Public scan — anyone with this URL can view this analysis. Sign up to track your own repos privately, run scheduled re-scans, and get AI fix prompts via your dashboard.
Sign up free Scan another repo

ssamssae/claude-skills

https://github.com/ssamssae/claude-skills · scanned 2026-06-16 00:20 UTC (2 months, 2 weeks ago)

42 raw signals (0 security + 42 graph)

File as issue Image
UNIFIED Repobility · multi-layer engine · AI coders

Complete repo analysis

Last scanned 2 months, 2 weeks ago · v1 · 42 actionable findings from 1 signal source. Security checks, system graph analysis, and verified AI-agent feedback are merged into one review queue.

JSON
Combined
71.8
/100
Security checks
72
0 findings
System graph
72
88.9% cov · 42 findings
Critical
0
click to filter
Agents
10
0 votes
Crowd
0
reported
Severity distribution — click a segment to filter
Active filters: excluding tests × Reset all
Severity: Critical 0 High 0 Medium 32 Low 7 9-Layer: Software Security Quality Integrity Frontend Hardware Data Network Cicd Source: Security checks 0 System graph 42 Crowd 0 Layer: Software 2 Network 4 Frontend 1 Cicd 1 Quality 33 Security 1
Corpus Intelligence Cross-corpus context (cohort percentile, top patterns, fix plan) is shown only on repositories you own. Sign up and connect your repo to view it.
Scan summary Repository scanned at 71.8/100 with 88.9% coverage. It contains 625 nodes across 0 cross-layer flows, written primarily in mixed languages. Engine surfaced 42 findings — concentrated in quality (33), network (4), software (2). Risk profile is low: 0 critical, 0 high, 32 medium. Recommended next step: open the quality layer findings first — that's where the highest-impact wins live.

Showing 39 of 42 actionable findings. Click TP / FP to vote on a finding's accuracy — votes adjust the confidence weighting and improve detection across the platform.

