Public scan — anyone with this URL can view this analysis. Sign up to track your own repos privately, run scheduled re-scans, and get AI fix prompts via your dashboard.

ToddHoff/DoubleCheckPrivate

https://github.com/ToddHoff/DoubleCheckPrivate · scanned 2026-06-16 00:38 UTC (2 months, 2 weeks ago)

26 raw signals (2 security + 24 graph)

File as issue Image

UNIFIED Repobility · multi-layer engine · AI coders

Complete repo analysis

Last scanned 2 months, 2 weeks ago · v1 · 26 actionable findings from 2 signal sources. Security checks, system graph analysis, and verified AI-agent feedback are merged into one review queue.

JSON

66.7% cov · 24 findings

Severity distribution — click a segment to filter

Active filters: excluding tests × Reset all

Severity: Critical 0 High 2 Medium 8 Low 4 9-Layer: Software Security Quality Integrity Frontend Hardware Data Network Cicd Source: Security checks 2 System graph 24 Crowd 0 Layer: Quality 18 Frontend 2 Security 5 Cicd 1

Exclude dismissed / FP Exclude test files

Corpus Intelligence Cross-corpus context (cohort percentile, top patterns, fix plan) is shown only on repositories you own. Sign up and connect your repo to view it.

Scan summary Repository scanned at 98.0/100 with 66.7% coverage. It contains 407 nodes across 0 cross-layer flows, written primarily in mixed languages. Engine surfaced 24 findings — concentrated in quality (16), security (5), frontend (2). Risk profile is high: 0 critical, 1 high, 7 medium. Recommended next step: open the quality layer findings first — that's where the highest-impact wins live.

Showing 14 of 26 actionable findings. Click TP / FP to vote on a finding's accuracy — votes adjust the confidence weighting and improve detection across the platform.

high Security checks quality Testing conf 0.78 Foundry mined test ci gap after feedback: ToddHoff/DoubleCheckPrivate

Graph query export: Feedback exposes missing tests or CI Query id: test_ci_gap_after_feedback Query type: motif_query Intent: Hard negatives for feedback/fix chains without adequate guardrails. Motif: test_ci_gap_after_feedback Training usage: hard_negative Graph gold label: supported_by_verificati…

high System graph security security conf 1.00 Insecure pattern 'new_function_used' in public/tesseract/worker.min.js:2

Found a known-risky pattern (new_function_used). Review and replace if possible.

public/tesseract/worker.min.js:2 New function used

medium Security checks quality maintenance conf 0.70 Foundry mined blueprint gap alignment: ToddHoff/DoubleCheckPrivate

Graph query export: Human feedback aligned with blueprint or architecture gaps Query id: blueprint_gap_alignment Query type: motif_query Intent: Curriculum-gap examples connecting issue threads to helicopter-view gaps. Motif: blueprint_gap_alignment Training usage: curriculum_gap Graph gold label: …

medium System graph quality Placeholder conf 1.00 Critical user flow still appears backed by mock or placeholder data

A payment/auth/admin/order/billing-style flow contains mock, fake, TODO, dummy, or placeholder markers in runtime source. In the Fable corpus this is a high-leverage completeness smell: the app can look finished while the money, identity, or tenant flow is still scaffolded.

Mock dataCritical flowGenerated repo pattern

medium System graph security security conf 1.00 Insecure pattern 'direct_innerhtml_assignment' in src/onboarding/main.ts:258

Found a known-risky pattern (direct_innerhtml_assignment). Review and replace if possible.

src/onboarding/main.ts:258 Direct innerhtml assignment

medium System graph security security conf 1.00 Insecure pattern 'direct_innerhtml_assignment' in src/options/tabs/docs.ts:206

Found a known-risky pattern (direct_innerhtml_assignment). Review and replace if possible.

src/options/tabs/docs.ts:206 Direct innerhtml assignment

medium System graph security security conf 1.00 Insecure pattern 'direct_innerhtml_assignment' in src/popup/main.ts:9

Found a known-risky pattern (direct_innerhtml_assignment). Review and replace if possible.

src/popup/main.ts:9 Direct innerhtml assignment

medium System graph security Coverage conf 1.00 No auth library detected

The scanner did not find any standard auth library (JWT, OAuth, NextAuth, Auth0, etc.). The repo has auth/admin/session surface indicators, so auth may live in custom code, in a separate service, or be missing.

auth

medium System graph cicd CI/CD security conf 1.00 No CI/CD pipelines detected

No GitHub Actions, GitLab CI, or CircleCI configs found. Without CI you can't gate deploys on tests/lints.

CI/CD securityCoverage

medium System graph quality Placeholder conf 1.00 Placeholder or mock-heavy implementation detected

Found 29 placeholder/mock markers across 8 source files. This often means the repo looks complete while core flows still use generated scaffolding or fake data.

Mock dataIncompleteGenerated repo pattern

low System graph quality Debug conf 1.00 Debug logging residue appears in source files

Found 18 console/debugger/print-style debug statements in non-test source. This is a common fast-generation residue before production cleanup.

CleanupRepo hardeningGenerated repo pattern

low System graph quality Tests conf 1.00 Low test-to-source ratio

11 tests / 56 src (ratio 0.20).

low System graph quality Provenance conf 1.00 Shallow git history limits provenance confidence

The repository is a shallow clone. Origin/evolution analysis cannot distinguish fresh generation, imported legacy code, or long-lived human code with high confidence.

Git historyGenerated repo pattern

low System graph frontend Frontend quality conf 1.00 Stray `console.log` in TS/JS — public/tesseract/worker.min.js:2

Replace with the toast helper, an error boundary, or remove. `console.warn` / `console.error` are acceptable. Why: Hygiene — easy to leak debug output. Rule id: fq.console-leak

Fq console leak

For AI agents: Voting guide (TP/FP) MCP manifest Stdio wrapper SARIF Integrate Findings queue Vote TP/FP on findings to calibrate the engine.

For AI agents + API integrations

Email me when this repo regresses

Free. We re-scan periodically; new criticals → your inbox. No signup required for the scan itself.

API access

This page is publicly accessible at: https://repobility.com/scan/490110c1-8cd3-4e06-8201-1d80756c203c/

To check status programmatically (no auth required):

curl -s https://repobility.com/api/v1/public/scan/490110c1-8cd3-4e06-8201-1d80756c203c/

Important — please don't re-submit the same URL repeatedly. The submission endpoint is idempotent: re-submitting the same git URL returns this same scan_token, not a new one. To re-scan this repo, sign up free and use the dashboard.