Public scan — anyone with this URL can view this analysis. Sign up to track your own repos privately, run scheduled re-scans, and get AI fix prompts via your dashboard.
Sign up free Scan another repo

zzstoatzz/leaflet-search

https://github.com/zzstoatzz/leaflet-search · scanned 2026-06-16 01:14 UTC (2 months, 1 week ago)

42 raw signals (0 security + 42 graph)

File as issue Image
UNIFIED Repobility · multi-layer engine · AI coders

Complete repo analysis

Last scanned 2 months, 1 week ago · v1 · 36 actionable findings from 1 signal source. 6 repeated signals grouped for readability. Security checks, system graph analysis, and verified AI-agent feedback are merged into one review queue.

JSON
Combined
63.2
/100
Security checks
63
0 findings
System graph
63
88.9% cov · 36 findings
Critical
0
click to filter
Agents
10
0 votes
Crowd
0
reported
Severity distribution — click a segment to filter
Active filters: excluding tests × Reset all
Severity: Critical 0 High 1 Medium 22 Low 8 9-Layer: Software Security Quality Integrity Frontend Hardware Data Network Cicd Source: Security checks 0 System graph 36 Crowd 0 Layer: Network 1 Hardware 4 Frontend 1 Security 10 Cicd 2 Quality 18
Corpus Intelligence Cross-corpus context (cohort percentile, top patterns, fix plan) is shown only on repositories you own. Sign up and connect your repo to view it.
Scan summary Repository scanned at 63.2/100 with 88.9% coverage. It contains 336 nodes across 0 cross-layer flows, written primarily in mixed languages. Engine surfaced 42 findings — concentrated in quality (18), security (10), hardware (7). Risk profile is high: 0 critical, 1 high, 25 medium. Recommended next step: open the quality layer findings first — that's where the highest-impact wins live.

Showing 31 of 36 actionable findings. 42 raw detector signals were grouped into reader-sized issues. Click TP / FP to vote on a finding's accuracy — votes adjust the confidence weighting and improve detection across the platform.

