Public scan — anyone with this URL can view this analysis. Sign up to track your own repos privately, run scheduled re-scans, and get AI fix prompts via your dashboard.
95 of your 151 findings came from Repobility's proprietary detections. ✓ Repobility tags below mark them.

Scan timing: clone 19.73s · analysis 57.14s · 76.9 MB · GitHub API rate-limit (preflight)

facebook/flow

https://github.com/facebook/flow · scanned 2026-06-06 00:54 UTC (4 days, 1 hour ago) · 10 languages

1137 raw signals (137 security + 1000 graph) 11/13 scanners ran 88th percentile · Javascript · huge (>500K LoC) System graph score 52 (higher by 38)

UNIFIED Repobility · multi-layer engine · AI coders

Complete repo analysis

Last scanned 4 days, 1 hour ago · v2 · 536 actionable findings from 2 signal sources. 101 repeated signals grouped for readability. Security checks, system graph analysis, and verified AI-agent feedback are merged into one review queue.

JSON
Score breakdown â 2026-05-18-v5
Component Sub-score Weight Contribution
structure_score 85.0 0.15 12.75
security_score 100.0 0.25 25.00
testing_score 100.0 0.20 20.00
documentation_score 100.0 0.15 15.00
practices_score 72.0 0.15 10.80
code_quality 70.0 0.10 7.00
Overall 1.00 90.5
security_score may be inflated — optional security scanners were skipped on this fast scan
Severity distribution — click a segment to filter
Active filters: excluding tests × Reset all

Bug-class explainers. Each card groups findings of the same shape — these are the patterns most likely to ship to prod and reappear in future scans unless you systematically fix the cause, not just the instance.

Legacy markers 4 findings
What it is: TODO, FIXME, XXX, HACK comments. Often indicate a known-broken path the author meant to fix.
Why it matters: Each marker is an unfinished thought. Production code shouldn't ship with debt that's documented but not tracked.
How AI causes it: AI mirrors the style of the codebase, so existing TODOs propagate into new code.
Fix approach: Convert each into a ticket. Delete the comment when the ticket lands. Use a pre-commit hook to block new TODOs without an issue link.
4 matching findings on this repo
  • low Old/deprecated-named symbol `invalid_neg_octal_legacy` in tests/bigint/invalid1…
  • low Old/deprecated-named symbol `invalid_octal_legacy` in tests/bigint/invalid13.js…
  • low Old/deprecated-named symbol `InvalidOctalLegacy` in tests/bigint/invalid11.js:1
  • low Old/deprecated-named symbol `InvalidNegOctalLegacy` in tests/bigint/invalid12.j…
View all legacy markers findings →
Commented-out code 100 findings
What it is: Lines of source that were intentionally disabled but never deleted.
Why it matters: Git already remembers history — commented code rots, becomes wrong, and adds noise to diffs.
How AI causes it: AI sometimes comments out broken code instead of fixing it. Reviewers approve out of inertia.
Fix approach: Delete. Trust `git log`. If you really need to remember, save it in a notes file under `docs/`.
12 matching findings on this repo
  • info Commented-code block (8 lines) in tests/override/no_implicit_override_off.js:1
  • info Commented-code block (5 lines) in tests/override/cross_module_static.js:1
  • info Commented-code block (6 lines) in tests/override/abstract_override.js:4
  • info Commented-code block (5 lines) in tests/override/accessor_half_pair.js:6
  • info Commented-code block (5 lines) in tests/ts_variance/tuple_polarity.ts:1
  • info Commented-code block (5 lines) in tests/ts_variance/cross_lang_lib.ts:1
  • info Commented-code block (5 lines) in tests/ts_variance/method_bivariance_consumer.…
  • info Commented-code block (5 lines) in tests/ts_variance/cross_lang_consumer.js:1
  • info Commented-code block (6 lines) in tests/ts_variance/declared_polarity.ts:6
  • info Commented-code block (5 lines) in tests/ts_variance/type_arg_variance.ts:22
  • info Commented-code block (5 lines) in tests/ts_variance/method_bivariance.ts:11
  • info Commented-code block (8 lines) in tests/ts_variance/optional_property_invarianc…
View all commented-out code findings →
Config drift 10 findings
What it is: Settings duplicated across env files, Docker compose, K8s, and code defaults, all with slightly different values.
Why it matters: Production behaviour depends on whichever copy your loader reads first. Subtle bugs in staging that don't reproduce in dev.
How AI causes it: AI writes new config from memory rather than reading the existing source.
Fix approach: Pick one source of truth (env vars + a settings module). Have every other place import from there. Lint for duplicates in CI.
10 matching findings on this repo
  • low File has no detected symbols: tests/config_module_file_exts_precedence/js_vs_zz…
  • low File has no detected symbols: tests/config_module_file_exts_precedence/test.js
  • low File has no detected symbols: tests/config_module_file_exts_precedence/zzz_vs_z…
  • low File has no detected symbols: tests/config_module_file_exts_precedence/js_vs_zz…
  • low File has no detected symbols: tests/config_module_file_exts_precedence/aaa_vs_a…
  • low File has no detected symbols: tests/config_module_file_exts_precedence/multiple…
  • critical Possible secret in website/docusaurus.config.js website/docusaurus.config.js:105
  • low Very large file: rust_port/crates/flow_config/src/flowconfig.rs (3872 lines)
  • info Commented-code block (7 lines) in packages/babel.config.js:38
  • info Commented-code block (5 lines) in packages/flow-dev-tools/src/check-test/checkT…
View all config drift findings →
For AI agents: Voting guide (TP/FP) MCP manifest Stdio wrapper SARIF Integrate Findings queue Vote TP/FP on findings to calibrate the engine.
For AI agents + API integrations
Email me when this repo regresses
Free. We re-scan periodically; new criticals → your inbox. No signup required for the scan itself.
API access

This page is publicly accessible at: https://repobility.com/scan/4930b5ba-4f83-4e87-9857-7da8af461489/

To check status programmatically (no auth required):

curl -s https://repobility.com/api/v1/public/scan/4930b5ba-4f83-4e87-9857-7da8af461489/

Important — please don't re-submit the same URL repeatedly. The submission endpoint is idempotent: re-submitting the same git URL returns this same scan_token, not a new one. To re-scan this repo, sign up free and use the dashboard.