Public scan — anyone with this URL can view this analysis. Sign up to track your own repos privately, run scheduled re-scans, and get AI fix prompts via your dashboard.
Sign up free Scan another repo

brownplaya239/smid-scanner

https://github.com/brownplaya239/smid-scanner · scanned 2026-06-17 01:43 UTC (1 month, 1 week ago)

70 raw signals (0 security + 70 graph)

File as issue Image
UNIFIED Repobility · multi-layer engine · AI coders

Complete repo analysis

Last scanned 1 month, 1 week ago · v2 · last Δ -24.6 (diff) · 39 actionable findings from 1 signal source. 31 repeated signals grouped for readability. Security checks, system graph analysis, and verified AI-agent feedback are merged into one review queue.

JSON
Combined
52.1
/100
Security checks
52
0 findings
System graph
52
88.9% cov · 39 findings
Critical
1
click to filter
Agents
10
0 votes
Crowd
0
reported
Severity distribution — click a segment to filter
Active filters: excluding tests × Reset all
Severity: Critical 1 High 0 Medium 17 Low 13 9-Layer: Software Security Quality Integrity Frontend Hardware Data Network Cicd Source: Security checks 0 System graph 39 Crowd 0 Layer: Software 1 Frontend 2 Network 6 Security 3 Cicd 3 Quality 24
Corpus Intelligence Cross-corpus context (cohort percentile, top patterns, fix plan) is shown only on repositories you own. Sign up and connect your repo to view it.
Scan summary Repository scanned at 52.1/100 with 88.9% coverage. It contains 476 nodes across 0 cross-layer flows, written primarily in mixed languages. Engine surfaced 70 findings — concentrated in cicd (34), quality (24), network (6). Risk profile is high: 1 critical, 0 high, 22 medium. Recommended next step: open the cicd layer findings first — that's where the highest-impact wins live.

Showing 31 of 39 actionable findings. 70 raw detector signals were grouped into reader-sized issues. Click TP / FP to vote on a finding's accuracy — votes adjust the confidence weighting and improve detection across the platform.

