Public scan — anyone with this URL can view this analysis. Sign up to track your own repos privately, run scheduled re-scans, and get AI fix prompts via your dashboard.
Sign up free Scan another repo

realitydn/realitydn.github.io

https://github.com/realitydn/realitydn.github.io · scanned 2026-06-15 23:48 UTC (2 months, 3 weeks ago)

57 raw signals (0 security + 57 graph)

File as issue Image
UNIFIED Repobility · multi-layer engine · AI coders

Complete repo analysis

Last scanned 2 months, 3 weeks ago · v1 · 52 actionable findings from 1 signal source. 5 repeated signals grouped for readability. Security checks, system graph analysis, and verified AI-agent feedback are merged into one review queue.

JSON
Combined
44.3
/100
Security checks
44
0 findings
System graph
44
77.8% cov · 52 findings
Critical
1
click to filter
Agents
10
0 votes
Crowd
0
reported
Severity distribution — click a segment to filter
Active filters: excluding tests × Reset all
Severity: Critical 1 High 1 Medium 23 Low 21 9-Layer: Software Security Quality Integrity Frontend Hardware Data Network Cicd Source: Security checks 0 System graph 52 Crowd 0 Layer: Frontend 5 Security 10 Cicd 2 Quality 26 Api 9
Corpus Intelligence Cross-corpus context (cohort percentile, top patterns, fix plan) is shown only on repositories you own. Sign up and connect your repo to view it.
Scan summary Repository scanned at 44.3/100 with 77.8% coverage. It contains 947 nodes across 17 cross-layer flows, written primarily in mixed languages. Engine surfaced 57 findings — concentrated in quality (30), security (10), api (9). Risk profile is high: 1 critical, 1 high, 26 medium. Recommended next step: open the quality layer findings first — that's where the highest-impact wins live.

Showing 46 of 52 actionable findings. 57 raw detector signals were grouped into reader-sized issues. Click TP / FP to vote on a finding's accuracy — votes adjust the confidence weighting and improve detection across the platform.

