Public scan — anyone with this URL can view this analysis. Sign up to track your own repos privately, run scheduled re-scans, and get AI fix prompts via your dashboard.

rithwikshetty/tab-it

https://github.com/rithwikshetty/tab-it · scanned 2026-06-15 23:52 UTC (2 months, 3 weeks ago)

21 raw signals (11 security + 10 graph)

File as issue Image

UNIFIED Repobility · multi-layer engine · AI coders

Complete repo analysis

Last scanned 2 months, 3 weeks ago · v1 · 17 actionable findings from 2 signal sources. 13 repeated signals grouped for readability. Security checks, system graph analysis, and verified AI-agent feedback are merged into one review queue.

JSON

66.7% cov · 10 findings

Severity distribution — click a segment to filter

Active filters: excluding tests × Reset all

Severity: Critical 4 High 2 Medium 6 Low 3 9-Layer: Software Security Quality Integrity Frontend Hardware Data Network Cicd Source: Security checks 7 System graph 10 Crowd 0 Layer: Quality 12 Security 3 Frontend 1 Cicd 1

Exclude dismissed / FP Exclude test files

Corpus Intelligence Cross-corpus context (cohort percentile, top patterns, fix plan) is shown only on repositories you own. Sign up and connect your repo to view it.

Scan summary Repository scanned at 64.1/100 with 66.7% coverage. It contains 294 nodes across 0 cross-layer flows, written primarily in mixed languages. Engine surfaced 10 findings — concentrated in quality (6), security (2), frontend (1). Risk profile is high: 2 critical, 0 high, 3 medium. Recommended next step: open the quality layer findings first — that's where the highest-impact wins live.

Showing 15 of 17 actionable findings. 30 raw detector signals were grouped into reader-sized issues. Click TP / FP to vote on a finding's accuracy — votes adjust the confidence weighting and improve detection across the platform.

critical Security checks quality Practices conf 0.82 4 occurrences Foundry mined mock as real or placeholder: rithwikshetty/tab-it

Graph query export: Mock, sample, placeholder, or self-attested behavior treated as real Query id: mock_as_real_or_placeholder Query type: motif_query Intent: Hard negatives for fake completeness and missing real data paths. Motif: mock_as_real_or_placeholder Training usage: hard_negative Graph gol…

4 occurrences

repo-level (4 hits)

critical Security checks security auth conf 0.78 Foundry mined security auth guardrail gaps: rithwikshetty/tab-it

Graph query export: Security/auth changes without enough guardrails Query id: security_auth_guardrail_gaps Query type: motif_query Intent: Assumption-check security/auth examples requiring stronger tests or CI. Motif: security_auth_without_guardrails Training usage: assumption_check Graph gold labe…

critical System graph security security conf 1.00 Insecure pattern 'private_key_in_repo' in supabase/functions/send-push/apns.ts:8

Found a known-risky pattern (private_key_in_repo). Review and replace if possible.

supabase/functions/send-push/apns.ts:8 Private key in repo

critical System graph security security conf 1.00 Insecure pattern 'private_key_in_repo' in supabase/functions/send-push/README.md:29

Found a known-risky pattern (private_key_in_repo). Review and replace if possible.

supabase/functions/send-push/README.md:29 Private key in repo

high Security checks quality Practices conf 0.84 4 occurrences Foundry mined bad chains: rithwikshetty/tab-it

Comment chain pattern product: bad_chains Repo: rithwikshetty/tab-it Thread: rithwikshetty/tab-it#7 Outcome: not_resolved_or_not_observed Thread label: thread_has_human_issue_without_fix_context Source graph label: source_backed_multi_signal_graph Reasons: source_graph_has_real_artifacts, source_gr…

4 occurrences

repo-level (4 hits)

high Security checks quality Quality conf 0.76 2 occurrences Foundry mined schema ui api mismatch: rithwikshetty/tab-it

