Public scan — anyone with this URL can view this analysis. Sign up to track your own repos privately, run scheduled re-scans, and get AI fix prompts via your dashboard.

Wrivard/kua-coif

https://github.com/Wrivard/kua-coif · scanned 2026-06-16 04:41 UTC (1 month, 2 weeks ago)

14 raw signals (0 security + 14 graph)

File as issue Image

UNIFIED Repobility · multi-layer engine · AI coders

Complete repo analysis

Last scanned 1 month, 2 weeks ago · v1 · 14 actionable findings from 1 signal source. Security checks, system graph analysis, and verified AI-agent feedback are merged into one review queue.

JSON

88.9% cov · 14 findings

Severity distribution — click a segment to filter

Active filters: excluding tests × Reset all

Severity: Critical 0 High 1 Medium 4 Low 2 9-Layer: Software Security Quality Integrity Frontend Hardware Data Network Cicd Source: Security checks 0 System graph 14 Crowd 0 Layer: Frontend 1 Cicd 1 Quality 11 Security 1

Exclude dismissed / FP Exclude test files

Bug-class explainers. Each card groups findings of the same shape — these are the patterns most likely to ship to prod and reappear in future scans unless you systematically fix the cause, not just the instance.

Commented-out code 6 findings

What it is: Lines of source that were intentionally disabled but never deleted.

Why it matters: Git already remembers history — commented code rots, becomes wrong, and adds noise to diffs.

How AI causes it: AI sometimes comments out broken code instead of fixing it. Reviewers approve out of inertia.

Fix approach: Delete. Trust `git log`. If you really need to remember, save it in a notes file under `docs/`.

6 matching findings on this repo

info Commented-code block (6 lines) in tailwind.config.ts:106
info Commented-code block (6 lines) in vitest.config.ts:13
info Commented-code block (6 lines) in next.config.mjs:55
info Commented-code block (5 lines) in sentry.server.config.ts:25
info Commented-code block (5 lines) in middleware.ts:29
info Commented-code block (5 lines) in instrumentation.ts:14

View all commented-out code findings →

Config drift 5 findings

What it is: Settings duplicated across env files, Docker compose, K8s, and code defaults, all with slightly different values.

Why it matters: Production behaviour depends on whichever copy your loader reads first. Subtle bugs in staging that don't reproduce in dev.

How AI causes it: AI writes new config from memory rather than reading the existing source.

Fix approach: Pick one source of truth (env vars + a settings module). Have every other place import from there. Lint for duplicates in CI.

5 matching findings on this repo

high Agent instruction/config may expose a secret: CLAUDE.md CLAUDE.md:48
info Commented-code block (6 lines) in tailwind.config.ts:106
info Commented-code block (6 lines) in vitest.config.ts:13
info Commented-code block (6 lines) in next.config.mjs:55
info Commented-code block (5 lines) in sentry.server.config.ts:25

View all config drift findings →

For AI agents: Voting guide (TP/FP) MCP manifest Stdio wrapper SARIF Integrate Findings queue Vote TP/FP on findings to calibrate the engine.

For AI agents + API integrations

Email me when this repo regresses

Free. We re-scan periodically; new criticals → your inbox. No signup required for the scan itself.

API access

This page is publicly accessible at: https://repobility.com/scan/7107ae83-f73a-4b15-acf5-fbc8be742f42/

To check status programmatically (no auth required):

curl -s https://repobility.com/api/v1/public/scan/7107ae83-f73a-4b15-acf5-fbc8be742f42/

Important — please don't re-submit the same URL repeatedly. The submission endpoint is idempotent: re-submitting the same git URL returns this same scan_token, not a new one. To re-scan this repo, sign up free and use the dashboard.