tesseract-ocr/tesseract

Public scan — anyone with this URL can view this analysis. Sign up to track your own repos privately, run scheduled re-scans, and get AI fix prompts via your dashboard.

39 of your 58 findings came from Repobility's proprietary detections. ✓ Repobility tags below mark them.

Scan timing: clone 2.01s · analysis 12.71s · 8.2 MB · GitHub API rate-limit (preflight)

https://github.com/tesseract-ocr/tesseract · scanned 2026-06-05 07:44 UTC (5 days, 21 hours ago) · 10 languages

91 raw signals (55 security + 36 graph) 75th percentile · Cpp · large (100-500K LoC) System graph score 88 (lower by 20)

File as issue Image

UNIFIED Repobility · multi-layer engine · AI coders

Complete repo analysis

Last scanned 5 days, 21 hours ago · v2 · 25 actionable findings from 2 signal sources. 48 repeated signals grouped for readability. Security checks, system graph analysis, and verified AI-agent feedback are merged into one review queue.

JSON

66.7% cov · 6 findings

Score breakdown â 2026-05-18-v5

Component	Sub-score	Weight	Contribution
`structure_score`	80.0	0.15	12.00
`security_score`	96.0	0.25	24.00
`testing_score`	0.0	0.20	0.00
`documentation_score`	100.0	0.15	15.00
`practices_score`	76.0	0.15	11.40
`code_quality`	62.9	0.10	6.29
Overall		1.00	68.7

Severity distribution — click a segment to filter

Active filters: excluding tests × Reset all

Severity: Critical 1 High 5 Medium 4 Low 3 9-Layer: Software Security Quality Integrity Frontend Hardware Data Network Cicd Source: Security checks 19 System graph 6 Crowd 0 Layer: Quality 14 Security 2 Cicd 4 Software 3 Api 1 Frontend 1

Exclude dismissed / FP Exclude test files

Scan summary Quality grade B- (69/100). Dimensions: security 96, maintainability 80. 55 findings (28 security). 205,606 lines analyzed.

Showing 12 of 25 actionable findings. 73 raw detector signals were grouped into reader-sized issues. Click TP / FP to vote on a finding's accuracy — votes adjust the confidence weighting and improve detection across the platform.

critical Security checks software dependencies conf 0.90 ✓ Repobility Trojan Source bidi character (RLM) in source

Line 986 contains a Unicode bidirectional override character (U+200F RLM). This is the 'Trojan Source' attack (CVE-2021-42574): the character makes the compiler / interpreter see different code than the human reviewer.

src/api/pagerenderer.cpp:986

high Security checks security path traversal conf 0.80 [SEC013] Path Traversal — User Input in File Path: User-controlled input used in file path without sanitization. Allows reading arbitrary files.

Use os.path.realpath() and verify the path starts with your expected base directory. Use secure_filename() for uploads.

src/training/ambiguous_words.cpp:65

high Security checks cicd CI/CD security conf 0.90 ✓ Repobility 2 occurrences GitHub Action is tag-pinned rather than SHA-pinned

Action `google/oss-fuzz/infra/cifuzz/actions/build_fuzzers` pinned to mutable ref `@master` uses a mutable tag or branch. Pin external actions to a reviewed full commit SHA when the workflow is security-sensitive.

2 files, 2 locations

.github/workflows/cifuzz.yml:17

.github/workflows/sw.yml:28

CI/CD securitySupply chainGitHub Actions

low Security checks cicd CI/CD security conf 0.90 ✓ Repobility 25 occurrences GitHub Action is tag-pinned rather than SHA-pinned

Action `actions/checkout` pinned to mutable ref `@v6` uses a mutable tag or branch. Pin external actions to a reviewed full commit SHA when the workflow is security-sensitive.