critical System graph security security conf 1.00 Insecure pattern 'private_key_in_repo' in worker/src/services/sheets.js:96
Found a known-risky pattern (private_key_in_repo). Review and replace if possible.
worker/src/services/sheets.js:96 Private key in repo
high System graph api Wiring conf 1.00 Dangling fetch: GET /events-config.json (src/components/EventsSection.jsx:12)
`src/components/EventsSection.jsx:12` calls `GET /events-config.json` but no backend route matches that path. This is a runtime 404 waiting to happen. Tool: fetch Normalized path used for matching: `/events-config.json` If this points at an external API, prefix it with `https://` so the matcher sk…
Dangling fetchFetch
medium System graph quality Integrity conf 1.00 `fetch()` without try/.catch or AbortSignal — design-system-year2/design_handoff_reality_system/design/design-canvas.jsx:136
Bare `fetch(...)` will throw an unhandled rejection on network failure. Wrap in try/catch, attach a `.catch(...)`, or pass an AbortSignal with a timeout.
runtime safetyRobustness
medium System graph quality Integrity conf 1.00 `fetch()` without try/.catch or AbortSignal — public/print/print-export.jsx:20
Bare `fetch(...)` will throw an unhandled rejection on network failure. Wrap in try/catch, attach a `.catch(...)`, or pass an AbortSignal with a timeout.
runtime safetyRobustness
medium System graph quality Integrity conf 1.00 `fetch()` without try/.catch or AbortSignal — src/components/EventsSection.jsx:12
Bare `fetch(...)` will throw an unhandled rejection on network failure. Wrap in try/catch, attach a `.catch(...)`, or pass an AbortSignal with a timeout.
runtime safetyRobustness
medium System graph quality Integrity conf 1.00 `fetch()` without try/.catch or AbortSignal — worker/src/index.js:65
Bare `fetch(...)` will throw an unhandled rejection on network failure. Wrap in try/catch, attach a `.catch(...)`, or pass an AbortSignal with a timeout.
runtime safetyRobustness
medium System graph quality Integrity conf 1.00 `fetch()` without try/.catch or AbortSignal — worker/src/services/resend.js:45
Bare `fetch(...)` will throw an unhandled rejection on network failure. Wrap in try/catch, attach a `.catch(...)`, or pass an AbortSignal with a timeout.
runtime safetyRobustness
medium System graph quality Integrity conf 1.00 `fetch()` without try/.catch or AbortSignal — worker/src/services/sheets.js:66
Bare `fetch(...)` will throw an unhandled rejection on network failure. Wrap in try/catch, attach a `.catch(...)`, or pass an AbortSignal with a timeout.
runtime safetyRobustness
medium System graph quality Agent instructions conf 1.00 Agent authority lacks a verifier contract: .claude/launch.json
This agent instruction grants code or shell authority but does not state the verification gate that decides promotion. The recurring safe pattern is: LLM proposes; deterministic tests/build/security checks verify; only verified code promotes.
.claude/launch.json VerificationClaude instruction
medium System graph quality Agent instructions conf 1.00 Agent instructions exist but release-hardening basics are missing
AI-coder instruction files were found, but the repo is missing license, tests. Treat this as a contract gap: the agent is guided, but the generated output is not yet guarded by the controls that make it repeatable.
Repo hardeningGenerated repo pattern
medium System graph quality Tests conf 1.00 CI is configured but no tests are detected
A CI pipeline exists, but the scan found no test files to gate. Opus labeled this generated-code pattern as config theater: release machinery exists, but it has little behavioral signal.
CI/CDConfig theaterRepo hardening
medium System graph quality Placeholder conf 1.00 Critical user flow still appears backed by mock or placeholder data
A payment/auth/admin/order/billing-style flow contains mock, fake, TODO, dummy, or placeholder markers in runtime source. In the Fable corpus this is a high-leverage completeness smell: the app can look finished while the money, identity, or tenant flow is still scaffolded.
Mock dataCritical flowGenerated repo pattern
medium System graph quality Integrity conf 1.00 4 occurrences Frontend route `/host-guide` has no Link/navigate to it — src/App.jsx
The route is registered but no `<Link to=…>` or `navigate(…)` in the codebase navigates here. Either it's reachable only via direct URL (intentional), it's dead, or the link broke during a refactor.
4 occurrences
repo-level (4 hits)
Orphan pageWiring
medium System graph cicd CI/CD security conf 1.00 GitHub Action is tag-pinned rather than SHA-pinned
cloudflare/wrangler-action@v4 can move without a code change in this repo. Pin third-party actions to a reviewed 40-character commit SHA.
.github/workflows/deploy.yml:42 CI/CD securitySupply chainGithub actions
medium System graph security security conf 1.00 Insecure pattern 'cors_wildcard' in worker/src/handlers/artExhibition.js:83
Found a known-risky pattern (cors_wildcard). Review and replace if possible.
worker/src/handlers/artExhibition.js:83 Cors wildcard
medium System graph security security conf 1.00 Insecure pattern 'cors_wildcard' in worker/src/handlers/eventProposal.js:81
Found a known-risky pattern (cors_wildcard). Review and replace if possible.
