neurocyte/flow

Public scan — anyone with this URL can view this analysis. Sign up to track your own repos privately, run scheduled re-scans, and get AI fix prompts via your dashboard.

33 of your 45 findings came from Repobility's proprietary detections. ✓ Repobility tags below mark them.

Scan timing: clone 2.83s · analysis 6.41s · 2.7 MB · GitHub API rate-limit (preflight)

https://github.com/neurocyte/flow · scanned 2026-06-05 21:05 UTC (4 days, 11 hours ago) · 10 languages

46 raw signals (34 security + 12 graph) System graph score 85 (lower by 8)

File as issue Image

UNIFIED Repobility · multi-layer engine · AI coders

Complete repo analysis

Last scanned 4 days, 11 hours ago · v2 · 22 actionable findings from 2 signal sources. 18 repeated signals grouped for readability. Security checks, system graph analysis, and verified AI-agent feedback are merged into one review queue.

JSON

66.7% cov · 6 findings

Score breakdown â 2026-05-18-v5

Component	Sub-score	Weight	Contribution
`structure_score`	70.0	0.15	10.50
`security_score`	97.2	0.25	24.30
`testing_score`	70.0	0.20	14.00
`documentation_score`	60.0	0.15	9.00
`practices_score`	70.0	0.15	10.50
`code_quality`	80.0	0.10	8.00
Overall		1.00	76.3

Severity distribution — click a segment to filter

Active filters: excluding tests × Reset all

Severity: Critical 0 High 2 Medium 5 Low 2 9-Layer: Software Security Quality Integrity Frontend Hardware Data Network Cicd Source: Security checks 16 System graph 6 Crowd 0 Layer: Cicd 3 Quality 13 Software 1 Api 1 Hardware 2 Frontend 1 Security 1

Exclude dismissed / FP Exclude test files

Scan summary Quality grade B+ (76/100). Dimensions: security 97, maintainability 70. 34 findings (1 security). 1 lines analyzed.

Showing 9 of 22 actionable findings. 40 raw detector signals were grouped into reader-sized issues. Click TP / FP to vote on a finding's accuracy — votes adjust the confidence weighting and improve detection across the platform.

high Security checks quality Quality conf 1.00 ✓ Repobility 3 occurrences [MINED002] Dart Null Bang: value! throws on null. Use ?. or null check.

Review and fix per the pattern semantics. See CWE-476 / for context.

3 files, 3 locations

src/buffer/unicode.zig:138

src/keybind/parse_flow.zig:21

src/soft_root.zig:84

high Security checks software dependencies conf 0.90 ✓ Repobility Dockerfile FROM `archlinux:latest` not pinned by digest

`FROM archlinux:latest` resolves the tag at build time. The registry CAN re-push a different image for the same tag, so every build is potentially different. Production images should pin to `image@sha256:...` for reproducibility + supply-chain integrity.

contrib/builder/Dockerfile:1

medium Security checks cicd CI/CD security conf 0.90 Docker build context has no .dockerignore

Without .dockerignore, build context can include source history, local env files, dependencies, and generated artifacts.

.dockerignore CI/CD securitycontainers

medium Security checks cicd CI/CD security conf 0.94 Dockerfile base image uses the latest tag

The latest tag is mutable and can change without a code review, producing different images from the same source.

contrib/builder/Dockerfile:1 CI/CD securitycontainers

medium System graph hardware Supply chain conf 1.00 Docker base image uses a mutable or implicit tag: archlinux:latest

Container tags can be retagged upstream. Pin production base images to a reviewed digest (`image@sha256:...`) when reproducibility and supply-chain integrity matter.

contrib/builder/Dockerfile:1 containersPinned dependencies

medium System graph security Coverage conf 1.00 No auth library detected

The scanner did not find any standard auth library (JWT, OAuth, NextAuth, Auth0, etc.). Either auth lives in custom code, in a separate service, or is missing.

auth

medium System graph cicd CI/CD security conf 1.00 No CI/CD pipelines detected

No GitHub Actions, GitLab CI, or CircleCI configs found. Without CI you can't gate deploys on tests/lints.

CI/CD securityCoverage

low Security checks quality Error handling conf 1.00 3 occurrences [ERR003] Ignored Error (Go): Ignoring error return values.

Handle the error or use errcheck linter.

3 files, 3 locations

src/VcsBlame.zig:86

src/bin_path.zig:41

src/buffer/Cursor.zig:75

low System graph hardware Coverage conf 1.00 Containers defined but no K8s/orchestration manifest found

Repo has Dockerfiles/compose but no Kubernetes/Nomad manifests. If the target deployment is K8s, the manifests may live in a separate ops repo.

Deployment

For AI agents: Voting guide (TP/FP) MCP manifest Stdio wrapper SARIF Integrate Findings queue Vote TP/FP on findings to calibrate the engine.

For AI agents + API integrations

Email me when this repo regresses

Free. We re-scan periodically; new criticals → your inbox. No signup required for the scan itself.

API access

This page is publicly accessible at: https://repobility.com/scan/5e9d0a3a-b3f5-44c1-bbb9-da30d2e8587d/

To check status programmatically (no auth required):

curl -s https://repobility.com/api/v1/public/scan/5e9d0a3a-b3f5-44c1-bbb9-da30d2e8587d/

Important — please don't re-submit the same URL repeatedly. The submission endpoint is idempotent: re-submitting the same git URL returns this same scan_token, not a new one. To re-scan this repo, sign up free and use the dashboard.