watchttvv/free-proxy-list

Public scan — anyone with this URL can view this analysis. Sign up to track your own repos privately, run scheduled re-scans, and get AI fix prompts via your dashboard.

5 of your 16 findings came from Repobility's proprietary detections. ✓ Repobility tags below mark them.

Scan timing: clone 1.1s · analysis 3.04s · GitHub API rate-limit (preflight)

https://github.com/watchttvv/free-proxy-list · scanned 2026-06-06 00:57 UTC (4 days ago) · 10 languages

27 raw signals (13 security + 14 graph) 54th percentile · Python · tiny (<2K LoC) System graph score 86 (lower by 18)

File as issue Image

UNIFIED Repobility · multi-layer engine · AI coders

Complete repo analysis

Last scanned 4 days ago · v2 · 16 actionable findings from 2 signal sources. 4 repeated signals grouped for readability. Security checks, system graph analysis, and verified AI-agent feedback are merged into one review queue.

JSON

77.8% cov · 5 findings

Score breakdown â 2026-05-18-v5

Component	Sub-score	Weight	Contribution
`structure_score`	30.0	0.15	4.50
`security_score`	91.2	0.25	22.80
`testing_score`	70.0	0.20	14.00
`documentation_score`	55.0	0.15	8.25
`practices_score`	72.0	0.15	10.80
`code_quality`	80.0	0.10	8.00
Overall		1.00	68.3

Severity distribution — click a segment to filter

Active filters: excluding tests × Reset all

Severity: Critical 0 High 1 Medium 7 Low 3 9-Layer: Software Security Quality Integrity Frontend Hardware Data Network Cicd Source: Security checks 11 System graph 5 Crowd 0 Layer: Software 5 Quality 6 Cicd 2 Api 1 Frontend 1 Security 1

Exclude dismissed / FP Exclude test files

Scan summary Quality grade B- (68/100). Dimensions: security 91, maintainability 30. 13 findings (6 security). 97 lines analyzed.

Showing 11 of 16 actionable findings. 20 raw detector signals were grouped into reader-sized issues. Click TP / FP to vote on a finding's accuracy — votes adjust the confidence weighting and improve detection across the platform.

low Security checks cicd CI/CD security conf 0.90 ✓ Repobility 4 occurrences GitHub Action is tag-pinned rather than SHA-pinned

Action `actions/checkout` pinned to mutable ref `@v3` uses a mutable tag or branch. Pin external actions to a reviewed full commit SHA when the workflow is security-sensitive.

lines 25, 32

.github/workflows/update-proxy-list.yml:25, 32 (4 hits)

CI/CD securitySupply chainGitHub Actions

high Security checks software dependencies conf 0.88 requests: PYSEC-2023-74

Requests is a HTTP library. Since Requests 2.3.0, Requests has been leaking Proxy-Authorization headers to destination servers when redirected to an HTTPS endpoint. This is a product of how we use `rebuild_proxies` to reattach the `Proxy-Authorization` header to requests. For HTTP connections sent …

requirements.txt

medium Security checks quality Practices conf 1.00 [CFG006] Missing .gitignore: No .gitignore file. Risk of committing secrets and build artifacts.

Add a .gitignore appropriate for your language/framework.

low Security checks quality Error handling conf 0.55 ✓ Repobility 2 occurrences Broad exception handler needs review

This handler catches Exception/BaseException. It is actionable when it swallows errors without logging, re-raising, or returning a structured error. Handlers that intentionally convert exceptions into typed error results should not be treated as high risk.

lines 59, 78

generate_proxy_list.py:59, 78 (2 hits)

Error handlingquality

medium Security checks software dependencies conf 0.88 requests: GHSA-9hjg-9r4m-mvj7

Requests vulnerable to .netrc credentials leak via malicious URLs

requirements.txt

medium Security checks software dependencies conf 0.88 requests: GHSA-9wx4-h78v-vm56

Requests `Session` object does not verify requests after making first request with verify=False

requirements.txt

medium Security checks software dependencies conf 0.88 requests: GHSA-gc5v-m9x4-r6x2

Requests has Insecure Temp File Reuse in its extract_zipped_paths() utility function

requirements.txt

medium System graph cicd CI/CD security conf 1.00 GitHub Actions workflow grants broad write permissions

CI tokens with write permissions increase blast radius when an action, dependency, or PR workflow is compromised. Prefer job-level least-privilege permissions.

.github/workflows/update-proxy-list.yml CI/CD securitySupply chainGithub actions

medium System graph security Coverage conf 1.00 No auth library detected

The scanner did not find any standard auth library (JWT, OAuth, NextAuth, Auth0, etc.). Either auth lives in custom code, in a separate service, or is missing.

auth

medium System graph quality Tests conf 1.00 Very low test-to-source ratio

0 test file(s) for 1 source file(s) (ratio 0.00). Consider adding integration or unit tests for critical paths.

Coverage

low Security checks quality Documentation No LICENSE file

Add a LICENSE file to your repository. Use choosealicense.com to pick the right license (MIT for permissive, Apache 2.0 for patent protection, GPL for copyleft).

For AI agents: Voting guide (TP/FP) MCP manifest Stdio wrapper SARIF Integrate Findings queue Vote TP/FP on findings to calibrate the engine.

For AI agents + API integrations

Email me when this repo regresses

Free. We re-scan periodically; new criticals → your inbox. No signup required for the scan itself.

API access

This page is publicly accessible at: https://repobility.com/scan/70e02975-9f06-4cd8-8c78-db87c65fc975/

To check status programmatically (no auth required):

curl -s https://repobility.com/api/v1/public/scan/70e02975-9f06-4cd8-8c78-db87c65fc975/

Important — please don't re-submit the same URL repeatedly. The submission endpoint is idempotent: re-submitting the same git URL returns this same scan_token, not a new one. To re-scan this repo, sign up free and use the dashboard.