JetBrains/rd

Public scan — anyone with this URL can view this analysis. Sign up to track your own repos privately, run scheduled re-scans, and get AI fix prompts via your dashboard.

35 of your 64 findings came from Repobility's proprietary detections. ✓ Repobility tags below mark them.

Scan timing: clone 3.73s · analysis 13.6s · 6.5 MB · GitHub API rate-limit (preflight)

https://github.com/JetBrains/rd · scanned 2026-06-05 12:49 UTC (5 days, 9 hours ago) · 10 languages

103 raw signals (59 security + 44 graph) System graph score 79 (lower by 3)

File as issue Image

UNIFIED Repobility · multi-layer engine · AI coders

Complete repo analysis

Last scanned 5 days, 9 hours ago · v2 · 27 actionable findings from 2 signal sources. 54 repeated signals grouped for readability. Security checks, system graph analysis, and verified AI-agent feedback are merged into one review queue.

JSON

66.7% cov · 6 findings

Score breakdown â 2026-05-18-v5

Component	Sub-score	Weight	Contribution
`structure_score`	40.0	0.15	6.00
`security_score`	96.0	0.25	24.00
`testing_score`	80.0	0.20	16.00
`documentation_score`	67.0	0.15	10.05
`practices_score`	87.0	0.15	13.05
`code_quality`	71.6	0.10	7.16
Overall		1.00	76.3

Severity distribution — click a segment to filter

Active filters: excluding tests × Reset all

Severity: Critical 0 High 5 Medium 4 Low 7 9-Layer: Software Security Quality Integrity Frontend Hardware Data Network Cicd Source: Security checks 21 System graph 6 Crowd 0 Layer: Cicd 5 Quality 11 Security 3 Software 3 Api 1 Hardware 3 Frontend 1

Exclude dismissed / FP Exclude test files

Scan summary Quality grade B+ (76/100). Dimensions: security 96, maintainability 40. 59 findings (27 security). 150,321 lines analyzed.

Showing 15 of 27 actionable findings. 81 raw detector signals were grouped into reader-sized issues. Click TP / FP to vote on a finding's accuracy — votes adjust the confidence weighting and improve detection across the platform.

high Security checks quality Quality conf 1.00 ✓ Repobility 3 occurrences [MINED029] Kotlin Null Bang: x!! throws NullPointerException if x is null. Bypasses Kotlins null safety.

Review and fix per the pattern semantics. See CWE-476 / for context.

3 files, 3 locations

rd-kt/rd-core/src/main/kotlin/com/jetbrains/rd/util/reactive/ViewableCollections.kt:48

rd-kt/rd-cross/src/main/kotlin/com/jetbrains/rd/cross/base/CrossTest_KtClient_Base.kt:34

rd-kt/rd-framework/src/main/kotlin/com/jetbrains/rd/framework/ReflectionMarshallers.kt:22

high Security checks software dependencies conf 0.90 ✓ Repobility Binary file `gradle/wrapper/gradle-wrapper.jar` committed in source repo

`gradle/wrapper/gradle-wrapper.jar` is a .jar binary (62,076 bytes) committed to a repo that otherwise has 1159 source files. Trojan binaries inside otherwise-normal source repos are a known supply-chain attack: a compromised dependency or PR slips in a binary that gets executed by build scripts.

gradle/wrapper/gradle-wrapper.jar:1

high Security checks software dependencies conf 0.90 ✓ Repobility Dockerfile FROM `adoptopenjdk/openjdk11:x86_64-ubuntu-jdk-11.0.11_9` not pinned by digest

`FROM adoptopenjdk/openjdk11:x86_64-ubuntu-jdk-11.0.11_9` resolves the tag at build time. The registry CAN re-push a different image for the same tag, so every build is potentially different. Production images should pin to `image@sha256:...` for reproducibility + supply-chain integrity.

Dockerfile:1

low Security checks cicd CI/CD security conf 0.90 ✓ Repobility 30 occurrences GitHub Action is tag-pinned rather than SHA-pinned

Action `actions/checkout` pinned to mutable ref `@v6` uses a mutable tag or branch. Pin external actions to a reviewed full commit SHA when the workflow is security-sensitive.

5 files, 30 locations

.github/workflows/build-rd-cpp.yml:49, 60, 66, 72, 82, 169, 223 (13 hits)

.github/workflows/release-rd-cpp.yml:51, 54, 73, 200 (7 hits)

.github/workflows/build-rd-net.yml:18, 21, 36 (4 hits)

.github/workflows/build-rd-kt-container.yml:18, 28 (3 hits)

.github/workflows/build-rd-kt.yml:21, 31 (3 hits)

CI/CD securitySupply chainGitHub Actions

medium Security checks cicd CI/CD security conf 0.90 ✓ Repobility 8 occurrences GitHub Action is tag-pinned rather than SHA-pinned

Action `nuget/setup-nuget` pinned to mutable ref `@v4` uses a mutable tag or branch. Pin external actions to a reviewed full commit SHA when the workflow is security-sensitive.