high System graph cicd CI/CD security conf 1.00 GitHub Action tracks a moving branch
superfly/flyctl-actions/setup-flyctl@master can move without a code change in this repo. Pin third-party actions to a reviewed 40-character commit SHA.
.github/workflows/deploy-backend.yml:23 CI/CD securitySupply chainGithub actions
medium System graph quality Integrity conf 1.00 `fetch()` without try/.catch or AbortSignal — site/atlas.js:1908
Bare `fetch(...)` will throw an unhandled rejection on network failure. Wrap in try/catch, attach a `.catch(...)`, or pass an AbortSignal with a timeout.
runtime safetyRobustness
medium System graph quality Integrity conf 1.00 `fetch()` without try/.catch or AbortSignal — site/functions/img-proxy.js:30
Bare `fetch(...)` will throw an unhandled rejection on network failure. Wrap in try/catch, attach a `.catch(...)`, or pass an AbortSignal with a timeout.
runtime safetyRobustness
medium System graph quality Integrity conf 1.00 `fetch()` without try/.catch or AbortSignal — site/functions/og-image.js:1167
Bare `fetch(...)` will throw an unhandled rejection on network failure. Wrap in try/catch, attach a `.catch(...)`, or pass an AbortSignal with a timeout.
runtime safetyRobustness
medium System graph quality Integrity conf 1.00 `fetch()` without try/.catch or AbortSignal — site/ui.js:423
Bare `fetch(...)` will throw an unhandled rejection on network failure. Wrap in try/catch, attach a `.catch(...)`, or pass an AbortSignal with a timeout.
runtime safetyRobustness
medium System graph quality Agent instructions conf 1.00 Agent authority lacks a verifier contract: .claude/commands/check-perf.md
This agent instruction grants code or shell authority but does not state the verification gate that decides promotion. The recurring safe pattern is: LLM proposes; deterministic tests/build/security checks verify; only verified code promotes.
.claude/commands/check-perf.md VerificationClaude instruction
medium System graph quality Agent instructions conf 1.00 Agent authority lacks a verifier contract: .claude/commands/check-prod.md
This agent instruction grants code or shell authority but does not state the verification gate that decides promotion. The recurring safe pattern is: LLM proposes; deterministic tests/build/security checks verify; only verified code promotes.
.claude/commands/check-prod.md VerificationClaude instruction
medium System graph quality Agent instructions conf 1.00 Agent authority lacks a verifier contract: pub-search-mcp/.mcp.json
This agent instruction grants code or shell authority but does not state the verification gate that decides promotion. The recurring safe pattern is: LLM proposes; deterministic tests/build/security checks verify; only verified code promotes.
pub-search-mcp/.mcp.json VerificationMcp config
medium System graph quality Agent instructions conf 1.00 Agent instructions exist but release-hardening basics are missing
AI-coder instruction files were found, but the repo is missing license. Treat this as a contract gap: the agent is guided, but the generated output is not yet guarded by the controls that make it repeatable.
Repo hardeningGenerated repo pattern
medium System graph hardware Security conf 1.00 Dockerfile runs as root: backend/Dockerfile
No non-root USER set. Containers running as root expand the blast radius of any vulnerability inside the image.
Container
medium System graph hardware Security conf 1.00 Dockerfile runs as root: ingester/Dockerfile
No non-root USER set. Containers running as root expand the blast radius of any vulnerability inside the image.
Container
medium System graph cicd CI/CD security conf 1.00 4 occurrences GitHub Action is tag-pinned rather than SHA-pinned
astral-sh/setup-uv@v5 can move without a code change in this repo. Pin third-party actions to a reviewed 40-character commit SHA.
4 files, 4 locations
.github/workflows/backfill-embeddings.yml:16
.github/workflows/daily-discovery.yml:36
.github/workflows/ingestion-watchdog.yml:22
.github/workflows/reconcile-recommends.yml:20
CI/CD securitySupply chainGithub actions
medium System graph security security conf 1.00 Insecure pattern 'cors_wildcard' in site/functions/img-proxy.js:37
Found a known-risky pattern (cors_wildcard). Review and replace if possible.
site/functions/img-proxy.js:37 Cors wildcard
medium System graph security security conf 1.00 Insecure pattern 'direct_innerhtml_assignment' in site/atlas.js:1877
Found a known-risky pattern (direct_innerhtml_assignment). Review and replace if possible.
site/atlas.js:1877 Direct innerhtml assignment
medium System graph security security conf 1.00 Insecure pattern 'direct_innerhtml_assignment' in site/dashboard.js:76
Found a known-risky pattern (direct_innerhtml_assignment). Review and replace if possible.
site/dashboard.js:76 Direct innerhtml assignment
medium System graph security security conf 1.00 Insecure pattern 'direct_innerhtml_assignment' in site/index.html:1000