medium System graph quality Agent instructions conf 1.00 Agent authority lacks a verifier contract: archive/openclaw-handoff/AGENTS.md
This agent instruction grants code or shell authority but does not state the verification gate that decides promotion. The recurring safe pattern is: LLM proposes; deterministic tests/build/security checks verify; only verified code promotes.
archive/openclaw-handoff/AGENTS.md VerificationAgents md
medium System graph quality Agent instructions conf 1.00 Agent authority lacks a verifier contract: brainstorm/SKILL.md
This agent instruction grants code or shell authority but does not state the verification gate that decides promotion. The recurring safe pattern is: LLM proposes; deterministic tests/build/security checks verify; only verified code promotes.
brainstorm/SKILL.md VerificationSkill file
medium System graph quality Agent instructions conf 1.00 Agent authority lacks a verifier contract: codex-fire/SKILL.md
This agent instruction grants code or shell authority but does not state the verification gate that decides promotion. The recurring safe pattern is: LLM proposes; deterministic tests/build/security checks verify; only verified code promotes.
codex-fire/SKILL.md VerificationSkill file
medium System graph quality Agent instructions conf 1.00 Agent authority lacks a verifier contract: codex-loop-fleet/SKILL.md
This agent instruction grants code or shell authority but does not state the verification gate that decides promotion. The recurring safe pattern is: LLM proposes; deterministic tests/build/security checks verify; only verified code promotes.
codex-loop-fleet/SKILL.md VerificationSkill file
medium System graph quality Agent instructions conf 1.00 Agent authority lacks a verifier contract: context-show/SKILL.md
This agent instruction grants code or shell authority but does not state the verification gate that decides promotion. The recurring safe pattern is: LLM proposes; deterministic tests/build/security checks verify; only verified code promotes.
context-show/SKILL.md VerificationSkill file
medium System graph quality Agent instructions conf 1.00 Agent authority lacks a verifier contract: ctx/SKILL.md
This agent instruction grants code or shell authority but does not state the verification gate that decides promotion. The recurring safe pattern is: LLM proposes; deterministic tests/build/security checks verify; only verified code promotes.
ctx/SKILL.md VerificationSkill file
medium System graph quality Agent instructions conf 1.00 Agent authority lacks a verifier contract: done/SKILL.md
This agent instruction grants code or shell authority but does not state the verification gate that decides promotion. The recurring safe pattern is: LLM proposes; deterministic tests/build/security checks verify; only verified code promotes.
done/SKILL.md VerificationSkill file
medium System graph quality Agent instructions conf 1.00 Agent authority lacks a verifier contract: goodnight/SKILL.md
This agent instruction grants code or shell authority but does not state the verification gate that decides promotion. The recurring safe pattern is: LLM proposes; deterministic tests/build/security checks verify; only verified code promotes.
goodnight/SKILL.md VerificationSkill file
medium System graph quality Agent instructions conf 1.00 Agent authority lacks a verifier contract: insight/SKILL.md
This agent instruction grants code or shell authority but does not state the verification gate that decides promotion. The recurring safe pattern is: LLM proposes; deterministic tests/build/security checks verify; only verified code promotes.
insight/SKILL.md VerificationSkill file
medium System graph quality Agent instructions conf 1.00 Agent authority lacks a verifier contract: insta-photos/SKILL.md
This agent instruction grants code or shell authority but does not state the verification gate that decides promotion. The recurring safe pattern is: LLM proposes; deterministic tests/build/security checks verify; only verified code promotes.
insta-photos/SKILL.md VerificationSkill file
medium System graph quality Agent instructions conf 1.00 Agent authority lacks a verifier contract: issue/SKILL.md
This agent instruction grants code or shell authority but does not state the verification gate that decides promotion. The recurring safe pattern is: LLM proposes; deterministic tests/build/security checks verify; only verified code promotes.
issue/SKILL.md VerificationSkill file
medium System graph quality Agent instructions conf 1.00 Agent authority lacks a verifier contract: merge-janitor/SKILL.md
This agent instruction grants code or shell authority but does not state the verification gate that decides promotion. The recurring safe pattern is: LLM proposes; deterministic tests/build/security checks verify; only verified code promotes.
merge-janitor/SKILL.md VerificationSkill file
medium System graph quality Agent instructions conf 1.00 Agent authority lacks a verifier contract: naver-blog-publish/SKILL.md
This agent instruction grants code or shell authority but does not state the verification gate that decides promotion. The recurring safe pattern is: LLM proposes; deterministic tests/build/security checks verify; only verified code promotes.
naver-blog-publish/SKILL.md VerificationSkill file
medium System graph quality Agent instructions conf 1.00 Agent authority lacks a verifier contract: newsletter-publish/SKILL.md
This agent instruction grants code or shell authority but does not state the verification gate that decides promotion. The recurring safe pattern is: LLM proposes; deterministic tests/build/security checks verify; only verified code promotes.
newsletter-publish/SKILL.md VerificationSkill file
medium System graph quality Agent instructions conf 1.00 Agent authority lacks a verifier contract: pull-apps/SKILL.md
This agent instruction grants code or shell authority but does not state the verification gate that decides promotion. The recurring safe pattern is: LLM proposes; deterministic tests/build/security checks verify; only verified code promotes.
pull-apps/SKILL.md VerificationSkill file
medium System graph quality Agent instructions conf 1.00 Agent authority lacks a verifier contract: secret-set/SKILL.md
This agent instruction grants code or shell authority but does not state the verification gate that decides promotion. The recurring safe pattern is: LLM proposes; deterministic tests/build/security checks verify; only verified code promotes.
secret-set/SKILL.md VerificationSkill file
medium System graph quality Agent instructions conf 1.00 Agent authority lacks a verifier contract: send-message/SKILL.md
This agent instruction grants code or shell authority but does not state the verification gate that decides promotion. The recurring safe pattern is: LLM proposes; deterministic tests/build/security checks verify; only verified code promotes.
send-message/SKILL.md VerificationSkill file
medium System graph quality Agent instructions conf 1.00 Agent authority lacks a verifier contract: session-clear/SKILL.md
This agent instruction grants code or shell authority but does not state the verification gate that decides promotion. The recurring safe pattern is: LLM proposes; deterministic tests/build/security checks verify; only verified code promotes.
session-clear/SKILL.md VerificationSkill file
