis cannot distinguish fresh generation, imported legacy code, or long-lived human code with high confidence.

Git historyGenerated repo pattern

low System graph frontend Frontend quality conf 1.00 Stray `console.log` in TS/JS — hal-stack/content-freshness/check-freshness.js:30