Public scan — anyone with this URL can view this analysis. Sign up to track your own repos privately, run scheduled re-scans, and get AI fix prompts via your dashboard.
Sign up free Scan another repo

thewoolleyman/livespec

https://github.com/thewoolleyman/livespec · scanned 2026-06-16 00:35 UTC (2 months, 2 weeks ago)

67 raw signals (0 security + 67 graph)

File as issue Image
UNIFIED Repobility · multi-layer engine · AI coders

Complete repo analysis

Last scanned 2 months, 2 weeks ago · v1 · 54 actionable findings from 1 signal source. 13 repeated signals grouped for readability. Security checks, system graph analysis, and verified AI-agent feedback are merged into one review queue.

JSON
Combined
73.1
/100
Security checks
73
0 findings
System graph
73
77.8% cov · 54 findings
Critical
0
click to filter
Agents
10
0 votes
Crowd
0
reported
Severity distribution — click a segment to filter
Active filters: excluding tests × Reset all
Severity: Critical 0 High 0 Medium 17 Low 12 9-Layer: Software Security Quality Integrity Frontend Hardware Data Network Cicd Source: Security checks 0 System graph 54 Crowd 0 Layer: Network 1 Frontend 1 Security 1 Cicd 3 Quality 48
Corpus Intelligence Cross-corpus context (cohort percentile, top patterns, fix plan) is shown only on repositories you own. Sign up and connect your repo to view it.
Scan summary Repository scanned at 73.1/100 with 77.8% coverage. It contains 2975 nodes across 0 cross-layer flows, written primarily in mixed languages. Engine surfaced 67 findings — concentrated in quality (48), cicd (16), network (1). Risk profile is low: 0 critical, 0 high, 23 medium. Recommended next step: open the quality layer findings first — that's where the highest-impact wins live.

Showing 27 of 54 actionable findings. 67 raw detector signals were grouped into reader-sized issues. Click TP / FP to vote on a finding's accuracy — votes adjust the confidence weighting and improve detection across the platform.