critical System graph security Secrets conf 1.00 Possible secret in README.md
Detected pattern matching generic_api_key. Rotate the credential and move to a secret manager.
README.md:33
medium System graph quality Integrity conf 1.00 `fetch()` without try/.catch or AbortSignal — cloudflare-worker/worker.js:254
Bare `fetch(...)` will throw an unhandled rejection on network failure. Wrap in try/catch, attach a `.catch(...)`, or pass an AbortSignal with a timeout.
runtime safetyRobustness
medium System graph quality Agent instructions conf 1.00 Agent authority lacks a verifier contract: CLAUDE.md
This agent instruction grants code or shell authority but does not state the verification gate that decides promotion. The recurring safe pattern is: LLM proposes; deterministic tests/build/security checks verify; only verified code promotes.
CLAUDE.md VerificationClaude instruction
medium System graph quality Agent instructions conf 1.00 Agent instructions exist but release-hardening basics are missing
AI-coder instruction files were found, but the repo is missing license, tests. Treat this as a contract gap: the agent is guided, but the generated output is not yet guarded by the controls that make it repeatable.
Repo hardeningGenerated repo pattern
medium System graph quality Tests conf 1.00 CI is configured but no tests are detected
A CI pipeline exists, but the scan found no test files to gate. Opus labeled this generated-code pattern as config theater: release machinery exists, but it has little behavioral signal.
CI/CDConfig theaterRepo hardening
medium System graph quality Placeholder conf 1.00 Critical user flow still appears backed by mock or placeholder data
A payment/auth/admin/order/billing-style flow contains mock, fake, TODO, dummy, or placeholder markers in runtime source. In the Fable corpus this is a high-leverage completeness smell: the app can look finished while the money, identity, or tenant flow is still scaffolded.
Mock dataCritical flowGenerated repo pattern
medium System graph cicd CI/CD security conf 1.00 GitHub Action is tag-pinned rather than SHA-pinned
cloudflare/wrangler-action@v3 can move without a code change in this repo. Pin third-party actions to a reviewed 40-character commit SHA.
.github/workflows/deploy_worker.yml:44 CI/CD securitySupply chainGithub actions
medium System graph cicd CI/CD security conf 1.00 6 occurrences GitHub Actions workflow grants broad write permissions
CI tokens with write permissions increase blast radius when an action, dependency, or PR workflow is compromised. Prefer job-level least-privilege permissions.
6 files, 6 locations
.github/workflows/alt-data.yml
.github/workflows/momentum.yml
.github/workflows/pages.yml
.github/workflows/scanner.yml
.github/workflows/ticker-lookup.yml
.github/workflows/uoa.yml
CI/CD securitySupply chainGithub actions
medium System graph security security conf 1.00 Insecure pattern 'cors_wildcard' in cloudflare-worker/worker.js:1936
Found a known-risky pattern (cors_wildcard). Review and replace if possible.
cloudflare-worker/worker.js:1936 Cors wildcard
medium System graph security security conf 1.00 Insecure pattern 'node_child_process' in scripts/verify_inline_js.js:8
Found a known-risky pattern (node_child_process). Review and replace if possible.
scripts/verify_inline_js.js:8 Node child process
medium System graph network Security conf 1.00 Privileged port 10 in use
Port 10 is privileged (<1024). Make sure the service runs with the right caps or front it with a non-privileged port via a load balancer.
.github/workflows/uoa_monitor.yml Ports
medium System graph network Security conf 1.00 Privileged port 13 in use
Port 13 is privileged (<1024). Make sure the service runs with the right caps or front it with a non-privileged port via a load balancer.
.github/workflows/uoa_monitor.yml Ports
medium System graph network Security conf 1.00 Privileged port 19 in use
Port 19 is privileged (<1024). Make sure the service runs with the right caps or front it with a non-privileged port via a load balancer.
.github/workflows/uoa_monitor.yml Ports
medium System graph network Security conf 1.00 Privileged port 30 in use
Port 30 is privileged (<1024). Make sure the service runs with the right caps or front it with a non-privileged port via a load balancer.
.github/workflows/uoa_monitor.yml Ports
medium System graph network Security conf 1.00 Privileged port 35 in use
Port 35 is privileged (<1024). Make sure the service runs with the right caps or front it with a non-privileged port via a load balancer.
.github/workflows/uoa_monitor.yml Ports
medium System graph network Security conf 1.00 Privileged port 47 in use
Port 47 is privileged (<1024). Make sure the service runs with the right caps or front it with a non-privileged port via a load balancer.
.github/workflows/uoa_monitor.yml Ports
medium System graph quality Placeholder conf 1.00 Runtime service client appears to use placeholder configuration