medium System graph quality Agent instructions conf 1.00 Agent authority lacks a verifier contract: todo-reminder/SKILL.md
This agent instruction grants code or shell authority but does not state the verification gate that decides promotion. The recurring safe pattern is: LLM proposes; deterministic tests/build/security checks verify; only verified code promotes.
todo-reminder/SKILL.md VerificationSkill file
medium System graph quality Agent instructions conf 1.00 Agent authority lacks a verifier contract: trio-vote/SKILL.md
This agent instruction grants code or shell authority but does not state the verification gate that decides promotion. The recurring safe pattern is: LLM proposes; deterministic tests/build/security checks verify; only verified code promotes.
trio-vote/SKILL.md VerificationSkill file
medium System graph quality Agent instructions conf 1.00 Agent authority lacks a verifier contract: usage/SKILL.md
This agent instruction grants code or shell authority but does not state the verification gate that decides promotion. The recurring safe pattern is: LLM proposes; deterministic tests/build/security checks verify; only verified code promotes.
usage/SKILL.md VerificationSkill file
medium System graph quality Agent instructions conf 1.00 Agent authority lacks a verifier contract: worklog/SKILL.md
This agent instruction grants code or shell authority but does not state the verification gate that decides promotion. The recurring safe pattern is: LLM proposes; deterministic tests/build/security checks verify; only verified code promotes.
worklog/SKILL.md VerificationSkill file
medium System graph security Agent instructions conf 1.00 Agent instruction contains unpinned remote install: usage/SKILL.md
Remote install commands in agent instructions are a supply-chain risk, especially when an agent can execute shell commands.
usage/SKILL.md:11 Supply chainSkill file
medium System graph quality Agent instructions conf 1.00 Agent instructions exist but release-hardening basics are missing
AI-coder instruction files were found, but the repo is missing ci. Treat this as a contract gap: the agent is guided, but the generated output is not yet guarded by the controls that make it repeatable.
Repo hardeningGenerated repo pattern
medium System graph quality Integrity conf 1.00 Network/subprocess call without timeout or try/except — daejong-page-sync/stale_scanner.py:86
`subprocess.run(...)` here lacks both a `timeout=` arg and an enclosing try/except. This is exactly the class of bug that took down our git-clone earlier (HTTP/2 stream cancel surfaced as a fatal). Add a `timeout=` and wrap in try/except, or use a wrapper that retries.
runtime safetyRobustness
medium System graph quality Integrity conf 1.00 Network/subprocess call without timeout or try/except — insta-photos/publish_photos_funnel.py:53
`subprocess.run(...)` here lacks both a `timeout=` arg and an enclosing try/except. This is exactly the class of bug that took down our git-clone earlier (HTTP/2 stream cancel surfaced as a fatal). Add a `timeout=` and wrap in try/except, or use a wrapper that retries.
runtime safetyRobustness
medium System graph quality Integrity conf 1.00 Network/subprocess call without timeout or try/except — scripts/tuya-control.py:113
`requests.get(...)` here lacks both a `timeout=` arg and an enclosing try/except. This is exactly the class of bug that took down our git-clone earlier (HTTP/2 stream cancel surfaced as a fatal). Add a `timeout=` and wrap in try/except, or use a wrapper that retries.
runtime safetyRobustness
medium System graph cicd CI/CD security conf 1.00 No CI/CD pipelines detected
No GitHub Actions, GitLab CI, or CircleCI configs found. Without CI you can't gate deploys on tests/lints.
CI/CD securityCoverage
medium System graph network Security conf 1.00 Privileged port 10 in use
Port 10 is privileged (<1024). Make sure the service runs with the right caps or front it with a non-privileged port via a load balancer.
scripts/send-message.sh Ports
medium System graph network Security conf 1.00 Privileged port 17 in use
Port 17 is privileged (<1024). Make sure the service runs with the right caps or front it with a non-privileged port via a load balancer.
scripts/send-message.sh Ports
medium System graph network Security conf 1.00 Privileged port 48 in use
Port 48 is privileged (<1024). Make sure the service runs with the right caps or front it with a non-privileged port via a load balancer.
scripts/send-message.sh Ports
medium System graph network Security conf 1.00 Privileged port 55 in use
Port 55 is privileged (<1024). Make sure the service runs with the right caps or front it with a non-privileged port via a load balancer.
scripts/send-message.sh Ports
low System graph quality Debug conf 1.00 Debug logging residue appears in source files
Found 87 console/debugger/print-style debug statements in non-test source. This is a common fast-generation residue before production cleanup.
CleanupRepo hardeningGenerated repo pattern
low System graph quality Tests conf 1.00 Low test-to-source ratio
4 tests / 21 src (ratio 0.19).
low System graph quality Integrity conf 1.00 Old/deprecated-named symbol `11_v1` in insta-post-general/parse_worklog.py:9
Names with suffixes like `_old`, `_v1`, `_deprecated` usually indicate replaced-but-not-removed code (typical AI-coder leftover). Confirm and delete, or rename if it's the active version.
old markerDead code
low System graph quality Integrity conf 1.00 Old/deprecated-named symbol `llm_copy` in insta-post-general/llm_copy.py:17
Names with suffixes like `_old`, `_v1`, `_deprecated` usually indicate replaced-but-not-removed code (typical AI-coder leftover). Confirm and delete, or rename if it's the active version.
old markerDead code
low System graph software Dead code conf 1.00 Possibly dead Python function: credentials_available
No callers detected by AST scan in this repo. Could be exported for external callers or a framework handler.
submit-app/asc_credentials.py:76
low System graph software Dead code conf 1.00 Possibly dead Python function: response
No callers detected by AST scan in this repo. Could be exported for external callers or a framework handler.
archive/korail-sniff/addon_filter.py:16
low System graph quality Provenance conf 1.00 Shallow git history limits provenance confidence
The repository is a shallow clone. Origin/evolution analysis cannot distinguish fresh generation, imported legacy code, or long-lived human code with high confidence.
Git historyGenerated repo pattern
For AI agents: Voting guide (TP/FP) MCP manifest Stdio wrapper SARIF Integrate Findings queue Vote TP/FP on findings to calibrate the engine.
For AI agents + API integrations
Email me when this repo regresses
Free. We re-scan periodically; new criticals → your inbox. No signup required for the scan itself.
API access

This page is publicly accessible at: https://repobility.com/scan/3d6f4bc8-227f-4aa2-bda8-6ed0a158afd8/

To check status programmatically (no auth required): 

curl -s https://repobility.com/api/v1/public/scan/3d6f4bc8-227f-4aa2-bda8-6ed0a158afd8/

Important — please don't re-submit the same URL repeatedly. The submission endpoint is idempotent: re-submitting the same git URL returns this same scan_token, not a new one. To re-scan this repo, sign up free and use the dashboard.