Public scan — anyone with this URL can view this analysis. Sign up to track your own repos privately, run scheduled re-scans, and get AI fix prompts via your dashboard.
Sign up free Scan another repo

tyabu12/pastura

https://github.com/tyabu12/pastura · scanned 2026-06-16 00:44 UTC (2 months, 1 week ago)

31 raw signals (0 security + 31 graph)

File as issue Image
UNIFIED Repobility · multi-layer engine · AI coders

Complete repo analysis

Last scanned 2 months, 1 week ago · v1 · 30 actionable findings from 1 signal source. 1 repeated signal grouped for readability. Security checks, system graph analysis, and verified AI-agent feedback are merged into one review queue.

JSON
Combined
76.2
/100
Security checks
76
0 findings
System graph
76
88.9% cov · 30 findings
Critical
0
click to filter
Agents
10
0 votes
Crowd
0
reported
Severity distribution — click a segment to filter
Active filters: excluding tests × Reset all
Severity: Critical 0 High 1 Medium 14 Low 7 9-Layer: Software Security Quality Integrity Frontend Hardware Data Network Cicd Source: Security checks 0 System graph 30 Crowd 0 Layer: Software 3 Network 3 Frontend 1 Security 3 Cicd 1 Quality 19
Corpus Intelligence Cross-corpus context (cohort percentile, top patterns, fix plan) is shown only on repositories you own. Sign up and connect your repo to view it.
Scan summary Repository scanned at 76.2/100 with 88.9% coverage. It contains 955 nodes across 0 cross-layer flows, written primarily in mixed languages. Engine surfaced 31 findings — concentrated in quality (20), software (3), network (3). Risk profile is high: 0 critical, 1 high, 16 medium. Recommended next step: open the quality layer findings first — that's where the highest-impact wins live.

Showing 20 of 30 actionable findings. 31 raw detector signals were grouped into reader-sized issues. Click TP / FP to vote on a finding's accuracy — votes adjust the confidence weighting and improve detection across the platform.

