thClaws/thClaws

Public scan — anyone with this URL can view this analysis. Sign up to track your own repos privately, run scheduled re-scans, and get AI fix prompts via your dashboard.

Upstream (GitHub) caused delay on this scan — not Repobility.

GitHub API rate-limited (HTTP 403) — preflight skipped, fell back to direct git clone.
Clone from GitHub took 38.12s for a 46.0 MB repo slow.
Repobility's analysis ran in 5.16s after the clone landed.

https://github.com/thClaws/thClaws · scanned 2026-05-31 01:25 UTC (5 days, 8 hours ago) · 10 languages

239 findings (93 legacy + 146 scanner) 11/13 scanners ran 60th percentile · Rust · large (100-500K LoC)

File as issue Image v2 schema

UNIFIED Repobility · multi-layer engine · AI coders

Complete repo analysis

Last scanned 5 days, 8 hours ago · v2 · 177 findings from 2 sources. Findings combine the legacy security pipeline AND the multi-layer engine (atlas, wiring, flows, ranked) AND verified AI agent contributions.

JSON

Score breakdown â 2026-05-18-v5

Component	Sub-score	Weight	Contribution
`structure_score`	60.0	0.15	9.00
`security_score`	100.0	0.25	25.00
`testing_score`	20.0	0.20	4.00
`documentation_score`	96.0	0.15	14.40
`practices_score`	90.0	0.15	13.50
`code_quality`	50.0	0.10	5.00
Overall		1.00	70.9

security_score may be inflated — optional security scanners were skipped on this fast scan

Severity distribution — click a segment to filter

Active filters: excluding tests × Reset all

Severity: Critical 0 High 62 Medium 10 Low 49 9-Layer: Software Security Quality Integrity Frontend Hardware Data Network Cicd Source: Legacy 93 9-layer 84 Crowd 0 Layer: Cicd 7 Quality 107 Software 38 Security 5 Api 1 Frontend 16 Hardware 3

Exclude dismissed / FP Exclude test files

Last 2 scans of this repo. Each new scan persists a full payload — historical comparison is exact, not lossy.

May 14 11:55

May 31 01:30

Diff unavailable: ValidationError: 8 validation errors for ScanResult score.by_layer.`Layer.API`.[key] Input should be 'software', 'api', 'data', 'network', 'hardware', 'frontend', 'security', 'cicd' or 'quality' [type=enum, input_value='Layer.API', input_type=str] For further information visit https://errors.pydantic.dev/2.13/v/enum score.by_layer.`Layer.CICD`.[key] Input should be 'software', 'api', 'data', 'network', 'hardware', 'frontend', 'security', 'cicd' or 'quality' [type=enum, input_value='Layer.CICD', input_type=str] For further information visit https://errors.pydantic.dev/2.13/v/enum score.by_layer.`Layer.NETWORK`.[key] Input should be 'software', 'api', 'data', 'network', 'hardware', 'frontend', 'security', 'cicd' or 'quality' [type=enum, input_value='Layer.NETWORK', input_type=str] For further information visit https://errors.pydantic.dev/2.13/v/enum score.by_layer.`Layer.QUALITY`.[key] Input should be 'software', 'api', 'data', 'network', 'hardware', 'frontend', 'security', 'cicd' or 'quality' [type=enum, input_value='Layer.QUALITY', input_type=str] For further information visit https://errors.pydantic.dev/2.13/v/enum score.by_layer.`Layer.FRONTEND`.[key] Input should be 'software', 'api', 'data', 'network', 'hardware', 'frontend', 'security', 'cicd' or 'quality' [type=enum, input_value='Layer.FRONTEND', input_type=str] For further information visit https://errors.pydantic.dev/2.13/v/enum score.by_layer.`Layer.HARDWARE`.[key] Input should be 'software', 'api', 'data', 'network', 'hardware', 'frontend', 'security', 'cicd' or 'quality' [type=enum, input_value='Layer.HARDWARE', input_type=str] For further information visit https://errors.pydantic.dev/2.13/v/enum score.by_layer.`Layer.SECURITY`.[key] Input should be 'software', 'api', 'data', 'network', 'hardware', 'frontend', 'security', 'cicd' or 'quality' [type=enum, input_value='Layer.SECURITY', input_type=str] For further information visit https://errors.pydantic.dev/2.13/v/enum score.by_layer.`Layer.SOFTWARE`.[key] Input should be 'software', 'api', 'data', 'network', 'hardware', 'frontend', 'security', 'cicd' or 'quality' [type=enum, input_value='Layer.SOFTWARE', input_type=str] For further information visit https://errors.pydantic.dev/2.13/v/enum

v#	ID	Status	Score	Gaps	Nodes	Commit	Started
v	`scan_a989f3ccc0b1`	ok	69.9	84	873	`326640c` v0.24.0	May 31 01:30
v	`scan_d0ab699988ed`	ok	76.4	62	629	`9ae4a08` v0.9.7	May 14 11:55

For AI agents: Voting guide (TP/FP) MCP manifest Stdio wrapper SARIF Integrate Findings queue Vote TP/FP on findings to calibrate the engine.

For AI agents + API integrations

Email me when this repo regresses

Free. We re-scan periodically; new criticals → your inbox. No signup required for the scan itself.

API access

This page is publicly accessible at: https://repobility.com/scan/35c0bd90-7a84-43f2-96fa-aa9e363646bc/

To check status programmatically (no auth required):

curl -s https://repobility.com/api/v1/public/scan/35c0bd90-7a84-43f2-96fa-aa9e363646bc/

Important — please don't re-submit the same URL repeatedly. The submission endpoint is idempotent: re-submitting the same git URL returns this same scan_token, not a new one. To re-scan this repo, sign up free and use the dashboard.