Public scan — anyone with this URL can view this analysis. Sign up to track your own repos privately, run scheduled re-scans, and get AI fix prompts via your dashboard.
Sign up free Scan another repo

Red7Al/ClaudeCode

https://github.com/Red7Al/ClaudeCode · scanned 2026-06-15 23:48 UTC (2 months, 3 weeks ago)

64 raw signals (0 security + 64 graph)

File as issue Image
UNIFIED Repobility · multi-layer engine · AI coders

Complete repo analysis

Last scanned 2 months, 3 weeks ago · v1 · 63 actionable findings from 1 signal source. 1 repeated signal grouped for readability. Security checks, system graph analysis, and verified AI-agent feedback are merged into one review queue.

JSON
Combined
82.3
/100
Security checks
82
0 findings
System graph
82
88.9% cov · 63 findings
Critical
0
click to filter
Agents
10
0 votes
Crowd
0
reported
Severity distribution — click a segment to filter
Active filters: excluding tests × Reset all
Severity: Critical 0 High 0 Medium 9 Low 23 9-Layer: Software Security Quality Integrity Frontend Hardware Data Network Cicd Source: Security checks 0 System graph 63 Crowd 0 Layer: Software 7 Frontend 1 Security 1 Cicd 2 Quality 52
Corpus Intelligence Cross-corpus context (cohort percentile, top patterns, fix plan) is shown only on repositories you own. Sign up and connect your repo to view it.
Scan summary Repository scanned at 82.3/100 with 88.9% coverage. It contains 694 nodes across 0 cross-layer flows, written primarily in mixed languages. Engine surfaced 64 findings — concentrated in quality (53), software (7), cicd (2). Risk profile is low: 0 critical, 0 high, 9 medium. Recommended next step: open the quality layer findings first — that's where the highest-impact wins live.

Showing 32 of 63 actionable findings. 64 raw detector signals were grouped into reader-sized issues. Click TP / FP to vote on a finding's accuracy — votes adjust the confidence weighting and improve detection across the platform.