worker/src/handlers/eventProposal.js:81 Cors wildcard
medium System graph security security conf 1.00 Insecure pattern 'direct_innerhtml_assignment' in design-system-year2/design_handoff_reality_system/design/anim/motion.js:22
Found a known-risky pattern (direct_innerhtml_assignment). Review and replace if possible.
design-system-year2/design_handoff_reality_system/design/anim/motion.js:22 Direct innerhtml assignment
medium System graph security security conf 1.00 Insecure pattern 'direct_innerhtml_assignment' in design-system-year2/design_handoff_reality_system/design/REALITY Poster App - Feature Menu.html:414
Found a known-risky pattern (direct_innerhtml_assignment). Review and replace if possible.
design-system-year2/design_handoff_reality_system/design/REALITY Poster App - Feature Menu.html:414 Direct innerhtml assignment
medium System graph security security conf 1.00 Insecure pattern 'direct_innerhtml_assignment' in design-system-year2/design_handoff_reality_system/design/riso-app.js:119
Found a known-risky pattern (direct_innerhtml_assignment). Review and replace if possible.
design-system-year2/design_handoff_reality_system/design/riso-app.js:119 Direct innerhtml assignment
medium System graph security security conf 1.00 Insecure pattern 'direct_innerhtml_assignment' in icon-preview.html:400
Found a known-risky pattern (direct_innerhtml_assignment). Review and replace if possible.
icon-preview.html:400 Direct innerhtml assignment
medium System graph security security conf 1.00 Insecure pattern 'direct_innerhtml_assignment' in public/event-report/index.html:255
Found a known-risky pattern (direct_innerhtml_assignment). Review and replace if possible.
public/event-report/index.html:255 Direct innerhtml assignment
medium System graph security security conf 1.00 Insecure pattern 'direct_innerhtml_assignment' in src/components/Footer.jsx:97
Found a known-risky pattern (direct_innerhtml_assignment). Review and replace if possible.
src/components/Footer.jsx:97 Direct innerhtml assignment
medium System graph security security conf 1.00 Insecure pattern 'direct_innerhtml_assignment' in tools/poster-manager/public/index.html:470
Found a known-risky pattern (direct_innerhtml_assignment). Review and replace if possible.
tools/poster-manager/public/index.html:470 Direct innerhtml assignment
medium System graph quality Placeholder conf 1.00 Placeholder or mock-heavy implementation detected
Found 40 placeholder/mock markers across 8 source files. This often means the repo looks complete while core flows still use generated scaffolding or fake data.
Mock dataIncompleteGenerated repo pattern
medium System graph quality Tests conf 1.00 Very low test-to-source ratio
0 test file(s) for 73 source file(s) (ratio 0.00). Consider adding integration or unit tests for critical paths.
Coverage
low System graph quality Production readiness conf 1.00 Composite production-readiness gap
Multiple low-cost hardening controls are missing together: license, tests. Opus verification showed these co-occurring gaps are a better readiness signal than reading each flag in isolation.
Repo hardeningGenerated repo pattern
low System graph quality Debug conf 1.00 Debug logging residue appears in source files
Found 42 console/debugger/print-style debug statements in non-test source. This is a common fast-generation residue before production cleanup.
CleanupRepo hardeningGenerated repo pattern
low System graph cicd CI/CD security conf 1.00 2 occurrences GitHub Action is tag-pinned rather than SHA-pinned
actions/checkout@v6 can move without a code change in this repo. Pin third-party actions to a reviewed 40-character commit SHA.
lines 21, 24
.github/workflows/deploy.yml:21, 24 (2 hits)
CI/CD securitySupply chainGithub actions
low System graph quality Integrity conf 1.00 2 occurrences Near-duplicate function bodies in 2 places
Functions with the same first-5-line body hash: design-system-year2/design_handoff_reality_system/assets/qr/generate-qr.py:render_png, tools/generate-qr.py:render_png This is *the* AI-coder failure mode (4× more duplication in vibe-coded repos — see https://jw.hn/ai-code-hygiene). Consolidate or d…
2 occurrences
repo-level (2 hits)
duplicatesduplication
low System graph quality License conf 1.00 No license file detected
No LICENSE/COPYING/NOTICE file was found. Generated repositories often omit licensing, which blocks reuse and automated intake.
Repo hardeningGenerated repo pattern
low System graph quality Provenance conf 1.00 Shallow git history limits provenance confidence
The repository is a shallow clone. Origin/evolution analysis cannot distinguish fresh generation, imported legacy code, or long-lived human code with high confidence.
Git historyGenerated repo pattern
low System graph frontend Frontend quality conf 1.00 Stray `console.log` in TS/JS — src/components/EventsSection.jsx:40
Replace with the toast helper, an error boundary, or remove. `console.warn` / `console.error` are acceptable. Why: Hygiene — easy to leak debug output. Rule id: fq.console-leak
Fq console leak
low System graph frontend Frontend quality conf 1.00 Stray `console.log` in TS/JS — tools/poster-manager/server.js:234
Replace with the toast helper, an error boundary, or remove. `console.warn` / `console.error` are acceptable. Why: Hygiene — easy to leak debug output. Rule id: fq.console-leak