medium System graph quality Agent instructions conf 1.00 Agent authority lacks a verifier contract: .claude/settings.json
This agent instruction grants code or shell authority but does not state the verification gate that decides promotion. The recurring safe pattern is: LLM proposes; deterministic tests/build/security checks verify; only verified code promotes.
.claude/settings.json VerificationClaude instruction
medium System graph quality Agent instructions conf 1.00 Agent authority lacks a verifier contract: archive/AGENTS.md
This agent instruction grants code or shell authority but does not state the verification gate that decides promotion. The recurring safe pattern is: LLM proposes; deterministic tests/build/security checks verify; only verified code promotes.
archive/AGENTS.md VerificationAgents md
medium System graph quality Agent instructions conf 1.00 Agent authority lacks a verifier contract: archive/bootstrap/AGENTS.md
This agent instruction grants code or shell authority but does not state the verification gate that decides promotion. The recurring safe pattern is: LLM proposes; deterministic tests/build/security checks verify; only verified code promotes.
archive/bootstrap/AGENTS.md VerificationAgents md
medium System graph quality Agent instructions conf 1.00 Agent authority lacks a verifier contract: dev-tooling/implementation/CLAUDE.md
This agent instruction grants code or shell authority but does not state the verification gate that decides promotion. The recurring safe pattern is: LLM proposes; deterministic tests/build/security checks verify; only verified code promotes.
dev-tooling/implementation/CLAUDE.md VerificationClaude instruction
medium System graph quality Agent instructions conf 1.00 Agent authority lacks a verifier contract: research/beads/CLAUDE.md
This agent instruction grants code or shell authority but does not state the verification gate that decides promotion. The recurring safe pattern is: LLM proposes; deterministic tests/build/security checks verify; only verified code promotes.
research/beads/CLAUDE.md VerificationClaude instruction
medium System graph quality Agent instructions conf 1.00 Agent authority lacks a verifier contract: research/CLAUDE.md
This agent instruction grants code or shell authority but does not state the verification gate that decides promotion. The recurring safe pattern is: LLM proposes; deterministic tests/build/security checks verify; only verified code promotes.
research/CLAUDE.md VerificationClaude instruction
medium System graph quality Agent instructions conf 1.00 Agent authority lacks a verifier contract: templates/impl-plugin/.claude/settings.json
This agent instruction grants code or shell authority but does not state the verification gate that decides promotion. The recurring safe pattern is: LLM proposes; deterministic tests/build/security checks verify; only verified code promotes.
templates/impl-plugin/.claude/settings.json VerificationClaude instruction
medium System graph quality Agent instructions conf 1.00 Agent instructions exist but release-hardening basics are missing
AI-coder instruction files were found, but the repo is missing license. Treat this as a contract gap: the agent is guided, but the generated output is not yet guarded by the controls that make it repeatable.
Repo hardeningGenerated repo pattern
medium System graph cicd CI/CD security conf 1.00 7 occurrences GitHub Action is tag-pinned rather than SHA-pinned
thewoolleyman/livespec-dev-tooling/.github/workflows/[email protected] can move without a code change in this repo. Pin third-party actions to a reviewed 40-character commit SHA.
6 files, 7 locations
.github/workflows/ci.yml:113, 221 (2 hits)
.github/workflows/bump-pin-from-dispatch.yml:27
.github/workflows/e2e-real.yml:71
.github/workflows/pin-freshness.yml:28
.github/workflows/release-dispatch.yml:24
.github/workflows/release-tag.yml:62
CI/CD securitySupply chainGithub actions
medium System graph cicd CI/CD security conf 1.00 GitHub Actions workflow grants broad write permissions
CI tokens with write permissions increase blast radius when an action, dependency, or PR workflow is compromised. Prefer job-level least-privilege permissions.
.github/workflows/auto-update-branches.yml CI/CD securitySupply chainGithub actions
medium System graph quality Integrity conf 1.00 Network/subprocess call without timeout or try/except — dev-tooling/checks/copier_template_smoke.py:134
`subprocess.run(...)` here lacks both a `timeout=` arg and an enclosing try/except. This is exactly the class of bug that took down our git-clone earlier (HTTP/2 stream cancel surfaced as a fatal). Add a `timeout=` and wrap in try/except, or use a wrapper that retries.
runtime safetyRobustness
medium System graph quality Integrity conf 1.00 Network/subprocess call without timeout or try/except — dev-tooling/reap_stale_worktrees.py:173
`subprocess.run(...)` here lacks both a `timeout=` arg and an enclosing try/except. This is exactly the class of bug that took down our git-clone earlier (HTTP/2 stream cancel surfaced as a fatal). Add a `timeout=` and wrap in try/except, or use a wrapper that retries.
runtime safetyRobustness
