Public scan — anyone with this URL can view this analysis. Sign up to track your own repos privately, run scheduled re-scans, and get AI fix prompts via your dashboard.
Sign up free Scan another repo

bkizzy/claude-skills

https://github.com/bkizzy/claude-skills · scanned 2026-06-17 01:40 UTC (1 month, 2 weeks ago)

17 raw signals (0 security + 17 graph)

File as issue Image
UNIFIED Repobility · multi-layer engine · AI coders

Complete repo analysis

Last scanned 1 month, 2 weeks ago · v2 · last Δ -12.4 (diff) · 17 actionable findings from 1 signal source. Security checks, system graph analysis, and verified AI-agent feedback are merged into one review queue.

JSON
Combined
64.3
/100
Security checks
64
0 findings
System graph
64
55.6% cov · 17 findings
Critical
0
click to filter
Agents
10
0 votes
Crowd
0
reported
Severity distribution — click a segment to filter
Active filters: excluding tests × Reset all
Severity: Critical 0 High 1 Medium 8 Low 6 9-Layer: Software Security Quality Integrity Frontend Hardware Data Network Cicd Source: Security checks 0 System graph 17 Crowd 0 Layer: Software 3 Frontend 1 Security 1 Quality 12
Corpus Intelligence Cross-corpus context (cohort percentile, top patterns, fix plan) is shown only on repositories you own. Sign up and connect your repo to view it.
Scan summary Repository scanned at 64.3/100 with 55.6% coverage. It contains 492 nodes across 0 cross-layer flows, written primarily in mixed languages. Engine surfaced 17 findings — concentrated in quality (12), software (3), frontend (1). Risk profile is high: 0 critical, 1 high, 8 medium. Recommended next step: open the quality layer findings first — that's where the highest-impact wins live.

Showing 15 of 17 actionable findings. Click TP / FP to vote on a finding's accuracy — votes adjust the confidence weighting and improve detection across the platform.

high System graph security security conf 1.00 Insecure pattern 'new_function_used' in pdf-annotator/assets/pdf.min.js:22
Found a known-risky pattern (new_function_used). Review and replace if possible.
pdf-annotator/assets/pdf.min.js:22 New function used
medium System graph quality Integrity conf 1.00 `fetch()` without try/.catch or AbortSignal — aaarrr/scripts/asc_private_scrape.js:167
Bare `fetch(...)` will throw an unhandled rejection on network failure. Wrap in try/catch, attach a `.catch(...)`, or pass an AbortSignal with a timeout.
runtime safetyRobustness
medium System graph quality Integrity conf 1.00 `fetch()` without try/.catch or AbortSignal — pdf-annotator/assets/pdf.min.js:22
Bare `fetch(...)` will throw an unhandled rejection on network failure. Wrap in try/catch, attach a `.catch(...)`, or pass an AbortSignal with a timeout.
runtime safetyRobustness
medium System graph quality Agent instructions conf 1.00 Agent authority lacks a verifier contract: aaarrr/SKILL.md
This agent instruction grants code or shell authority but does not state the verification gate that decides promotion. The recurring safe pattern is: LLM proposes; deterministic tests/build/security checks verify; only verified code promotes.
aaarrr/SKILL.md VerificationSkill file
medium System graph quality Agent instructions conf 1.00 Agent authority lacks a verifier contract: pdf-annotator/SKILL.md
This agent instruction grants code or shell authority but does not state the verification gate that decides promotion. The recurring safe pattern is: LLM proposes; deterministic tests/build/security checks verify; only verified code promotes.
pdf-annotator/SKILL.md VerificationSkill file
medium System graph quality Placeholder conf 1.00 Critical user flow still appears backed by mock or placeholder data
A payment/auth/admin/order/billing-style flow contains mock, fake, TODO, dummy, or placeholder markers in runtime source. In the Fable corpus this is a high-leverage completeness smell: the app can look finished while the money, identity, or tenant flow is still scaffolded.
Mock dataCritical flowGenerated repo pattern
medium System graph quality Integrity conf 1.00 Network/subprocess call without timeout or try/except — rfp-evaluator/scripts/_pdf_engine.py:49
`subprocess.run(...)` here lacks both a `timeout=` arg and an enclosing try/except. This is exactly the class of bug that took down our git-clone earlier (HTTP/2 stream cancel surfaced as a fatal). Add a `timeout=` and wrap in try/except, or use a wrapper that retries.
runtime safetyRobustness
medium System graph quality Integrity conf 1.00 Network/subprocess call without timeout or try/except — rfp-evaluator/scripts/render_pages.py:46
`subprocess.run(...)` here lacks both a `timeout=` arg and an enclosing try/except. This is exactly the class of bug that took down our git-clone earlier (HTTP/2 stream cancel surfaced as a fatal). Add a `timeout=` and wrap in try/except, or use a wrapper that retries.
runtime safetyRobustness
medium System graph quality Tests conf 1.00 Very low test-to-source ratio
0 test file(s) for 15 source file(s) (ratio 0.00). Consider adding integration or unit tests for critical paths.
Coverage
low System graph quality Production readiness conf 1.00 Composite production-readiness gap
Multiple low-cost hardening controls are missing together: ci, tests. Opus verification showed these co-occurring gaps are a better readiness signal than reading each flag in isolation.
Repo hardeningGenerated repo pattern
low System graph quality Debug conf 1.00 Debug logging residue appears in source files
Found 20 console/debugger/print-style debug statements in non-test source. This is a common fast-generation residue before production cleanup.
CleanupRepo hardeningGenerated repo pattern
low System graph software Dead code conf 1.00 Possibly dead Python function: do_POST
No callers detected by AST scan in this repo. Could be exported for external callers or a framework handler.
pdf-annotator/scripts/annotate.py:58
low System graph software Dead code conf 1.00 Possibly dead Python function: guard
No callers detected by AST scan in this repo. Could be exported for external callers or a framework handler.
pdf-annotator/scripts/annotate.py:83
low System graph software Dead code conf 1.00 Possibly dead Python function: log_message
No callers detected by AST scan in this repo. Could be exported for external callers or a framework handler.
pdf-annotator/scripts/annotate.py:55
low System graph frontend Frontend quality conf 1.00 Stray `console.log` in TS/JS — pdf-annotator/assets/pdf.min.js:22
Replace with the toast helper, an error boundary, or remove. `console.warn` / `console.error` are acceptable. Why: Hygiene — easy to leak debug output. Rule id: fq.console-leak
Fq console leak
For AI agents: Voting guide (TP/FP) MCP manifest Stdio wrapper SARIF Integrate Findings queue Vote TP/FP on findings to calibrate the engine.
For AI agents + API integrations
Email me when this repo regresses
Free. We re-scan periodically; new criticals → your inbox. No signup required for the scan itself.
API access

This page is publicly accessible at: https://repobility.com/scan/2d91ed44-04b4-4e97-9bec-4ab602b77b1c/

To check status programmatically (no auth required): 

curl -s https://repobility.com/api/v1/public/scan/2d91ed44-04b4-4e97-9bec-4ab602b77b1c/

Important — please don't re-submit the same URL repeatedly. The submission endpoint is idempotent: re-submitting the same git URL returns this same scan_token, not a new one. To re-scan this repo, sign up free and use the dashboard.