devops-infra/action-pull-request

Public scan — anyone with this URL can view this analysis. Sign up to track your own repos privately, run scheduled re-scans, and get AI fix prompts via your dashboard.

9 of your 12 findings came from Repobility's proprietary detections. ✓ Repobility tags below mark them.

Scan timing: clone 2.61s · analysis 1.87s · 0.4 MB · GitHub API rate-limit (preflight)

https://github.com/devops-infra/action-pull-request · scanned 2026-06-05 17:38 UTC (4 days, 21 hours ago) · 10 languages

48 raw signals (12 security + 36 graph) 96th percentile · Python · tiny (<2K LoC)

File as issue Image

UNIFIED Repobility · multi-layer engine · AI coders

Complete repo analysis

Last scanned 4 days, 21 hours ago · v2 · 16 actionable findings from 2 signal sources. 14 repeated signals grouped for readability. Security checks, system graph analysis, and verified AI-agent feedback are merged into one review queue.

JSON

77.8% cov · 8 findings

Score breakdown â 2026-05-18-v5

Component	Sub-score	Weight	Contribution
`structure_score`	45.0	0.15	6.75
`security_score`	97.1	0.25	24.27
`testing_score`	85.0	0.20	17.00
`documentation_score`	75.0	0.15	11.25
`practices_score`	89.0	0.15	13.35
`code_quality`	80.0	0.10	8.00
Overall		1.00	80.6

Severity distribution — click a segment to filter

Active filters: excluding tests × Reset all

Severity: Critical 0 High 6 Medium 4 Low 3 9-Layer: Software Security Quality Integrity Frontend Hardware Data Network Cicd Source: Security checks 8 System graph 8 Crowd 0 Layer: Cicd 6 Quality 2 Software 2 Api 1 Hardware 3 Frontend 1 Security 1

Exclude dismissed / FP Exclude test files

Scan summary Quality grade A- (81/100). Dimensions: security 97, maintainability 45. 12 findings (8 security). 157 lines analyzed.

Showing 13 of 16 actionable findings. 30 raw detector signals were grouped into reader-sized issues. Click TP / FP to vote on a finding's accuracy — votes adjust the confidence weighting and improve detection across the platform.

high Security checks quality Quality conf 1.00 ✓ Repobility [MINED021] Path Traversal Os Join: os.path.join(user_dir, filename) where filename can contain "../" — directory escape.

Review and fix per the pattern semantics. See CWE-22 / A01:2021 for context.

scripts/split_content_bytes.py:60

high Security checks software dependencies conf 0.90 ✓ Repobility Dockerfile FROM `alpine:3.23.4` not pinned by digest

`FROM alpine:3.23.4` resolves the tag at build time. The registry CAN re-push a different image for the same tag, so every build is potentially different. Production images should pin to `image@sha256:...` for reproducibility + supply-chain integrity.

Dockerfile:1

medium Security checks cicd CI/CD security conf 0.90 ✓ Repobility 10 occurrences GitHub Action is tag-pinned rather than SHA-pinned

Action `devops-infra/.github/.github/workflows/reusable-auto-pull-request-create.yml` pinned to mutable ref `@v1` uses a mutable tag or branch. Pin external actions to a reviewed full commit SHA when the workflow is security-sensitive.

5 files, 10 locations

.github/workflows/auto-pull-request-create.yml:19 (2 hits)

.github/workflows/auto-release-create.yml:29 (2 hits)

.github/workflows/cron-dependency-update.yml:16 (2 hits)

.github/workflows/manual-release-branch-prepare.yml:34 (2 hits)

.github/workflows/manual-release-create.yml:33 (2 hits)

CI/CD securitySupply chainGitHub Actions

high Security checks cicd CI/CD security conf 0.90 ✓ Repobility GitHub Action is tag-pinned rather than SHA-pinned

Action `devops-infra/triglav/.github/workflows/e2e-action-pull-request.yml` pinned to mutable ref `@master` uses a mutable tag or branch. Pin external actions to a reviewed full commit SHA when the workflow is security-sensitive.

