← Back to scan
File as GitHub Issue repo: ramyanant/McHRMS

Push this scan report to ramyanant/McHRMS

Click the green button below to open GitHub’s new-issue form, pre-filled with the report title, summary table, top findings, and an embedded score-card image. No authentication needed — you review on GitHub before submitting. Repobility is credited as the scanner.

Embedded score card image

This image will render at the top of the issue body. Hosted on Repobility, refreshes automatically after re-scans.

Repobility score card

Issue title

Missing .gitignore

Curate findings to include

Pick exactly which findings appear in the issue body. By default the top 5 are included. Uncheck noise, check what matters.

Top 5 (default)
Severity Rule Title File:line
HIGH SEC029 [SEC029] Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) — outbound HTTP from user input: Outbound HTT… static/js/pages/organisation.js:679
HIGH SEC029 [SEC029] Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) — outbound HTTP from user input: Outbound HTT… static/js/pages/clients.js:332
HIGH SEC029 [SEC029] Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) — outbound HTTP from user input: Outbound HTT… static/js/pages/bills.js:249
HIGH CORE_NO_TESTS No test files found —
MED CFG006 [CFG006] Missing .gitignore: No .gitignore file. Risk of committing secrets and build art… —
MED ERR002 [ERR002] Empty Catch Block: Empty catch blocks hide errors. static/js/pages/clients.js:354
MED ERR002 [ERR002] Empty Catch Block: Empty catch blocks hide errors. static/js/pages/admin.js:257
MED ERR002 [ERR002] Empty Catch Block: Empty catch blocks hide errors. static/js/api.js:73
MED ERR001 [ERR001] Silent Exception Swallowing: Silently swallowing all exceptions hides bugs. Even… api/v2/blueprints/auth/routes.py:106
MED AUC001 [AUC001] No Repobility access matrix policy found: The repository uses web/API frameworks… —
MED JRN002 Browser storage is used for session token material static/js/auth.js:12
MED JRN002 Browser storage is used for session token material static/js/auth.js:11
MED JRN002 Browser storage is used for session token material static/js/api.js:20
MED JRN002 Browser storage is used for session token material static/js/api.js:15
MED JRN002 Browser storage is used for session token material index.html:666
MED JRN002 Browser storage is used for session token material index.html:624
MED WEB003 Public web service has no security.txt .well-known/security.txt
MED JRN003 Frontend API reference is not matched by discovered backend routes static/js/pages/organisation.js:393
MED JRN003 Frontend API reference is not matched by discovered backend routes static/js/pages/organisation.js:134
MED JRN003 Frontend API reference is not matched by discovered backend routes static/js/api.js:7
MED JRN003 Frontend API reference is not matched by discovered backend routes index.html:2623
MED JRN003 Frontend API reference is not matched by discovered backend routes index.html:2612
MED JRN003 Frontend API reference is not matched by discovered backend routes index.html:2602
MED JRN003 Frontend API reference is not matched by discovered backend routes index.html:2592
MED JRN003 Frontend API reference is not matched by discovered backend routes index.html:2581
MED JRN003 Frontend API reference is not matched by discovered backend routes index.html:2569
MED JRN003 Frontend API reference is not matched by discovered backend routes index.html:2557
MED JRN003 Frontend API reference is not matched by discovered backend routes index.html:2516
MED JRN003 Frontend API reference is not matched by discovered backend routes index.html:2125
MED WEB015 Public web app has no Content Security Policy index.html
MED AUC009 [AUC009] Sensitive function route lacks elevated authorization evidence: A route appears … api/app.py:864
MED AUC009 [AUC009] Sensitive function route lacks elevated authorization evidence: A route appears … api/app.py:843
MED AUC009 [AUC009] Sensitive function route lacks elevated authorization evidence: A route appears … api/app.py:818
MED AUC009 [AUC009] Sensitive function route lacks elevated authorization evidence: A route appears … api/app.py:631
MED AUC009 [AUC009] Sensitive function route lacks elevated authorization evidence: A route appears … api/app.py:487
MED AUC009 [AUC009] Sensitive function route lacks elevated authorization evidence: A route appears … api/app.py:458
MED AUC009 [AUC009] Sensitive function route lacks elevated authorization evidence: A route appears … api/app.py:443
MED AUC009 [AUC009] Sensitive function route lacks elevated authorization evidence: A route appears … api/app.py:420
MED AUC009 [AUC009] Sensitive function route lacks elevated authorization evidence: A route appears … api/app.py:356
MED AUC009 [AUC009] Sensitive function route lacks elevated authorization evidence: A route appears … api/app.py:355
MED AUC004 [AUC004] Admin route does not show super_admin separation: An administrative route was de… api/app.py:2630
MED AUC004 [AUC004] Admin route does not show super_admin separation: An administrative route was de… api/app.py:2494
MED AUC004 [AUC004] Admin route does not show super_admin separation: An administrative route was de… api/app.py:1498
MED AUC004 [AUC004] Admin route does not show super_admin separation: An administrative route was de… api/app.py:1491
MED AUC004 [AUC004] Admin route does not show super_admin separation: An administrative route was de… api/app.py:1455
MED AUC004 [AUC004] Admin route does not show super_admin separation: An administrative route was de… api/app.py:1296
MED AUC004 [AUC004] Admin route does not show super_admin separation: An administrative route was de… api/app.py:1158
MED AUC004 [AUC004] Admin route does not show super_admin separation: An administrative route was de… api/app.py:1102
MED AUC004 [AUC004] Admin route does not show super_admin separation: An administrative route was de… api/app.py:1062
MED AUC004 [AUC004] Admin route does not show super_admin separation: An administrative route was de… api/app.py:398
MED CORE_NO_CI No CI/CD configuration found —
LOW AIC003 Duplicated implementation block across source files static/js/pages/timesheets.js:1
LOW AIC003 Duplicated implementation block across source files static/js/pages/invoices.js:1
LOW AUC005 [AUC005] No authorization-focused tests detected: No test files with common authorization… —
LOW WEB001 Public web app has no robots.txt robots.txt
LOW WEB002 Public web app has no sitemap sitemap.xml
LOW WEB008 Public docs site has no llms.txt llms.txt
LOW WEB011 Public web app has no humans.txt humans.txt
LOW CORE_NO_LICENSE No LICENSE file —
Reset to top 5 59 findings available (after auto-suppression of test files + won't-fix)

