a-kenji/tui-term

Public scan — anyone with this URL can view this analysis. Sign up to track your own repos privately, run scheduled re-scans, and get AI fix prompts via your dashboard.

46 of your 51 findings came from Repobility's proprietary detections. ✓ Repobility tags below mark them.

Scan timing: clone 2.53s · analysis 4.84s · 0.7 MB · GitHub API rate-limit (preflight)

https://github.com/a-kenji/tui-term · scanned 2026-06-05 15:04 UTC (5 days ago) · 10 languages

70 raw signals (48 security + 22 graph) 83rd percentile · Rust · small (2-20K LoC) System graph score 91 (lower by 7)

File as issue Image

UNIFIED Repobility · multi-layer engine · AI coders

Complete repo analysis

Last scanned 5 days ago · v2 · 13 actionable findings from 2 signal sources. 46 repeated signals grouped for readability. Security checks, system graph analysis, and verified AI-agent feedback are merged into one review queue.

JSON

66.7% cov · 6 findings

Score breakdown â 2026-05-18-v5

Component	Sub-score	Weight	Contribution
`structure_score`	100.0	0.15	15.00
`security_score`	96.5	0.25	24.12
`testing_score`	70.0	0.20	14.00
`documentation_score`	74.0	0.15	11.10
`practices_score`	85.0	0.15	12.75
`code_quality`	68.7	0.10	6.87
Overall		1.00	83.8

Severity distribution — click a segment to filter

Active filters: excluding tests × Reset all

Severity: Critical 0 High 1 Medium 3 Low 4 9-Layer: Software Security Quality Integrity Frontend Hardware Data Network Cicd Source: Security checks 7 System graph 6 Crowd 0 Layer: Quality 6 Software 1 Cicd 3 Api 1 Frontend 1 Security 1

Exclude dismissed / FP Exclude test files

Scan summary Quality grade A- (84/100). Dimensions: security 96, maintainability 100. 48 findings (41 security). 3,571 lines analyzed.

Showing 8 of 13 actionable findings. 59 raw detector signals were grouped into reader-sized issues. Click TP / FP to vote on a finding's accuracy — votes adjust the confidence weighting and improve detection across the platform.

low Security checks cicd CI/CD security conf 0.35 ✓ Repobility 15 occurrences Workflow references repository secrets in a pull_request workflow

Fork pull_request runs do not receive normal repository secrets on GitHub Actions. Review this as a reliability/intent signal, not as direct fork-secret exfiltration. Raise severity only for pull_request_target or another trusted-context path that runs untrusted PR code with secrets.

4 files, 15 locations

.github/workflows/nix.yml:31, 47, 63, 79, 96, 114, 130, 147, +3 more (11 hits)

.github/workflows/ci.yml:26, 49 (2 hits)

.github/workflows/actionlint.yml:28

.github/workflows/nix-develop.yml:39

CI/CD securityworkflow secretsGitHub Actions

high Security checks software dependencies conf 0.88 rand: RUSTSEC-2026-0097

Rand is unsound with a custom logger using `rand::rng()`

Cargo.lock

medium System graph cicd CI/CD security conf 1.00 20 occurrences GitHub Action is tag-pinned rather than SHA-pinned

dtolnay/rust-toolchain@stable can move without a code change in this repo. Pin third-party actions to a reviewed 40-character commit SHA.

4 files, 20 locations

.github/workflows/nix.yml:23, 27, 39, 43, 55, 59, 71, 75, +8 more (16 hits)

.github/workflows/update-flake-lock.yml:15, 20 (2 hits)

.github/workflows/darwin.yml:20

.github/workflows/update-rust-toolchain.yml:18

CI/CD securitySupply chainGitHub Actions

medium System graph security Coverage conf 1.00 No auth library detected

The scanner did not find any standard auth library (JWT, OAuth, NextAuth, Auth0, etc.). Either auth lives in custom code, in a separate service, or is missing.

auth

medium System graph quality Tests conf 1.00 Very low test-to-source ratio

0 test file(s) for 15 source file(s) (ratio 0.00). Consider adding integration or unit tests for critical paths.

Coverage

low Security checks quality Quality conf 0.60 Duplicated implementation block across source files

Duplicate implementation blocks are maintenance debt. Keep them visible, but they are not a high-severity defect unless the duplicated logic is security-sensitive or drifting.

benches/iai.rs:1 duplicationquality

low Security checks quality Quality conf 0.60 Duplicated implementation block across source files

Duplicate implementation blocks are maintenance debt. Keep them visible, but they are not a high-severity defect unless the duplicated logic is security-sensitive or drifting.

benches/divan.rs:8 duplicationquality

low System graph cicd CI/CD security conf 1.00 12 occurrences GitHub Action is tag-pinned rather than SHA-pinned

actions/checkout@v6 can move without a code change in this repo. Pin third-party actions to a reviewed 40-character commit SHA.

4 files, 12 locations

.github/workflows/nix.yml:20, 38, 54, 70, 87, 105, 121, 138, +1 more (9 hits)

.github/workflows/darwin.yml:16

.github/workflows/update-flake-lock.yml:13

.github/workflows/update-rust-toolchain.yml:15

CI/CD securitySupply chainGitHub Actions

For AI agents: Voting guide (TP/FP) MCP manifest Stdio wrapper SARIF Integrate Findings queue Vote TP/FP on findings to calibrate the engine.

For AI agents + API integrations

Email me when this repo regresses

Free. We re-scan periodically; new criticals → your inbox. No signup required for the scan itself.

API access

This page is publicly accessible at: https://repobility.com/scan/633cde11-6a0c-4e53-a370-98e603188553/

To check status programmatically (no auth required):

curl -s https://repobility.com/api/v1/public/scan/633cde11-6a0c-4e53-a370-98e603188553/

Important — please don't re-submit the same URL repeatedly. The submission endpoint is idempotent: re-submitting the same git URL returns this same scan_token, not a new one. To re-scan this repo, sign up free and use the dashboard.