Public scan — anyone with this URL can view this analysis. Sign up to track your own repos privately, run scheduled re-scans, and get AI fix prompts via your dashboard.
Sign up free Scan another repo

ronnierosal/askpet

https://github.com/ronnierosal/askpet · scanned 2026-06-15 23:55 UTC (2 months, 3 weeks ago)

32 raw signals (0 security + 32 graph)

File as issue Image
UNIFIED Repobility · multi-layer engine · AI coders

Complete repo analysis

Last scanned 2 months, 3 weeks ago · v1 · 27 actionable findings from 1 signal source. 5 repeated signals grouped for readability. Security checks, system graph analysis, and verified AI-agent feedback are merged into one review queue.

JSON
Combined
88.1
/100
Security checks
88
0 findings
System graph
88
88.9% cov · 27 findings
Critical
0
click to filter
Agents
10
0 votes
Crowd
0
reported
Severity distribution — click a segment to filter
Active filters: excluding tests × Reset all
Severity: Critical 0 High 0 Medium 5 Low 19 9-Layer: Software Security Quality Integrity Frontend Hardware Data Network Cicd Source: Security checks 0 System graph 27 Crowd 0 Layer: Software 11 Frontend 1 Cicd 1 Quality 14
Corpus Intelligence Cross-corpus context (cohort percentile, top patterns, fix plan) is shown only on repositories you own. Sign up and connect your repo to view it.
Scan summary Repository scanned at 88.1/100 with 88.9% coverage. It contains 389 nodes across 0 cross-layer flows, written primarily in mixed languages. Engine surfaced 32 findings — concentrated in quality (19), software (11), frontend (1). Risk profile is low: 0 critical, 0 high, 5 medium. Recommended next step: open the quality layer findings first — that's where the highest-impact wins live.

Showing 24 of 27 actionable findings. 32 raw detector signals were grouped into reader-sized issues. Click TP / FP to vote on a finding's accuracy — votes adjust the confidence weighting and improve detection across the platform.

