Public scan — anyone with this URL can view this analysis. Sign up to track your own repos privately, run scheduled re-scans, and get AI fix prompts via your dashboard.

sougetuOte/LivingArchitectModel

https://github.com/sougetuOte/LivingArchitectModel · scanned 2026-06-16 00:18 UTC (2 months, 2 weeks ago)

26 raw signals (0 security + 26 graph)

File as issue Image

UNIFIED Repobility · multi-layer engine · AI coders

Complete repo analysis

Last scanned 2 months, 2 weeks ago · v1 · 24 actionable findings from 1 signal source. 2 repeated signals grouped for readability. Security checks, system graph analysis, and verified AI-agent feedback are merged into one review queue.

JSON

66.7% cov · 24 findings

Severity distribution — click a segment to filter

Active filters: excluding tests × Reset all

Severity: Critical 0 High 1 Medium 12 Low 6 9-Layer: Software Security Quality Integrity Frontend Hardware Data Network Cicd Source: Security checks 0 System graph 24 Crowd 0 Layer: Frontend 1 Cicd 1 Quality 21 Security 1

Exclude dismissed / FP Exclude test files

Corpus Intelligence Cross-corpus context (cohort percentile, top patterns, fix plan) is shown only on repositories you own. Sign up and connect your repo to view it.

Scan summary Repository scanned at 74.2/100 with 66.7% coverage. It contains 1941 nodes across 0 cross-layer flows, written primarily in mixed languages. Engine surfaced 26 findings — concentrated in quality (23), frontend (1), cicd (1). Risk profile is high: 0 critical, 1 high, 12 medium. Recommended next step: open the quality layer findings first — that's where the highest-impact wins live.

Showing 19 of 24 actionable findings. 26 raw detector signals were grouped into reader-sized issues. Click TP / FP to vote on a finding's accuracy — votes adjust the confidence weighting and improve detection across the platform.

high System graph security Agent instructions conf 1.00 Agent instruction/config may expose a secret: .claude/skills/goal-driven/SKILL.md

Agent-facing files are routinely pasted into LLM/tool contexts. Move literal tokens, keys, and passwords into a secret manager or document them as placeholders only.

.claude/skills/goal-driven/SKILL.md:28 SecretsClaude instruction

medium System graph quality Agent instructions conf 1.00 Agent authority lacks a verifier contract: .claude/agent-memory/code-reviewer/project_hook_structure.md

This agent instruction grants code or shell authority but does not state the verification gate that decides promotion. The recurring safe pattern is: LLM proposes; deterministic tests/build/security checks verify; only verified code promotes.

.claude/agent-memory/code-reviewer/project_hook_structure.md VerificationClaude instruction

medium System graph quality Agent instructions conf 1.00 Agent authority lacks a verifier contract: .claude/agent-memory/code-reviewer/project_hooks_security.md

.claude/agent-memory/code-reviewer/project_hooks_security.md VerificationClaude instruction

medium System graph quality Agent instructions conf 1.00 Agent authority lacks a verifier contract: .claude/agent-memory/design-architect/b3-goal-driven-design-context.md

.claude/agent-memory/design-architect/b3-goal-driven-design-context.md VerificationClaude instruction

medium System graph quality Agent instructions conf 1.00 Agent authority lacks a verifier contract: .claude/agents/quality-auditor.md

.claude/agents/quality-auditor.md VerificationClaude instruction

medium System graph quality Agent instructions conf 1.00 Agent authority lacks a verifier contract: .claude/logs/full-review-20260313T044913Z.json

.claude/logs/full-review-20260313T044913Z.json VerificationClaude instruction

medium System graph quality Agent instructions conf 1.00 Agent authority lacks a verifier contract: .claude/logs/full-review-20260314T004739Z.json

.claude/logs/full-review-20260314T004739Z.json VerificationClaude instruction

medium System graph quality Agent instructions conf 1.00 Agent authority lacks a verifier contract: .claude/skills/goal-driven/SKILL.md

.claude/skills/goal-driven/SKILL.md VerificationClaude instruction

medium System graph quality Agent instructions conf 1.00 Agent authority lacks a verifier contract: .claude/states/hooks-python-migration.json

.claude/states/hooks-python-migration.json VerificationClaude instruction

medium System graph quality Agent instructions conf 1.00 Agent authority lacks a verifier contract: CLAUDE.md

CLAUDE.md VerificationClaude instruction

medium System graph quality Agent instructions conf 1.00 Agent instructions exist but release-hardening basics are missing

AI-coder instruction files were found, but the repo is missing ci. Treat this as a contract gap: the agent is guided, but the generated output is not yet guarded by the controls that make it repeatable.

