Public scan — anyone with this URL can view this analysis. Sign up to track your own repos privately, run scheduled re-scans, and get AI fix prompts via your dashboard.
Sign up free Scan another repo
11 of your 13 findings came from Repobility's proprietary detections. ✓ Repobility tags below mark them.

Scan timing: clone 3.77s · analysis 7.08s · 6.6 MB · GitHub API rate-limit (preflight)

google/ink

https://github.com/google/ink · scanned 2026-06-05 22:10 UTC (4 days, 8 hours ago) · 10 languages

17 raw signals (11 security + 6 graph) 68th percentile · C · medium (20-100K LoC) System graph score 100 (lower by 34)

File as issue Image
UNIFIED Repobility · multi-layer engine · AI coders

Complete repo analysis

Last scanned 4 days, 8 hours ago · v2 · 10 actionable findings from 2 signal sources. 4 repeated signals grouped for readability. Security checks, system graph analysis, and verified AI-agent feedback are merged into one review queue.

JSON
Combined
86.6
/100
Security checks
73
7 findings
System graph
100
55.6% cov · 3 findings
Critical
0
click to filter
Agents
6
0 votes
Crowd
0
reported
Score breakdown â 2026-05-18-v5
Component Sub-score Weight Contribution
structure_score 55.0 0.15 8.25
security_score 100.0 0.25 25.00
testing_score 15.0 0.20 3.00
documentation_score 75.0 0.15 11.25
practices_score 67.0 0.15 10.05
code_quality 78.0 0.10 7.80
Overall 1.00 65.3
Severity distribution — click a segment to filter
Active filters: excluding tests × Reset all
Severity: Critical 0 High 1 Medium 3 Low 2 9-Layer: Software Security Quality Integrity Frontend Hardware Data Network Cicd Source: Security checks 7 System graph 3 Crowd 0 Layer: Quality 4 Cicd 3 Api 1 Frontend 1 Security 1
Scan summary Quality grade B- (65/100). Dimensions: security 100, maintainability 55. 11 findings (3 security). 21,208 lines analyzed.

Showing 3 of 10 actionable findings. 14 raw detector signals were grouped into reader-sized issues. Click TP / FP to vote on a finding's accuracy — votes adjust the confidence weighting and improve detection across the platform.

medium Security checks quality Quality conf 0.78 Suspicious implementation file appears unreferenced
A file created as a fixed/new/final/copy variant is not referenced by imports or path-like strings in the rest of the repository. This is a strong sign that an agent produced code beside the active application path.
ink/strokes/internal/stroke_shape_update.h:1
medium System graph security Coverage conf 1.00 No auth library detected
The scanner did not find any standard auth library (JWT, OAuth, NextAuth, Auth0, etc.). Either auth lives in custom code, in a separate service, or is missing.
auth
high Security checks quality Quality conf 0.62 Source file name looks like an AI patch artifact
Files named as final, fixed, copy, new, or backup are often temporary patch artifacts. They may be legitimate, but they deserve review before becoming production surface area.
ink/strokes/internal/stroke_shape_update.h:1
For AI agents: Voting guide (TP/FP) MCP manifest Stdio wrapper SARIF Integrate Findings queue Vote TP/FP on findings to calibrate the engine.
For AI agents + API integrations
Email me when this repo regresses
Free. We re-scan periodically; new criticals → your inbox. No signup required for the scan itself.
API access

This page is publicly accessible at: https://repobility.com/scan/3aa32ee5-6933-447b-8716-7b86151b8fb3/

To check status programmatically (no auth required): 

curl -s https://repobility.com/api/v1/public/scan/3aa32ee5-6933-447b-8716-7b86151b8fb3/

Important — please don't re-submit the same URL repeatedly. The submission endpoint is idempotent: re-submitting the same git URL returns this same scan_token, not a new one. To re-scan this repo, sign up free and use the dashboard.