medium System graph quality Agent instructions conf 1.00 Agent authority lacks a verifier contract: .mcp.json
This agent instruction grants code or shell authority but does not state the verification gate that decides promotion. The recurring safe pattern is: LLM proposes; deterministic tests/build/security checks verify; only verified code promotes.
.mcp.json VerificationMcp config
medium System graph quality Placeholder conf 1.00 Critical user flow still appears backed by mock or placeholder data
A payment/auth/admin/order/billing-style flow contains mock, fake, TODO, dummy, or placeholder markers in runtime source. In the Fable corpus this is a high-leverage completeness smell: the app can look finished while the money, identity, or tenant flow is still scaffolded.
Mock dataCritical flowGenerated repo pattern
medium System graph quality Integrity conf 1.00 Network/subprocess call without timeout or try/except — askpet.py:5614
`subprocess.Popen(...)` here lacks both a `timeout=` arg and an enclosing try/except. This is exactly the class of bug that took down our git-clone earlier (HTTP/2 stream cancel surfaced as a fatal). Add a `timeout=` and wrap in try/except, or use a wrapper that retries.
runtime safetyRobustness
medium System graph quality Integrity conf 1.00 Network/subprocess call without timeout or try/except — build_knowledge_pack.py:31
`subprocess.run(...)` here lacks both a `timeout=` arg and an enclosing try/except. This is exactly the class of bug that took down our git-clone earlier (HTTP/2 stream cancel surfaced as a fatal). Add a `timeout=` and wrap in try/except, or use a wrapper that retries.
runtime safetyRobustness
medium System graph cicd CI/CD security conf 1.00 No CI/CD pipelines detected
No GitHub Actions, GitLab CI, or CircleCI configs found. Without CI you can't gate deploys on tests/lints.
CI/CD securityCoverage
low System graph quality Debug conf 1.00 Debug logging residue appears in source files
Found 42 console/debugger/print-style debug statements in non-test source. This is a common fast-generation residue before production cleanup.
CleanupRepo hardeningGenerated repo pattern
low System graph quality Integrity conf 1.00 4 occurrences Near-duplicate function bodies in 2 places
Functions with the same first-5-line body hash: askpet.py:set_status, askpet.py:set This is *the* AI-coder failure mode (4× more duplication in vibe-coded repos — see https://jw.hn/ai-code-hygiene). Consolidate or document why they're separate.
4 occurrences
repo-level (4 hits)
duplicatesduplication
low System graph quality Integrity conf 1.00 3 occurrences Near-duplicate function bodies in 6 places
Functions with the same first-5-line body hash: askpet.py:start, askpet.py:start, askpet.py:start, askpet.py:start This is *the* AI-coder failure mode (4× more duplication in vibe-coded repos — see https://jw.hn/ai-code-hygiene). Consolidate or document why they're separate.
3 occurrences
repo-level (3 hits)
duplicatesduplication
low System graph quality Integrity conf 1.00 Near-duplicate function bodies in 7 places
Functions with the same first-5-line body hash: askpet.py:worker, askpet.py:work, askpet.py:worker, askpet.py:worker This is *the* AI-coder failure mode (4× more duplication in vibe-coded repos — see https://jw.hn/ai-code-hygiene). Consolidate or document why they're separate.
duplicatesduplication
low System graph quality Integrity conf 1.00 Old/deprecated-named symbol `_settings_backup` in test_pet.py:9
Names with suffixes like `_old`, `_v1`, `_deprecated` usually indicate replaced-but-not-removed code (typical AI-coder leftover). Confirm and delete, or rename if it's the active version.
old markerDead code
low System graph quality Integrity conf 1.00 Old/deprecated-named symbol `_settings_backup` in test_petstore.py:9
Names with suffixes like `_old`, `_v1`, `_deprecated` usually indicate replaced-but-not-removed code (typical AI-coder leftover). Confirm and delete, or rename if it's the active version.
old markerDead code
low System graph software Dead code conf 1.00 Possibly dead Python function: clear_chat_history_now
No callers detected by AST scan in this repo. Could be exported for external callers or a framework handler.
askpet.py:7336
low System graph software Dead code conf 1.00 Possibly dead Python function: clear_history_now
No callers detected by AST scan in this repo. Could be exported for external callers or a framework handler.
askpet.py:7316
low System graph software Dead code conf 1.00 Possibly dead Python function: clear_pet_memory_now
No callers detected by AST scan in this repo. Could be exported for external callers or a framework handler.
askpet.py:7347
low System graph software Dead code conf 1.00 Possibly dead Python function: open_page
No callers detected by AST scan in this repo. Could be exported for external callers or a framework handler.
askpet.py:7833
low System graph software Dead code conf 1.00 Possibly dead Python function: open_pet_browser
No callers detected by AST scan in this repo. Could be exported for external callers or a framework handler.
askpet.py:7239
low System graph software Dead code conf 1.00 Possibly dead Python function: repl
No callers detected by AST scan in this repo. Could be exported for external callers or a framework handler.
askpet.py:332
low System graph software Dead code conf 1.00 Possibly dead Python function: show_about
No callers detected by AST scan in this repo. Could be exported for external callers or a framework handler.
askpet.py:7242
low System graph software Dead code conf 1.00 Possibly dead Python function: show_pet_credit
No callers detected by AST scan in this repo. Could be exported for external callers or a framework handler.
askpet.py:7228
low System graph software Dead code conf 1.00 Possibly dead Python function: use_selected
No callers detected by AST scan in this repo. Could be exported for external callers or a framework handler.
askpet.py:7838
low System graph software Dead code conf 1.00 Possibly dead Python function: work
No callers detected by AST scan in this repo. Could be exported for external callers or a framework handler.
askpet.py:6446
low System graph software Dead code conf 1.00 Possibly dead Python function: worker
No callers detected by AST scan in this repo. Could be exported for external callers or a framework handler.
askpet.py:9561
low System graph quality Provenance conf 1.00 Shallow git history limits provenance confidence
The repository is a shallow clone. Origin/evolution analysis cannot distinguish fresh generation, imported legacy code, or long-lived human code with high confidence.
Git historyGenerated repo pattern
low System graph quality Complexity conf 1.00 Very large file: askpet.py (9995 lines)
Files with >800 lines often hide complexity hotspots and discourage tests.
For AI agents: Voting guide (TP/FP) MCP manifest Stdio wrapper SARIF Integrate Findings queue Vote TP/FP on findings to calibrate the engine.
For AI agents + API integrations
Email me when this repo regresses
Free. We re-scan periodically; new criticals → your inbox. No signup required for the scan itself.
API access

This page is publicly accessible at: https://repobility.com/scan/5cfe56ba-cf25-46c3-bea0-056d5e2617ad/

To check status programmatically (no auth required): 

curl -s https://repobility.com/api/v1/public/scan/5cfe56ba-cf25-46c3-bea0-056d5e2617ad/

Important — please don't re-submit the same URL repeatedly. The submission endpoint is idempotent: re-submitting the same git URL returns this same scan_token, not a new one. To re-scan this repo, sign up free and use the dashboard.