← Back to scan
File as GitHub Issue repo: knadh/listmonk

Push this scan report to knadh/listmonk

Click the green button below to open GitHub’s new-issue form, pre-filled with the report title, summary table, top findings, and an embedded score-card image. No authentication needed — you review on GitHub before submitting. Repobility is credited as the scanner.

Embedded score card image

This image will render at the top of the issue body. Hosted on Repobility, refreshes automatically after re-scans.

Repobility score card

Issue title

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) — outbound HTTP from user input

Curate findings to include

Pick exactly which findings appear in the issue body. By default the top 5 are included. Uncheck noise, check what matters.

Top 5 (default)
Severity Rule Title File:line
CRIT DKC007 Compose service contains a literal secret environment value docker-compose.yml:45
CRIT DKC007 Compose service contains a literal secret environment value docker-compose.yml:10
HIGH SEC029 [SEC029] Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) — outbound HTTP from user input: Outbound HTT… cmd/bounce.go:34
HIGH SEC029 [SEC029] Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) — outbound HTTP from user input: Outbound HTT… cmd/auth.go:200
HIGH SEC029 [SEC029] Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) — outbound HTTP from user input: Outbound HTT… cmd/archive.go:29
HIGH DKC011 Database service publishes a host port dev/docker-compose.yml:19
HIGH AUC003 [AUC003] Object-level route lacks visible authorization: A route with an object id-like p… cmd/handlers.go:129
HIGH AUC003 [AUC003] Object-level route lacks visible authorization: A route with an object id-like p… cmd/handlers.go:128
HIGH AUC003 [AUC003] Object-level route lacks visible authorization: A route with an object id-like p… cmd/handlers.go:126
HIGH AUC003 [AUC003] Object-level route lacks visible authorization: A route with an object id-like p… cmd/handlers.go:125
HIGH AUC003 [AUC003] Object-level route lacks visible authorization: A route with an object id-like p… cmd/handlers.go:124
HIGH AUC003 [AUC003] Object-level route lacks visible authorization: A route with an object id-like p… cmd/handlers.go:122
HIGH AUC003 [AUC003] Object-level route lacks visible authorization: A route with an object id-like p… cmd/handlers.go:121
HIGH AUC003 [AUC003] Object-level route lacks visible authorization: A route with an object id-like p… cmd/handlers.go:120
HIGH AUC003 [AUC003] Object-level route lacks visible authorization: A route with an object id-like p… cmd/handlers.go:119
HIGH AUC003 [AUC003] Object-level route lacks visible authorization: A route with an object id-like p… cmd/handlers.go:118
HIGH CORE_NO_TESTS No test files found
MED DKR003 Compose service `app` image uses the latest tag docker-compose.yml:10
MED DKR003 Dockerfile base image uses the latest tag Dockerfile:1
MED AUC001 [AUC001] No Repobility access matrix policy found: The repository uses web/API frameworks…
MED DKC015 Database service has no healthcheck dev/docker-compose.yml:19
MED DKC016 App service does not wait for database health docker-compose.yml:10
MED DKR001 Docker final stage has no non-root USER Dockerfile:1
MED WEB003 Public web service has no security.txt .well-known/security.txt
MED JRN003 Frontend API reference is not matched by discovered backend routes frontend/src/api/index.js:321
MED JRN003 Frontend API reference is not matched by discovered backend routes frontend/src/api/index.js:316
MED JRN003 Frontend API reference is not matched by discovered backend routes frontend/src/api/index.js:311
MED JRN003 Frontend API reference is not matched by discovered backend routes frontend/src/api/index.js:306
MED AUC002 [AUC002] Low visible authorization coverage in route inventory: Only 39.1% of discovered …
MED WEB015 Public web app has no Content Security Policy index.html
MED AUC009 [AUC009] Sensitive function route lacks elevated authorization evidence: A route appears … cmd/handlers.go:128
MED AUC009 [AUC009] Sensitive function route lacks elevated authorization evidence: A route appears … cmd/handlers.go:127
MED AUC009 [AUC009] Sensitive function route lacks elevated authorization evidence: A route appears … cmd/handlers.go:126
MED AUC009 [AUC009] Sensitive function route lacks elevated authorization evidence: A route appears … cmd/handlers.go:125
MED AUC009 [AUC009] Sensitive function route lacks elevated authorization evidence: A route appears … cmd/handlers.go:124
MED AUC009 [AUC009] Sensitive function route lacks elevated authorization evidence: A route appears … cmd/handlers.go:123
