Public scan — anyone with this URL can view this analysis. Sign up to track your own repos privately, run scheduled re-scans, and get AI fix prompts via your dashboard.
Sign up free Scan another repo

xenonluv/stocknews

https://github.com/xenonluv/stocknews · scanned 2026-06-16 01:02 UTC (2 months, 1 week ago)

27 raw signals (0 security + 27 graph)

File as issue Image
UNIFIED Repobility · multi-layer engine · AI coders

Complete repo analysis

Last scanned 2 months, 1 week ago · v1 · 25 actionable findings from 1 signal source. 2 repeated signals grouped for readability. Security checks, system graph analysis, and verified AI-agent feedback are merged into one review queue.

JSON
Combined
77.9
/100
Security checks
78
0 findings
System graph
78
100.0% cov · 25 findings
Critical
0
click to filter
Agents
10
0 votes
Crowd
0
reported
Severity distribution — click a segment to filter
Active filters: excluding tests × Reset all
Severity: Critical 0 High 0 Medium 12 Low 7 9-Layer: Software Security Quality Integrity Frontend Hardware Data Network Cicd Source: Security checks 0 System graph 25 Crowd 0 Layer: Api 1 Frontend 3 Network 4 Security 2 Cicd 1 Quality 14
Corpus Intelligence Cross-corpus context (cohort percentile, top patterns, fix plan) is shown only on repositories you own. Sign up and connect your repo to view it.
Scan summary Repository scanned at 77.9/100 with 100.0% coverage. It contains 587 nodes across 4 cross-layer flows, written primarily in mixed languages. Engine surfaced 27 findings — concentrated in quality (16), network (4), frontend (3). Risk profile is low: 0 critical, 0 high, 12 medium. Recommended next step: open the quality layer findings first — that's where the highest-impact wins live.

Showing 19 of 25 actionable findings. 27 raw detector signals were grouped into reader-sized issues. Click TP / FP to vote on a finding's accuracy — votes adjust the confidence weighting and improve detection across the platform.

