Public scan — anyone with this URL can view this analysis. Sign up to track your own repos privately, run scheduled re-scans, and get AI fix prompts via your dashboard.
Sign up free Scan another repo

xr843/fojin

https://github.com/xr843/fojin.git · scanned 2026-05-16 02:11 UTC (2 weeks, 6 days ago) · 10 languages

382 findings (202 legacy + 180 scanner) 50th percentile · Python · medium (20-100K LoC) Scanner says 64 (lower by 15)

File as issue Image v2 schema
UNIFIED Repobility · multi-layer engine · AI coders

Complete repo analysis

Last scanned 2 weeks, 6 days ago · v1 · 194 findings from 1 source. Findings combine the legacy security pipeline AND the multi-layer engine (atlas, wiring, flows, ranked) AND verified AI agent contributions.

JSON
Combined
47.4
/100
Repobility
31
194 legacy
9-layer
64
100.0% cov · 0 gaps
Critical
26
click to filter
Agents
6
0 votes
Crowd
0
reported
Score breakdown â 2026-05-17-v4 calibration-aware
Component Sub-score Weight Contribution
structure_score 40.0 0.15 6.00
security_score 3.0 0.25 0.75
testing_score 47.0 0.20 9.40
documentation_score 98.0 0.15 14.70
practices_score 85.0 0.15 12.75
code_quality 56.5 0.10 5.65
Overall 1.00 49.3
Calibrated penalty buckets (security_score): web: 1.6 · agent: 3.5 · docker: 40.2 · threat: 67.0
Severity distribution — click a segment to filter
Active filters: excluding tests × Reset all
Severity: Critical 26 High 136 Medium 26 Low 3 9-Layer: Software Security Quality Integrity Frontend Hardware Data Network Cicd Source: Legacy 194 9-layer 0 Crowd 0 Layer: Quality 42 Software 8 Security 128 Cicd 16

Bug-class explainers. Each card groups findings of the same shape — these are the patterns most likely to ship to prod and reappear in future scans unless you systematically fix the cause, not just the instance.

Fragile runtime 42 findings
What it is: Code that runs but breaks under predictable input — division by zero, missing keys, unbounded loops, off-by-one slicing.
Why it matters: Reaches production undetected because happy-path tests pass. First user with a weird input crashes the request.
How AI causes it: AI loves writing the happy path; doesn't probe edge cases unless explicitly asked.
Fix approach: Add property-based tests. Wrap external inputs with explicit validators. Use the framework's typed deserializer (Pydantic, attrs).
12 matching findings on this repo
  • medium Magic number used as default arg backend/alembic/versions/0059_add_sort_order_and_…:19
  • medium Public web service has no security.txt .well-known/security.txt
  • medium [ERR001] Silent Exception Swallowing: Silently swallowing all exceptions hides … backend/scripts/init_es_index.py:56
  • medium [ERR001] Silent Exception Swallowing: Silently swallowing all exceptions hides … backend/scripts/fetch_korean_hanja.py:43
  • medium [ERR001] Silent Exception Swallowing: Silently swallowing all exceptions hides … backend/app/main.py:321
  • medium [ERR002] Empty Catch Block: Empty catch blocks hide errors. frontend/src/components/Layout.tsx:66
  • medium [ERR002] Empty Catch Block: Empty catch blocks hide errors. frontend/src/components/NotificationBell.tsx:26
  • medium [ERR002] Empty Catch Block: Empty catch blocks hide errors. frontend/src/pages/CollectionsPage.tsx:209
  • medium localStorage write failures are swallowed silently frontend/src/pages/TextReaderPage.tsx:599
  • medium localStorage write failures are swallowed silently frontend/src/pages/ChatPage.tsx:267
  • medium Agent control bridge may listen on a network interface without visible auth backend/entrypoint.sh:13
  • medium Duplicated implementation block across source files backend/alembic/versions/0054_ensure_openpecha_so…:80
View all fragile runtime findings →
Config drift 2 findings
What it is: Settings duplicated across env files, Docker compose, K8s, and code defaults, all with slightly different values.
Why it matters: Production behaviour depends on whichever copy your loader reads first. Subtle bugs in staging that don't reproduce in dev.
How AI causes it: AI writes new config from memory rather than reading the existing source.
Fix approach: Pick one source of truth (env vars + a settings module). Have every other place import from there. Lint for duplicates in CI.
2 matching findings on this repo
  • medium CORS misconfiguration — wildcard Access-Control-Allow-Origin backend/app/main.py:75
  • medium CORS misconfiguration — wildcard Access-Control-Allow-Origin backend/app/main.py:69
View all config drift findings →
For AI agents: Voting guide (TP/FP) MCP manifest Stdio wrapper SARIF Integrate Findings queue Vote TP/FP on findings to calibrate the engine.
For AI agents + API integrations
Email me when this repo regresses
Free. We re-scan periodically; new criticals → your inbox. No signup required for the scan itself.
API access

This page is publicly accessible at: https://repobility.com/scan/42747e40-840f-4f7f-95d6-8422159cbe2e/

To check status programmatically (no auth required): 

curl -s https://repobility.com/api/v1/public/scan/42747e40-840f-4f7f-95d6-8422159cbe2e/

Important — please don't re-submit the same URL repeatedly. The submission endpoint is idempotent: re-submitting the same git URL returns this same scan_token, not a new one. To re-scan this repo, sign up free and use the dashboard.