Public scan — anyone with this URL can view this analysis. Sign up to track your own repos privately, run scheduled re-scans, and get AI fix prompts via your dashboard.

Vladimir03/sokratai

https://github.com/Vladimir03/sokratai · scanned 2026-06-16 00:52 UTC (2 months, 1 week ago)

418 raw signals (0 security + 418 graph)

File as issue Image

UNIFIED Repobility · multi-layer engine · AI coders

Complete repo analysis

Last scanned 2 months, 1 week ago · v1 · 372 actionable findings from 1 signal source. 46 repeated signals grouped for readability. Security checks, system graph analysis, and verified AI-agent feedback are merged into one review queue.

JSON

100.0% cov · 372 findings

Severity distribution — click a segment to filter

Active filters: excluding tests × Reset all

Severity: Critical 2 High 3 Medium 108 Low 81 9-Layer: Software Security Quality Integrity Frontend Hardware Data Network Cicd Source: Security checks 0 System graph 372 Crowd 0 Layer: Software 3 Api 1 Frontend 111 Security 63 Cicd 2 Quality 192

Exclude dismissed / FP Exclude test files

Bug-class explainers. Each card groups findings of the same shape — these are the patterns most likely to ship to prod and reappear in future scans unless you systematically fix the cause, not just the instance.

Legacy markers 1 finding

What it is: TODO, FIXME, XXX, HACK comments. Often indicate a known-broken path the author meant to fix.

Why it matters: Each marker is an unfinished thought. Production code shouldn't ship with debt that's documented but not tracked.

How AI causes it: AI mirrors the style of the codebase, so existing TODOs propagate into new code.

Fix approach: Convert each into a ticket. Delete the comment when the ticket lands. Use a pre-commit hook to block new TODOs without an issue link.

1 matching finding on this repo

low Old/deprecated-named symbol `payloadLegacy` in supabase/functions/homework-api/…

View all legacy markers findings →

Commented-out code 117 findings

What it is: Lines of source that were intentionally disabled but never deleted.

Why it matters: Git already remembers history — commented code rots, becomes wrong, and adds noise to diffs.

How AI causes it: AI sometimes comments out broken code instead of fixing it. Reviewers approve out of inertia.

Fix approach: Delete. Trust `git log`. If you really need to remember, save it in a notes file under `docs/`.

12 matching findings on this repo

info Commented-code block (5 lines) in vite.config.ts:59
info Commented-code block (5 lines) in vite.config.ts.timestamp-1779353619296-3e79d6…
info Commented-code block (6 lines) in scripts/test-mockexam-contact-type.mjs:10
info Commented-code block (5 lines) in scripts/test-mockexam-checker.mjs:95
info Commented-code block (7 lines) in scripts/test-criteria-templates.mjs:4
info Commented-code block (5 lines) in scripts/smoke-check.mjs:391
info Commented-code block (6 lines) in scripts/structure-mock-exam.py:60
info Commented-code block (5 lines) in .claude/hooks/check-supabase-url.mjs:2
info Commented-code block (7 lines) in supabase/functions/mock-exam-public/index.ts:3
info Commented-code block (6 lines) in supabase/functions/tutor-progress-api/index.t…
info Commented-code block (5 lines) in supabase/functions/homework-api/guided_ai.ts:…
info Commented-code block (5 lines) in supabase/functions/homework-api/index.ts:1395

View all commented-out code findings →

Config drift 7 findings

What it is: Settings duplicated across env files, Docker compose, K8s, and code defaults, all with slightly different values.

Why it matters: Production behaviour depends on whichever copy your loader reads first. Subtle bugs in staging that don't reproduce in dev.

How AI causes it: AI writes new config from memory rather than reading the existing source.

Fix approach: Pick one source of truth (env vars + a settings module). Have every other place import from there. Lint for duplicates in CI.

7 matching findings on this repo

medium Runtime service client appears to use placeholder configuration
medium CI is configured but no tests are detected
high Agent instruction/config may expose a secret: .claude/rules/96-auth-ru-bypass.md .claude/rules/96-auth-ru-bypass.md:257
high Agent instruction/config may expose a secret: .claude/agents/kb-explorer.md .claude/agents/kb-explorer.md:22
high Agent instruction/config may expose a secret: .claude/plans/compressed-sparking… .claude/plans/compressed-sparking-spindle-review-…:58
info Commented-code block (5 lines) in vite.config.ts:59
info Commented-code block (5 lines) in vite.config.ts.timestamp-1779353619296-3e79d6…

View all config drift findings →

For AI agents: Voting guide (TP/FP) MCP manifest Stdio wrapper SARIF Integrate Findings queue Vote TP/FP on findings to calibrate the engine.

For AI agents + API integrations

Email me when this repo regresses

Free. We re-scan periodically; new criticals → your inbox. No signup required for the scan itself.

API access

This page is publicly accessible at: https://repobility.com/scan/4692c25b-cafe-45d0-be8e-1122ce0f7684/

To check status programmatically (no auth required):

curl -s https://repobility.com/api/v1/public/scan/4692c25b-cafe-45d0-be8e-1122ce0f7684/

Important — please don't re-submit the same URL repeatedly. The submission endpoint is idempotent: re-submitting the same git URL returns this same scan_token, not a new one. To re-scan this repo, sign up free and use the dashboard.