medium System graph quality Integrity conf 1.00 `fetch()` without try/.catch or AbortSignal — web/app/api/track/route.ts:14
Bare `fetch(...)` will throw an unhandled rejection on network failure. Wrap in try/catch, attach a `.catch(...)`, or pass an AbortSignal with a timeout.
runtime safetyRobustness
medium System graph quality Integrity conf 1.00 `fetch()` without try/.catch or AbortSignal — web/services/radar.client.ts:11
Bare `fetch(...)` will throw an unhandled rejection on network failure. Wrap in try/catch, attach a `.catch(...)`, or pass an AbortSignal with a timeout.
runtime safetyRobustness
medium System graph quality Agent instructions conf 1.00 Agent instructions exist but release-hardening basics are missing
AI-coder instruction files were found, but the repo is missing ci, tests. Treat this as a contract gap: the agent is guided, but the generated output is not yet guarded by the controls that make it repeatable.
Repo hardeningGenerated repo pattern
medium System graph quality Placeholder conf 1.00 Critical user flow still appears backed by mock or placeholder data
A payment/auth/admin/order/billing-style flow contains mock, fake, TODO, dummy, or placeholder markers in runtime source. In the Fable corpus this is a high-leverage completeness smell: the app can look finished while the money, identity, or tenant flow is still scaffolded.
Mock dataCritical flowGenerated repo pattern
medium System graph security security conf 1.00 Insecure pattern 'cors_wildcard' in web/app/api/predictions/route.ts:8
Found a known-risky pattern (cors_wildcard). Review and replace if possible.
web/app/api/predictions/route.ts:8 Cors wildcard
medium System graph security Coverage conf 1.00 No auth library detected
The scanner did not find any standard auth library (JWT, OAuth, NextAuth, Auth0, etc.). The repo has auth/admin/session surface indicators, so auth may live in custom code, in a separate service, or be missing.
auth
medium System graph cicd CI/CD security conf 1.00 No CI/CD pipelines detected
No GitHub Actions, GitLab CI, or CircleCI configs found. Without CI you can't gate deploys on tests/lints.
CI/CD securityCoverage
medium System graph network Security conf 1.00 Privileged port 14 in use
Port 14 is privileged (<1024). Make sure the service runs with the right caps or front it with a non-privileged port via a load balancer.
scripts/setup_mac_kimi_radar.sh Ports
medium System graph network Security conf 1.00 Privileged port 15 in use
Port 15 is privileged (<1024). Make sure the service runs with the right caps or front it with a non-privileged port via a load balancer.
scripts/setup_mac_kimi_radar.sh Ports
medium System graph network Security conf 1.00 Privileged port 30 in use
Port 30 is privileged (<1024). Make sure the service runs with the right caps or front it with a non-privileged port via a load balancer.
scripts/setup_mac_kimi_radar.sh Ports
medium System graph network Security conf 1.00 Privileged port 45 in use
Port 45 is privileged (<1024). Make sure the service runs with the right caps or front it with a non-privileged port via a load balancer.
scripts/setup_mac_kimi_radar.sh Ports
medium System graph quality Tests conf 1.00 Very low test-to-source ratio
3 test file(s) for 95 source file(s) (ratio 0.03). Consider adding integration or unit tests for critical paths.
Coverage
low System graph quality Integrity conf 1.00 15 env vars used in code but missing from .env.example
Drift between code and config docs. The first few: `FORECAST_SUPPLEMENT_N`, `KV_REST_API_READ_ONLY_TOKEN`, `KV_REST_API_TOKEN`, `KV_REST_API_URL`, `MOONSHOT_API_KEY`, `MOONSHOT_BASE_URL`, `MOONSHOT_MODEL`, `MOONSHOT_THINKING` + 7 more. Add them (with a placeholder/comment) to .env.example so onboar…
config drift
low System graph quality Production readiness conf 1.00 Composite production-readiness gap
Multiple low-cost hardening controls are missing together: ci, tests. Opus verification showed these co-occurring gaps are a better readiness signal than reading each flag in isolation.
Repo hardeningGenerated repo pattern
low System graph quality Debug conf 1.00 Debug logging residue appears in source files
Found 77 console/debugger/print-style debug statements in non-test source. This is a common fast-generation residue before production cleanup.
CleanupRepo hardeningGenerated repo pattern
low System graph quality Integrity conf 1.00 3 occurrences Near-duplicate function bodies in 2 places
Functions with the same first-5-line body hash: scripts/radar.py:build_universe_naver, scripts/radar.py:build_universe This is *the* AI-coder failure mode (4× more duplication in vibe-coded repos — see https://jw.hn/ai-code-hygiene). Consolidate or document why they're separate.
3 occurrences
repo-level (3 hits)
duplicatesduplication
low System graph quality Provenance conf 1.00 Shallow git history limits provenance confidence
The repository is a shallow clone. Origin/evolution analysis cannot distinguish fresh generation, imported legacy code, or long-lived human code with high confidence.
Git historyGenerated repo pattern
low System graph frontend Frontend quality conf 1.00 Stray `console.log` in TS/JS — web/lib/stock/ai.ts:426
Replace with the toast helper, an error boundary, or remove. `console.warn` / `console.error` are acceptable. Why: Hygiene — easy to leak debug output. Rule id: fq.console-leak
Fq console leak
low System graph quality Complexity conf 1.00 Very large file: scripts/radar.py (1270 lines)
Files with >800 lines often hide complexity hotspots and discourage tests.
For AI agents: Voting guide (TP/FP) MCP manifest Stdio wrapper SARIF Integrate Findings queue Vote TP/FP on findings to calibrate the engine.
For AI agents + API integrations
Email me when this repo regresses
Free. We re-scan periodically; new criticals → your inbox. No signup required for the scan itself.
API access

This page is publicly accessible at: https://repobility.com/scan/2942b3a1-3e95-4f50-a813-9d23c0d28abe/

To check status programmatically (no auth required): 

curl -s https://repobility.com/api/v1/public/scan/2942b3a1-3e95-4f50-a813-9d23c0d28abe/

Important — please don't re-submit the same URL repeatedly. The submission endpoint is idempotent: re-submitting the same git URL returns this same scan_token, not a new one. To re-scan this repo, sign up free and use the dashboard.