evid12/ACDSee-Photo-Studio-Ultimate-Toolkit

Public scan — anyone with this URL can view this analysis. Sign up to track your own repos privately, run scheduled re-scans, and get AI fix prompts via your dashboard.

1 of your 10 findings came from Repobility's proprietary detections. ✓ Repobility tags below mark them.

Scan timing: clone 1.13s · analysis 0.61s · GitHub API rate-limit (preflight)

evid12/ACDSee-Photo-Studio-Ultimate-Toolkit

https://github.com/evid12/ACDSee-Photo-Studio-Ultimate-Toolkit · scanned 2026-06-05 13:07 UTC (5 days, 7 hours ago) · 10 languages

19 raw signals (9 security + 10 graph) 21st percentile · Unknown · System graph score 83 (lower by 16)

File as issue Image

UNIFIED Repobility · multi-layer engine · AI coders

Complete repo analysis

Last scanned 5 days, 7 hours ago · v2 · 13 actionable findings from 2 signal sources. 1 repeated signal grouped for readability. Security checks, system graph analysis, and verified AI-agent feedback are merged into one review queue.

JSON

55.6% cov · 4 findings

Score breakdown â 2026-05-18-v5

Component	Sub-score	Weight	Contribution
`structure_score`	30.0	0.15	4.50
`security_score`	97.0	0.25	24.25
`testing_score`	70.0	0.20	14.00
`documentation_score`	38.7	0.15	5.81
`practices_score`	70.0	0.15	10.50
`code_quality`	80.0	0.10	8.00
Overall		1.00	67.1

Severity distribution — click a segment to filter

Active filters: excluding tests × Reset all

Severity: Critical 0 High 0 Medium 5 Low 6 9-Layer: Software Security Quality Integrity Frontend Hardware Data Network Cicd Source: Security checks 9 System graph 4 Crowd 0 Layer: Quality 8 Cicd 2 Api 1 Frontend 1 Security 1

Exclude dismissed / FP Exclude test files

Scan summary Quality grade B- (67/100). Dimensions: security 97, maintainability 30. 9 findings (1 security).

Showing 11 of 13 actionable findings. 14 raw detector signals were grouped into reader-sized issues. Click TP / FP to vote on a finding's accuracy — votes adjust the confidence weighting and improve detection across the platform.

low Security checks cicd CI/CD security conf 0.90 ✓ Repobility 2 occurrences GitHub Action is tag-pinned rather than SHA-pinned

Action `actions/github-script` pinned to mutable ref `@v7` uses a mutable tag or branch. Pin external actions to a reviewed full commit SHA when the workflow is security-sensitive.

lines 17

.github/workflows/QkAFytAVtFZL.yml:17 (2 hits)

CI/CD securitySupply chainGitHub Actions

medium Security checks quality Practices conf 1.00 [CFG006] Missing .gitignore: No .gitignore file. Risk of committing secrets and build artifacts.

Add a .gitignore appropriate for your language/framework.

medium Security checks quality Quality conf 0.70 Public web app has no Content Security Policy

A Content Security Policy reduces the blast radius of injected scripts if the app is ever served through preview, static hosting, or a web container outside its normal sandbox.

index.html

medium Security checks quality Quality conf 0.78 Public web service has no security.txt

security.txt gives researchers and customers a safe disclosure channel. Public web apps and APIs should publish it under /.well-known/security.txt.

.well-known/security.txt

medium System graph cicd CI/CD security conf 1.00 GitHub Actions workflow grants broad write permissions

CI tokens with write permissions increase blast radius when an action, dependency, or PR workflow is compromised. Prefer job-level least-privilege permissions.

.github/workflows/QkAFytAVtFZL.yml CI/CD securitySupply chainGithub actions

medium System graph security Coverage conf 1.00 No auth library detected

The scanner did not find any standard auth library (JWT, OAuth, NextAuth, Auth0, etc.). Either auth lives in custom code, in a separate service, or is missing.

auth

low Security checks quality Documentation No LICENSE file

Add a LICENSE file to your repository. Use choosealicense.com to pick the right license (MIT for permissive, Apache 2.0 for patent protection, GPL for copyleft).

low Security checks quality Quality conf 0.64 Public docs site has no llms.txt

AI coding agents increasingly read llms.txt to find canonical docs and API workflows. Without it, agents are more likely to browse pages repeatedly or use stale instructions.

llms.txt

low Security checks quality Quality conf 0.50 Public web app has no humans.txt

humans.txt is optional, but it gives operators and reviewers a simple place to find ownership, contact, and important public documentation links.

humans.txt

low Security checks quality Quality conf 0.74 Public web app has no robots.txt

Public websites should publish a robots.txt file so crawlers and AI agents can discover crawl rules and sitemap locations without guessing.

robots.txt

low Security checks quality Quality conf 0.72 Public web app has no sitemap

A sitemap gives search engines, docs crawlers, and AI agents a structured list of public pages. Without one, important docs and product pages are easy to miss.

sitemap.xml

For AI agents: Voting guide (TP/FP) MCP manifest Stdio wrapper SARIF Integrate Findings queue Vote TP/FP on findings to calibrate the engine.

For AI agents + API integrations

Email me when this repo regresses

Free. We re-scan periodically; new criticals → your inbox. No signup required for the scan itself.

API access

This page is publicly accessible at: https://repobility.com/scan/55df03d5-8d23-413c-9759-256c700f83a4/

To check status programmatically (no auth required):

curl -s https://repobility.com/api/v1/public/scan/55df03d5-8d23-413c-9759-256c700f83a4/

Important — please don't re-submit the same URL repeatedly. The submission endpoint is idempotent: re-submitting the same git URL returns this same scan_token, not a new one. To re-scan this repo, sign up free and use the dashboard.