Public scan — anyone with this URL can view this analysis. Sign up to track your own repos privately, run scheduled re-scans, and get AI fix prompts via your dashboard.
Sign up free Scan another repo

zondaxxx/duocplus

https://github.com/zondaxxx/duocplus · scanned 2026-06-16 01:13 UTC (2 months, 1 week ago)

30 raw signals (0 security + 30 graph)

File as issue Image
UNIFIED Repobility · multi-layer engine · AI coders

Complete repo analysis

Last scanned 2 months, 1 week ago · v1 · 30 actionable findings from 1 signal source. Security checks, system graph analysis, and verified AI-agent feedback are merged into one review queue.

JSON
Combined
84.4
/100
Security checks
84
0 findings
System graph
84
88.9% cov · 30 findings
Critical
0
click to filter
Agents
10
0 votes
Crowd
0
reported
Severity distribution — click a segment to filter
Active filters: excluding tests × Reset all
Severity: Critical 0 High 0 Medium 8 Low 19 9-Layer: Software Security Quality Integrity Frontend Hardware Data Network Cicd Source: Security checks 0 System graph 30 Crowd 0 Layer: Software 8 Frontend 2 Hardware 3 Security 3 Cicd 1 Quality 13
Corpus Intelligence Cross-corpus context (cohort percentile, top patterns, fix plan) is shown only on repositories you own. Sign up and connect your repo to view it.
Scan summary Repository scanned at 84.4/100 with 88.9% coverage. It contains 87 nodes across 0 cross-layer flows, written primarily in mixed languages. Engine surfaced 30 findings — concentrated in quality (13), software (8), hardware (3). Risk profile is low: 0 critical, 0 high, 8 medium. Recommended next step: open the quality layer findings first — that's where the highest-impact wins live.

Showing 27 of 30 actionable findings. Click TP / FP to vote on a finding's accuracy — votes adjust the confidence weighting and improve detection across the platform.

