avolsh/ai-dotfiles — Repobility public scan

Public scan — anyone with this URL can view this analysis. Sign up to track your own repos privately, run scheduled re-scans, and get AI fix prompts via your dashboard.

Sign up free Scan another repo

avolsh/ai-dotfiles

https://github.com/avolsh/ai-dotfiles · scanned 2026-06-17 01:36 UTC (1 month, 2 weeks ago)

37 raw signals (0 security + 37 graph)

File as issue Image

UNIFIED Repobility · multi-layer engine · AI coders

Complete repo analysis

Last scanned 1 month, 2 weeks ago · v2 · last Δ -3.1 (diff) · 36 actionable findings from 1 signal source. 1 repeated signal grouped for readability. Security checks, system graph analysis, and verified AI-agent feedback are merged into one review queue.

JSON

Security checks

88.9% cov · 36 findings

click to filter

Severity distribution — click a segment to filter

Active filters: excluding tests × Reset all

Severity: Critical 0 High 1 Medium 20 Low 13 9-Layer: Software Security Quality Integrity Frontend Hardware Data Network Cicd Source: Security checks 0 System graph 36 Crowd 0 Layer: Software 10 Cicd 1 Quality 24 Security 1

Exclude dismissed / FP Exclude test files

Corpus Intelligence Cross-corpus context (cohort percentile, top patterns, fix plan) is shown only on repositories you own. Sign up and connect your repo to view it.

Scan summary Repository scanned at 73.6/100 with 88.9% coverage. It contains 429 nodes across 5 cross-layer flows, written primarily in mixed languages. Engine surfaced 37 findings — concentrated in quality (24), software (10), cicd (2). Risk profile is high: 0 critical, 1 high, 20 medium. Recommended next step: open the quality layer findings first — that's where the highest-impact wins live.

Showing 22 of 36 actionable findings. 37 raw detector signals were grouped into reader-sized issues. Click TP / FP to vote on a finding's accuracy — votes adjust the confidence weighting and improve detection across the platform.

high System graph security Agent instructions conf 1.00 Agent instruction/config may expose a secret: framework/skills/gitops-workflow/SKILL.md

Agent-facing files are routinely pasted into LLM/tool contexts. Move literal tokens, keys, and passwords into a secret manager or document them as placeholders only.

framework/skills/gitops-workflow/SKILL.md:245 SecretsSkill file

medium System graph quality Agent instructions conf 1.00 Agent authority lacks a verifier contract: framework/skills/istio-traffic-management/SKILL.md

This agent instruction grants code or shell authority but does not state the verification gate that decides promotion. The recurring safe pattern is: LLM proposes; deterministic tests/build/security checks verify; only verified code promotes.

framework/skills/istio-traffic-management/SKILL.md VerificationSkill file

medium System graph quality Agent instructions conf 1.00 Agent authority lacks a verifier contract: framework/skills/k8s-security-policies/SKILL.md

This agent instruction grants code or shell authority but does not state the verification gate that decides promotion. The recurring safe pattern is: LLM proposes; deterministic tests/build/security checks verify; only verified code promotes.

framework/skills/k8s-security-policies/SKILL.md VerificationSkill file

medium System graph quality Agent instructions conf 1.00 Agent authority lacks a verifier contract: framework/skills/postgresql/SKILL.md

This agent instruction grants code or shell authority but does not state the verification gate that decides promotion. The recurring safe pattern is: LLM proposes; deterministic tests/build/security checks verify; only verified code promotes.

framework/skills/postgresql/SKILL.md VerificationSkill file

medium System graph quality Agent instructions conf 1.00 Agent authority lacks a verifier contract: framework/skills/systematic-debugging/SKILL.md

This agent instruction grants code or shell authority but does not state the verification gate that decides promotion. The recurring safe pattern is: LLM proposes; deterministic tests/build/security checks verify; only verified code promotes.

framework/skills/systematic-debugging/SKILL.md VerificationSkill file

medium System graph quality Agent instructions conf 1.00 Agent authority lacks a verifier contract: framework/skills/using-git-worktrees/SKILL.md

This agent instruction grants code or shell authority but does not state the verification gate that decides promotion. The recurring safe pattern is: LLM proposes; deterministic tests/build/security checks verify; only verified code promotes.

framework/skills/using-git-worktrees/SKILL.md VerificationSkill file

medium System graph quality Agent instructions conf 1.00 Agent authority lacks a verifier contract: framework/templates/project/.github/copilot-instructions.md

This agent instruction grants code or shell authority but does not state the verification gate that decides promotion. The recurring safe pattern is: LLM proposes; deterministic tests/build/security checks verify; only verified code promotes.

framework/templates/project/.github/copilot-instructions.md VerificationAgent instruction

medium System graph quality Agent instructions conf 1.00 Agent authority lacks a verifier contract: framework/templates/project/AGENTS.md

This agent instruction grants code or shell authority but does not state the verification gate that decides promotion. The recurring safe pattern is: LLM proposes; deterministic tests/build/security checks verify; only verified code promotes.

framework/templates/project/AGENTS.md VerificationAgents md

medium System graph quality Agent instructions conf 1.00 Agent authority lacks a verifier contract: framework/templates/project/CLAUDE.md

This agent instruction grants code or shell authority but does not state the verification gate that decides promotion. The recurring safe pattern is: LLM proposes; deterministic tests/build/security checks verify; only verified code promotes.

