Public scan — anyone with this URL can view this analysis. Sign up to track your own repos privately, run scheduled re-scans, and get AI fix prompts via your dashboard.

chairithinug/chairithinug.github.io

https://github.com/chairithinug/chairithinug.github.io · scanned 2026-06-17 01:47 UTC (1 month, 1 week ago)

6 raw signals (0 security + 6 graph)

File as issue Image

UNIFIED Repobility · multi-layer engine · AI coders

Complete repo analysis

Last scanned 1 month, 1 week ago · v2 · last Δ -22.5 (diff) · 6 actionable findings from 1 signal source. Security checks, system graph analysis, and verified AI-agent feedback are merged into one review queue.

JSON

33.3% cov · 6 findings

Severity distribution — click a segment to filter

Active filters: excluding tests × Reset all

Severity: Critical 0 High 0 Medium 5 Low 1 9-Layer: Software Security Quality Integrity Frontend Hardware Data Network Cicd Source: Security checks 0 System graph 6 Crowd 0 Layer: Security 3 Quality 3

Exclude dismissed / FP Exclude test files

Corpus Intelligence Cross-corpus context (cohort percentile, top patterns, fix plan) is shown only on repositories you own. Sign up and connect your repo to view it.

Scan summary Repository scanned at 54.2/100 with 33.3% coverage. It contains 93 nodes across 0 cross-layer flows, written primarily in mixed languages. Engine surfaced 6 findings — concentrated in security (3), quality (3). Risk profile is low: 0 critical, 0 high, 5 medium. Recommended next step: open the security layer findings first — that's where the highest-impact wins live.

Showing 6 of 6 actionable findings. Click TP / FP to vote on a finding's accuracy — votes adjust the confidence weighting and improve detection across the platform.

medium System graph quality Production readiness conf 1.00 Composite production-readiness gap

Multiple low-cost hardening controls are missing together: license, ci, tests. Opus verification showed these co-occurring gaps are a better readiness signal than reading each flag in isolation.

Repo hardeningGenerated repo pattern

medium System graph security security conf 1.00 Insecure pattern 'direct_innerhtml_assignment' in chrome.js:159

Found a known-risky pattern (direct_innerhtml_assignment). Review and replace if possible.

chrome.js:159 Direct innerhtml assignment

medium System graph security security conf 1.00 Insecure pattern 'direct_innerhtml_assignment' in faq-cards.js:24

Found a known-risky pattern (direct_innerhtml_assignment). Review and replace if possible.

faq-cards.js:24 Direct innerhtml assignment

medium System graph security security conf 1.00 Insecure pattern 'direct_innerhtml_assignment' in site.js:316

Found a known-risky pattern (direct_innerhtml_assignment). Review and replace if possible.

site.js:316 Direct innerhtml assignment

medium System graph quality Tests conf 1.00 Very low test-to-source ratio

0 test file(s) for 5 source file(s) (ratio 0.00). Consider adding integration or unit tests for critical paths.

Coverage

low System graph quality License conf 1.00 No license file detected

No LICENSE/COPYING/NOTICE file was found. Generated repositories often omit licensing, which blocks reuse and automated intake.

Repo hardeningGenerated repo pattern

For AI agents: Voting guide (TP/FP) MCP manifest Stdio wrapper SARIF Integrate Findings queue Vote TP/FP on findings to calibrate the engine.

For AI agents + API integrations

Email me when this repo regresses

Free. We re-scan periodically; new criticals → your inbox. No signup required for the scan itself.

API access

This page is publicly accessible at: https://repobility.com/scan/4900dbfe-66ee-4369-a44c-ca00c3f068e2/

To check status programmatically (no auth required):

curl -s https://repobility.com/api/v1/public/scan/4900dbfe-66ee-4369-a44c-ca00c3f068e2/

Important — please don't re-submit the same URL repeatedly. The submission endpoint is idempotent: re-submitting the same git URL returns this same scan_token, not a new one. To re-scan this repo, sign up free and use the dashboard.