Fq console leak
low System graph frontend Frontend quality conf 1.00 Stray `console.log` in TS/JS — worker/src/services/notion.js:32
Replace with the toast helper, an error boundary, or remove. `console.warn` / `console.error` are acceptable. Why: Hygiene — easy to leak debug output. Rule id: fq.console-leak
Fq console leak
low System graph frontend Frontend quality conf 1.00 Stray `console.log` in TS/JS — worker/src/services/resend.js:66
Replace with the toast helper, an error boundary, or remove. `console.warn` / `console.error` are acceptable. Why: Hygiene — easy to leak debug output. Rule id: fq.console-leak
Fq console leak
low System graph frontend Frontend quality conf 1.00 Stray `console.log` in TS/JS — worker/src/services/sheets.js:162
Replace with the toast helper, an error boundary, or remove. `console.warn` / `console.error` are acceptable. Why: Hygiene — easy to leak debug output. Rule id: fq.console-leak
Fq console leak
low System graph api Wiring conf 1.00 Unused endpoint: DELETE /api/posters/:file
`tools/poster-manager/server.js` declares `DELETE /api/posters/:file` but no frontend code we scanned calls it. This is fine if the endpoint serves external clients (mobile app, third-party, server-side webhooks). Otherwise it's dead code — consider removing or documenting who consumes it.
Unused endpoint
low System graph api Wiring conf 1.00 Unused endpoint: GET /api/posters
`tools/poster-manager/server.js` declares `GET /api/posters` but no frontend code we scanned calls it. This is fine if the endpoint serves external clients (mobile app, third-party, server-side webhooks). Otherwise it's dead code — consider removing or documenting who consumes it.
Unused endpoint
low System graph api Wiring conf 1.00 Unused endpoint: POST /api/generate-thumbs
`tools/poster-manager/server.js` declares `POST /api/generate-thumbs` but no frontend code we scanned calls it. This is fine if the endpoint serves external clients (mobile app, third-party, server-side webhooks). Otherwise it's dead code — consider removing or documenting who consumes it.
Unused endpoint
low System graph api Wiring conf 1.00 Unused endpoint: POST /api/posters/:file/metadata
`tools/poster-manager/server.js` declares `POST /api/posters/:file/metadata` but no frontend code we scanned calls it. This is fine if the endpoint serves external clients (mobile app, third-party, server-side webhooks). Otherwise it's dead code — consider removing or documenting who consumes it.
Unused endpoint
low System graph api Wiring conf 1.00 Unused endpoint: POST /api/posters/reorder
`tools/poster-manager/server.js` declares `POST /api/posters/reorder` but no frontend code we scanned calls it. This is fine if the endpoint serves external clients (mobile app, third-party, server-side webhooks). Otherwise it's dead code — consider removing or documenting who consumes it.
Unused endpoint
low System graph api Wiring conf 1.00 Unused endpoint: POST /api/posters/upload
`tools/poster-manager/server.js` declares `POST /api/posters/upload` but no frontend code we scanned calls it. This is fine if the endpoint serves external clients (mobile app, third-party, server-side webhooks). Otherwise it's dead code — consider removing or documenting who consumes it.
Unused endpoint
low System graph api Wiring conf 1.00 Unused endpoint: POST /api/publish
`tools/poster-manager/server.js` declares `POST /api/publish` but no frontend code we scanned calls it. This is fine if the endpoint serves external clients (mobile app, third-party, server-side webhooks). Otherwise it's dead code — consider removing or documenting who consumes it.
Unused endpoint
low System graph api Wiring conf 1.00 Unused endpoint: USE /thumbs
`tools/poster-manager/server.js` declares `USE /thumbs` but no frontend code we scanned calls it. This is fine if the endpoint serves external clients (mobile app, third-party, server-side webhooks). Otherwise it's dead code — consider removing or documenting who consumes it.
Unused endpoint
low System graph quality Complexity conf 1.00 Very large file: design-system-year2/design_handoff_reality_system/design/design-canvas.jsx (974 lines)
Files with >800 lines often hide complexity hotspots and discourage tests.
low System graph quality Complexity conf 1.00 Very large file: public/studio/studio-app.jsx (1029 lines)
Files with >800 lines often hide complexity hotspots and discourage tests.
For AI agents: Voting guide (TP/FP) MCP manifest Stdio wrapper SARIF Integrate Findings queue Vote TP/FP on findings to calibrate the engine.
For AI agents + API integrations
Email me when this repo regresses
Free. We re-scan periodically; new criticals → your inbox. No signup required for the scan itself.
API access

This page is publicly accessible at: https://repobility.com/scan/51aa80e9-a3d4-4d6d-9ba9-226e5d09d623/

To check status programmatically (no auth required): 

curl -s https://repobility.com/api/v1/public/scan/51aa80e9-a3d4-4d6d-9ba9-226e5d09d623/

Important — please don't re-submit the same URL repeatedly. The submission endpoint is idempotent: re-submitting the same git URL returns this same scan_token, not a new one. To re-scan this repo, sign up free and use the dashboard.