.github/workflows/manual-e2e-validate.yml:28 CI/CD securitySupply chainGitHub Actions

high Security checks software dependencies conf 0.90 ✓ Repobility pre-commit hook `https://github.com/pre-commit/pre-commit-hooks` pinned to mutable rev `v6.0.0`

`.pre-commit-config.yaml` references `https://github.com/pre-commit/pre-commit-hooks` at `rev: v6.0.0`. If `{rev}` is a branch or version tag, the repo owner can push new code there and `pre-commit install --install-hooks` will fetch it on every developer's machine.

.pre-commit-config.yaml:2

high System graph cicd CI/CD security conf 1.00 GitHub Action tracks a moving branch

devops-infra/triglav/.github/workflows/e2e-action-pull-request.yml@master can move without a code change in this repo. Pin third-party actions to a reviewed 40-character commit SHA.

.github/workflows/manual-e2e-validate.yml:28 CI/CD securitySupply chainGithub actions

high Security checks cicd CI/CD security conf 0.82 Docker final stage has no non-root USER

Docker images run as root unless the image or Dockerfile switches to a non-root user.

Dockerfile:1 CI/CD securitycontainers

medium System graph hardware Security conf 1.00 Dockerfile runs as root: Dockerfile

No non-root USER set. Containers running as root expand the blast radius of any vulnerability inside the image.

Container

medium System graph cicd CI/CD security conf 1.00 6 occurrences GitHub Actions workflow grants broad write permissions

CI tokens with write permissions increase blast radius when an action, dependency, or PR workflow is compromised. Prefer job-level least-privilege permissions.

6 files, 6 locations

.github/workflows/auto-pull-request-create.yml

.github/workflows/auto-release-create.yml

.github/workflows/cron-dependency-update.yml

.github/workflows/manual-e2e-validate.yml

.github/workflows/manual-release-branch-prepare.yml

.github/workflows/manual-release-create.yml

CI/CD securitySupply chainGithub actions

medium System graph security Coverage conf 1.00 No auth library detected

The scanner did not find any standard auth library (JWT, OAuth, NextAuth, Auth0, etc.). Either auth lives in custom code, in a separate service, or is missing.

auth

low Security checks cicd CI/CD security conf 0.72 .dockerignore misses sensitive defaults

.dockerignore exists but does not cover common secret or VCS patterns.

.dockerignore CI/CD securitycontainers

low System graph hardware Coverage conf 1.00 Containers defined but no K8s/orchestration manifest found

Repo has Dockerfiles/compose but no Kubernetes/Nomad manifests. If the target deployment is K8s, the manifests may live in a separate ops repo.

Deployment

low System graph hardware Supply chain conf 1.00 Docker base image is tag-pinned but not digest-pinned: alpine:3.23.4

Container tags can be retagged upstream. Pin production base images to a reviewed digest (`image@sha256:...`) when reproducibility and supply-chain integrity matter.

Dockerfile:1 containersPinned dependencies

For AI agents: Voting guide (TP/FP) MCP manifest Stdio wrapper SARIF Integrate Findings queue Vote TP/FP on findings to calibrate the engine.

For AI agents + API integrations

Email me when this repo regresses

Free. We re-scan periodically; new criticals → your inbox. No signup required for the scan itself.

API access

This page is publicly accessible at: https://repobility.com/scan/2368cd81-0e9f-4d73-a031-6ca41589207d/

To check status programmatically (no auth required):

curl -s https://repobility.com/api/v1/public/scan/2368cd81-0e9f-4d73-a031-6ca41589207d/

Important — please don't re-submit the same URL repeatedly. The submission endpoint is idempotent: re-submitting the same git URL returns this same scan_token, not a new one. To re-scan this repo, sign up free and use the dashboard.