4 files, 8 locations

.github/workflows/build-rd-cpp.yml:55 (2 hits)

.github/workflows/build-rd-kt-container.yml:21 (2 hits)

.github/workflows/build-rd-kt.yml:24 (2 hits)

.github/workflows/release-rd-cpp.yml:68 (2 hits)

CI/CD securitySupply chainGitHub Actions

high Security checks software dependencies conf 0.90 ✓ Repobility Workflow container/services image `adoptopenjdk/openjdk11:x86_64-ubuntu-jdk-11.0.11_9` unpinned

`container/services image: adoptopenjdk/openjdk11:x86_64-ubuntu-jdk-11.0.11_9` without `@sha256:...` pulls a mutable tag at workflow-run time. Treat workflow container references with the same supply-chain discipline as Dockerfile FROM lines.

.github/workflows/build-rd-kt-container.yml:12

low Security checks quality Quality conf 1.00 [SEC136] AI-typical over-broad exception handler swallowing all errors: Catch-all exception block that silently returns success or no-ops. AI agents reach for this pattern when a flaky test or an unfamiliar API throws — wrap, swallow, return success. Real bugs are masked, observability is destroyed, and callers think the operation worked. CWE-396 (improperly-generalized exception). Distinct from intentional fallback because there's no log line and the success value is fabricated.

Catch the specific exception type, log at error level with full exception info, and return a failure-shaped result. If the operation is genuinely best-effort, log at warning and document why in a comment so the next reader (or scanner) knows.

rd-net/Lifetimes/Util/ReflectionUtil.cs:137

high Security checks cicd CI/CD security conf 0.82 Docker final stage has no non-root USER

Docker images run as root unless the image or Dockerfile switches to a non-root user.

Dockerfile:1 CI/CD securitycontainers

medium Security checks cicd CI/CD security conf 0.76 Dockerfile copies broad context with incomplete .dockerignore

COPY . or ADD . is safer when .dockerignore excludes secrets, git history, keys, and generated artifacts.

Dockerfile:4 CI/CD securitycontainers

medium System graph hardware Security conf 1.00 Dockerfile runs as root: Dockerfile

No non-root USER set. Containers running as root expand the blast radius of any vulnerability inside the image.

Container

medium System graph security Coverage conf 1.00 No auth library detected

The scanner did not find any standard auth library (JWT, OAuth, NextAuth, Auth0, etc.). Either auth lives in custom code, in a separate service, or is missing.

auth

low Security checks cicd CI/CD security conf 0.72 .dockerignore misses sensitive defaults

.dockerignore exists but does not cover common secret or VCS patterns.

.dockerignore CI/CD securitycontainers

low Security checks quality Quality conf 0.60 13 occurrences Duplicated implementation block across source files

Duplicate implementation blocks are maintenance debt. Keep them visible, but they are not a high-severity defect unless the duplicated logic is security-sensitive or drifting.

12 files, 12 locations

rd-cpp/src/rd_core_cpp/src/main/reactive/ViewableMap.h:36

rd-cpp/src/rd_core_cpp/src/main/reactive/ViewableSet.h:24

rd-cpp/thirdparty/ordered-map/include/tsl/ordered_set.h:105

rd-kt/rd-cross/src/main/kotlin/com/jetbrains/rd/cross/cases/server/CrossTest_AllEntities_KtServer.kt:11

rd-kt/rd-framework/src/main/kotlin/com/jetbrains/rd/framework/impl/AsyncRdSet.kt:142

rd-kt/rd-framework/src/main/kotlin/com/jetbrains/rd/framework/impl/RdMap.kt:56

rd-kt/rd-framework/src/main/kotlin/com/jetbrains/rd/framework/impl/RdSet.kt:60

rd-net/Lifetimes/Diagnostics/StringInterpolation/JetLogInfoInterpolatedStringHandler.cs:15

duplicationquality

low System graph hardware Coverage conf 1.00 Containers defined but no K8s/orchestration manifest found

Repo has Dockerfiles/compose but no Kubernetes/Nomad manifests. If the target deployment is K8s, the manifests may live in a separate ops repo.

Deployment

low System graph hardware Supply chain conf 1.00 Docker base image is tag-pinned but not digest-pinned: adoptopenjdk/openjdk11:x86_64-ubuntu-jdk-11.0.11_9

Container tags can be retagged upstream. Pin production base images to a reviewed digest (`image@sha256:...`) when reproducibility and supply-chain integrity matter.

Dockerfile:1 containersPinned dependencies

For AI agents: Voting guide (TP/FP) MCP manifest Stdio wrapper SARIF Integrate Findings queue Vote TP/FP on findings to calibrate the engine.

For AI agents + API integrations

Email me when this repo regresses

Free. We re-scan periodically; new criticals → your inbox. No signup required for the scan itself.

API access

This page is publicly accessible at: https://repobility.com/scan/347b898a-d29f-405d-9afc-97e727d278a1/

To check status programmatically (no auth required):

curl -s https://repobility.com/api/v1/public/scan/347b898a-d29f-405d-9afc-97e727d278a1/

Important — please don't re-submit the same URL repeatedly. The submission endpoint is idempotent: re-submitting the same git URL returns this same scan_token, not a new one. To re-scan this repo, sign up free and use the dashboard.