high System graph security Agent instructions conf 1.00 Agent instruction/config may expose a secret: .claude/rules/navigation.md
Agent-facing files are routinely pasted into LLM/tool contexts. Move literal tokens, keys, and passwords into a secret manager or document them as placeholders only.
.claude/rules/navigation.md:79 SecretsClaude instruction
medium System graph quality Agent instructions conf 1.00 Agent authority lacks a verifier contract: .claude/rules/context-budget.md
This agent instruction grants code or shell authority but does not state the verification gate that decides promotion. The recurring safe pattern is: LLM proposes; deterministic tests/build/security checks verify; only verified code promotes.
.claude/rules/context-budget.md VerificationClaude instruction
medium System graph quality Agent instructions conf 1.00 Agent authority lacks a verifier contract: .claude/rules/navigation.md
This agent instruction grants code or shell authority but does not state the verification gate that decides promotion. The recurring safe pattern is: LLM proposes; deterministic tests/build/security checks verify; only verified code promotes.
.claude/rules/navigation.md VerificationClaude instruction
medium System graph quality Agent instructions conf 1.00 Agent authority lacks a verifier contract: .claude/rules/subagent-usage.md
This agent instruction grants code or shell authority but does not state the verification gate that decides promotion. The recurring safe pattern is: LLM proposes; deterministic tests/build/security checks verify; only verified code promotes.
.claude/rules/subagent-usage.md VerificationClaude instruction
medium System graph quality Agent instructions conf 1.00 Agent instructions exist but release-hardening basics are missing
AI-coder instruction files were found, but the repo is missing tests. Treat this as a contract gap: the agent is guided, but the generated output is not yet guarded by the controls that make it repeatable.
Repo hardeningGenerated repo pattern
medium System graph quality Tests conf 1.00 CI is configured but no tests are detected
A CI pipeline exists, but the scan found no test files to gate. Opus labeled this generated-code pattern as config theater: release machinery exists, but it has little behavioral signal.
CI/CDConfig theaterRepo hardening
medium System graph cicd CI/CD security conf 1.00 GitHub Actions workflow grants broad write permissions
CI tokens with write permissions increase blast radius when an action, dependency, or PR workflow is compromised. Prefer job-level least-privilege permissions.
.github/workflows/deploy-pages.yml CI/CD securitySupply chainGithub actions
medium System graph security security conf 1.00 Insecure pattern 'direct_innerhtml_assignment' in docs/design/demo-replay-reference.html:466
Found a known-risky pattern (direct_innerhtml_assignment). Review and replace if possible.
docs/design/demo-replay-reference.html:466 Direct innerhtml assignment
medium System graph quality Integrity conf 1.00 Network/subprocess call without timeout or try/except — .claude/skills/queue-consumer/scripts/append_digest.py:88
`subprocess.run(...)` here lacks both a `timeout=` arg and an enclosing try/except. This is exactly the class of bug that took down our git-clone earlier (HTTP/2 stream cancel surfaced as a fatal). Add a `timeout=` and wrap in try/except, or use a wrapper that retries.
runtime safetyRobustness
medium System graph quality Integrity conf 1.00 Network/subprocess call without timeout or try/except — scripts/check_i18n_potential_keys.py:285
`subprocess.run(...)` here lacks both a `timeout=` arg and an enclosing try/except. This is exactly the class of bug that took down our git-clone earlier (HTTP/2 stream cancel surfaced as a fatal). Add a `timeout=` and wrap in try/except, or use a wrapper that retries.
runtime safetyRobustness
medium System graph security Coverage conf 1.00 No auth library detected
The scanner did not find any standard auth library (JWT, OAuth, NextAuth, Auth0, etc.). The repo has auth/admin/session surface indicators, so auth may live in custom code, in a separate service, or be missing.
auth
medium System graph network Security conf 1.00 Privileged port 18 in use
Port 18 is privileged (<1024). Make sure the service runs with the right caps or front it with a non-privileged port via a load balancer.
.github/workflows/codeql.yml Ports
medium System graph quality Tests conf 1.00 Very low test-to-source ratio
0 test file(s) for 13 source file(s) (ratio 0.00). Consider adding integration or unit tests for critical paths.
Coverage
low System graph quality Debug conf 1.00 Debug logging residue appears in source files
Found 205 console/debugger/print-style debug statements in non-test source. This is a common fast-generation residue before production cleanup.
CleanupRepo hardeningGenerated repo pattern
low System graph quality Integrity conf 1.00 2 occurrences Near-duplicate function bodies in 2 places
Functions with the same first-5-line body hash: scripts/check_design_tokens_css.py:check_tokens, scripts/check_design_tokens_css.py:check This is *the* AI-coder failure mode (4× more duplication in vibe-coded repos — see https://jw.hn/ai-code-hygiene). Consolidate or document why they're separate.
2 occurrences
repo-level (2 hits)
duplicatesduplication
low System graph software Dead code conf 1.00 Possibly dead Python function: run_bokete
No callers detected by AST scan in this repo. Could be exported for external callers or a framework handler.
docs/prototype/among_them_prototype.py:428
low System graph software Dead code conf 1.00 Possibly dead Python function: run_prisoners_dilemma
No callers detected by AST scan in this repo. Could be exported for external callers or a framework handler.
docs/prototype/among_them_prototype.py:297
low System graph software Dead code conf 1.00 Possibly dead Python function: run_wordwolf
No callers detected by AST scan in this repo. Could be exported for external callers or a framework handler.
docs/prototype/among_them_prototype.py:541
low System graph quality Provenance conf 1.00 Shallow git history limits provenance confidence
The repository is a shallow clone. Origin/evolution analysis cannot distinguish fresh generation, imported legacy code, or long-lived human code with high confidence.
Git historyGenerated repo pattern
low System graph quality Complexity conf 1.00 Very large file: docs/prototype/among_them_prototype.py (1159 lines)
Files with >800 lines often hide complexity hotspots and discourage tests.
For AI agents: Voting guide (TP/FP) MCP manifest Stdio wrapper SARIF Integrate Findings queue Vote TP/FP on findings to calibrate the engine.
For AI agents + API integrations
Email me when this repo regresses
Free. We re-scan periodically; new criticals → your inbox. No signup required for the scan itself.
API access

This page is publicly accessible at: https://repobility.com/scan/39b08318-c481-47b0-8f04-3c6b24130601/

To check status programmatically (no auth required): 

curl -s https://repobility.com/api/v1/public/scan/39b08318-c481-47b0-8f04-3c6b24130601/

Important — please don't re-submit the same URL repeatedly. The submission endpoint is idempotent: re-submitting the same git URL returns this same scan_token, not a new one. To re-scan this repo, sign up free and use the dashboard.