Issue body (markdown)

## Code-quality scan: `ramyanant/McHRMS`

**Score: 72/100 (D)**  ·  59 findings  ·  scanned 2026-05-16 20:29 UTC  ·  14,849 LOC

| Severity | Count |
|---|---|
| CRITICAL | 0 |
| HIGH | 4 |
| MEDIUM | 47 |
| LOW | 8 |

📊 [Full filterable report](https://repobility.com/scan/70ca1e05-2ed2-48bd-8ad2-b84eca1d9557/)  ·  ![scorecard](https://repobility.com/scan/70ca1e05-2ed2-48bd-8ad2-b84eca1d9557/report.png?v=1778963389-s2)

### Top findings

1. **HIGH** `SEC029` — Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) — outbound HTTP from user input
   `static/js/pages/organisation.js:679` · A10:2021 SSRF
2. **HIGH** `SEC029` — Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) — outbound HTTP from user input
   `static/js/pages/clients.js:332` · A10:2021 SSRF
3. **HIGH** `SEC029` — Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) — outbound HTTP from user input
   `static/js/pages/bills.js:249` · A10:2021 SSRF
4. **HIGH** `CORE_NO_TESTS` — No test files found
5. **MEDIUM** `CFG006` — Missing .gitignore

---

**Security note**: this issue is public. If any flagged finding is a real, exploitable vulnerability, please redirect to your `SECURITY.md` policy or open a [private security advisory](https://docs.github.com/en/code-security/security-advisories/guidance-on-reporting-and-writing-information-about-vulnerabilities/privately-reporting-a-security-vulnerability) instead. We're happy to close this and re-submit privately.

---

_Filed automatically. Close this issue if not useful — we won't refile. Full report: https://repobility.com/scan/70ca1e05-2ed2-48bd-8ad2-b84eca1d9557/_
Already filed
Repobility already filed issue #1 on this repo on 2026-05-17. Filing again would be duplicate spam.
View existing issue
Premium account
This scan was submitted by a Enterprise-tier account. Premium accounts have full outreach control â Repobility doesn't pre-fill the 'file as GitHub issue' button for paid users. You can still file the issue manually using the markdown body above (Copy markdown), or contact us if you'd like batch-filing enabled for your account.
Megaproject â high spam risk
Could not determine 'ramyanant/McHRMS' star count (GitHub API rate-limited or unreachable). When in doubt about repo size, prefer opening a focused PR or a discussion rather than an issue.
Cancel

The button opens GitHubâs new-issue page in a new tab. You will see the title + body pre-filled â review, edit if you want, then click GitHubâs "Submit new issue" button. Repobility never posts anything on your behalf.

For real security findings on big repos: use the project's SECURITY.md or private advisory flow instead of a public issue.