Public scan — anyone with this URL can view this analysis. Sign up to track your own repos privately, run scheduled re-scans, and get AI fix prompts via your dashboard.

strategiesfbbs/fbbs-portal

https://github.com/strategiesfbbs/fbbs-portal · scanned 2026-06-16 00:23 UTC (2 months, 2 weeks ago)

80 raw signals (0 security + 80 graph)

File as issue Image

UNIFIED Repobility · multi-layer engine · AI coders

Complete repo analysis

Last scanned 2 months, 2 weeks ago · v1 · 80 actionable findings from 1 signal source. Security checks, system graph analysis, and verified AI-agent feedback are merged into one review queue.

JSON

88.9% cov · 80 findings

Severity distribution — click a segment to filter

Active filters: excluding tests × Reset all

Severity: Critical 0 High 0 Medium 7 Low 44 9-Layer: Software Security Quality Integrity Frontend Hardware Data Network Cicd Source: Security checks 0 System graph 80 Crowd 0 Layer: Frontend 35 Security 5 Cicd 1 Quality 39

Exclude dismissed / FP Exclude test files

Corpus Intelligence Cross-corpus context (cohort percentile, top patterns, fix plan) is shown only on repositories you own. Sign up and connect your repo to view it.

Scan summary Repository scanned at 77.7/100 with 88.9% coverage. It contains 2628 nodes across 12 cross-layer flows, written primarily in mixed languages. Engine surfaced 80 findings — concentrated in quality (39), frontend (35), security (5). Risk profile is low: 0 critical, 0 high, 7 medium. Recommended next step: open the quality layer findings first — that's where the highest-impact wins live.

Showing 51 of 80 actionable findings. Click TP / FP to vote on a finding's accuracy — votes adjust the confidence weighting and improve detection across the platform.

medium System graph quality Agent instructions conf 1.00 Agent instructions exist but release-hardening basics are missing

AI-coder instruction files were found, but the repo is missing license, ci. Treat this as a contract gap: the agent is guided, but the generated output is not yet guarded by the controls that make it repeatable.

Repo hardeningGenerated repo pattern

medium System graph security security conf 1.00 Insecure pattern 'direct_innerhtml_assignment' in public/js/modules/breadcrumbs.js:59

Found a known-risky pattern (direct_innerhtml_assignment). Review and replace if possible.

public/js/modules/breadcrumbs.js:59 Direct innerhtml assignment

medium System graph security security conf 1.00 Insecure pattern 'node_child_process' in scripts/portal-doctor.js:3

Found a known-risky pattern (node_child_process). Review and replace if possible.

scripts/portal-doctor.js:3 Node child process

medium System graph security security conf 1.00 Insecure pattern 'node_child_process' in server/bank-data-importer.js:3

Found a known-risky pattern (node_child_process). Review and replace if possible.

server/bank-data-importer.js:3 Node child process

medium System graph security security conf 1.00 Insecure pattern 'node_child_process' in server/server.js:257

Found a known-risky pattern (node_child_process). Review and replace if possible.

server/server.js:257 Node child process

medium System graph security Coverage conf 1.00 No auth library detected

The scanner did not find any standard auth library (JWT, OAuth, NextAuth, Auth0, etc.). The repo has auth/admin/session surface indicators, so auth may live in custom code, in a separate service, or be missing.

auth

medium System graph cicd CI/CD security conf 1.00 No CI/CD pipelines detected

No GitHub Actions, GitLab CI, or CircleCI configs found. Without CI you can't gate deploys on tests/lints.

CI/CD securityCoverage

low System graph quality Production readiness conf 1.00 Composite production-readiness gap

Multiple low-cost hardening controls are missing together: license, ci. Opus verification showed these co-occurring gaps are a better readiness signal than reading each flag in isolation.

Repo hardeningGenerated repo pattern

low System graph quality Debug conf 1.00 Debug logging residue appears in source files

Found 34 console/debugger/print-style debug statements in non-test source. This is a common fast-generation residue before production cleanup.

CleanupRepo hardeningGenerated repo pattern

low System graph quality License conf 1.00 No license file detected

No LICENSE/COPYING/NOTICE file was found. Generated repositories often omit licensing, which blocks reuse and automated intake.

Repo hardeningGenerated repo pattern

low System graph quality Integrity conf 1.00 Old/deprecated-named symbol `report_hidden_v2` in server/report-store.js:144

Names with suffixes like `_old`, `_v1`, `_deprecated` usually indicate replaced-but-not-removed code (typical AI-coder leftover). Confirm and delete, or rename if it's the active version.

old markerDead code

low System graph quality Provenance conf 1.00 Shallow git history limits provenance confidence

The repository is a shallow clone. Origin/evolution analysis cannot distinguish fresh generation, imported legacy code, or long-lived human code with high confidence.

Git historyGenerated repo pattern

low System graph frontend Frontend quality conf 1.00 Stray `console.log` in TS/JS — scripts/import-bank-workbook.js:16