12 files, 23 locations

.github/workflows/cmake-win64.yml:30, 119 (4 hits)

.github/workflows/autotools.yml:24, 71 (3 hits)

.github/workflows/sw.yml:24, 77 (3 hits)

.github/workflows/autotools-macos.yml:20, 122 (2 hits)

.github/workflows/codeql-analysis.yml:58 (2 hits)

.github/workflows/installer-for-windows.yml:21, 24 (2 hits)

.github/workflows/vcpkg.yml:20 (2 hits)

.github/workflows/autotools-openmp.yml:20

CI/CD securitySupply chainGitHub Actions

medium Security checks cicd CI/CD security conf 0.90 ✓ Repobility 9 occurrences GitHub Action is tag-pinned rather than SHA-pinned

Action `ilammy/setup-nasm` pinned to mutable ref `@v1` uses a mutable tag or branch. Pin external actions to a reviewed full commit SHA when the workflow is security-sensitive.

4 files, 9 locations

.github/workflows/codeql-analysis.yml:70, 85 (4 hits)

.github/workflows/cmake-win64.yml:27, 28 (2 hits)

.github/workflows/sw.yml:84 (2 hits)

.github/workflows/msys2.yml:23

CI/CD securitySupply chainGitHub Actions

high Security checks software dependencies conf 0.90 ✓ Repobility Workflow container/services image `fedora:latest` unpinned

`container/services image: fedora:latest` without `@sha256:...` pulls a mutable tag at workflow-run time. Treat workflow container references with the same supply-chain discipline as Dockerfile FROM lines.

.github/workflows/sw.yml:18

high System graph cicd CI/CD security conf 1.00 2 occurrences GitHub Action tracks a moving branch

google/oss-fuzz/infra/cifuzz/actions/build_fuzzers@master can move without a code change in this repo. Pin third-party actions to a reviewed 40-character commit SHA.

lines 17, 23

.github/workflows/cifuzz.yml:17, 23 (2 hits)

CI/CD securitySupply chainGithub actions

medium Security checks quality Quality conf 1.00 [SEC123] Production stack trace / debug output exposed: Debug mode left on in production exposes stack traces, environment variables, framework internals — sometimes triggers RCE (Django debug page with arbitrary template eval).

Set DEBUG=False / APP_DEBUG=false in production. Provide a generic 500 handler that logs to backend but returns a sanitized page to clients.

src/lstm/parallel.cpp:58

medium System graph security Coverage conf 1.00 No auth library detected

The scanner did not find any standard auth library (JWT, OAuth, NextAuth, Auth0, etc.). Either auth lives in custom code, in a separate service, or is missing.

auth

medium System graph quality Tests conf 1.00 Very low test-to-source ratio

0 test file(s) for 2 source file(s) (ratio 0.00). Consider adding integration or unit tests for critical paths.

Coverage

low Security checks quality Quality conf 0.60 11 occurrences Duplicated implementation block across source files

Duplicate implementation blocks are maintenance debt. Keep them visible, but they are not a high-severity defect unless the duplicated logic is security-sensitive or drifting.

10 files, 11 locations

src/ccutil/elst2.h:34, 65 (2 hits)

java/com/google/scrollview/ui/SVPopupMenu.java:19

src/arch/dotproductfma.cpp:42

src/ccmain/resultiterator.cpp:480

src/ccutil/elst.h:77

src/classify/intfx.cpp:268

src/classify/intmatcher.cpp:17

src/textord/pithsync.h:73

duplicationquality

low System graph software Dead code candidate conf 1.00 File has no detected symbols: src/lstm/generate_lut.py

Source file with no class/function declarations — possible config, dead code, or scratch file.

For AI agents: Voting guide (TP/FP) MCP manifest Stdio wrapper SARIF Integrate Findings queue Vote TP/FP on findings to calibrate the engine.

For AI agents + API integrations

Email me when this repo regresses

Free. We re-scan periodically; new criticals → your inbox. No signup required for the scan itself.

API access

This page is publicly accessible at: https://repobility.com/scan/51d5397c-fa0e-43b8-b8c5-d13768f569a9/

To check status programmatically (no auth required):

curl -s https://repobility.com/api/v1/public/scan/51d5397c-fa0e-43b8-b8c5-d13768f569a9/

Important — please don't re-submit the same URL repeatedly. The submission endpoint is idempotent: re-submitting the same git URL returns this same scan_token, not a new one. To re-scan this repo, sign up free and use the dashboard.