Public scan — anyone with this URL can view this analysis. Sign up to track your own repos privately, run scheduled re-scans, and get AI fix prompts via your dashboard.
Sign up free Scan another repo
77 of your 125 findings came from Repobility's proprietary detections. ✓ Repobility tags below mark them.
Upstream (GitHub) caused delay on this scan — not Repobility.
  • GitHub API rate-limited (HTTP 403) — preflight skipped, fell back to direct git clone.
  • Clone from GitHub took 131.25s for a 222.5 MB repo slow.
  • Repobility's analysis ran in 7.05s after the clone landed.

IvanMurzak/Unity-MCP

https://github.com/IvanMurzak/Unity-MCP · scanned 2026-05-24 01:22 UTC (2 weeks, 6 days ago) · 10 languages

479 raw signals (120 security + 359 graph) 11/13 scanners ran 100th percentile · Csharp · medium (20-100K LoC) System graph score 54 (higher by 23)

File as issue Image
UNIFIED Repobility · multi-layer engine · AI coders

Complete repo analysis

Last scanned 2 weeks, 6 days ago · v5 · 97 actionable findings from 2 signal sources. 116 repeated signals grouped for readability. Security checks, system graph analysis, and verified AI-agent feedback are merged into one review queue.

JSON
Combined
63.2
/100
Security checks
72
49 findings
System graph
54
88.9% cov · 48 findings
Critical
1
click to filter
Agents
6
0 votes
Crowd
0
reported
Score breakdown â 2026-05-18-v5
Component Sub-score Weight Contribution
structure_score 40.0 0.15 6.00
security_score 100.0 0.25 25.00
testing_score 80.0 0.20 16.00
documentation_score 75.0 0.15 11.25
practices_score 72.0 0.15 10.80
code_quality 79.0 0.10 7.90
Overall 1.00 77.0
security_score may be inflated — optional security scanners were skipped on this fast scan
Severity distribution — click a segment to filter
Active filters: excluding tests × Reset all
Severity: Critical 1 High 30 Medium 5 Low 36 9-Layer: Software Security Quality Integrity Frontend Hardware Data Network Cicd Source: Security checks 49 System graph 48 Crowd 0 Layer: Quality 28 Cicd 9 Software 46 Security 2 Api 1 Frontend 7 Hardware 4

Last 5 scans of this repo. Each new scan persists a full payload — historical comparison is exact, not lossy.

v1
May 14 00:55
v2
May 14 01:01
v3
May 14 01:05
v4
May 14 04:04
v5
May 24 01:25
Diff unavailable: ValidationError: 8 validation errors for ScanResult score.by_layer.`Layer.API`.[key] Input should be 'software', 'api', 'data', 'network', 'hardware', 'frontend', 'security', 'cicd' or 'quality' [type=enum, input_value='Layer.API', input_type=str] For further information visit https://errors.pydantic.dev/2.13/v/enum score.by_layer.`Layer.CICD`.[key] Input should be 'software', 'api', 'data', 'network', 'hardware', 'frontend', 'security', 'cicd' or 'quality' [type=enum, input_value='Layer.CICD', input_type=str] For further information visit https://errors.pydantic.dev/2.13/v/enum score.by_layer.`Layer.NETWORK`.[key] Input should be 'software', 'api', 'data', 'network', 'hardware', 'frontend', 'security', 'cicd' or 'quality' [type=enum, input_value='Layer.NETWORK', input_type=str] For further information visit https://errors.pydantic.dev/2.13/v/enum score.by_layer.`Layer.QUALITY`.[key] Input should be 'software', 'api', 'data', 'network', 'hardware', 'frontend', 'security', 'cicd' or 'quality' [type=enum, input_value='Layer.QUALITY', input_type=str] For further information visit https://errors.pydantic.dev/2.13/v/enum score.by_layer.`Layer.FRONTEND`.[key] Input should be 'software', 'api', 'data', 'network', 'hardware', 'frontend', 'security', 'cicd' or 'quality' [type=enum, input_value='Layer.FRONTEND', input_type=str] For further information visit https://errors.pydantic.dev/2.13/v/enum score.by_layer.`Layer.HARDWARE`.[key] Input should be 'software', 'api', 'data', 'network', 'hardware', 'frontend', 'security', 'cicd' or 'quality' [type=enum, input_value='Layer.HARDWARE', input_type=str] For further information visit https://errors.pydantic.dev/2.13/v/enum score.by_layer.`Layer.SECURITY`.[key] Input should be 'software', 'api', 'data', 'network', 'hardware', 'frontend', 'security', 'cicd' or 'quality' [type=enum, input_value='Layer.SECURITY', input_type=str] For further information visit https://errors.pydantic.dev/2.13/v/enum score.by_layer.`Layer.SOFTWARE`.[key] Input should be 'software', 'api', 'data', 'network', 'hardware', 'frontend', 'security', 'cicd' or 'quality' [type=enum, input_value='Layer.SOFTWARE', input_type=str] For further information visit https://errors.pydantic.dev/2.13/v/enum
v#IDStatusScoreGapsNodesCommitStarted
v scan_dfbb34141d92 ok 54.0 93 1245 acedcf7 May 24 01:25
v scan_c70413cd5230 ok 54.0 92 1216 6300cb5 0.72.1 May 14 04:04
v scan_c8849bb618af ok 57.3 87 1216 6300cb5 0.72.1 May 14 01:05
v scan_58d7db02eb46 ok 57.3 87 1216 6300cb5 0.72.1 May 14 01:01
v scan_ed7061c4e14b failed — — — — May 14 00:55
Recent failures
scan_ed7061c4e14b — 4 weeks, 2 days ago
Scanner task exceeded the interactive time limit or the worker stopped before it could update this scan. Please retry the scan.
For AI agents: Voting guide (TP/FP) MCP manifest Stdio wrapper SARIF Integrate Findings queue Vote TP/FP on findings to calibrate the engine.
For AI agents + API integrations
Email me when this repo regresses
Free. We re-scan periodically; new criticals → your inbox. No signup required for the scan itself.
API access

This page is publicly accessible at: https://repobility.com/scan/6c4ec7b4-0160-44c0-9bea-974257836dea/

To check status programmatically (no auth required): 

curl -s https://repobility.com/api/v1/public/scan/6c4ec7b4-0160-44c0-9bea-974257836dea/

Important — please don't re-submit the same URL repeatedly. The submission endpoint is idempotent: re-submitting the same git URL returns this same scan_token, not a new one. To re-scan this repo, sign up free and use the dashboard.