medium System graph quality Production readiness conf 1.00 Composite production-readiness gap
Multiple low-cost hardening controls are missing together: license, ci, tests, operator-readme. Opus verification showed these co-occurring gaps are a better readiness signal than reading each flag in isolation.
Repo hardeningGenerated repo pattern
medium System graph hardware Security conf 1.00 Dockerfile runs as root: Dockerfile
No non-root USER set. Containers running as root expand the blast radius of any vulnerability inside the image.
Container
medium System graph security security conf 1.00 Insecure pattern 'direct_innerhtml_assignment' in ide.html:531
Found a known-risky pattern (direct_innerhtml_assignment). Review and replace if possible.
ide.html:531 Direct innerhtml assignment
medium System graph security security conf 1.00 Insecure pattern 'direct_innerhtml_assignment' in index.html:645
Found a known-risky pattern (direct_innerhtml_assignment). Review and replace if possible.
index.html:645 Direct innerhtml assignment
medium System graph security Coverage conf 1.00 No auth library detected
The scanner did not find any standard auth library (JWT, OAuth, NextAuth, Auth0, etc.). The repo has auth/admin/session surface indicators, so auth may live in custom code, in a separate service, or be missing.
auth
medium System graph cicd CI/CD security conf 1.00 No CI/CD pipelines detected
No GitHub Actions, GitLab CI, or CircleCI configs found. Without CI you can't gate deploys on tests/lints.
CI/CD securityCoverage
medium System graph quality Placeholder conf 1.00 Placeholder or mock-heavy implementation detected
Found 14 placeholder/mock markers across 3 source files. This often means the repo looks complete while core flows still use generated scaffolding or fake data.
Mock dataIncompleteGenerated repo pattern
medium System graph quality Tests conf 1.00 Very low test-to-source ratio
0 test file(s) for 13 source file(s) (ratio 0.00). Consider adding integration or unit tests for critical paths.
Coverage
low System graph quality Integrity conf 1.00 5 env vars used in code but missing from .env.example
Drift between code and config docs. The first few: `EASTER_MSG`, `EASTER_USER_ID`, `PG_DSN`, `PORT`, `REDIS_URL`. Add them (with a placeholder/comment) to .env.example so onboarding doesn't break.
config drift
low System graph hardware Coverage conf 1.00 Containers defined but no K8s/orchestration manifest found
Repo has Dockerfiles/compose but no Kubernetes/Nomad manifests. If the target deployment is K8s, the manifests may live in a separate ops repo.
Deployment
low System graph quality Debug conf 1.00 Debug logging residue appears in source files
Found 6 console/debugger/print-style debug statements in non-test source. This is a common fast-generation residue before production cleanup.
CleanupRepo hardeningGenerated repo pattern
low System graph hardware Supply chain conf 1.00 Docker base image is tag-pinned but not digest-pinned: python:3.12-slim
Container tags can be retagged upstream. Pin production base images to a reviewed digest (`image@sha256:...`) when reproducibility and supply-chain integrity matter.
Dockerfile:1 containersPinned dependencies
low System graph quality License conf 1.00 No license file detected
No LICENSE/COPYING/NOTICE file was found. Generated repositories often omit licensing, which blocks reuse and automated intake.
Repo hardeningGenerated repo pattern
low System graph quality Integrity conf 1.00 Old/deprecated-named symbol `sum_old` in server/recompute_xp.py:68
Names with suffixes like `_old`, `_v1`, `_deprecated` usually indicate replaced-but-not-removed code (typical AI-coder leftover). Confirm and delete, or rename if it's the active version.
old markerDead code
low System graph software Dead code conf 1.00 Possibly dead Python function: api_get_progress
No callers detected by AST scan in this repo. Could be exported for external callers or a framework handler.
server/app.py:117
low System graph software Dead code conf 1.00 Possibly dead Python function: api_health
No callers detected by AST scan in this repo. Could be exported for external callers or a framework handler.
server/app.py:113
low System graph software Dead code conf 1.00 Possibly dead Python function: api_run
No callers detected by AST scan in this repo. Could be exported for external callers or a framework handler.
server/app.py:149
low System graph software Dead code conf 1.00 Possibly dead Python function: api_save_progress
No callers detected by AST scan in this repo. Could be exported for external callers or a framework handler.
server/app.py:129
low System graph software Dead code conf 1.00 Possibly dead Python function: log_message
No callers detected by AST scan in this repo. Could be exported for external callers or a framework handler.
serve.py:12
low System graph software Dead code conf 1.00 Possibly dead Python function: page_ide
No callers detected by AST scan in this repo. Could be exported for external callers or a framework handler.
server/app.py:194
low System graph software Dead code conf 1.00 Possibly dead Python function: page_index
No callers detected by AST scan in this repo. Could be exported for external callers or a framework handler.
server/app.py:190
low System graph software Dead code conf 1.00 Possibly dead Python function: page_js
No callers detected by AST scan in this repo. Could be exported for external callers or a framework handler.
server/app.py:201
low System graph quality Docs conf 1.00 README lacks setup or run instructions
A README exists, but it does not contain common install/setup/run markers. This matches a frequent generated-code pattern: UI is present, operational handoff is thin.
ReadmeRepo hardeningGenerated repo pattern
low System graph quality Provenance conf 1.00 Shallow git history limits provenance confidence
The repository is a shallow clone. Origin/evolution analysis cannot distinguish fresh generation, imported legacy code, or long-lived human code with high confidence.
Git historyGenerated repo pattern
low System graph quality Integrity conf 1.00 Stub function `log_message` (body is just `pass`/`return`) — serve.py:12
Likely an AI scaffold that was never filled in. Remove or implement.
Empty handlerDead code
low System graph quality Complexity conf 1.00 Very large file: data.js (1228 lines)
Files with >800 lines often hide complexity hotspots and discourage tests.
low System graph quality Complexity conf 1.00 Very large file: data_c.js (805 lines)
Files with >800 lines often hide complexity hotspots and discourage tests.
For AI agents: Voting guide (TP/FP) MCP manifest Stdio wrapper SARIF Integrate Findings queue Vote TP/FP on findings to calibrate the engine.
For AI agents + API integrations
Email me when this repo regresses
Free. We re-scan periodically; new criticals → your inbox. No signup required for the scan itself.
API access

This page is publicly accessible at: https://repobility.com/scan/51432acc-7979-4d95-88d8-1ae2e6ece2ce/

To check status programmatically (no auth required): 

curl -s https://repobility.com/api/v1/public/scan/51432acc-7979-4d95-88d8-1ae2e6ece2ce/

Important — please don't re-submit the same URL repeatedly. The submission endpoint is idempotent: re-submitting the same git URL returns this same scan_token, not a new one. To re-scan this repo, sign up free and use the dashboard.