cjrichardson3r-cmyk/bview

Public scan — anyone with this URL can view this analysis. Sign up to track your own repos privately, run scheduled re-scans, and get AI fix prompts via your dashboard.

https://github.com/cjrichardson3r-cmyk/bview.git · scanned 2026-05-26 23:11 UTC (2 weeks, 3 days ago) · 10 languages

895 raw signals (199 security + 696 graph) 11/13 scanners ran 90th percentile · Python · medium (20-100K LoC) System graph score 50 (higher by 33)

File as issue Image

UNIFIED Repobility · multi-layer engine · AI coders

Complete repo analysis

Last scanned 2 weeks, 3 days ago · v2 · 297 actionable findings from 2 signal sources. 227 repeated signals grouped for readability. Security checks, system graph analysis, and verified AI-agent feedback are merged into one review queue.

JSON

100.0% cov · 215 findings

Score breakdown â 2026-05-18-v5

Component	Sub-score	Weight	Contribution
`structure_score`	60.0	0.15	9.00
`security_score`	100.0	0.25	25.00
`testing_score`	100.0	0.20	20.00
`documentation_score`	86.0	0.15	12.90
`practices_score`	74.0	0.15	11.10
`code_quality`	58.0	0.10	5.80
Overall		1.00	83.8

security_score may be inflated — optional security scanners were skipped on this fast scan

Severity distribution — click a segment to filter

Active filters: excluding tests × Reset all

Severity: Critical 0 High 37 Medium 17 Low 177 9-Layer: Software Security Quality Integrity Frontend Hardware Data Network Cicd Source: Security checks 82 System graph 215 Crowd 0 Layer: Quality 110 Security 26 Software 71 Cicd 4 Frontend 44 Network 4 Hardware 2 Api 36

Exclude dismissed / FP Exclude test files

Bug-class explainers. Each card groups findings of the same shape — these are the patterns most likely to ship to prod and reappear in future scans unless you systematically fix the cause, not just the instance.

Duplicates & near-duplicates 3 findings

What it is: Same function copy-pasted into multiple modules with minor variations.

Why it matters: Each copy drifts independently — bug fixes apply to one, miss the others.

How AI causes it: AI completes the same pattern in each file rather than refactoring to a shared helper.

Fix approach: Extract the duplicated logic into the most general module both call sites already import. Add tests at the helper level.

3 matching findings on this repo

low Near-duplicate function bodies in 2 places repo-level
low Near-duplicate function bodies in 5 places repo-level
low Near-duplicate function bodies in 6 places

View all duplicates & near-duplicates findings →

Legacy markers 3 findings

What it is: TODO, FIXME, XXX, HACK comments. Often indicate a known-broken path the author meant to fix.

Why it matters: Each marker is an unfinished thought. Production code shouldn't ship with debt that's documented but not tracked.

How AI causes it: AI mirrors the style of the codebase, so existing TODOs propagate into new code.

Fix approach: Convert each into a ticket. Delete the comment when the ticket lands. Use a pre-commit hook to block new TODOs without an issue link.

3 matching findings on this repo

low Archive or legacy directory is mixed into the active repository root archive:1
low Old/deprecated-named symbol `ht_legacy` in archive/v1/tests/unit/test_esp32_bin…
low Old/deprecated-named symbol `ht_legacy` in archive/v1/src/hardware/csi_extracto…

View all legacy markers findings →

Commented-out code 17 findings

What it is: Lines of source that were intentionally disabled but never deleted.

Why it matters: Git already remembers history — commented code rots, becomes wrong, and adds noise to diffs.

How AI causes it: AI sometimes comments out broken code instead of fixing it. Reviewers approve out of inertia.

Fix approach: Delete. Trust `git log`. If you really need to remember, save it in a notes file under `docs/`.

12 matching findings on this repo

info Commented-code block (6 lines) in archive/v1/src/config/settings.py:167
info Commented-code block (5 lines) in archive/v1/src/middleware/error_handler.py:430
info Commented-code block (5 lines) in archive/v1/src/api/dependencies.py:432
info Commented-code block (9 lines) in ui/observatory/js/demo-data.js:574
info Commented-code block (7 lines) in ui/components/body-model.js:284
info Commented-code block (6 lines) in ui/mobile/src/services/rssi.service.ts:13
info Commented-code block (5 lines) in ui/services/sensing.service.js:49
info Commented-code block (5 lines) in scripts/train-count.py:512
info Commented-code block (5 lines) in scripts/qemu_swarm.py:262
info Commented-code block (7 lines) in scripts/ruview-hap-bridge.py:47
info Commented-code block (6 lines) in scripts/esp32_wasm_test.py:25
info Commented-code block (5 lines) in scripts/csi-spectrogram.js:268

View all commented-out code findings →

Config drift 20 findings

What it is: Settings duplicated across env files, Docker compose, K8s, and code defaults, all with slightly different values.

Why it matters: Production behaviour depends on whichever copy your loader reads first. Subtle bugs in staging that don't reproduce in dev.

How AI causes it: AI writes new config from memory rather than reading the existing source.

Fix approach: Pick one source of truth (env vars + a settings module). Have every other place import from there. Lint for duplicates in CI.

12 matching findings on this repo

medium [AUC004] Admin route does not show super_admin separation: An administrative ro… archive/v1/src/api/main.py:387
medium [AUC004] Admin route does not show super_admin separation: An administrative ro… archive/v1/src/app.py:293
low Possibly dead Python function: configure_third_party_loggers archive/v1/src/logger.py:225
low Possibly dead Python function: validate_app_configuration archive/v1/src/config.py:300
low Possibly dead Python function: reload_configuration archive/v1/src/config.py:305
low Possibly dead Python function: load_domain_config_from_file archive/v1/src/config/domains.py:434
low Possibly dead Python function: save_domain_config_to_file archive/v1/src/config/domains.py:473
low Possibly dead Python function: validate_rate_limit_config archive/v1/src/middleware/rate_limit.py:462
low Possibly dead Python function: validate_cors_config archive/v1/src/middleware/cors.py:333
low File has no detected symbols: v2/crates/wifi-densepose-desktop/ui/vite.config.ts
low File has no detected symbols: frontend/vite.config.ts
low File has no detected symbols: frontend/vitest.config.ts

View all config drift findings →

For AI agents: Voting guide (TP/FP) MCP manifest Stdio wrapper SARIF Integrate Findings queue Vote TP/FP on findings to calibrate the engine.

For AI agents + API integrations

Email me when this repo regresses

Free. We re-scan periodically; new criticals → your inbox. No signup required for the scan itself.

API access

This page is publicly accessible at: https://repobility.com/scan/3957ea6c-5e4a-4151-af59-ece5d5153057/

To check status programmatically (no auth required):

curl -s https://repobility.com/api/v1/public/scan/3957ea6c-5e4a-4151-af59-ece5d5153057/

Important — please don't re-submit the same URL repeatedly. The submission endpoint is idempotent: re-submitting the same git URL returns this same scan_token, not a new one. To re-scan this repo, sign up free and use the dashboard.