Repo hardeningGenerated repo pattern

medium System graph quality Integrity conf 1.00 Network/subprocess call without timeout or try/except — .claude/scripts/gd_state.py:444

`subprocess.run(...)` here lacks both a `timeout=` arg and an enclosing try/except. This is exactly the class of bug that took down our git-clone earlier (HTTP/2 stream cancel surfaced as a fatal). Add a `timeout=` and wrap in try/except, or use a wrapper that retries.

runtime safetyRobustness

medium System graph cicd CI/CD security conf 1.00 No CI/CD pipelines detected

No GitHub Actions, GitLab CI, or CircleCI configs found. Without CI you can't gate deploys on tests/lints.

CI/CD securityCoverage

low System graph quality Debug conf 1.00 Debug logging residue appears in source files

Found 25 console/debugger/print-style debug statements in non-test source. This is a common fast-generation residue before production cleanup.

CleanupRepo hardeningGenerated repo pattern

low System graph quality Integrity conf 1.00 3 occurrences Near-duplicate function bodies in 2 places

Functions with the same first-5-line body hash: docs/artifacts/cross-module-blame-package/blame_hint_parser.py:parse_blame_hint, .claude/hooks/analyzers/card_generator.py:parse_blame_hint This is *the* AI-coder failure mode (4× more duplication in vibe-coded repos — see https://jw.hn/ai-code-hygie…

3 occurrences

repo-level (3 hits)

duplicatesduplication

low System graph quality Integrity conf 1.00 Old/deprecated-named symbol `hash_a_old` in .claude/hooks/analyzers/tests/test_integration_pipeline.py:317

Names with suffixes like `_old`, `_v1`, `_deprecated` usually indicate replaced-but-not-removed code (typical AI-coder leftover). Confirm and delete, or rename if it's the active version.

old markerDead code

low System graph quality Integrity conf 1.00 Old/deprecated-named symbol `test_check_unused_reexports_detects_unused` in .claude/hooks/analyzers/tests/test_card_generator.py:813

Names with suffixes like `_old`, `_v1`, `_deprecated` usually indicate replaced-but-not-removed code (typical AI-coder leftover). Confirm and delete, or rename if it's the active version.

old markerDead code

low System graph quality Provenance conf 1.00 Shallow git history limits provenance confidence

The repository is a shallow clone. Origin/evolution analysis cannot distinguish fresh generation, imported legacy code, or long-lived human code with high confidence.

Git historyGenerated repo pattern

low System graph quality Complexity conf 1.00 Very large file: .claude/hooks/analyzers/tests/test_card_generator.py (2013 lines)

Files with >800 lines often hide complexity hotspots and discourage tests.

For AI agents: Voting guide (TP/FP) MCP manifest Stdio wrapper SARIF Integrate Findings queue Vote TP/FP on findings to calibrate the engine.

For AI agents + API integrations

Email me when this repo regresses

Free. We re-scan periodically; new criticals → your inbox. No signup required for the scan itself.

API access

This page is publicly accessible at: https://repobility.com/scan/71f2e746-388f-49c5-9936-5cf8b269ac38/

To check status programmatically (no auth required):

curl -s https://repobility.com/api/v1/public/scan/71f2e746-388f-49c5-9936-5cf8b269ac38/

Important — please don't re-submit the same URL repeatedly. The submission endpoint is idempotent: re-submitting the same git URL returns this same scan_token, not a new one. To re-scan this repo, sign up free and use the dashboard.