MED AUC009 [AUC009] Sensitive function route lacks elevated authorization evidence: A route appears … cmd/handlers.go:122
MED AUC009 [AUC009] Sensitive function route lacks elevated authorization evidence: A route appears … cmd/handlers.go:121
MED AUC009 [AUC009] Sensitive function route lacks elevated authorization evidence: A route appears … cmd/handlers.go:120
MED AUC009 [AUC009] Sensitive function route lacks elevated authorization evidence: A route appears … cmd/handlers.go:119
MED AUC004 [AUC004] Admin route does not show super_admin separation: An administrative route was de… cmd/handlers.go:117
MED AUC004 [AUC004] Admin route does not show super_admin separation: An administrative route was de… cmd/handlers.go:115
MED AUC004 [AUC004] Admin route does not show super_admin separation: An administrative route was de… cmd/handlers.go:114
MED AUC004 [AUC004] Admin route does not show super_admin separation: An administrative route was de… cmd/handlers.go:113
MED AUC004 [AUC004] Admin route does not show super_admin separation: An administrative route was de… cmd/handlers.go:112
MED AUC004 [AUC004] Admin route does not show super_admin separation: An administrative route was de… cmd/handlers.go:111
MED AUC004 [AUC004] Admin route does not show super_admin separation: An administrative route was de… cmd/handlers.go:110
MED AUC004 [AUC004] Admin route does not show super_admin separation: An administrative route was de… cmd/handlers.go:109
MED AUC004 [AUC004] Admin route does not show super_admin separation: An administrative route was de… cmd/handlers.go:108
MED AUC004 [AUC004] Admin route does not show super_admin separation: An administrative route was de… cmd/handlers.go:106
MED DKC007 Compose service contains a literal secret environment value dev/docker-compose.yml:19
LOW ERR003 [ERR003] Ignored Error (Go): Ignoring error return values. cmd/bounce.go:29
LOW ERR003 [ERR003] Ignored Error (Go): Ignoring error return values. cmd/auth.go:171
LOW ERR003 [ERR003] Ignored Error (Go): Ignoring error return values. cmd/archive.go:218
LOW AIC003 Duplicated implementation block across source files frontend/src/views/settings/performance…:75
LOW AIC003 Duplicated implementation block across source files frontend/src/views/settings/performance…:73
LOW AIC003 Duplicated implementation block across source files frontend/src/views/settings/performance…:71
LOW AIC003 Duplicated implementation block across source files frontend/src/views/settings/messengers.…:81
LOW AIC003 Duplicated implementation block across source files frontend/src/views/settings/messengers.…:79
LOW AIC003 Duplicated implementation block across source files frontend/src/views/settings/media.vue:108
LOW AIC003 Duplicated implementation block across source files frontend/src/components/RichtextEditor.…:281
LOW AIC003 Duplicated implementation block across source files frontend/src/components/Chart.vue:15
LOW AIC003 Duplicated implementation block across source files frontend/public/static/tinymce/lang/pt_…:30
LOW AIC003 Duplicated implementation block across source files frontend/email-builder/src/App/Inspecto…:76
LOW AIC003 Duplicated implementation block across source files cmd/lists.go:113
LOW AUC005 [AUC005] No authorization-focused tests detected: No test files with common authorization…
LOW WEB001 Public web app has no robots.txt robots.txt
LOW WEB002 Public web app has no sitemap sitemap.xml
LOW DKR008 .dockerignore misses sensitive defaults .dockerignore
LOW DKC016 App service does not wait for database health dev/docker-compose.yml:51
LOW DKC016 App service does not wait for database health dev/docker-compose.yml:35
LOW WEB008 Public docs site has no llms.txt llms.txt
LOW DKC010 Compose service lacks no-new-privileges hardening docker-compose.yml:10
LOW DKC010 Compose service lacks no-new-privileges hardening dev/docker-compose.yml:51
LOW DKC010 Compose service lacks no-new-privileges hardening dev/docker-compose.yml:35
LOW DKC010 Compose service lacks no-new-privileges hardening dev/docker-compose.yml:11
LOW DKC010 Compose service lacks no-new-privileges hardening dev/docker-compose.yml:3
LOW DKC011 Database service publishes a loopback host port docker-compose.yml:45
LOW DKC006 Compose service does not declare a runtime user docker-compose.yml:10
LOW DKC006 Compose service does not declare a runtime user dev/docker-compose.yml:51
LOW DKC006 Compose service does not declare a runtime user dev/docker-compose.yml:35
LOW DKC006 Compose service does not declare a runtime user dev/docker-compose.yml:11
LOW DKC006 Compose service does not declare a runtime user dev/docker-compose.yml:3
LOW WEB011 Public web app has no humans.txt humans.txt
Reset to top 5 84 findings available (after auto-suppression of test files + won't-fix)

