Public scan — anyone with this URL can view this analysis. Sign up to track your own repos privately, run scheduled re-scans, and get AI fix prompts via your dashboard.
Sign up free Scan another repo

lucaswjunges/blumenau-automacao

https://github.com/lucaswjunges/blumenau-automacao · scanned 2026-06-16 02:55 UTC (2 months ago)

20 raw signals (0 security + 20 graph)

File as issue Image
UNIFIED Repobility · multi-layer engine · AI coders

Complete repo analysis

Last scanned 2 months ago · v2 · 20 actionable findings from 1 signal source. Security checks, system graph analysis, and verified AI-agent feedback are merged into one review queue.

JSON
Combined
67.9
/100
Security checks
68
0 findings
System graph
68
77.8% cov · 20 findings
Critical
0
click to filter
Agents
10
0 votes
Crowd
0
reported
Severity distribution — click a segment to filter
Active filters: excluding tests × Reset all
Severity: Critical 0 High 0 Medium 16 Low 2 9-Layer: Software Security Quality Integrity Frontend Hardware Data Network Cicd Source: Security checks 0 System graph 20 Crowd 0 Layer: Quality 7 Frontend 1 Security 11 Cicd 1
Corpus Intelligence Cross-corpus context (cohort percentile, top patterns, fix plan) is shown only on repositories you own. Sign up and connect your repo to view it.
Scan summary Repository scanned at 67.9/100 with 77.8% coverage. It contains 49 nodes across 0 cross-layer flows, written primarily in mixed languages. Engine surfaced 20 findings — concentrated in security (11), quality (7), frontend (1). Risk profile is low: 0 critical, 0 high, 16 medium. Recommended next step: open the security layer findings first — that's where the highest-impact wins live.

Showing 18 of 20 actionable findings. Click TP / FP to vote on a finding's accuracy — votes adjust the confidence weighting and improve detection across the platform.

medium System graph quality Agent instructions conf 1.00 Agent authority lacks a verifier contract: CLAUDE.md
This agent instruction grants code or shell authority but does not state the verification gate that decides promotion. The recurring safe pattern is: LLM proposes; deterministic tests/build/security checks verify; only verified code promotes.
CLAUDE.md VerificationClaude instruction
medium System graph quality Agent instructions conf 1.00 Agent instructions exist but release-hardening basics are missing
AI-coder instruction files were found, but the repo is missing license, ci, operator-readme. Treat this as a contract gap: the agent is guided, but the generated output is not yet guarded by the controls that make it repeatable.
Repo hardeningGenerated repo pattern
medium System graph quality Production readiness conf 1.00 Composite production-readiness gap
Multiple low-cost hardening controls are missing together: license, ci, operator-readme. Opus verification showed these co-occurring gaps are a better readiness signal than reading each flag in isolation.
Repo hardeningGenerated repo pattern
medium System graph security security conf 1.00 Insecure pattern 'direct_innerhtml_assignment' in admin-shopee.html:272
Found a known-risky pattern (direct_innerhtml_assignment). Review and replace if possible.
admin-shopee.html:272 Direct innerhtml assignment
medium System graph security security conf 1.00 Insecure pattern 'direct_innerhtml_assignment' in checkout-pending.html:130
Found a known-risky pattern (direct_innerhtml_assignment). Review and replace if possible.
checkout-pending.html:130 Direct innerhtml assignment
medium System graph security security conf 1.00 Insecure pattern 'direct_innerhtml_assignment' in checkout-success.html:85
Found a known-risky pattern (direct_innerhtml_assignment). Review and replace if possible.
checkout-success.html:85 Direct innerhtml assignment
medium System graph security security conf 1.00 Insecure pattern 'direct_innerhtml_assignment' in checkout.html:486
Found a known-risky pattern (direct_innerhtml_assignment). Review and replace if possible.
checkout.html:486 Direct innerhtml assignment
medium System graph security security conf 1.00 Insecure pattern 'direct_innerhtml_assignment' in index.html:1183
Found a known-risky pattern (direct_innerhtml_assignment). Review and replace if possible.
index.html:1183 Direct innerhtml assignment
medium System graph security security conf 1.00 Insecure pattern 'direct_innerhtml_assignment' in produto.html:932
Found a known-risky pattern (direct_innerhtml_assignment). Review and replace if possible.
produto.html:932 Direct innerhtml assignment
medium System graph security security conf 1.00 Insecure pattern 'direct_innerhtml_assignment' in produtos.html:429
Found a known-risky pattern (direct_innerhtml_assignment). Review and replace if possible.
produtos.html:429 Direct innerhtml assignment
medium System graph security security conf 1.00 Insecure pattern 'direct_innerhtml_assignment' in shopee-dashboard.html:337
Found a known-risky pattern (direct_innerhtml_assignment). Review and replace if possible.
shopee-dashboard.html:337 Direct innerhtml assignment
medium System graph security security conf 1.00 Insecure pattern 'direct_innerhtml_assignment' in shopee-review.html:1375
Found a known-risky pattern (direct_innerhtml_assignment). Review and replace if possible.
shopee-review.html:1375 Direct innerhtml assignment
medium System graph security security conf 1.00 Insecure pattern 'local_storage_auth_token' in admin-shopee.html:237
Found a known-risky pattern (local_storage_auth_token). Review and replace if possible.
admin-shopee.html:237 Local storage auth token
medium System graph security security conf 1.00 Insecure pattern 'local_storage_auth_token' in shopee-review.html:1281
Found a known-risky pattern (local_storage_auth_token). Review and replace if possible.
shopee-review.html:1281 Local storage auth token
medium System graph cicd CI/CD security conf 1.00 No CI/CD pipelines detected
No GitHub Actions, GitLab CI, or CircleCI configs found. Without CI you can't gate deploys on tests/lints.
CI/CD securityCoverage
medium System graph quality Tests conf 1.00 Very low test-to-source ratio
0 test file(s) for 1 source file(s) (ratio 0.00). Consider adding integration or unit tests for critical paths.
Coverage
low System graph quality License conf 1.00 No license file detected
No LICENSE/COPYING/NOTICE file was found. Generated repositories often omit licensing, which blocks reuse and automated intake.
Repo hardeningGenerated repo pattern
low System graph quality Docs conf 1.00 No README detected
No README file was found. Generated repos without README context are hard to operate, validate, or safely hand off.
ReadmeRepo hardeningGenerated repo pattern
For AI agents: Voting guide (TP/FP) MCP manifest Stdio wrapper SARIF Integrate Findings queue Vote TP/FP on findings to calibrate the engine.
For AI agents + API integrations
Email me when this repo regresses
Free. We re-scan periodically; new criticals → your inbox. No signup required for the scan itself.
API access

This page is publicly accessible at: https://repobility.com/scan/6263a68d-49e0-4b65-8053-fb4e7f86f311/

To check status programmatically (no auth required): 

curl -s https://repobility.com/api/v1/public/scan/6263a68d-49e0-4b65-8053-fb4e7f86f311/

Important — please don't re-submit the same URL repeatedly. The submission endpoint is idempotent: re-submitting the same git URL returns this same scan_token, not a new one. To re-scan this repo, sign up free and use the dashboard.