medium System graph quality Agent instructions conf 1.00 Agent authority lacks a verifier contract: skills_src/ah-instrument-dossier/SKILL.md
This agent instruction grants code or shell authority but does not state the verification gate that decides promotion. The recurring safe pattern is: LLM proposes; deterministic tests/build/security checks verify; only verified code promotes.
skills_src/ah-instrument-dossier/SKILL.md VerificationSkill file
medium System graph quality Agent instructions conf 1.00 Agent authority lacks a verifier contract: skills_src/ah-quality-report/SKILL.md
This agent instruction grants code or shell authority but does not state the verification gate that decides promotion. The recurring safe pattern is: LLM proposes; deterministic tests/build/security checks verify; only verified code promotes.
skills_src/ah-quality-report/SKILL.md VerificationSkill file
medium System graph quality Agent instructions conf 1.00 Agent authority lacks a verifier contract: skills_src/ah-signal-stack/SKILL.md
This agent instruction grants code or shell authority but does not state the verification gate that decides promotion. The recurring safe pattern is: LLM proposes; deterministic tests/build/security checks verify; only verified code promotes.
skills_src/ah-signal-stack/SKILL.md VerificationSkill file
medium System graph quality Agent instructions conf 1.00 Agent authority lacks a verifier contract: skills_src/ah-x-publications/SKILL.md
This agent instruction grants code or shell authority but does not state the verification gate that decides promotion. The recurring safe pattern is: LLM proposes; deterministic tests/build/security checks verify; only verified code promotes.
skills_src/ah-x-publications/SKILL.md VerificationSkill file
medium System graph quality Placeholder conf 1.00 Critical user flow still appears backed by mock or placeholder data
A payment/auth/admin/order/billing-style flow contains mock, fake, TODO, dummy, or placeholder markers in runtime source. In the Fable corpus this is a high-leverage completeness smell: the app can look finished while the money, identity, or tenant flow is still scaffolded.
Mock dataCritical flowGenerated repo pattern
medium System graph cicd CI/CD security conf 1.00 GitHub Actions workflow grants broad write permissions
CI tokens with write permissions increase blast radius when an action, dependency, or PR workflow is compromised. Prefer job-level least-privilege permissions.
.github/workflows/trading-query-auto.yml CI/CD securitySupply chainGithub actions
medium System graph security security conf 1.00 Insecure pattern 'subprocess_shell_true' in setup_hooks.py:14
Found a known-risky pattern (subprocess_shell_true). Review and replace if possible.
setup_hooks.py:14 Subprocess shell true
medium System graph quality Integrity conf 1.00 Network/subprocess call without timeout or try/except — setup_hooks.py:14
`subprocess.run(...)` here lacks both a `timeout=` arg and an enclosing try/except. This is exactly the class of bug that took down our git-clone earlier (HTTP/2 stream cancel surfaced as a fatal). Add a `timeout=` and wrap in try/except, or use a wrapper that retries.
runtime safetyRobustness
medium System graph quality Integrity conf 1.00 Network/subprocess call without timeout or try/except — signals.py:816
`requests.get(...)` here lacks both a `timeout=` arg and an enclosing try/except. This is exactly the class of bug that took down our git-clone earlier (HTTP/2 stream cancel surfaced as a fatal). Add a `timeout=` and wrap in try/except, or use a wrapper that retries.
runtime safetyRobustness
low System graph quality Production readiness conf 1.00 Composite production-readiness gap
Multiple low-cost hardening controls are missing together: license, operator-readme. Opus verification showed these co-occurring gaps are a better readiness signal than reading each flag in isolation.
Repo hardeningGenerated repo pattern
low System graph quality Debug conf 1.00 Debug logging residue appears in source files
Found 225 console/debugger/print-style debug statements in non-test source. This is a common fast-generation residue before production cleanup.
CleanupRepo hardeningGenerated repo pattern
low System graph cicd CI/CD security conf 1.00 GitHub Action is tag-pinned rather than SHA-pinned
actions/upload-artifact@v5 can move without a code change in this repo. Pin third-party actions to a reviewed 40-character commit SHA.
.github/workflows/trading-create-env.yml:62 CI/CD securitySupply chainGithub actions
low System graph quality Tests conf 1.00 Low test-to-source ratio
5 tests / 38 src (ratio 0.13).
low System graph quality Integrity conf 1.00 2 occurrences Near-duplicate function bodies in 2 places
Functions with the same first-5-line body hash: CopyPythonFilesToGithubDirectory.py:should_ignore, CopyMDFilesToGithubDirectory.py:should_ignore This is *the* AI-coder failure mode (4× more duplication in vibe-coded repos — see https://jw.hn/ai-code-hygiene). Consolidate or document why they're se…
2 occurrences
repo-level (2 hits)
duplicatesduplication
low System graph quality Integrity conf 1.00 Near-duplicate function bodies in 3 places
Functions with the same first-5-line body hash: ig_shim.py:get_db, ig_shim.py:get, signals.py:get_db This is *the* AI-coder failure mode (4× more duplication in vibe-coded repos — see https://jw.hn/ai-code-hygiene). Consolidate or document why they're separate.
duplicatesduplication
low System graph quality License conf 1.00 No license file detected
No LICENSE/COPYING/NOTICE file was found. Generated repositories often omit licensing, which blocks reuse and automated intake.
Repo hardeningGenerated repo pattern
low System graph software Dead code conf 1.00 Possibly dead Python function: alert_daily_loss_limit
No callers detected by AST scan in this repo. Could be exported for external callers or a framework handler.
notify.py:984
low System graph software Dead code conf 1.00 Possibly dead Python function: handle_data
No callers detected by AST scan in this repo. Could be exported for external callers or a framework handler.
run_session.py:1009
low System graph software Dead code conf 1.00 Possibly dead Python function: handle_endtag
No callers detected by AST scan in this repo. Could be exported for external callers or a framework handler.
run_session.py:1001
low System graph software Dead code conf 1.00 Possibly dead Python function: handle_starttag
No callers detected by AST scan in this repo. Could be exported for external callers or a framework handler.
run_session.py:988
low System graph software Dead code conf 1.00 Possibly dead Python function: publish_to_x
No callers detected by AST scan in this repo. Could be exported for external callers or a framework handler.
x_publish.py:84
low System graph software Dead code conf 1.00 Possibly dead Python function: signal_detail
No callers detected by AST scan in this repo. Could be exported for external callers or a framework handler.
notify.py:666
low System graph software Dead code conf 1.00 Possibly dead Python function: x_stagger_seconds
No callers detected by AST scan in this repo. Could be exported for external callers or a framework handler.
quality_report.py:57
low System graph quality Docs conf 1.00 README lacks setup or run instructions
A README exists, but it does not contain common install/setup/run markers. This matches a frequent generated-code pattern: UI is present, operational handoff is thin.
ReadmeRepo hardeningGenerated repo pattern
low System graph quality Provenance conf 1.00 Shallow git history limits provenance confidence
The repository is a shallow clone. Origin/evolution analysis cannot distinguish fresh generation, imported legacy code, or long-lived human code with high confidence.
Git historyGenerated repo pattern
low System graph quality Integrity conf 1.00 Stub function `ensure_authenticated` (body is just `pass`/`return`) — test_working_orders_mock.py:74
Likely an AI scaffold that was never filled in. Remove or implement.
Empty handlerDead code
low System graph quality Complexity conf 1.00 Very large file: ig_shim.py (2761 lines)
Files with >800 lines often hide complexity hotspots and discourage tests.
low System graph quality Complexity conf 1.00 Very large file: intraday_signals.py (1928 lines)
Files with >800 lines often hide complexity hotspots and discourage tests.
low System graph quality Complexity conf 1.00 Very large file: notify.py (1385 lines)
Files with >800 lines often hide complexity hotspots and discourage tests.
low System graph quality Complexity conf 1.00 Very large file: price_action.py (2247 lines)
Files with >800 lines often hide complexity hotspots and discourage tests.
low System graph quality Complexity conf 1.00 Very large file: run_session.py (1166 lines)
Files with >800 lines often hide complexity hotspots and discourage tests.
low System graph quality Complexity conf 1.00 Very large file: signals.py (2264 lines)
Files with >800 lines often hide complexity hotspots and discourage tests.
For AI agents: Voting guide (TP/FP) MCP manifest Stdio wrapper SARIF Integrate Findings queue Vote TP/FP on findings to calibrate the engine.
For AI agents + API integrations
Email me when this repo regresses
Free. We re-scan periodically; new criticals → your inbox. No signup required for the scan itself.
API access

This page is publicly accessible at: https://repobility.com/scan/41364481-28bb-407e-b1f3-9c993bdc2827/

To check status programmatically (no auth required): 

curl -s https://repobility.com/api/v1/public/scan/41364481-28bb-407e-b1f3-9c993bdc2827/

Important — please don't re-submit the same URL repeatedly. The submission endpoint is idempotent: re-submitting the same git URL returns this same scan_token, not a new one. To re-scan this repo, sign up free and use the dashboard.