framework/templates/project/CLAUDE.md VerificationClaude instruction

medium System graph quality Agent instructions conf 1.00 Agent authority lacks a verifier contract: framework/templates/system/claude/CLAUDE.md

This agent instruction grants code or shell authority but does not state the verification gate that decides promotion. The recurring safe pattern is: LLM proposes; deterministic tests/build/security checks verify; only verified code promotes.

framework/templates/system/claude/CLAUDE.md VerificationClaude instruction

medium System graph quality Agent instructions conf 1.00 Agent authority lacks a verifier contract: framework/templates/system/codex/AGENTS.md

This agent instruction grants code or shell authority but does not state the verification gate that decides promotion. The recurring safe pattern is: LLM proposes; deterministic tests/build/security checks verify; only verified code promotes.

framework/templates/system/codex/AGENTS.md VerificationAgents md

medium System graph quality Agent instructions conf 1.00 Agent authority lacks a verifier contract: framework/templates/system/copilot/copilot-instructions.md

This agent instruction grants code or shell authority but does not state the verification gate that decides promotion. The recurring safe pattern is: LLM proposes; deterministic tests/build/security checks verify; only verified code promotes.

framework/templates/system/copilot/copilot-instructions.md VerificationAgent instruction

medium System graph quality Agent instructions conf 1.00 Agent authority lacks a verifier contract: framework/templates/workspace/.github/copilot-instructions.md

This agent instruction grants code or shell authority but does not state the verification gate that decides promotion. The recurring safe pattern is: LLM proposes; deterministic tests/build/security checks verify; only verified code promotes.

framework/templates/workspace/.github/copilot-instructions.md VerificationAgent instruction

medium System graph quality Agent instructions conf 1.00 Agent authority lacks a verifier contract: framework/templates/workspace/AGENTS.md

This agent instruction grants code or shell authority but does not state the verification gate that decides promotion. The recurring safe pattern is: LLM proposes; deterministic tests/build/security checks verify; only verified code promotes.

framework/templates/workspace/AGENTS.md VerificationAgents md

medium System graph quality Agent instructions conf 1.00 Agent authority lacks a verifier contract: framework/templates/workspace/CLAUDE.md

This agent instruction grants code or shell authority but does not state the verification gate that decides promotion. The recurring safe pattern is: LLM proposes; deterministic tests/build/security checks verify; only verified code promotes.

framework/templates/workspace/CLAUDE.md VerificationClaude instruction

medium System graph quality Agent instructions conf 1.00 Agent instructions exist but release-hardening basics are missing

AI-coder instruction files were found, but the repo is missing tests. Treat this as a contract gap: the agent is guided, but the generated output is not yet guarded by the controls that make it repeatable.

Repo hardeningGenerated repo pattern

medium System graph quality Tests conf 1.00 CI is configured but no tests are detected

A CI pipeline exists, but the scan found no test files to gate. Opus labeled this generated-code pattern as config theater: release machinery exists, but it has little behavioral signal.

CI/CDConfig theaterRepo hardening

medium System graph quality Placeholder conf 1.00 Critical user flow still appears backed by mock or placeholder data

A payment/auth/admin/order/billing-style flow contains mock, fake, TODO, dummy, or placeholder markers in runtime source. In the Fable corpus this is a high-leverage completeness smell: the app can look finished while the money, identity, or tenant flow is still scaffolded.

Mock dataCritical flowGenerated repo pattern

medium System graph quality Tests conf 1.00 Very low test-to-source ratio

0 test file(s) for 6 source file(s) (ratio 0.00). Consider adding integration or unit tests for critical paths.

Coverage

low System graph quality Debug conf 1.00 Debug logging residue appears in source files

Found 24 console/debugger/print-style debug statements in non-test source. This is a common fast-generation residue before production cleanup.

CleanupRepo hardeningGenerated repo pattern

low System graph cicd CI/CD security conf 1.00 2 occurrences GitHub Action is tag-pinned rather than SHA-pinned

actions/checkout@v4 can move without a code change in this repo. Pin third-party actions to a reviewed 40-character commit SHA.

lines 29, 32

.github/workflows/validate.yml:29, 32 (2 hits)

CI/CD securitySupply chainGithub actions

low System graph quality Integrity conf 1.00 Near-duplicate function bodies in 2 places

Functions with the same first-5-line body hash: scripts/lint-rules.py:find_repo_root, scripts/validate-anchors.py:find_repo_root This is *the* AI-coder failure mode (4× more duplication in vibe-coded repos — see https://jw.hn/ai-code-hygiene). Consolidate or document why they're separate.

duplicatesduplication

For AI agents: Voting guide (TP/FP) MCP manifest Stdio wrapper SARIF Integrate Findings queue Vote TP/FP on findings to calibrate the engine.

For AI agents + API integrations

Email me when this repo regresses

Free. We re-scan periodically; new criticals → your inbox. No signup required for the scan itself.

API access

This page is publicly accessible at: https://repobility.com/scan/3b93a5f6-400e-4b98-8bbb-5b97f16ea0be/

To check status programmatically (no auth required):

curl -s https://repobility.com/api/v1/public/scan/3b93a5f6-400e-4b98-8bbb-5b97f16ea0be/

Important — please don't re-submit the same URL repeatedly. The submission endpoint is idempotent: re-submitting the same git URL returns this same scan_token, not a new one. To re-scan this repo, sign up free and use the dashboard.