← Back to scan
File as GitHub Issue repo: TypeCellOS/BlockNote

Push this scan report to TypeCellOS/BlockNote

Click the green button below to open GitHub’s new-issue form, pre-filled with the report title, summary table, top findings, and an embedded score-card image. No authentication needed — you review on GitHub before submitting. Repobility is credited as the scanner.

Embedded score card image

This image will render at the top of the issue body. Hosted on Repobility, refreshes automatically after re-scans.

Repobility score card

Issue title

Duplicated implementation block across source files

Curate findings to include

Pick exactly which findings appear in the issue body. By default the top 5 are included. Uncheck noise, check what matters.

Top 5 (default)
Severity Rule Title File:line
MED AUC001 [AUC001] No Repobility access matrix policy found: The repository uses web/API frameworks… —
MED AIC003 Duplicated implementation block across source files packages/mantine/src/comments/Editor.tsx:1
MED AIC003 Duplicated implementation block across source files packages/mantine/src/comments/Comment.t…:6
MED AIC003 Duplicated implementation block across source files packages/mantine/src/badge/Badge.tsx:12
MED AIC003 Duplicated implementation block across source files packages/core/vite.config.ts:39
MED AIC003 Duplicated implementation block across source files packages/core/vite.config.ts:23
MED AIC003 Duplicated implementation block across source files packages/core/src/schema/styles/createS…:32
MED AIC003 Duplicated implementation block across source files packages/core/src/editor/defaultColors.…:2
MED AIC003 Duplicated implementation block across source files packages/core/src/blocks/ListItem/Numbe…:58
MED AIC003 Duplicated implementation block across source files packages/core/src/blocks/Image/block.ts:25
MED AIC003 Duplicated implementation block across source files packages/core/src/api/exporters/html/ut…:33
MED AIC003 Duplicated implementation block across source files packages/code-block/vite.config.ts:26
MED AIC003 Duplicated implementation block across source files packages/ariakit/src/sideMenu/SideMenuB…:8
MED QUAL003 Magic number used as default arg packages/react/src/components/Comments/…:179
MED CRYP001 Crypto — plaintext HTTP for sensitive endpoint packages/xl-odt-exporter/src/odt/odtExp…:197
MED XSS001 Cross-site scripting — dangerouslySetInnerHTML packages/xl-odt-exporter/src/odt/odtExp…:243
MED XSS001 Cross-site scripting — dangerouslySetInnerHTML packages/xl-odt-exporter/src/odt/odtExp…:236
MED XSS001 Cross-site scripting — dangerouslySetInnerHTML packages/react/src/components/Formattin…:76
MED XSS001 Cross-site scripting — dangerouslySetInnerHTML packages/react/src/components/Popovers/…:175
MED XSS001 Cross-site scripting — dangerouslySetInnerHTML docs/app/(home)/_components/ui/FeatureW…:68
MED AIC001 Parallel implementation file sits beside a canonical file packages/mantine/src/defaultThemes copy…:1
MED JRN006 Documented legal route has no visible implementation docs/redirects.ts:252
MED JRN006 Documented legal route has no visible implementation docs/redirects.ts:247
MED JRN006 Documented legal route has no visible implementation docs/components/Footer.tsx:125
MED JRN006 Documented legal route has no visible implementation docs/components/Footer.tsx:120
MED AUC002 [AUC002] Low visible authorization coverage in route inventory: Only 0.0% of discovered r… —
MED AUC009 [AUC009] Sensitive function route lacks elevated authorization evidence: A route appears … docs/app/llms.mdx/[[...slug]]/route.ts:11
MED AUC009 [AUC009] Sensitive function route lacks elevated authorization evidence: A route appears … docs/app/llms-full.txt/route.ts:6
MED AUC009 [AUC009] Sensitive function route lacks elevated authorization evidence: A route appears … docs/app/llms.txt/route.ts:5
LOW QUAL005 Cluster of TODOs in one file packages/core/src/schema/blocks/createS…:224
LOW QUAL005 Cluster of TODOs in one file packages/react/src/components/Comments/…:44
LOW QUAL005 Cluster of TODOs in one file packages/react/src/components/Comments/…:64
LOW AUC005 [AUC005] No authorization-focused tests detected: No test files with common authorization… —
LOW AIC005 Duplicate top-level symbol appears in a patch-style file packages/mantine/src/defaultThemes copy…:1
Reset to top 5 34 findings available (after auto-suppression of test files + won't-fix)

Issue body (markdown)

## Code-quality scan: `TypeCellOS/BlockNote`

**Score: 65/100 (B)**  ·  38 findings  ·  scanned 2026-05-15 21:15 UTC  ·  141,849 LOC

| Severity | Count |
|---|---|
| CRITICAL | 0 |
| HIGH | 0 |
| MEDIUM | 29 |
| LOW | 5 |

📊 [Full filterable report](https://repobility.com/scan/5f7e4eb4-3fc5-4e04-b8c8-9bed19543eed/)  ·  ![scorecard](https://repobility.com/scan/5f7e4eb4-3fc5-4e04-b8c8-9bed19543eed/report.png?v=1778879741-s2)

### Top findings

1. **MEDIUM** `AUC001` — No Repobility access matrix policy found
   CWE-285 · WSTG-AUTHZ
2. **MEDIUM** `AIC003` — Duplicated implementation block across source files
   `packages/mantine/src/comments/Editor.tsx:1`
3. **MEDIUM** `AIC003` — Duplicated implementation block across source files
   `packages/mantine/src/comments/Comment.tsx:6`
4. **MEDIUM** `AIC003` — Duplicated implementation block across source files
   `packages/mantine/src/badge/Badge.tsx:12`
5. **MEDIUM** `AIC003` — Duplicated implementation block across source files
   `packages/core/vite.config.ts:39`

---

_Filed automatically. Close this issue if not useful — we won't refile. Full report: https://repobility.com/scan/5f7e4eb4-3fc5-4e04-b8c8-9bed19543eed/_
Megaproject â high spam risk
Could not determine 'TypeCellOS/BlockNote' star count (GitHub API rate-limited or unreachable). When in doubt about repo size, prefer opening a focused PR or a discussion rather than an issue.
Open in GitHub to file this issue Cancel

The button opens GitHubâs new-issue page in a new tab. You will see the title + body pre-filled â review, edit if you want, then click GitHubâs "Submit new issue" button. Repobility never posts anything on your behalf.

For real security findings on big repos: use the project's SECURITY.md or private advisory flow instead of a public issue.