Issue body (markdown)

## Code-quality scan: `knadh/listmonk`

**Score: 65/100 (C-)**  ·  84 findings  ·  scanned 2026-05-17 19:44 UTC  ·  42,694 LOC

| Severity | Count |
|---|---|
| CRITICAL | 2 |
| HIGH | 15 |
| MEDIUM | 34 |
| LOW | 33 |

📊 [Full filterable report](https://repobility.com/scan/5f9e7ac5-52c8-4ef1-8003-12908491c992/)  ·  ![scorecard](https://repobility.com/scan/5f9e7ac5-52c8-4ef1-8003-12908491c992/report.png?v=1779047078-s2)

### Top findings

1. **CRITICAL** `DKC007` — Compose service contains a literal secret environment value
   `docker-compose.yml:45`
2. **CRITICAL** `DKC007` — Compose service contains a literal secret environment value
   `docker-compose.yml:10`
3. **HIGH** `SEC029` — Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) — outbound HTTP from user input
   `cmd/bounce.go:34` · A10:2021 SSRF
4. **HIGH** `SEC029` — Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) — outbound HTTP from user input
   `cmd/auth.go:200` · A10:2021 SSRF
5. **HIGH** `SEC029` — Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) — outbound HTTP from user input
   `cmd/archive.go:29` · A10:2021 SSRF

---

**Security note**: this issue is public. If any flagged finding is a real, exploitable vulnerability, please redirect to your `SECURITY.md` policy or open a [private security advisory](https://docs.github.com/en/code-security/security-advisories/guidance-on-reporting-and-writing-information-about-vulnerabilities/privately-reporting-a-security-vulnerability) instead. We're happy to close this and re-submit privately.

---

_Filed automatically. Close this issue if not useful — we won't refile. Full report: https://repobility.com/scan/5f9e7ac5-52c8-4ef1-8003-12908491c992/_
Already filed
Repobility already filed issue #3053 on this repo on 2026-05-17. Filing again would be duplicate spam.
View existing issue
Premium account
This scan was submitted by a Enterprise-tier account. Premium accounts have full outreach control â Repobility doesn't pre-fill the 'file as GitHub issue' button for paid users. You can still file the issue manually using the markdown body above (Copy markdown), or contact us if you'd like batch-filing enabled for your account.
Already filed
This repo publishes a SECURITY.md policy and the scan contains 13 Critical/High security finding(s). Public issue filing would violate coordinated disclosure. Submit privately via the project's security reporting channel.
Megaproject â high spam risk
Could not determine 'knadh/listmonk' star count (GitHub API rate-limited or unreachable). When in doubt about repo size, prefer opening a focused PR or a discussion rather than an issue.

The button opens GitHubâs new-issue page in a new tab. You will see the title + body pre-filled â review, edit if you want, then click GitHubâs "Submit new issue" button. Repobility never posts anything on your behalf.

For real security findings on big repos: use the project's SECURITY.md or private advisory flow instead of a public issue.