Graph query export: Schema, UI, and API mismatch Query id: schema_ui_api_mismatch Query type: motif_query Intent: Assumption-check examples for data-path consistency across layers. Motif: schema_ui_api_mismatch Training usage: assumption_check Graph gold label: supported_by_verification_signal Repo…

2 occurrences

repo-level (2 hits)

medium Security checks quality Practices conf 0.62 2 occurrences Foundry mined assumption checks: rithwikshetty/tab-it

Comment chain pattern product: assumption_checks Repo: rithwikshetty/tab-it Thread: rithwikshetty/tab-it#6 Outcome: ambiguous_needs_more_evidence Thread label: thread_needs_classification Source graph label: source_backed_multi_signal_graph Reasons: source_graph_has_real_artifacts, source_graph_has…

2 occurrences

repo-level (2 hits)

medium Security checks quality maintenance conf 0.70 4 occurrences Foundry mined blueprint gap alignment: rithwikshetty/tab-it

Graph query export: Human feedback aligned with blueprint or architecture gaps Query id: blueprint_gap_alignment Query type: motif_query Intent: Curriculum-gap examples connecting issue threads to helicopter-view gaps. Motif: blueprint_gap_alignment Training usage: curriculum_gap Graph gold label: …

4 occurrences

repo-level (4 hits)

medium Security checks quality Practices conf 0.70 3 occurrences Foundry mined unresolved feedback: rithwikshetty/tab-it

Graph query export: Human feedback without linked fix evidence Query id: unresolved_feedback Query type: motif_query Intent: Negative/unresolved examples that should not be hallucinated into fixes. Motif: unlinked_feedback_needs_evidence Training usage: negative_or_unresolved Graph gold label: need…

3 occurrences

repo-level (3 hits)

medium System graph quality Agent instructions conf 1.00 Agent instructions exist but release-hardening basics are missing

AI-coder instruction files were found, but the repo is missing ci, tests. Treat this as a contract gap: the agent is guided, but the generated output is not yet guarded by the controls that make it repeatable.

Repo hardeningGenerated repo pattern

medium System graph cicd CI/CD security conf 1.00 No CI/CD pipelines detected

No GitHub Actions, GitLab CI, or CircleCI configs found. Without CI you can't gate deploys on tests/lints.

CI/CD securityCoverage

medium System graph quality Tests conf 1.00 Very low test-to-source ratio

0 test file(s) for 3 source file(s) (ratio 0.00). Consider adding integration or unit tests for critical paths.

Coverage

low System graph quality Production readiness conf 1.00 Composite production-readiness gap

Multiple low-cost hardening controls are missing together: ci, tests. Opus verification showed these co-occurring gaps are a better readiness signal than reading each flag in isolation.

Repo hardeningGenerated repo pattern

low System graph quality Agent instructions conf 1.00 Multiple root agent instruction files without precedence

The repo has multiple top-level AI-coder instruction files. Without precedence rules, different agents may follow different policies.

Governance

low System graph quality Provenance conf 1.00 Shallow git history limits provenance confidence

The repository is a shallow clone. Origin/evolution analysis cannot distinguish fresh generation, imported legacy code, or long-lived human code with high confidence.

Git historyGenerated repo pattern

For AI agents: Voting guide (TP/FP) MCP manifest Stdio wrapper SARIF Integrate Findings queue Vote TP/FP on findings to calibrate the engine.

For AI agents + API integrations

Email me when this repo regresses

Free. We re-scan periodically; new criticals → your inbox. No signup required for the scan itself.

API access

This page is publicly accessible at: https://repobility.com/scan/3d015711-9d72-4b93-9647-9ddd5e1ff71b/

To check status programmatically (no auth required):

curl -s https://repobility.com/api/v1/public/scan/3d015711-9d72-4b93-9647-9ddd5e1ff71b/

Important — please don't re-submit the same URL repeatedly. The submission endpoint is idempotent: re-submitting the same git URL returns this same scan_token, not a new one. To re-scan this repo, sign up free and use the dashboard.