A runtime source file appears to wire Supabase/Firebase/AI/payment-style clients to placeholder URLs, keys, or fallback values. In the Fable corpus this often means the UI/API shape is present while the backend service is not actually configured.
Runtime configService clientGenerated repo pattern
medium System graph quality Tests conf 1.00 Very low test-to-source ratio
0 test file(s) for 28 source file(s) (ratio 0.00). Consider adding integration or unit tests for critical paths.
Coverage
low System graph quality Integrity conf 1.00 14 env vars used in code but missing from .env.example
Drift between code and config docs. The first few: `ALERT_EMAIL`, `CRONJOB_API_KEY`, `FROM_EMAIL`, `GH_DISPATCH_PAT`, `MAX_AGE_MIN`, `REPORT_URL`, `RESEND_API_KEY`, `SITE_URL` + 6 more. Add them (with a placeholder/comment) to .env.example so onboarding doesn't break.
config drift
low System graph quality Production readiness conf 1.00 Composite production-readiness gap
Multiple low-cost hardening controls are missing together: license, tests. Opus verification showed these co-occurring gaps are a better readiness signal than reading each flag in isolation.
Repo hardeningGenerated repo pattern
low System graph quality Debug conf 1.00 Debug logging residue appears in source files
Found 328 console/debugger/print-style debug statements in non-test source. This is a common fast-generation residue before production cleanup.
CleanupRepo hardeningGenerated repo pattern
low System graph cicd CI/CD security conf 1.00 27 occurrences GitHub Action is tag-pinned rather than SHA-pinned
actions/checkout@v4 can move without a code change in this repo. Pin third-party actions to a reviewed 40-character commit SHA.
10 files, 27 locations
.github/workflows/alt-data.yml:19, 22, 27 (3 hits)
.github/workflows/daily_brief.yml:41, 49, 54 (3 hits)
.github/workflows/daily_snapshot.yml:30, 35, 40 (3 hits)
.github/workflows/momentum.yml:35, 38, 43 (3 hits)
.github/workflows/push_alerts.yml:49, 54, 59 (3 hits)
.github/workflows/scanner.yml:49, 52, 57 (3 hits)
.github/workflows/ticker-lookup.yml:19, 22, 27 (3 hits)
.github/workflows/uoa.yml:46, 49, 54 (3 hits)
CI/CD securitySupply chainGithub actions
low System graph quality Integrity conf 1.00 Near-duplicate function bodies in 2 places
Functions with the same first-5-line body hash: scanner.py:load_iwm_universe, setup_builder.py:load_iwm_universe This is *the* AI-coder failure mode (4× more duplication in vibe-coded repos — see https://jw.hn/ai-code-hygiene). Consolidate or document why they're separate.
duplicatesduplication
low System graph quality License conf 1.00 No license file detected
No LICENSE/COPYING/NOTICE file was found. Generated repositories often omit licensing, which blocks reuse and automated intake.
Repo hardeningGenerated repo pattern
low System graph software Dead code conf 1.00 Possibly dead Python function: screen_snapshot
No callers detected by AST scan in this repo. Could be exported for external callers or a framework handler.
uoa_scanner.py:306
low System graph frontend Frontend quality conf 1.00 Stray `console.log` in TS/JS — cloudflare-worker/worker.js:1518
Replace with the toast helper, an error boundary, or remove. `console.warn` / `console.error` are acceptable. Why: Hygiene — easy to leak debug output. Rule id: fq.console-leak
Fq console leak
low System graph frontend Frontend quality conf 1.00 Stray `console.log` in TS/JS — scripts/verify_inline_js.js:27
Replace with the toast helper, an error boundary, or remove. `console.warn` / `console.error` are acceptable. Why: Hygiene — easy to leak debug output. Rule id: fq.console-leak
Fq console leak
low System graph quality Complexity conf 1.00 Very large file: cloudflare-worker/worker.js (2584 lines)
Files with >800 lines often hide complexity hotspots and discourage tests.
low System graph quality Complexity conf 1.00 Very large file: scanner.py (2327 lines)
Files with >800 lines often hide complexity hotspots and discourage tests.
low System graph quality Complexity conf 1.00 Very large file: setup_builder.py (1212 lines)
Files with >800 lines often hide complexity hotspots and discourage tests.
low System graph quality Complexity conf 1.00 Very large file: uoa_scanner.py (1180 lines)
Files with >800 lines often hide complexity hotspots and discourage tests.
For AI agents: Voting guide (TP/FP) MCP manifest Stdio wrapper SARIF Integrate Findings queue Vote TP/FP on findings to calibrate the engine.
For AI agents + API integrations
Email me when this repo regresses
Free. We re-scan periodically; new criticals → your inbox. No signup required for the scan itself.
API access

This page is publicly accessible at: https://repobility.com/scan/5a2e1ab4-f1f3-4da4-9b14-47d8b9128b3f/

To check status programmatically (no auth required): 

curl -s https://repobility.com/api/v1/public/scan/5a2e1ab4-f1f3-4da4-9b14-47d8b9128b3f/

Important — please don't re-submit the same URL repeatedly. The submission endpoint is idempotent: re-submitting the same git URL returns this same scan_token, not a new one. To re-scan this repo, sign up free and use the dashboard.