medium System graph quality Integrity conf 1.00 Network/subprocess call without timeout or try/except — dev-tooling/vendor_update.py:60
`subprocess.run(...)` here lacks both a `timeout=` arg and an enclosing try/except. This is exactly the class of bug that took down our git-clone earlier (HTTP/2 stream cancel surfaced as a fatal). Add a `timeout=` and wrap in try/except, or use a wrapper that retries.
runtime safetyRobustness
medium System graph security Coverage conf 1.00 No auth library detected
The scanner did not find any standard auth library (JWT, OAuth, NextAuth, Auth0, etc.). The repo has auth/admin/session surface indicators, so auth may live in custom code, in a separate service, or be missing.
auth
medium System graph network Security conf 1.00 Privileged port 13 in use
Port 13 is privileged (<1024). Make sure the service runs with the right caps or front it with a non-privileged port via a load balancer.
.github/workflows/pin-freshness.yml Ports
low System graph cicd CI/CD security conf 1.00 8 occurrences GitHub Action is tag-pinned rather than SHA-pinned
actions/create-github-app-token@v1 can move without a code change in this repo. Pin third-party actions to a reviewed 40-character commit SHA.
5 files, 8 locations
.github/workflows/ci.yml:27, 109, 162 (3 hits)
.github/workflows/e2e-real.yml:47, 61 (2 hits)
.github/workflows/auto-enable-merge.yml:86
.github/workflows/auto-update-branches.yml:69
.github/workflows/release-tag.yml:59
CI/CD securitySupply chainGithub actions
low System graph quality Integrity conf 1.00 Near-duplicate function bodies in 2 places
Functions with the same first-5-line body hash: dev-tooling/vendor_update.py:main, dev-tooling/checks/schema_dataclass_pairing.py:main This is *the* AI-coder failure mode (4× more duplication in vibe-coded repos — see https://jw.hn/ai-code-hygiene). Consolidate or document why they're separate.
duplicatesduplication
low System graph quality License conf 1.00 No license file detected
No LICENSE/COPYING/NOTICE file was found. Generated repositories often omit licensing, which blocks reuse and automated intake.
Repo hardeningGenerated repo pattern
low System graph quality Integrity conf 1.00 Old/deprecated-named symbol `_run_copier_copy` in dev-tooling/checks/copier_template_smoke.py:122
Names with suffixes like `_old`, `_v1`, `_deprecated` usually indicate replaced-but-not-removed code (typical AI-coder leftover). Confirm and delete, or rename if it's the active version.
old markerDead code
low System graph quality Integrity conf 1.00 Old/deprecated-named symbol `nOld` in tests/livespec/commands/test_revise.py:578
Names with suffixes like `_old`, `_v1`, `_deprecated` usually indicate replaced-but-not-removed code (typical AI-coder leftover). Confirm and delete, or rename if it's the active version.
old markerDead code
low System graph quality Integrity conf 1.00 Old/deprecated-named symbol `nOld` in tests/livespec/commands/test_revise_render.py:73
Names with suffixes like `_old`, `_v1`, `_deprecated` usually indicate replaced-but-not-removed code (typical AI-coder leftover). Confirm and delete, or rename if it's the active version.
old markerDead code
low System graph quality Provenance conf 1.00 Shallow git history limits provenance confidence
The repository is a shallow clone. Origin/evolution analysis cannot distinguish fresh generation, imported legacy code, or long-lived human code with high confidence.
Git historyGenerated repo pattern
low System graph quality Complexity conf 1.00 Very large file: tests/livespec/commands/test_prune_history.py (2027 lines)
Files with >800 lines often hide complexity hotspots and discourage tests.
low System graph quality Complexity conf 1.00 Very large file: tests/livespec/commands/test_revise.py (1904 lines)
Files with >800 lines often hide complexity hotspots and discourage tests.
low System graph quality Complexity conf 1.00 Very large file: tests/livespec/commands/test_seed.py (1900 lines)
Files with >800 lines often hide complexity hotspots and discourage tests.
low System graph quality Complexity conf 1.00 Very large file: tests/livespec/doctor/static/test_out_of_band_edits.py (1856 lines)
Files with >800 lines often hide complexity hotspots and discourage tests.
low System graph quality Complexity conf 1.00 Very large file: tests/livespec/doctor/static/test_wiring_completeness_cross_repo.py (1961 lines)
Files with >800 lines often hide complexity hotspots and discourage tests.
For AI agents: Voting guide (TP/FP) MCP manifest Stdio wrapper SARIF Integrate Findings queue Vote TP/FP on findings to calibrate the engine.
For AI agents + API integrations
Email me when this repo regresses
Free. We re-scan periodically; new criticals → your inbox. No signup required for the scan itself.
API access

This page is publicly accessible at: https://repobility.com/scan/70fec8c6-10bb-4965-b6d5-6468ea250bc1/

To check status programmatically (no auth required): 

curl -s https://repobility.com/api/v1/public/scan/70fec8c6-10bb-4965-b6d5-6468ea250bc1/

Important — please don't re-submit the same URL repeatedly. The submission endpoint is idempotent: re-submitting the same git URL returns this same scan_token, not a new one. To re-scan this repo, sign up free and use the dashboard.