Found a known-risky pattern (direct_innerhtml_assignment). Review and replace if possible.
site/index.html:1000 Direct innerhtml assignment
medium System graph security security conf 1.00 Insecure pattern 'direct_innerhtml_assignment' in site/loading.js:47
Found a known-risky pattern (direct_innerhtml_assignment). Review and replace if possible.
site/loading.js:47 Direct innerhtml assignment
medium System graph security security conf 1.00 Insecure pattern 'direct_innerhtml_assignment' in site/recommended.html:668
Found a known-risky pattern (direct_innerhtml_assignment). Review and replace if possible.
site/recommended.html:668 Direct innerhtml assignment
medium System graph security security conf 1.00 Insecure pattern 'direct_innerhtml_assignment' in site/ui.js:112
Found a known-risky pattern (direct_innerhtml_assignment). Review and replace if possible.
site/ui.js:112 Direct innerhtml assignment
medium System graph security security conf 1.00 Insecure pattern 'insert_adjacent_html' in site/index.html:1198
Found a known-risky pattern (insert_adjacent_html). Review and replace if possible.
site/index.html:1198 Insert adjacent html
medium System graph security security conf 1.00 Insecure pattern 'insert_adjacent_html' in site/recommended.html:686
Found a known-risky pattern (insert_adjacent_html). Review and replace if possible.
site/recommended.html:686 Insert adjacent html
medium System graph security Coverage conf 1.00 No auth library detected
The scanner did not find any standard auth library (JWT, OAuth, NextAuth, Auth0, etc.). The repo has auth/admin/session surface indicators, so auth may live in custom code, in a separate service, or be missing.
auth
medium System graph network Security conf 1.00 Privileged port 17 in use
Port 17 is privileged (<1024). Make sure the service runs with the right caps or front it with a non-privileged port via a load balancer.
.github/workflows/daily-discovery.yml Ports
low System graph hardware Coverage conf 1.00 Containers defined but no K8s/orchestration manifest found
Repo has Dockerfiles/compose but no Kubernetes/Nomad manifests. If the target deployment is K8s, the manifests may live in a separate ops repo.
Deployment
low System graph hardware Supply chain conf 1.00 4 occurrences Docker base image is tag-pinned but not digest-pinned: debian:bookworm-slim
Container tags can be retagged upstream. Pin production base images to a reviewed digest (`image@sha256:...`) when reproducibility and supply-chain integrity matter.
2 files, 4 locations
backend/Dockerfile:2, 35 (2 hits)
ingester/Dockerfile:2, 27 (2 hits)
containersPinned dependencies
low System graph quality Tests conf 1.00 Low test-to-source ratio
3 tests / 15 src (ratio 0.20).
low System graph quality Integrity conf 1.00 Near-duplicate function bodies in 2 places
Functions with the same first-5-line body hash: pub-search-mcp/server/src/pub_search/server.py:search_tips, pub-search-mcp/server/src/pub_search/server.py:search This is *the* AI-coder failure mode (4× more duplication in vibe-coded repos — see https://jw.hn/ai-code-hygiene). Consolidate or docume…
duplicatesduplication
low System graph quality License conf 1.00 No license file detected
No LICENSE/COPYING/NOTICE file was found. Generated repositories often omit licensing, which blocks reuse and automated intake.
Repo hardeningGenerated repo pattern
low System graph quality Integrity conf 1.00 Old/deprecated-named symbol `midDataOld` in site/atlas.js:1709
Names with suffixes like `_old`, `_v1`, `_deprecated` usually indicate replaced-but-not-removed code (typical AI-coder leftover). Confirm and delete, or rename if it's the active version.
old markerDead code
low System graph quality Provenance conf 1.00 Shallow git history limits provenance confidence
The repository is a shallow clone. Origin/evolution analysis cannot distinguish fresh generation, imported legacy code, or long-lived human code with high confidence.
Git historyGenerated repo pattern
low System graph quality Complexity conf 1.00 Very large file: site/atlas.js (2269 lines)
Files with >800 lines often hide complexity hotspots and discourage tests.
For AI agents: Voting guide (TP/FP) MCP manifest Stdio wrapper SARIF Integrate Findings queue Vote TP/FP on findings to calibrate the engine.
For AI agents + API integrations
Email me when this repo regresses
Free. We re-scan periodically; new criticals → your inbox. No signup required for the scan itself.
API access

This page is publicly accessible at: https://repobility.com/scan/2334ac0e-0dd1-4b12-8653-017c65475661/

To check status programmatically (no auth required): 

curl -s https://repobility.com/api/v1/public/scan/2334ac0e-0dd1-4b12-8653-017c65475661/

Important — please don't re-submit the same URL repeatedly. The submission endpoint is idempotent: re-submitting the same git URL returns this same scan_token, not a new one. To re-scan this repo, sign up free and use the dashboard.